Evicenter
P&T meetings

Imsidolimab

Generalized pustular psoriasis

Regulatory submission
BLA submitted December 2025
85 sources

Section 3 of 6

Product information and disease description

76 evidence topics · 64 sources

Product description

Phase of product development

Product information

Generic, brand name and therapeutic class of product
Dosage forms and strengths
Material safety data sheet

No evidence found.

Average sales price and wholesale acquisition cost

Not applicable.

American hospital formulary service (AHFS), or other drug classification
AHFS classification code

No evidence found.

Indication
Pharmacology
Mechanism of action
Pharmacodynamics
Pharmacokinetics
Contraindications/Warnings/Precautions/Adverse effects
Warnings and precautions

Not applicable.

Special populations
Pediatric, renal impairment, and hepatic impairment data

No evidence found.

Drug/Drug, drug/disease interactions
Effects of other drugs on Imsidolimab

No evidence found.

Effects of Imsidolimab on other drugs

No evidence found.

Dosing and administration
Dosage
Administration
Access and distribution

No evidence found.

Co-prescribed/Concomitant therapies
Effect of Imsidolimab on quality measures

No evidence found.

Product comparison

Place of product in therapy

Disease description

Definition and etiology
Epidemiology
Incidence of Generalized pustular psoriasis
Prevalence of Generalized pustular psoriasis
Natural history, survival, and mortality
Pathophysiology
Diagnosis
Clinical presentation - signs and symptoms
Long-term morbidity
Burden of Generalized pustular psoriasis
Humanistic burden and health-related quality of life
Economic burden and healthcare resource utilization
Economic impact of Generalized pustular psoriasis on families

No evidence found.

Economic impact of diagnostic testing

Not applicable.

Approaches to treatment

Current treatment options and standard of care
IL-36 receptor inhibitors
TNF inhibitors
IL-17 inhibitors
IL-23 inhibitors
Conventional systemic therapies
Topical therapies
Phototherapy
Granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis
Supportive care
Limitations of current therapies
Summary

A treatment review included 118 publications, of which 19% reported clinical trial results. A separate biologics meta-analysis identified moderate heterogeneity and publication bias as limitations affecting reliability. In a U.S. flare-episode analysis, 122 of 513 episodes (24%) had no dermatologic treatment in the interval encompassing the 30 days before, during, and 30 days after the flare. These findings describe limitations of the evidence base and observed treatment delivery; they do not establish comparative efficacy between imsidolimab and existing therapies.

Place in treatment, anticipated use, and care setting
Summary

The imsidolimab phase 3 program evaluated IV treatment of GPP flares and subcutaneous maintenance among initial responders. These studies used placebo comparisons rather than an active comparison with spesolimab. The Asia-Pacific consensus included in this report identifies spesolimab as the preferred biologic for acute flares. An imsidolimab treatment position therefore remains investigational while the BLA is under review. The GALLOP protocol specifies physician supervision and availability of full resuscitation facilities for administration.

Heterogeneity of treatment effect

No evidence found.

Care management intervention strategies
Other product development or post-marketing obligations required by the FDA

Not applicable.

Ongoing post-approval monitoring

Not applicable.

Expected outcomes of therapy