Evicenter
MarkdownP&T meetings
Atebrioz (zilurgisertib)

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva

Also known as INCB000928
Last updated
98 sources

Cost-effectiveness analyses and utility weights

Published cost-effectiveness analyses and health-state utility weights that a model of this product could cite, adapt, or compare against, grouped by how each article relates to the product and its indication. Every value is quoted from the article it cites, and section 3 lists the searches that found the articles.

2 cost-effectiveness analyses and 1 study reporting utility weights · 3 sources

Overview

ItemDetail
Literature searchedTufts Medical Center Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, searched October 21, 2026; the queries are listed in section 3.
Cost-effectiveness analyses2
Studies reporting utility weights1

Cost-effectiveness analyses

Analyses of Atebrioz (zilurgisertib and INCB000928)

No evidence found.

Treatments for the same indication

No evidence found.

The same disease in other populations or settings

No evidence found.

Related diseases and analogous treatments

Deflazacort versus prednisone in Duchenne muscular dystrophy, United States: ICER (2019)

Relevance: Evaluates deflazacort against prednisone in Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the United States with lifetime health states defined by ambulatory status, a structure a model of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva could adapt for the progression to wheelchair use described in section 2.2.1.3.

“A five-state partitioned survival model was developed for this evaluation, informed by key clinical trials, cohort studies, and prior relevant studies related to economic modeling in DMD.24,36-40 The five health states were early ambulatory, late ambulatory, early non-ambulatory, late non- ambulatory, and death. Children entered the model in the early ambulatory health state at age five.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The modeled population consisted of children diagnosed with DMD, with diagnosis and treatment commencing at age five. All comparative treatments were assumed to be given over a lifetime in accordance with the ICER Reference Case.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In this corrected version posted on April 22, 2022, we updated the cost-effectiveness analysis to correct an error in how treatment costs were estimated for prednisone and deflazacort.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Deflazacort Compared to Prednisone Health Sector Perspective $663,000 $632,000 $458,000 Deflazacort Compared to Prednisone Modified Societal Perspective $692,000 $659,000 $478,000” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The base-case results for incremental cost-effectiveness ratios comparing deflazacort to prednisone represent cost-utility results that are well beyond the range of commonly accepted thresholds of $50,000 to $150,000 per QALY despite highly favorable assumptions about treatment effects being incorporated in the model (see Table ES5).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that at a $150,000 per QALY threshold, deflazacort had less than a 0.01% probability of being cost-effective. When increasing the threshold to $500,000 per QALY, deflazacort had roughly a 13% probability of being cost-effective.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Asfotase alfa versus best supportive care in pediatric-onset hypophosphatasia, Canada: CADTH (2017)

Relevance: Evaluates asfotase alfa against best supportive care in pediatric-onset hypophosphatasia from the Canadian health care payer perspective over a lifetime, a government review of a chronic therapy for an ultra-rare genetic bone disorder in the same jurisdiction as the Canadian palovarotene review in section 4.1.

Utility weights

Utility weights from analyses of Atebrioz (zilurgisertib and INCB000928)

No evidence found.

Utility weights for the same indication

No evidence found.

Utility weights for the same disease in other populations or settings

No evidence found.

Utility weights for related diseases and analogous treatments

Patient and caregiver utility weights by functional score, ambulatory status, and ventilation status, Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Landfeldt et al. (2017)

Relevance: Patient and caregiver utilities by ambulatory status in Duchenne muscular dystrophy, health states that correspond to the progression to wheelchair use and lifelong dependence on assistance described for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva in section 2.2.1.3.

Health statePatientCaregiver
“Initial score”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.879 (0.037)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.862 (0.016)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Per lost score (multiplier)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.905 (1.003)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.995 (1.001)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Early ambulatory”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.699 (0.036)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.858 (0.017)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Late ambulatory”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.607 (0.029)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.839 (0.017)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Early non-ambulatory”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.224 (0.014)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.784 (0.021)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Late non-ambulatory”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.146 (0.010)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.810 (0.018)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“None”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.518 (0.027)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.837 (0.014)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Night-time”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.129 (0.017)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.775 (0.030)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Day- and night-time”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.051 (0.010)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote“0.774 (0.033)”View highlighted excerpt for this quote

Search strategy

DatasetQueryResults
Ratioszilurgisertib OR Atebrioz OR "INCB000928" OR palovarotene OR Sohonos OR garetosmab0
Ratios"fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva" OR "heterotopic ossification"0
Weights"fibrodysplasia" OR "heterotopic ossification" OR palovarotene OR "ossification"0
Methodsfibrodysplasia OR palovarotene OR "heterotopic ossification" OR "ALK2"0
Ratiosachondroplasia OR vosoritide OR "osteogenesis imperfecta" OR hypophosphatasia OR "asfotase" OR "X-linked hypophosphatemia" OR burosumab2
Weightsachondroplasia OR "osteogenesis imperfecta" OR hypophosphatasia OR "hypophosphatemia" OR "skeletal dysplasia"8
Weights"Duchenne" AND (ambulatory OR wheelchair OR ambulation)24
Methodszilurgisertib OR Atebrioz OR garetosmab OR Sohonos0