Evicenter
P&T meetings

Imlifidase

Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients

Manufacturer
Hansa Biopharma
Regulatory submission
BLA submitted December 2025
85 sources

Section 3 of 6

Product information and disease description

77 evidence topics · 59 sources

Product description

Phase of product development

Product information

Generic, brand name and therapeutic class of product
Dosage forms and strengths
Material safety data sheet for the medicinal product

No evidence found.

Average sales price and wholesale acquisition cost
United States average sales price and wholesale acquisition cost

No evidence found.

Irish economic assessment: wholesaler price and two-vial cost excluding VAT
Cost inputQuoted amount
Wholesaler price per vial“€148,080.77”
Two-vial cost“€296,161.54”
American hospital formulary service (AHFS), or other drug classification
Indication
Pharmacology
Mechanism of action
Pharmacodynamics
Pharmacokinetics
Product information: pharmacokinetic parameters
ParameterQuoted value
Mean maximum concentration after 0.25 mg/kg“5.8 (4.2‑8.9) µg/mL”
Mean distribution half-life“1.8 (0.6‑3.6) hours”
Mean elimination half-life“89 (60‑238) hours”
Mean clearance“1.8 (0.6‑7.9) mL/h/kg”
Mean distribution volume during elimination“0.20 (0.06‑0.55) L/kg”
Contraindications/Warnings/Precautions/Adverse effects
Warnings and precautions
Special populations
Hepatic impairment and pediatric populations
PopulationQuoted safety and efficacy information
Moderate or severe hepatic impairment“have not been established. No data are available.”
Children and adolescents younger than 18 years“No data are available.”
Drug/Drug, drug/disease interactions
Effects of other drugs on Imlifidase
Effects of Imlifidase on other drugs
Dosing and administration
Dosage
Administration
Access and distribution
Co-prescribed/Concomitant therapies
Effect of Imlifidase on quality measures
Demonstrated effect on quality-measure performance

No evidence found.

Product comparison
ConfIdeS: randomized comparison of kidney function at 12 months
OutcomeImlifidase armControl arm
Mean eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m²“51.5”“19.3”

Place of product in therapy

Disease description

Definition and etiology
Epidemiology
Incidence of Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients

No evidence found.

Prevalence of Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients
Natural history, survival, and mortality
Pathophysiology
Diagnosis
Clinical presentation - signs and symptoms
Long-term morbidity
Burden of Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients
Humanistic burden and health-related quality of life
Economic burden and healthcare resource utilization
Economic impact of Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients on families
Costs borne by families of highly sensitized adult transplant candidates

No evidence found.

Economic impact of diagnostic testing

Approaches to treatment

Current treatment options and standard of care
Compatible donor allocation and acceptable mismatch programs
Kidney paired exchange
Plasma exchange and immunoadsorption
Intravenous immunoglobulin
B-cell-depleting antibodies
IgG-cleaving enzyme therapy
Induction and maintenance immunosuppression
Selected agents in the French imlifidase-enabled transplantation protocol
Treatment roleQuoted agent
T-cell-depleting induction“rATG”
Calcineurin inhibition“tacrolimus”
Antimetabolite maintenance“mycophenolic acid”
Maintenance dialysis
Limitations of current therapies
Summary

Existing desensitization approaches include apheresis and off-label medicines. These regimens may require repeated treatment over weeks or months and may not reduce antibodies sufficiently to permit transplantation. Compatible allocation and kidney exchange do not resolve access for every highly sensitized candidate; United States analyses identified persistent access limitations even after allocation priority. European guidance advises against leaving highly sensitized candidates on a kidney exchange list indefinitely when an incompatible transplant is a feasible option. Some practical recommendations for imlifidase-enabled transplantation remain based on evidence that expert authors describe as lacking high-level scientific support.

Place in treatment, anticipated use, and care setting
Summary

The cited European indication concerns highly sensitized adults with a positive crossmatch against an available deceased donor, and European consensus considers imlifidase for selected candidates without other treatment options. The French consensus specifies cPRA of at least 98%, age no greater than 65 years, at least three years on the waiting list, and low biopsy-complication risk; these are consensus selection criteria rather than a universal label restriction. Administration is restricted to hospital use. Crossmatch conversion must be confirmed before transplantation. The French protocol combines imlifidase with additional immunosuppression, and German consensus recommends considering an early protocol biopsy between days 7 and 10 when clinically feasible.

Heterogeneity of treatment effect
Care management intervention strategies
Other product development or post-marketing obligations required by the FDA
Ongoing post-approval monitoring
Expected outcomes of therapy