Evicenter
P&T meetings

Azetukalner

Focal onset seizures

Also known as XEN1101
Regulatory submission
NDA submitted September 2026
Launch
Not announced
163 sources

Section 3 of 6

Product information and disease description

264 evidence topics · 141 sources

Product description

Phase of product development

Launch

No evidence found.

FDA expedited program designations, filing acceptance, and action date

No evidence found.

Product information

Generic, brand name and therapeutic class of product
Brand name

No evidence found.

Dosage forms and strengths
Average sales price and wholesale acquisition cost
Announced price for azetukalner

No evidence found.

Branded adjunctive antiseizure medication comparators: United States National Average Drug Acquisition Cost, week of 16 September 2026
Product and strengthQuoted record descriptionQuoted acquisition cost per unitQuoted effective date
Cenobamate 200 mg tablet“XCOPRI 200 MG TABLET”“39.86819”“2026-08-19”
Brivaracetam 100 mg tablet“BRIVIACT 100 MG TABLET”“24.07624”“2026-08-19”
Perampanel 12 mg tablet“FYCOMPA 12 MG TABLET”“39.07764”“2026-08-19”
American hospital formulary service (AHFS), or other drug classification
AHFS classification

No evidence found.

Indication
Pharmacology
Mechanism of action
Pharmacodynamics
Pharmacokinetics
Contraindications/Warnings/Precautions/Adverse effects
Warnings and precautions
FDA-approved prescribing information, contraindications, and boxed warnings

No evidence found.

Special populations
Hepatic impairment, renal impairment, pregnancy, and lactation

No evidence found.

Drug/Drug, drug/disease interactions
Effects of other drugs on Azetukalner
Effects of Azetukalner on other drugs
Effect on hormonal contraceptives

No evidence found.

Dosing and administration
Dosage
Administration
Access and distribution
Co-prescribed/Concomitant therapies
Effect of Azetukalner on quality measures

No evidence found.

Product comparison
Direct comparison with another active antiseizure medication

No evidence found.

Place of product in therapy

Disease description

Definition and etiology
Epidemiology
Incidence of Focal onset seizures
Prevalence of Focal onset seizures
Natural history, survival, and mortality
Pathophysiology
Diagnosis
Clinical presentation - signs and symptoms
Long-term morbidity
Burden of Focal onset seizures
Humanistic burden and health-related quality of life
Quality of life by treatment response in focal epilepsy
PopulationQuoted mean QOLIE-31-P total score with standard deviation
Focal epilepsy, drug resistant (n = 184)“56.4 (18.7)”
Focal epilepsy, drug responsive (n = 53)“70.8 (13.3)”
Comparison of the two groups“<0.0001”
Health utilities by seizure frequency in United States adults with focal epilepsy
Seizure frequency group, United States, unadjustedQuoted mean SF-6D health utility with standard deviation
Total sample (n = 345)“0.67 ± 0.14”
At least once a week (n = 55)“0.63 ± 0.14”
One to three times a month (n = 68)“0.65 ± 0.15”
One to four times a year (n = 71)“0.67 ± 0.13”
Less than once a year (n = 151)“0.70 ± 0.14”
p value for relationship to seizure frequency“0.006”
Economic burden and healthcare resource utilization
Direct costs by seizure frequency in United States adults with focal epilepsy
Seizure frequency group, United States, adjusted least-squares meansQuoted total direct costs in dollars with confidence interval
At least one seizure per week“43,708 (28,420, 67,219)”
One to three seizures per month“28,978 (19,665, 42,701)”
One to four seizures per year“20,943 (14,497, 30,257)”
Less than one seizure per year“18,600 (14,319, 24,162)”
Overall p value“0.0008”
Economic impact of Focal onset seizures on families
Economic impact of diagnostic testing

Approaches to treatment

Current treatment options and standard of care
Sodium channel blockers
SV2A ligands
Older broad-spectrum antiseizure medications
AMPA receptor antagonists
Cenobamate
Alpha-2-Delta calcium channel ligands
GABAergic medications
Epilepsy surgery
Neurostimulation
Ketogenic dietary therapy
Limitations of current therapies
Summary

Roughly one third of adults with epilepsy continue to have seizures despite available antiseizure medications. In a 30-year longitudinal cohort of participants with newly diagnosed epilepsy, 1,144 participants (63.7%) had been seizure free for the previous year or longer at the end of the study period, and the authors concluded that overall outcomes in newly diagnosed epilepsy have not improved despite the availability of many new medications with differing mechanisms of action. The yield of each successive medication falls steeply. Expressed as model-predicted probabilities, the first regimen gave a probability of seizure freedom of 50.5%, the second added 11.6%, the third added 4.1%, and from the fourth regimen onward each additional medication added approximately 1% or less. An earlier cohort in the same clinical setting reported that 222 of 470 previously untreated participants (47%) became seizure free on their first medication and 67 (14%) on a second or third, and that among participants with no response to the first medication only 11% subsequently became seizure free when the first failure was due to lack of efficacy, compared with 41% when it was due to intolerable side effects. A 2025 update reported that 64% of participants were seizure free, a proportion identical to that reported in the smaller 2000 study from the same setting.

Tolerability and interaction burden compound this efficacy ceiling. In up to a quarter of people, tolerability issues may lead to treatment discontinuation and harm adherence, and polypharmacotherapy further increases the risk of drug interactions and adverse events. Carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and primidone induce cytochrome P450 enzymes while valproic acid inhibits them, changing the serum concentrations of other antiseizure medications and of anticoagulants, oral contraceptives, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antimicrobial drugs, antineoplastic drugs, and immunosuppressants. Enzyme-inducing medications also affect sex hormone metabolism, vitamin D homeostasis, bone metabolism, and cholesterol synthesis, and reduce the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives. Valproate, phenobarbital, and topiramate increase the risk of major congenital malformations, and in the United Kingdom valproate must not be prescribed to any woman or girl able to have children unless the conditions of the Pregnancy Prevention Programme are followed, because around 1 in 9 babies (11%) exposed in pregnancy will have a birth defect.

The only previously marketed potassium channel opener, ezogabine, also known as retigabine, is no longer available. Its United States label carried a warning that the product can cause retinal abnormalities with funduscopic features similar to those seen in retinal pigment dystrophies, restricted use to adults who had responded inadequately to several alternative treatments, and required baseline and six-monthly visual monitoring by an ophthalmic professional. Approximately 10% of participants in long-term clinical trials developed skin discoloration, generally after two or more years of treatment and at doses of 900 mg or greater, and retinal pigmentary abnormalities occurred in about one third of participants examined after approximately four years of treatment. The product was withdrawn from the United States market in 2017 after use declined, and the European Commission withdrew the marketing authorisation for Trobalt on 19 July 2018 at the request of the marketing authorisation holder, for commercial reasons.

Place in treatment, anticipated use, and care setting
Summary

The treatment position addressed by an adjunctive potassium channel opener is add-on therapy for adults whose focal onset seizures persist on existing antiseizure medications. Clinical practice guidance defines that position by the number of failed medications rather than by mechanism. The International League Against Epilepsy defines drug-resistant epilepsy as failure of adequate trials of two tolerated, appropriately chosen and used medication schedules, whether as monotherapy or in combination, to achieve sustained seizure freedom, and NICE adopts that definition. Approximately 30% of people with focal epilepsy have seizures that are not controlled by antiseizure medications. NICE directs that a single medication be used whenever possible, that an add-on treatment be considered when monotherapy is unsuccessful, and that when trials of add-on treatment do not reduce seizures the regimen chosen should be the one providing the best balance between effectiveness and tolerability.

Mechanistic diversity supports adding a new mechanism rather than a further agent from a class already used, since combining medications with various mechanisms of action appears more efficacious than combining medications sharing the same or comparable mechanisms. Expert consensus on the most recently approved adjunctive agent argues against reserving new mechanisms for late-stage use, recommending introduction after the failure of two adequately dosed antiseizure medications rather than at later stages of treatment. Azetukalner was studied in exactly this position: participants in X-TOLE2 had a median of five prior antiseizure medications, 51.3% were taking three concomitant medications, and approximately 40% were taking concomitant cenobamate.

The care setting is specialist outpatient neurology care with access to a tertiary or comprehensive epilepsy centre. NICE requires that all people with suspected or confirmed epilepsy have access to a tertiary epilepsy service via their specialist, and sets a four-week referral target when seizures are drug resistant or treatment causes intolerable side effects. The National Association of Epilepsy Centers recommends that all epilepsy centres regularly assess medication adherence and side effects as part of routine outpatient care, and regularly screen for drug-resistant epilepsy. Once-daily oral dosing with food, without titration and without dose adjustment of concomitant antiseizure medications, would place administration in the same setting as other oral adjunctive antiseizure medications.

Heterogeneity of treatment effect
Care management intervention strategies
Other product development or post-marketing obligations required by the FDA

Not applicable.

Ongoing post-approval monitoring

Not applicable.

Expected outcomes of therapy