Section 3 of 6
Product information and disease description
250 evidence topics · 72 sources
Product description
Phase of product development
Summary: regulatory status in the United States and the European Union
The FDA approved Atebrioz (zilurgisertib) tablets on September 25, 2026, one day before the September 26, 2026 PDUFA target action date, to reduce the volume of total new heterotopic ossification in adults and pediatric patients aged 12 years and older with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. The NDA had been accepted with Priority Review by May 2026 and was based on Cohort 1 of the Phase 2 PROGRESS study, whose primary endpoint did not reach statistical significance; the NDA was supported by secondary endpoints. Zilurgisertib holds FDA Fast Track and orphan drug designations, and the FDA issued a Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher to Incyte at approval. Incyte developed zilurgisertib and licensed worldwide development and commercialization rights to Mirum Pharmaceuticals in April 2026. In the European Union, zilurgisertib received orphan designation EU/3/25/3119 on August 22, 2025, and a marketing authorization application is under review by the EMA. U.S. commercial availability is expected in October 2026.
FDA approval
| Field | Quoted record |
|---|---|
| Drug name | “Atebrioz” |
| Active ingredient | “zilurgisertib” |
| Approval date | “9/25/2026” |
| FDA-approved use on approval date | “To reduce the volume of total new heterotopic ossification in adults and pediatric patients 12 years and older with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva” |
Regulatory submission: NDA submitted by May 2026
Primary endpoint of the pivotal study and the basis of the NDA
Fast Track, Priority Review, and Orphan Drug designations
Breakthrough Therapy designation
No evidence found.
Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher
License of worldwide rights from Incyte to Mirum Pharmaceuticals
European Union orphan designation
| Designation field | Quoted record |
|---|---|
| Active substance | “zilurgisertib” |
| Intended use | “Treatment of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva” |
| Orphan designation status | “Positive” |
| EU designation number | “EU/3/25/3119” |
| Date of designation | “22/08/2025” |
| Sponsor | “Incyte Biosciences Distribution B.V.” |
European Union marketing authorization application
Ongoing development in children younger than 12 years
Product information
Generic, brand name and therapeutic class of product
Manufacturer: Mirum Pharmaceuticals
Brand name, generic name, and therapeutic class
Dosage forms and strengths
Package presentation and storage
Tablet strengths used in the phase 1 studies
Average sales price and wholesale acquisition cost
Summary: announced, estimated, and comparator prices
As of 26 September 2026, Mirum Pharmaceuticals had announced no wholesale acquisition cost, list price, or average sales price for Atebrioz; the company stated that it would announce the price at the U.S. launch planned for October 2026. The only published price figure is an estimate of about $750,000 per year attributed by Reuters to a named Citizens analyst. The United Kingdom horizon-scanning briefing of July 2025 recorded the cost as not yet known. For the two other FDA-approved FOP therapies, Ipsen stated an average U.S. list price for Sohonos of $624,000 per year at its 2023 approval, and Regeneron stated an average annual U.S. list price for Pasatru of about $1.4 million, with a range of $693,000 to $2.1 million by dose and body weight. In the 2023 Canadian review, the submitted price of palovarotene was $324.22 (Canadian) per mg, corresponding to about $622,373 per year for patients younger than 14 years and $1,022,894 per year for patients aged 14 years and older.
United States wholesale acquisition cost and average sales price of zilurgisertib
Analyst estimate of the annual price of zilurgisertib
Estimated cost in the United Kingdom horizon scan
Comparator list price: Sohonos (palovarotene) in the United States
Comparator list price: Pasatru (garetosmab-grts) in the United States
Comparator price in Canada: palovarotene submitted price and annual cost
American hospital formulary service (AHFS), or other drug classification
American Hospital Formulary Service classification and WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code
No evidence found.
Pharmacologic class stated in the prescribing information
Indication
Definition of total new heterotopic ossification volume in the label
Pharmacology
Mechanism of action
Kinase selectivity in preclinical characterization
Biochemical selectivity of zilurgisertib against related BMP and TGFβ type I receptor kinases
Kinome-wide selectivity screening for zilurgisertib (compound 15)
Pharmacodynamics
Cardiac electrophysiology
Suppression of heterotopic ossification in a mouse model
Threshold pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship for heterotopic ossification suppression
Hepcidin and iron effects in preclinical models
Iron parameters in participants with FOP
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
Effect of food
Elimination, metabolism, and excretion
Effect of age, sex, race, and body weight
Contraindications/Warnings/Precautions/Adverse effects
Warnings and precautions
Embryo-fetal toxicity
Adverse reactions occurring in 10% or more of participants through Week 24
Adverse reactions occurring in fewer than 10% of participants
Laboratory findings: serum iron, hemoglobin, and transferrin saturation
Nonclinical hepatic findings and carcinogenic potential
Mutagenicity and fertility
Adverse events in healthy participants in the phase 1 studies
Special populations
Pregnancy
Females of reproductive potential
Pediatric patients aged 12 to 16 years
Renal impairment
Hepatic impairment
Drug/Drug, drug/disease interactions
Effects of other drugs on zilurgisertib
Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors
CYP3A4/5 estimated to account for about half of zilurgisertib clearance
More potent strong CYP3A4 inhibitors may increase exposure more than itraconazole did
Mild and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors
Strong and moderate CYP3A4 inducers
Rifampin as a broad-spectrum, potent inducer represents a worst-case interaction
Effects of zilurgisertib on other drugs
MATE1 and MATE2-K substrates
Cytochrome P450 inhibition and induction in vitro
Dosing and administration
Dosage
Dosage modification with CYP3A4 inhibitors
Dosage modification for renal or hepatic impairment
No evidence found.
Administration
Administration with or without food
Access and distribution
Commercial availability, patient support program, and out-of-pocket cost
Mirum Access Plus services for patients and prescribers
Specialty pharmacy distribution of the manufacturer's approved medicines
Preapproval compassionate use and continued access for trial participants
Risk evaluation and mitigation strategy
No evidence found.
Co-prescribed/Concomitant therapies
Review of concomitant medications and supplements
Concomitant use with other FOP therapies
No evidence found.
Effect of zilurgisertib on quality measures
No evidence found.
Product comparison
Summary: products approved or in development for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
Three products are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva, and each acts at a different point in the signaling pathway driven by the gain-of-function ACVR1 (ALK2) variant. Zilurgisertib is an oral ALK2 kinase inhibitor given as 100 mg once daily to patients aged 12 years and older. Palovarotene is an oral retinoic acid receptor gamma agonist given as 5 mg daily with a 12-week 20/10 mg flare-up regimen (weight-based below age 14), labeled for females aged 8 years and older and males aged 10 years and older. Garetosmab-grts is an intravenous activin A antibody given as 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks, labeled for adults only.
The pivotal evidence differs in design and endpoint. Zilurgisertib was compared with placebo in 63 participants for 24 weeks, with total new HO volume (which includes expansion of existing lesions) of −3.2 cm³ versus +24.6 cm³ (Hodges-Lehmann difference −15.8 cm³). Palovarotene was studied in a single-arm trial of 97 participants against an external natural history control of 101 untreated participants, with annualized new HO volume of 9.4 versus 20.3 cm³/year; the trial's prespecified, square-root transformed primary analysis at this interim analysis did not show a statistically significant difference from the control, and the reported reduction rests on post hoc analyses using non-transformed volumes. Garetosmab-grts was compared with placebo in 63 adults for 56 weeks, with 90% and 94% reductions in the number of new HO lesions at 10 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg; its difference in new HO volume was not statistically significant by the prespecified test.
All three labels contraindicate use in pregnancy. Palovarotene carries a boxed warning for embryo-fetal toxicity and premature epiphyseal closure in growing pediatric patients. Garetosmab-grts carries warnings for embryo-fetal toxicity, skin and soft tissue infections, and epistaxis. Zilurgisertib carries one warning, embryo-fetal toxicity. No head-to-head trial was identified, and each label states that adverse reaction rates from one drug's trials "cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug". Among investigational products, fidrisertib (another ALK2 inhibitor) did not meet its primary endpoint in the 113-participant FALKON trial, and saracatinib and andecaliximab remain in phase 2 and phase 2/3 trials.
Zilurgisertib (Atebrioz): label profile
Palovarotene (Sohonos): label profile
Garetosmab-grts (Pasatru): label profile
Fidrisertib: phase 2 trial did not meet its primary endpoint
Saracatinib: phase 2a trial design
Andecaliximab: phase 2/3 trial in pediatric and adult participants
Place of product in therapy
Disease description
Definition and etiology
Definition of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
Genetic cause: gain-of-function variants in ACVR1, with R206H in about 97% of cases
Classic and variant genotypes
Inheritance, de novo occurrence, and paternal age
Genetic and environmental determinants of phenotype
Epidemiology
Incidence of Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
Birth frequency derived from the French national prevalence estimate
Detectability before birth and effect of paternal age on future incidence
Population-based annual incidence
No evidence found.
Prevalence of Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
United States: minimum prevalence of 0.88 per million, 2020
France: capture-recapture estimate of 1.36 per million, 2012
France: national rare disease registry estimate of 1.39 per million, 2020
Apparent prevalence by world region in patient organization databases
Number of known individuals in the United States and worldwide
Registry coverage of the known global population
Natural history, survival, and mortality
Onset in childhood and cumulative disability
Prospective 36-month natural history study: flare-ups and new heterotopic ossification
Imaged flare-ups with new heterotopic ossification at Day 84
Imaged flare-up frequency by age group
Functional and physical function scores over 36 months
One death during the 36-month natural history study
Baseline cross-sectional phenotype: HO volume and function increase with age
Anatomic progression and progression without flare-ups
Clinical staging
Median lifespan and causes of death in the international FOP community
Survival compared with matched controls in France
Systematic review of reported mortality
Pathophysiology
Constitutive and ligand-hyperresponsive ACVR1 signaling
Aberrant responsiveness of mutant ACVR1 to activin A
Endochondral sequence of heterotopic bone formation
Role of inflammation and triggers
Hypoxia and mTOR signaling amplify BMP pathway activity
Diagnosis
Guideline: clinical diagnosis with required genetic confirmation
Early clinical signs that prompt genetic testing
International survey: misdiagnosis in 87% and diagnostic delay of 4.1 years
FOP Registry: time to diagnosis and number of providers consulted
Initial evaluation and diagnosing provider in the IFOPA registry
China: misdiagnosis in 78.8% and iatrogenic harm in 62.7%
Age at diagnosis
Age at symptom onset and age at diagnosis in the IFOPA registry
| Measure | Age at symptom onset (years) | Age at diagnosis (years) |
|---|---|---|
| n | “209” | “208” |
| Mean (SD) | “5.3 (6.13)” | “7.2 (7.18)” |
| Median | “3.0” | “5.0” |
| Minimum, maximum | “0.1, 45” | “0.1, 48.0” |
Pediatric cohort: biopsy before referral and scalp nodules as an early sign
Clinical presentation - signs and symptoms
Congenital skeletal malformations: great toes and other anomalies
Flare-ups: presenting symptoms, frequency, and triggers
Heterotopic ossification: anatomic pattern
Joint immobility and loss of function after flare-ups
Pain: during and outside flare-ups
Respiratory: restrictive chest wall disease and thoracic insufficiency
Hearing: conductive hearing impairment
Spinal deformity
Neurological: headache and neurological symptoms
Psychological: anxiety, depression, and irritability
Long-term morbidity
Comorbidities by organ system in a systematic review
Disability severity by age
Developmental arthropathy and degenerative joint disease
Hospitalization in the 12 months before registry enrollment
Hospitalizations in a 10-year Swiss six-disease cohort
Comorbidity burden and lifelong hospitalization pattern in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
Burden of Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
Humanistic burden and health-related quality of life
EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS Global Health in an international burden of illness survey
PROMIS Global Health Scale scores by age in the IFOPA registry
Validation of the FOP Physical Function Questionnaire
Development and factor structure of the FOP-PFQ
Reliability of the FOP-PFQ
Convergent and known-groups validity of the FOP-PFQ
Pain severity and quality of life in the FOP Registry (PROMIS-based)
EQ-5D health utility by age in China
Economic burden and healthcare resource utilization
France: annual healthcare expenditure 10 to 14 times higher than matched controls
France: costs by disability severity and age
China: annual cost per patient of USD 10,820, mostly indirect
United States: out-of-pocket cost of care by mobility level
Healthcare services and assistive devices used
In-hospital outcomes among FOP hospitalizations compared with matched controls in Switzerland
| Outcome | FOP hospitalizations | Matched comparators | Relative risk or change (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length of hospital stay, days, median (IQR) | “5.5 (3-13)” | “3 (2-5.75)” | “2.04 (1.58, 2.62)” |
| ICU admission, n (%) | “10 (16.1)” | “19 (6.1)” | “2.63 (1.29, 5.38)” |
| In-hospital mortality, n (%) | “1 (1.6)” | “5 (1.6)” | “1.00 (0.12, 8.41)” |
| 30-day readmission, n (%) | “9 (14.5)” | “18 (5.8)” | “2.50 (1.18, 5.30)” |
Economic impact of Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva on families
Caregiver time, burden, and career effects
Emotional impact on family members
Caregiver productivity loss in children and adolescents in China
Economic impact of diagnostic testing
Cost and availability of ACVR1 genetic testing as a barrier
Procedures performed before a correct diagnosis
Recommendation for electronic health record prompts for ACVR1 testing
Price of ACVR1 genetic testing and cost of the diagnostic pathway
No evidence found.
Approaches to treatment
Current treatment options and standard of care
Retinoic acid receptor gamma agonists
Status of palovarotene in the international clinical guideline
Chronic and flare-up dosing regimen
Premature epiphyseal closure and growth monitoring
Mucocutaneous and bone adverse reactions
Prespecified and post hoc analyses of the phase 3 MOVE trial
Month-48 efficacy and safety of palovarotene
Refusal of marketing authorisation in the European Union
Regulatory review history in Canada and the United States
Prespecified square-root transformed analysis did not reach significance at interim analysis 3
Comparability of MOVE and its external natural history control
Activin A monoclonal antibodies
Phase 3 OPTIMA trial: new lesions and flare-ups
Warnings for infection and epistaxis
Phase 2 LUMINA-1 trial
Corticosteroids for flare-ups
Prophylaxis after injury and before procedures
Restrictions on axial flare-ups and chronic use
Submandibular flare-ups as a medical emergency
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and COX-2 inhibitors
Symptomatic role without evidence of flare-up prevention
Off-label therapies
Guideline position on off-label medications
Bisphosphonates
Case-series evidence for tofacitinib and canakinumab
Rapamycin: case reports without disease-modifying benefit
Approaches with no role or that are contraindicated
Injury prevention and supportive care
Avoidance of flare-up triggers, biopsies, and elective surgery
Immunization route and venous access
Physical and occupational therapy and assistive care
Limitations of current therapies
Summary: limitations of therapies available before and after the 2026 approvals
The international clinical guideline states that no medication has been proven to alter the natural history of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva and that its evidence-based statements are "generally moderate to low". Its management rests on injury avoidance and symptomatic treatment of flare-ups; corticosteroids are limited to 4-day courses started within 24 hours of onset, and no definitive evidence shows that NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, bisphosphonates, or off-label agents prevent flare-ups or heterotopic ossification. The guideline predates the approvals of garetosmab-grts (August 2026) and zilurgisertib (September 2026) and lists both as investigational Class III agents.
Until 2026, palovarotene was the only approved therapy. Its approval rested on post hoc analyses against an external natural history control after the prespecified month-18 analysis showed no statistically significant difference, and at month 48 the 46.4% lower annualized new HO volume was not significant (nominal p = .0585). Premature physeal closure occurred in 24 of 80 participants younger than 18 years (30.0%), all younger than 14 years, and the European Medicines Agency refused marketing authorisation. Garetosmab-grts is labeled for adults only, requires intravenous infusion every 4 weeks, and did not show a statistically significant difference in new HO volume. Zilurgisertib is not established in patients younger than 12 years. No approved therapy is labeled for females younger than 8 years or males younger than 10 years. Fidrisertib, a second ALK2 inhibitor, did not meet its primary endpoint in 113 participants.
No medication proven to alter the natural history
Strength of the evidence behind guideline recommendations
Standard of care limited to symptom management, and constraints in growing patients
Multiple pathway nodes under investigation, with no approach yet established as most effective
Place in treatment, anticipated use, and care setting
Summary: anticipated position of an oral ALK2 inhibitor
Zilurgisertib is the second oral product and the third product overall approved for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. It is taken once daily at home, with or without food, and tablets may be crushed into water, juice, apple sauce, or yogurt for patients who cannot swallow them. Its labeled population (12 years and older) includes adolescents aged 12 to 17 years, for whom garetosmab-grts is not labeled, and growing adolescents, for whom the palovarotene label carries a boxed warning for premature epiphyseal closure. Garetosmab-grts, by contrast, is given by intravenous infusion over 60 minutes every 4 weeks using an infusion pump. The international clinical guideline has not been updated since the 2026 approvals and classifies zilurgisertib as an investigational Class III agent. Zilurgisertib is expected to be commercially available in October 2026 through the Mirum Access Plus patient support program. No source identified in this review defines the order in which the three approved products should be used.
Intravenous administration of the activin A antibody
Commercial availability and investigator statement on adolescents
Guideline classification before approval
Heterogeneity of treatment effect
Variability of disease course among individuals
ACVR1 variant and eligibility in the pivotal trial
Age and disease severity of the enrolled population
Safety and exposure by age group
Age-dependent risk with the retinoic acid receptor gamma agonist
Care management intervention strategies
Pregnancy testing and contraception
Medication and food interaction review
Coordination with FOP specialists and clinical trial investigators
Prescriber education and growth monitoring for palovarotene
Other product development or post-marketing obligations required by the FDA
Postmarketing requirements and commitments in the approval letter
No evidence found.
Pediatric development in children younger than 12 years
Carcinogenicity studies not conducted before approval
European marketing authorisation application
Ongoing post-approval monitoring
Open-label extension of the pivotal trial
Iron parameters during long-term treatment
Pregnancy exposure registry
No evidence found.
Post-marketing registry for the retinoic acid receptor gamma agonist
Expected outcomes of therapy
Summary: outcomes reported for zilurgisertib
In the 24-week double-blind period of PROGRESS, total new HO volume (new lesions plus expansion of existing lesions) decreased by a mean of 3.2 cm³ with zilurgisertib and increased by 24.6 cm³ with placebo. The registered primary endpoint, the proportion of participants with new HO lesions, was 1 of 32 (3.1%) with zilurgisertib and 5 of 30 (16.7%) with placebo (P=0.0986). Mean volume of new lesions was 0.003 cm³ with zilurgisertib and 6.57 cm³ with placebo, and mean annualized new flares were 2.34 and 4.55. No new lesions were reported in either group from Week 24 to Week 48 of the open-label extension. The effect of these radiographic changes on joint function, mobility, and survival has not been reported, and no consensus threshold defines a clinically meaningful reduction in new HO volume.