Section 3 of 6
Product information and disease description
77 evidence topics · 59 sources
Product description
Phase of product development
Regulatory submission: BLA submitted December 2025
PDUFA action date
Launch: Anticipated in the first quarter of 2027
Product information
Generic, brand name and therapeutic class of product
Dosage forms and strengths
Material safety data sheet for the medicinal product
No evidence found.
Average sales price and wholesale acquisition cost
United States average sales price and wholesale acquisition cost
No evidence found.
Irish economic assessment: wholesaler price and two-vial cost excluding VAT
| Cost input | Quoted amount |
|---|---|
| Wholesaler price per vial | “€148,080.77” |
| Two-vial cost | “€296,161.54” |
American hospital formulary service (AHFS), or other drug classification
Indication
Pharmacology
Mechanism of action
Mechanism of action
Pharmacodynamics
Imlifidase-generated single-cleaved IgG
F(ab′)2 fragments and complement activation: in vitro study
Pharmacokinetics
Product information: pharmacokinetic parameters
| Parameter | Quoted value |
|---|---|
| Mean maximum concentration after 0.25 mg/kg | “5.8 (4.2‑8.9) µg/mL” |
| Mean distribution half-life | “1.8 (0.6‑3.6) hours” |
| Mean elimination half-life | “89 (60‑238) hours” |
| Mean clearance | “1.8 (0.6‑7.9) mL/h/kg” |
| Mean distribution volume during elimination | “0.20 (0.06‑0.55) L/kg” |
Contraindications/Warnings/Precautions/Adverse effects
Warnings and precautions
Identified risks and infection prevention
Interference with alloantibody screening: case report
Interference with protein electrophoresis and immunofixation
Special populations
Hepatic impairment and pediatric populations
| Population | Quoted safety and efficacy information |
|---|---|
| Moderate or severe hepatic impairment | “have not been established. No data are available.” |
| Children and adolescents younger than 18 years | “No data are available.” |
Drug/Drug, drug/disease interactions
Effects of other drugs on Imlifidase
Neutralizing antibodies in intravenous immunoglobulin preparations
Effects of Imlifidase on other drugs
Potential impairment of alemtuzumab activity after imlifidase
Dosing and administration
Dosage
Administration
Access and distribution
European and MENA rights acquired by SERB
Co-prescribed/Concomitant therapies
French consensus protocol: accompanying immunosuppression
Effect of Imlifidase on quality measures
Welsh commissioning requirements for quality monitoring
Demonstrated effect on quality-measure performance
No evidence found.
Product comparison
Place of product in therapy
Disease description
Definition and etiology
Epidemiology
Incidence of Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients
No evidence found.
Prevalence of Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients
Natural history, survival, and mortality
Transplant access and unmet need: background studies
Pathophysiology
Diagnosis
International Delphi consensus on imlifidase desensitization
Clinical presentation - signs and symptoms
Fluid retention: manifestations of kidney failure
Fatigue and sleep disturbance: manifestations of kidney failure
Long-term morbidity
Cardiovascular burden in kidney disease
Mineral and bone disorder in chronic kidney disease
Burden of Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients
Humanistic burden and health-related quality of life
Irish economic model: utility-data limitation
Economic burden and healthcare resource utilization
In-center hemodialysis: treatment frequency and duration
Irish economic model: probabilistic sensitivity analysis
Economic impact of Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients on families
Background evidence: caregivers of children with chronic kidney disease in Egypt
Costs borne by families of highly sensitized adult transplant candidates
No evidence found.
Economic impact of diagnostic testing
French selection pathway: cost implications of diluted-serum HLA testing
Approaches to treatment
Current treatment options and standard of care
Compatible donor allocation and acceptable mismatch programs
European guidance on acceptable mismatch programs
Kidney paired exchange
European Society for Organ Transplantation guideline
Plasma exchange and immunoadsorption
Guideline-supported antibody removal with adjunctive therapy
Intravenous immunoglobulin
European consensus: first-line desensitization
B-cell-depleting antibodies
European consensus: adjunctive prevention of antibody rebound
IgG-cleaving enzyme therapy
French consensus guidelines: patient selection
European Delphi consensus on sensitized kidney-transplant recipients
Induction and maintenance immunosuppression
Selected agents in the French imlifidase-enabled transplantation protocol
| Treatment role | Quoted agent |
|---|---|
| T-cell-depleting induction | “rATG” |
| Calcineurin inhibition | “tacrolimus” |
| Antimetabolite maintenance | “mycophenolic acid” |
Maintenance dialysis
Dialysis modalities for kidney failure
Limitations of current therapies
Summary
Existing desensitization approaches include apheresis and off-label medicines. These regimens may require repeated treatment over weeks or months and may not reduce antibodies sufficiently to permit transplantation. Compatible allocation and kidney exchange do not resolve access for every highly sensitized candidate; United States analyses identified persistent access limitations even after allocation priority. European guidance advises against leaving highly sensitized candidates on a kidney exchange list indefinitely when an incompatible transplant is a feasible option. Some practical recommendations for imlifidase-enabled transplantation remain based on evidence that expert authors describe as lacking high-level scientific support.
Conventional desensitization: treatment duration and incomplete response
German expert consensus: evidence limitations
Place in treatment, anticipated use, and care setting
Summary
The cited European indication concerns highly sensitized adults with a positive crossmatch against an available deceased donor, and European consensus considers imlifidase for selected candidates without other treatment options. The French consensus specifies cPRA of at least 98%, age no greater than 65 years, at least three years on the waiting list, and low biopsy-complication risk; these are consensus selection criteria rather than a universal label restriction. Administration is restricted to hospital use. Crossmatch conversion must be confirmed before transplantation. The French protocol combines imlifidase with additional immunosuppression, and German consensus recommends considering an early protocol biopsy between days 7 and 10 when clinically feasible.