Evicenter
P&T meetings

Juvmo

Parkinson's disease

Also known as tavapadon, CVL-751
Manufacturer
AbbVie
Regulatory submission
NDA submitted September 2025
217 sources

Section 3 of 6

Product information and disease description

441 evidence topics · 154 sources

Product description

Phase of product development

Development history: discovery at Pfizer and transfer to Cerevel Therapeutics
FDA expedited program designations

No evidence found.

Product information

Generic, brand name and therapeutic class of product
Dosage forms and strengths
Average sales price and wholesale acquisition cost
Reported list price of tavapadon, attributed to a William Blair analyst and to ICER public meeting slides; no AbbVie price statement published
DrugQuoted estimateQuoted annual cost used in model
Tavapadon“Reported WAC”“$58,800”
Branded and generic Parkinson's disease comparators: United States National Average Drug Acquisition Cost, week of 23 September 2026
Product and strengthQuoted record descriptionQuoted acquisition cost per unitQuoted pricing unit
Opicapone 50 mg capsule“ONGENTYS 50 MG CAPSULE”“24.76028”“EA”
Safinamide 100 mg tablet“XADAGO 100 MG TABLET”“36.32581”“EA”
Carbidopa-levodopa extended-release 36.25 mg-145 mg capsule“RYTARY ER 36.25 MG-145 MG CAP”“3.97630”“EA”
Pramipexole 1 mg tablet (generic)“PRAMIPEXOLE 1 MG TABLET”“0.06192”“EA”
Ropinirole 3 mg tablet (generic)“ROPINIROLE HCL 3 MG TABLET”“0.07680”“EA”
Carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg tablet (generic)“CARBIDOPA-LEVODOPA 25-100 TAB”“0.07589”“EA”
Rotigotine, monoamine oxidase B inhibitor, catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor, and amantadine comparators: United States National Average Drug Acquisition Cost, week of 23 September 2026
Product and strengthQuoted record descriptionQuoted acquisition cost per unitQuoted pricing unit
Rotigotine 2 mg/24 hours transdermal patch (Neupro)“NEUPRO 2 MG”/ “24 HR PATCH”“28.26022”“EA”
Rasagiline 1 mg tablet (generic)“RASAGILINE MESYLATE 1 MG TAB”“0.92551”“EA”
Selegiline 5 mg capsule (generic)“SELEGILINE HCL 5 MG CAPSULE”“0.75631”“EA”
Entacapone 200 mg tablet (generic)“ENTACAPONE 200 MG TABLET”“0.32457”“EA”
Carbidopa-levodopa-entacapone 25-100-200 mg tablet (generic)“CARBIDOPA-LEVODOPA-ENTACAPONE 25-100-200 MG TAB”“0.69542”“EA”
Amantadine 100 mg capsule (generic)“AMANTADINE 100 MG CAPSULE”“0.14251”“EA”
Gocovri and Nourianz: wholesale acquisition cost filings with the California Department of Health Care Access and Information
Product and packageQuoted manufacturerQuoted drug product descriptionQuoted WAC effective dateQuoted WAC increase amount (USD)Quoted WAC after increase (USD)
Gocovri (amantadine extended-release) 137 mg, 60 capsules“Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc.”“Gocovri Oral Capsule Extended Release 24 Hour 137 MG Package Size 60 Package Quantity 1”“01/01/2023”“149.67”“3142.96”
Nourianz (istradefylline) 20 mg, 90 tablets“Kyowa Kirin, Inc.”“Nourianz Oral Tablet 20 MG, 90 Each, Bottle”“01/05/2024”“270.39”“5678.15”
Nourianz (istradefylline) 40 mg, 90 tablets“Kyowa Kirin, Inc.”“Nourianz Oral Tablet 40 MG, 90 Each, Bottle”“01/05/2024”“270.39”“5678.15”
Branded Parkinson's disease adjunctive therapies: Medicare Part D spending, 2024
Brand (generic)Quoted total spending, 2024 (USD)Quoted beneficiaries, 2024Quoted average spending per dosage unit, 2024 (USD)Quoted average spending per beneficiary, 2024 (USD)
Ongentys (opicapone)“15354274.26”“3276”“21.749437532”“4686.8969048”
Xadago (safinamide)“7677985.91”“759”“37.323213575”“10115.923465”
Nourianz (istradefylline)“50721486.03”“3610”“62.728700759”“14050.273139”
Neupro (rotigotine)“90068151.36”“14920”“27.60090549”“6036.7393673”
Gocovri (amantadine extended-release)“99842781.69”“4906”“55.422069989”“20351.15811”
Inbrija (inhaled levodopa)“27688440.22”“2431”“20.495381225”“11389.732711”
Rytary (carbidopa-levodopa extended-release)“271784313.29”“34890”“4.2578095671”“7789.7481596”
Monoamine oxidase B inhibitors, catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, and amantadine products: Medicare Part D beneficiaries, claims, and spending per dosage unit, 2024
Brand name in the record (generic)Quoted beneficiaries, 2024Quoted claims, 2024Quoted average spending per dosage unit, 2024 (USD)
Rasagiline Mesylate (rasagiline, generic)“31737”“146909”“3.2972061315”
Selegiline HCl (selegiline, generic)“11299”“50495”“0.9994398084”
Xadago (safinamide)“759”“4385”“37.323213575”
Entacapone (entacapone, generic)“26289”“128596”“0.9670266984”
Carbidopa-Levodopa-Entacapone (carbidopa, levodopa, and entacapone, generic)“9136”“50738”“1.3434262576”
Ongentys (opicapone)“3276”“16686”“21.749437532”
Amantadine (amantadine, generic)“104318”“526882”“0.5229425868”
Gocovri (amantadine extended-release)“4906”“30705”“55.422069989”
American hospital formulary service (AHFS), or other drug classification
AHFS classification

No evidence found.

Indication
Pharmacology
Mechanism of action
Pharmacodynamics
Pharmacokinetics
Contraindications/Warnings/Precautions/Adverse effects
Warnings and precautions
Adverse reactions in at least 3% of participants and at least 2% more than placebo, Studies 1 and 2 (without concomitant levodopa)
Adverse reactionJuvmo (N=505), %Placebo (N=328), %
Nausea“27”“2”
Headache (multiple related terms)“17”“5”
Dizziness“14”“4”
Fatigue (includes asthenia)“10”“3”
Dysgeusia“8”“0”
Vomiting“7”“<1”
Dry mouth“5”“<1”
Anxiety“5”“2”
Hypotension“4”“1”
Dyspepsia“4”“1”
Abnormal dreams“4”“<1”
Orthostatic hypotension“4”“<1”
Hallucination (multiple related terms)“3”“0”
Gastroesophageal reflux disease“3”“<1”
Constipation“3”“1”
Adverse reactions in at least 3% of participants and at least 2% more than placebo, Study 3 (with concomitant levodopa)
Adverse reactionJuvmo (N=251), %Placebo (N=254), %
Nausea“14”“4”
Dyskinesia“10”“2”
Dizziness“8”“3”
Headache (multiple related terms)“7”“3”
Hallucination (multiple related terms)“7”“1”
Orthostatic hypotension“6”“1”
Hypotension“4”“<1”
Abdominal pain“3”“<1”
Asthenia“3”“0”
Special populations
Drug/Drug, drug/disease interactions
Effects of other drugs on tavapadon
Effects of tavapadon on other drugs
Dosing and administration
Dosage
Titration schedule
Treatment daysQuoted dosage
Days 1 to 4“0.25 mg once daily”
Days 5 to 8“0.5 mg once daily”
Days 9 to 12“0.75 mg once daily”
Days 13 to 16“1 mg once daily”
Days 17 to 20“1.5 mg once daily”
Days 21 to 24“2.25 mg once daily”
Days 25 to 40“3 mg once daily”
Maintenance, day 41 and thereafter“5 mg once daily”
Maximum dosage“15 mg once daily”
Dosage modification when initiating a CYP3A inhibitor during maintenance
Current maintenance dosageStrong CYP3A inhibitorModerate CYP3A inhibitor
5 mg once daily“5 mg every 7 days”“5 mg every 3 days”
10 mg once daily“10 mg every 7 days”“10 mg every 3 days”
15 mg once daily“15 mg every 7 days”“15 mg every 3 days”
Dosage for patients already on long-term moderate CYP3A inducers
Treatment daysQuoted dosage
Days 1 to 4“0.25 mg twice daily”
Days 5 to 8“0.5 mg twice daily”
Days 9 to 12“0.75 mg twice daily”
Days 13 to 16“1 mg twice daily”
Days 17 to 20“1.5 mg twice daily”
Days 21 to 24“2.25 mg twice daily”
Days 25 to 40“3 mg twice daily”
Maintenance, day 41 and thereafter“5 mg twice daily”
Maximum dosage“45 mg daily”
Administration
Access and distribution
Package configurations and National Drug Codes
Co-prescribed/Concomitant therapies
Effect of tavapadon on quality measures
Product-specific effect on quality measures

No evidence found.

Product comparison

Place of product in therapy

Disease description

Definition and etiology
Parkinsonism as the core clinical feature

“Similar to previous criteria, the Movement Disorder Society PD Criteria retain motor parkinsonism as the core feature of the disease, defined as bradykinesia plus rest tremor or rigidity.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Parkinsonism is defined as bradykinesia, in combination with either rest tremor, rigidity, or both. These features must be clearly demonstrable and not attributable to confounding factors.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Bradykinesia is defined as slowness of movement AND decrement in amplitude or speed (or progressive hesitations/halts) as movements are continued.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Although bradykinesia also occurs in voice, face, and axial/gait domains, limb bradykinesia must be documented to establish a diagnosis of PD.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Rest tremor refers to a 4- to 6-Hz tremor in the fully resting limb, which is suppressed during movement initiation.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Although postural instability is a feature of parkinsonism, it is not part of the MDS-PD criteria for parkinsonism caused by PD.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“This is reflected in a new diagnostic classification, prodromal PD, which is considered to be a true stage of PD (ie, prodromal PD is PD).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Epidemiology
Incidence of Parkinson's disease
Prevalence of Parkinson's disease
Natural history, survival, and mortality
Prodromal phase before motor diagnosis

“Prodromal disease refers to the stage wherein early symptoms or signs of PD neurodegeneration are present, but classic clinical diagnosis based on fully evolved motor parkinsonism is not yet possible.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“we proposed that early PD should be divided into three stages: preclinical PD” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“(neurodegenerative processes have commenced, but there are no evident symptoms or signs); prodromal PD (symptoms and signs are present, but are yet insufficient to define disease); and clinical PD (i.e., diagnosis of PD based on presence of classical motor signs).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The speed of progression from prodromal to full clinical stages varies among patients and cannot be reliably predicted on the individual level.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Polysomnogram-proven RBD: Prospective studies show that more than 75% will develop disease” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Some studies in cohorts (e.g., RBD cohorts) have clearly documented prodromal durations of >20 years in duration.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Based upon an overall assessment of the literature, we posited an average prodromal period of 10 years, but this was extremely subjective; the true value may differ considerably.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Mortality relative to people without Parkinson's disease

“Eighty-eight studies were included in the review with variable study methods and quality.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Almost all studies reported increased mortality in PD (vs. controls), with mortality ratios ranging from 0.9 to 3.8, with major between-study heterogeneity.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Inception cohorts were more consistent with a pooled mortality ratio of approximately 1.5.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The overall mortality ratio in the inception cohorts (9 studies; 1,801 patients; median follow-up duration, 9 years) was 1.52 (95% CI, 1.25-1.78), but heterogeneity was high” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Most of the heterogeneity was because of a single study (Hoehn, 1967)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“and when this study was removed, the overall mortality ratio was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.28-1.55) with low heterogeneity” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The non-inception cohorts (33 studies; 27,480 patients; median follow-up duration, 7 years) had mortality ratios ranging from 0.90 to 3.79, with major heterogeneity” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A funnel plot (Supplemental Data Figure 1) did not show any evidence of publication bias or other small-study effect (Egger’s test, P = 0.87).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Univariable metaregression of sex on these data showed no significant differences between males and females (P = 0.17).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Most mortality ratios lay between 1.2 and 2.4, but, because of the major heterogeneity in the included studies, calculation of an overall measure was inappropriate.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Forty-five studies (27,458 patients) reported survival proportion at specific times” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The regression coefficient was –0.045 (95% CI, –0.056-0.033).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“On average, PD survival reduced by approximately 5% every year of follow-up, although there was significant heterogeneity.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Eighteen studies reported median survival, 5 inception and 13 non-inception cohorts (Supplemental Data Table 6), which ranged from 6 to 22 years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Meta-analysis of 10 studies (1,306 patients) reporting the mean disease duration at death (Fig. 4) showed major heterogeneity” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In post-mortem studies, mean duration until death ranged from 6.9 to 14.3 years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Increasing age and presence of dementia were most commonly associated with increased mortality.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Treatment also may alter prognosis over time, but we did not find any robust evidence that L-dopa has reduced mortality, and we are not aware of data to suggest that any other treatments alter survival.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Only 5 studies met all 4 quality criteria.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Most of the studies in this review were from Europe or North America, so generalizability to other geographical areas may be limited.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Independent predictors of mortality across cohort studies
Prognostic factorStudies finding the factor independently associated with increased mortality / studies that examined the association
Increasing age, at onset or at recruitment“15/17”
Presence of dementia“9/13”
Male sex“6/17”
Higher Hoehn and Yahr stage“5/8”
Postural instability and gait difficulty phenotype, prominent bradykinesia, or lack of tremor“4/8”
Higher parkinsonian impairment score“3/6”
Presence of psychosis or hallucinations“2/4”
Presence of extensor plantar response“2/2”
Mortality and causes of death over 15 and 20 years in a levodopa-era incident cohort

“The standardized mortality ratio is significantly elevated at 1.86 and is not significantly different between treatment arms.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Eighty-two deaths were observed but only 44 were expected.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The excess of observed deaths was 86% (SMR, 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48–2.31; P < 0.001).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The mean age of death was 75.5 years (SD = 8.1): 74.8 years (SD=7.9) for men and 76.4 (SD = 8.3) for women.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Overall, the median time from onset of disease to death was 12.2 years (95% CI, 10.3–14.0 years).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“For men, the median survival was 11.9 years (95% CI, 9.7–14.0 years), and for women 12.9 years (95% CI, 9.6–16.1 years).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The difference in survival between men and women and the difference between randomization groups was not statistically significant.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Patients randomly assigned to L-dopa survived for a median of 13.1 years (95% CI, 10.5–15.6 years), whereas patients randomly assigned to bromocriptine survived for a median of 11.6 years (95% CI, 8.7–14.4 years).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Variables that were statistically significant univariately to predict death by 15 years were older age at onset (P < 0.001), Hoehn and Yahr Stage 3 at baseline (P < 0.003), rapid prestudy disease progression rate (P < 0.005), imbalance at baseline (P < 0.03), dementia at baseline (P < 0.05), increased tremor score at baseline (P < 0.02), dementia noted within 15 years (P < 0.001), and imbalance developing within the 15 years (P < 0.001).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In multivariate analysis, the variables were the older the age of onset and the higher the risk of mortality (P < 0.001), increasing by approximately 15% per year of age.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Imbalance noted within 15 years increased the risk of death almost threefold (P < 0.03).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“pneumonia being the most common cause (22 of 82, 27%) with a SMR >10.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Parkinson’s disease was considered to have contributed to the deaths of 43 patients (52%) because of pneumonia, inanition, pulmonary embolism, suicide, and patients who were Stage 5 who had cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events but who were considered unsuitable for rehabilitation.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Significantly lower than expected death rates were observed from carcinoma (12 vs. 24.2 expected; SMR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26–0.87).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Deaths due to cardiovascular disease (15 vs. 13.5 expected) were not significantly increased.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In this study, the SMR is 1.58 at 10 years and 1.86 at 15 years” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“After 20 years follow-up of newly diagnosed patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), 100 of 136 (74%) have died.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The mortality rate fell in the first 3 years of treatment, then rose compared to the general population, the standardized mortality ratio from 15 to 20 years reaching 3.1.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In the first 3 years, five died compared with an expected 9.2 deaths (SMR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.2–1.1).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Between 3 and 20 years, 95 died compared with an expected 38.7 deaths (SMR = 2.5, 95% CI = 2.0–3.0).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The SMR was similar for the periods 3 to 5, 5 to 10, 10 to 15, and 15 to 20 years (chi-square test statistic for between period differences = 2.6 for 3 degrees of freedom, P = 0.5) but showed a trend to increase with duration of disease compared to the age matched Australian population after falling in the early years of treatment: SMR = 0.5 at 0 to 3 years, 1.8 at 3 to 5 years, 2.3 at 5 to 10 years, 2.7 at 10 to 15 years and 3.1 at 15 to 20 years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The mean age at death was 76 years (SD = 7.5), 75 years for men and 78 years for women after a mean of 121 and 132 months from entry to the study, respectively.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The median time from historical onset of disease to death was 12.4 years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Pneumonia was the most common cause of death, 26 of 103 (25%), generally occurring in Hoehn and Yahr stage 5.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“PD was considered to have been a significant contributor to the death of 55 of 103 (54%).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Once dementia was diagnosed (excluding those diagnosed at baseline), the median survival was 54 months.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Although dementia was predictive of death (P = 0.001) univariately, it is so strongly associated with increasing age as to render it insignificant when age is corrected for multivariately.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Trends in Parkinson's disease mortality in the United States, 1999 to 2019
GroupDeaths, 1999Death rate per 100,000 (95% CI), 1999Deaths, 2019Death rate per 100,000 (95% CI), 2019Average annual percent change (95% CI), 1999 to 2019
All ages, crude rate“14,593”“5.2 (5.1–5.3)”“35,311”“10.8 (10.6–10.9)”“3.6 (3.0–4.2)”
All ages, age-adjusted rateNot applicable“5.4 (5.3–5.5)”Not applicable“8.8 (8.7–8.9)”“2.4 (1.8–3.0)”
Aged 64 years or younger, crude rate“295”“0.1 (0.1–0.1)”“876”“0.3 (0.3–0.3)”“5.0 (3.4–6.6)”
Aged 65 to 74 years, crude rate“2,020”“11.0 (10.5–11.4)”“5,276”“16.8 (16.3–17.2)”“1.9 (1.4–2.5)”
Aged 75 to 84 years, crude rate“7,110”“58.2 (56.8–59.5)”“14,902”“93.3 (91.8–94.8)”“2.2 (1.8–2.5)”
Aged 85 years or older, crude rate“5,168”“124.4 (121.0–127.8)”“14,257”“215.9 (212.3–219.4)”“2.7 (2.0–3.5)”
Men, age-adjusted rate“8,262”“8.4 (8.2–8.6)”“21,592”“13.1 (13.0–13.3)”“2.2 (1.7–2.7)”
Women, age-adjusted rate“6,331”“3.7 (3.6–3.8)”“13,719”“5.8 (5.7–5.9)”“2.1 (1.7–2.5)”
Hispanic, age-adjusted rate“389”“3.5 (3.2–3.9)”“2,126”“6.5 (6.2–6.8)”“3.0 (2.7–3.3)”
Non-Hispanic White, age-adjusted rate“13,475”“5.8 (5.7–5.9)”“30,307”“9.7 (9.6–9.8)”“2.5 (1.9–3.1)”
Non-Hispanic Black, age-adjusted rate“502”“2.4 (2.2–2.6)”“1,655”“4.7 (4.5–5.0)”“3.5 (2.7–4.3)”
Non-Hispanic, other, age-adjusted rate“200”“3.4 (2.9–3.8)”“1,182”“5.6 (5.3–6.0)”“2.5 (1.7–3.4)”
Large central metropolitan, age-adjusted rate“3,894”“5.1 (5.0–5.3)”“8,907”“8.2 (8.1–8.4)”“2.4 (1.7–3.1)”
Large fringe metropolitan, age-adjusted rate“3,400”“5.7 (5.5–5.9)”“9,008”“9.2 (9.0–9.4)”“2.4 (1.7–3.2)”
Medium metropolitan, age-adjusted rate“3,136”“5.6 (5.4–5.8)”“7,768”“9.0 (8.8–9.2)”“2.4 (1.5–3.2)”
Small metropolitan, age-adjusted rate“1,592”“6.0 (5.7–6.2)”“3,707”“9.3 (9.0–9.6)”“2.3 (2.0–2.7)”
Micropolitan, age-adjusted rate“1,510”“5.3 (5.0–5.5)”“3,464”“9.1 (8.8–9.5)”“2.5 (2.1–2.9)”
Noncore, age-adjusted rate“1,061”“4.4 (4.2–4.7)”“2,457”“8.3 (8.0–8.7)”“2.9 (2.4–3.4)”
Pathophysiology
Striatal direct and indirect pathways and D1 and D2 dopamine receptors
Diagnosis
Movement Disorder Society clinical diagnostic criteria

“The Movement Disorder Society PD Criteria are intended for use in clinical research but also may be used to guide clinical diagnosis.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“After documentation of parkinsonism, determination of PD as the cause of parkinsonism relies on three categories of diagnostic features: absolute exclusion criteria (which rule out PD), red flags (which must be counterbalanced by additional supportive criteria to allow diagnosis of PD), and supportive criteria (positive features that increase confidence of the PD diagnosis).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Two levels of certainty are delineated: clinically established PD (maximizing specificity at the expense of reduced sensitivity) and probable PD (which balances sensitivity and specificity).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Clinically Established PD: Maximizing specificity, the category is anchored with the goal that the large majority (ie, at least 90%) will have PD.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Clinically Probable PD: Balancing sensitivity and specificity, the category is anchored with the goal that at least 80% of patients diagnosed as probable PD truly have PD” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Diagnosis of clinically established PD requires: 1. Absence of absolute exclusion criteria 2. At least two supportive criteria 3. No red flags” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Diagnosis of clinically probable PD can be made in: 1. Absence of absolute exclusion criteria 2. Presence of red flags counterbalanced by supportive criteria, ie, if one red flag is present there must also be at least one supportive criterion; if two red flags, at least two supportive criteria are needed. If there are more than two red flags, clinically probable PD cannot be diagnosed.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“As outlined in our introductory manuscript, the MDS-PD criteria do not consider dementia as an exclusion criterion for PD, regardless of when it occurs in relation to parkinsonism onset.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Full diagnostic certainty is impossible during life; between 75% and 95% of patients diagnosed with PD by experts have their diagnosis confirmed on autopsy.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Supportive criteria in the Movement Disorder Society clinical diagnostic criteria

“Clear and dramatic beneficial response to dopaminergic therapy. To meet this criterion, during initial treatment, patients should have returned to normal or near-normal level of function.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Presence of levodopa-induced dyskinesia” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Rest tremor of a limb, documented on clinical examination (in the past, or on current examination)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Positive results from at least one ancillary diagnostic test having a specificity greater than 80% for differential diagnosis of PD from other parkinsonian conditions.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Such a marker must have been assessed as 80% or more specific in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism (compared with gold-standard clinical or clinicopathologic diagnosis) in most studies.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Olfactory loss (in the anosmic or clearly hyposmic range, adjusted for age and sex)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy clearly documenting cardiac sympathetic denervation” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Note that although dopaminergic neuroimaging can help distinguish parkinsonism (ie, degeneration of the nigrostriatal system) from PD-mimics without parkinsonism (eg, essential tremor), it does not qualify as a criterion for the differentiation of PD from other parkinsonian conditions like atypical parkinsonian syndromes.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Absolute exclusion criteria in the Movement Disorder Society clinical diagnostic criteria

“A benchmark for an absolute exclusion was occurrence in less than 3% of true PD” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The presence of any of these features rules out PD” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Unequivocal cerebellar abnormalities on examination, such as cerebellar gait, limb ataxia, or cerebellar oculomotor abnormalities (eg, sustained gaze-evoked nystagmus, macro square wave jerks, hypermetric saccades)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Downward vertical supranuclear gaze palsy, or selective slowing of downward vertical saccades” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Diagnosis of probable behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia or primary progressive aphasia, defined according to consensus criteria” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“within the first 5 y of disease” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Other forms of dementia are not an exclusion criterion for PD.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Parkinsonian features restricted to the lower limbs for more than 3 y” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Treatment with a dopamine receptor blocker or a dopamine-depleting agent in a dose and time-course consistent with drug-induced parkinsonism” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Absence of observable response to high-dose levodopa despite at least moderate severity of disease” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Unequivocal cortical sensory loss (ie, graphesthesia, stereognosis with intact primary sensory modalities), clear limb ideomotor apraxia, or progressive aphasia” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Normal functional neuroimaging of the presynaptic dopaminergic system” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Documentation of an alternative condition known to produce parkinsonism and plausibly connected to the patient’s symptoms, or the expert evaluating physician, based on the full diagnostic assessment, believes that an alternative syndrome is more likely than PD.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Red flags in the Movement Disorder Society clinical diagnostic criteria

“Red flags rule out probable PD diagnosis only when they cannot be counterbalanced by supportive criteria.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Rapid progression of gait impairment requiring regular use of wheelchair within 5 y of onset” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A complete absence of progression of motor symptoms or signs over 5 or more years unless stability is related to treatment” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Early bulbar dysfunction, defined as one of severe dysphonia, dysarthria (speech unintelligible most of the time), or severe dysphagia (requiring soft food, NG tube, or gastrostomy feeding) within the first 5 y of disease.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Inspiratory respiratory dysfunction defined as either diurnal or nocturnal inspiratory stridor or frequent inspiratory sighs” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Severe autonomic failure in the first 5 y of disease.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“orthostatic decrease of blood pressure within 3 min of standing by at least 30 mm Hg systolic or 15 mm Hg diastolic, in the absence of dehydration, medication, or other diseases that could plausibly explain autonomic dysfunction” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Severe urinary incontinence or urinary retention in the first 5 y of disease (excluding longstanding low-volume stress incontinence in women), which is not simply functional incontinence (ie, inability to get to the bathroom in a reasonable time).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Recurrent (>1/y) falls because of impaired balance within 3 y of onset.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The presence of disproportionate anterocollis (dystonic in nature) or contractures of hand or feet within the first 10 y.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Absence of any of the common nonmotor features of disease despite 5 y disease duration.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Otherwise unexplained pyramidal tract signs, defined as pyramidal weakness or clear pathologic hyperreflexia (excluding mild reflex asymmetry in the more affected limb, and isolated extensor plantar response).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Bilateral symmetric parkinsonism throughout the disease course. The patient or caregiver reports bilateral symptom onset with no side predominance, and no side predominance is observed on objective examination.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Proportion of PD participants meeting criteria for clinically established PD that differs between the results text and table 1
Table 1 characteristicPD (n = 434)Non-PD parkinsonism (n = 192)
Meets MDS probable criteria (%)“94.5”“11.5”
Meets MDS clinically established (%)“60.4”“1.6”
Validation of the criteria: frequency of individual criteria items
Criterion itemPD (n = 434), %Non-PD parkinsonism (n = 192), %
Supportive criterion: excellent levodopa response“73.4 (n = 364)”“19.9 (n = 151)”
Supportive criterion: dyskinesia“34.0 (n = 382)”“7.0 (n = 157)”
Supportive criterion: asymmetric rest tremor“56.5”“13.6”
Supportive criterion: positive ancillary test“67.6”“38.3”
Supportive criterion: abnormal olfaction“67.4”“36.6”
Any absolute exclusion“3.2”“64.1”
Absolute exclusion: cerebellar abnormalities“0.2”“14.2”
Absolute exclusion: vertical supranuclear gaze palsy“1.2”“29.2”
Absolute exclusion: frontotemporal dementia“0.2”“1.1”
Absolute exclusion: leg-only parkinsonism“0.5”“2.6”
Absolute exclusion: dopamine blocker or depleter“0.5”“4.2”
Absolute exclusion: absent levodopa response“1.3 (n = 393)”“33.8 (n = 157)”
Absolute exclusion: cortical sensory loss“0”“13.1”
Absolute exclusion: normal dopamine imaging“0 (n = 42)”“13.0 (n = 23)”
Any red flag“19.1”“84.4”
Red flag 1: rapid progression of gait impairment“1.4”“22.7”
Red flag 2: absence of progression over 5 years“1.2”“0.6”
Red flag 3: severe bulbar dysfunction within 5 years“0”“18.0”
Red flag 4: inspiratory stridor“0.2”“9.0”
Red flag 5: severe autonomic failure within 5 years“9.7”“40.1”
Red flag 6: recurrent falls within 3 years“3.7”“51.3”
Red flag 7: anterocollis or contractures“2.6”“10.2”
Red flag 8: absent nonmotor features after 5 years“1.6”“1.6”
Red flag 9: pyramidal tract signs“1.8”“25.8”
Red flag 10: bilateral symmetric parkinsonism“1.9”“25.1”
Proportion of non-PD participants with any red flag that differs between the results text and table 4
Table 4 itemPD (n = 434), %Non-PD parkinsonism (n = 192), %
Any red flag“19.1”“84.4”
Research criteria for prodromal Parkinson's disease
Likelihood ratios of risk and prodromal markers: 2015 research criteria
Marker typeMarkerPositive likelihood ratioNegative likelihood ratio
Risk markerMale sex“1.2 (male)”“0.8 (female)”
Risk markerRegular pesticide exposure“1.5”Not applicable
Risk markerOccupational solvent exposure“1.5”Not applicable
Risk markerNonuse of caffeine“1.35”“0.88”
Risk markerCurrent smokerNot applicable“0.45”
Risk markerNever smoker“1.25”Not applicable
Risk markerFormer smokerNot applicable“0.8”
Risk markerSibling with PD onset before age 50 years“7.5”Not applicable
Risk markerAny other first-degree relative with PD“2.5”Not applicable
Risk markerKnown gene mutation“see Supporting Table II”Not applicable
Risk markerSubstantia nigra hyperechogenicity“4.7”“0.45”
Prodromal markerPolysomnography-proven RBD“130”“0.62”
Prodromal markerPositive RBD screening questionnaire with more than 80% specificity“2.3”“0.76”
Prodromal markerDopaminergic PET or SPECT clearly abnormal“40”“0.65”
Prodromal markerPossible subthreshold parkinsonism (UPDRS above 3, excluding action tremor)“10”“0.70”
Prodromal markerAbnormal quantitative motor testing“3.5”“0.60”
Prodromal markerOlfactory loss“4.0”“0.43”
Prodromal markerConstipation“2.2”“0.80”
Prodromal markerExcessive daytime somnolence“2.2”“0.88”
Prodromal markerSymptomatic hypotension“2.1”“0.87”
Prodromal markerSevere erectile dysfunction“2.0”“0.90”
Prodromal markerUrinary dysfunction“1.9”“0.90”
Prodromal markerDepression with or without anxiety“1.8”“0.85”
Likelihood ratios of risk and prodromal markers: 2019 update

“Markers not included previously entered the revised criteria if evidence from 2 prospective studies was now available. The median positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and median negative likelihood ratio (LR−) of all available evidence of a respective marker was used as the revised predictive value.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Abnormal dopaminergic PET/SPECT scan (43.3, previously 40.0) and olfactory loss (6.4, previous 4.0) have substantial increases in LR+ relative to their previous value, as new evidence is considered.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Modest increases in LR+ are observed for possible RBD (questionnaire-based; LR+ = 2.8, previous = 2.3), constipation (2.5, previous = 2.2), excessive daytime somnolence (2.7, previous = 2.2), symptomatic hypotension (3.2, previous = 2.1), and erectile dysfunction (3.4, previous = 2.0).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“For risk markers of male sex, regular pesticide and occupational solvent exposure, and nonuse of caffeine, no new prospective evidence has, to our knowledge, been published that would have changed their LRs.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Neurogenic OH is LR+ = 18.5, LR− = 0.88; symptomatic OH is LR+ = 3.2, LR− = 0.80.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“For instance, the cumulative PD risk of a GBA mutation carrier is ~18% at 65 years of age but only 2% in the general population.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Using these risk values as estimates of sensitivity and specificity of the marker, the LR+ can be calculated (LR+ = 9).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“When a sibling or parent of an individual has been diagnosed with PD, an OR of 2–3.5 is estimated” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Marker typeMarkerPositive likelihood ratioNegative likelihood ratio
Risk markerMale sex“1.2 (male)”“0.8 (female)”
Risk markerRegular pesticide exposure“1.5”Not applicable
Risk markerOccupational solvent exposure“1.5”Not applicable
Risk markerNonuse of caffeine“1.35”“0.88”
Risk markerCurrent smokerNot applicable“0.51”
Risk markerNever smoker“1.2”Not applicable
Risk markerFormer smokerNot applicable“0.91”
Risk markerFirst-degree relative with PD“2.5”Not applicable
Risk markerKnown gene mutation with intermediate-strength penetrance“LR+ dependent on age-related penetrance, see Table 2”Not applicable
Risk markerPolygenic risk score“1.57 (highest quartile of PRS scores)”“0.45 (lowest quartile)”
Risk markerSubstantia nigra hyperechogenicity“3.4”“0.38”
Risk markerDiabetes mellitus (type II)“1.5”“0.97”
Risk markerPhysical inactivity“1.3”“0.91”
Risk markerLow plasma urate levels“1.8 (in men)”“0.88 (in men)”
Prodromal markerPolysomnography-proven RBD“130”“0.65”
Prodromal markerPossible RBD (questionnaire)“2.8”“0.89”
Prodromal markerDopaminergic PET or SPECT clearly abnormal“43.3”“0.66”
Prodromal markerSubthreshold parkinsonism“9.6”“0.55”
Prodromal markerAbnormal quantitative motor testing“3.5”“0.60”
Prodromal markerOlfactory loss“6.4”“0.40”
Prodromal markerConstipation“2.5”“0.82”
Prodromal markerExcessive daytime somnolence“2.7”“0.86”
Prodromal markerNeurogenic orthostatic hypotension“18.5”“0.88”
Prodromal markerSymptomatic orthostatic hypotension“3.2”“0.80”
Prodromal markerErectile dysfunction“3.4 (in men)”“0.87 (in men)”
Prodromal markerUrinary dysfunction“2.0”“0.90”
Prodromal markerDepression with or without anxiety“1.6”“0.88”
Prodromal markerGlobal cognitive deficit“1.8”“0.88”
Likelihood ratios of intermediate-strength genetic variants by age: 2019 update
Age group, yearsPD risk, noncarriersPD risk, GBA mutation carriersGBA positive likelihood ratioPD risk, LRRK2 mutation carriersLRRK2 positive likelihood ratio
50 to 54“0.4%”“8%”“20.0”“~1%”“2.5”
55 to 59“0.75%”“11%”“14.7”“3%”“4.0”
60 to 64“1.25%”“14%”“11.2”“7%”“5.6”
65 to 69“2.0%”“18%”“9.0”“15%”“7.5”
70 to 74“2.5%”“21%”“8.4”“29%”“11.6”
75 to 79“3.5%”“25%”“7.1”“32%”“9.1”
80 and over“4%”“30%”“7.5”“42%”“10.5”
Limitations of the prodromal research criteria
Biological research frameworks: neuronal alpha-synuclein disease integrated staging system

“Neuronal α-synuclein disease is defined by the presence of pathological n-αsyn species detected in vivo (S; the first biological anchor) regardless of the presence of any specific clinical syndrome.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Neuronal α-synuclein disease is defined by the presence of n-αsyn (S) and stage-dependent evidence of dopaminergic neuronal dysfunction (D).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Stages 0–1 occur without signs or symptoms and are defined by the presence of pathogenic variants in the SNCA gene (stage 0), S alone (stage 1A), or S and D (stage 1B). The presence of clinical manifestations marks the transition to stage 2 and beyond. Stage 2 is characterised by subtle signs or symptoms but without functional impairment. Stages 2B–6 require both S and D and stage-specific increases in functional impairment.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“However, at present, only a CSF α-synuclein seed amplification assay has undergone robust validation.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“This assay is positive in more than 95% of autopsy-confirmed cases of Parkinson’s disease or dementia with Lewy bodies” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A quantitative dopamine transporter SPECT biomarker, the specific binding ratio in the lowest putamen adjusted for age and sex, is used to categorise individuals with dopamine transporter deficit (D+) or without dopamine transporter deficit (D–).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We have conceptualised functional impairment qualitatively as progressing along the continuum of slight, mild, moderate, and severe, and provide categorical descriptors of this progression (table 1).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Although operational definitions of anchors for functional impairment for stages 3–6 are beyond the scope of this Position Paper, they are crucial for future versions of the NSD-ISS.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“However, MDS-UPDRS has limited sensitivity to detect changes in function in early disease stages and new scales and approaches need to be developed.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Among individuals with clinically diagnosed sporadic Parkinson’s disease and with evidence of dopaminergic dysfunction, about 7% do not have n-αsyn, relevant genetic variants, or alternative known biology” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Presently, the NSD-ISS is intended for research use only; its application in the clinical setting is premature and inappropriate.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Biological research frameworks: SynNeurGe classification

“Our classification acknowledges the complexity and heterogeneity of the disease by use of a three-component system (SynNeurGe): presence or absence of pathological α-synuclein (S) in tissues or CSF; evidence of underlying neurodegeneration (N) defined by neuroimaging procedures; and documentation of pathogenic gene variants (G) that cause or strongly predispose to Parkinson’s disease.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“α-synuclein positivity, detected by use of these assays, has been found in multiple biological samples, with the highest sensitivities in skin and CSF (0·92 [95% CI 0·87–0·95] and 0·90 [0·86–0·93], respectively).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The data suggest that only skin biopsies, with specific methods (appendix pp 6–8), provide adequate diagnostic sensitivity and specificity to distinguish between patients with Parkinson’s disease, people with rapid eye movement (REM)-sleep behaviour disorder as a presumed early clinical manifestation of Parkinson’s disease, and healthy controls to be considered useful for a biological classification.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In our proposed criteria, evidence of any of the findings listed in table 2 is sufficient to define neurodegeneration in biologically suspected Parkinson’s disease (appendix pp 23–34).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“However, available methods have inadequate specificity to differentiate between people with Parkinson’s disease and those with other neurodegenerative forms of parkinsonism, and they focus on a limited number of neuroanatomical systems, chiefly the nigrostriatal dopaminergic projection.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Reduced striatal uptake (typically asymmetric and with a caudal to rostral pattern) can be detected by use of molecular imaging markers for the dopamine transporter (DAT), vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2), or aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (F-dopa).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Reduced tracer uptake on metaiodobenzylguanidine SPECT provides sufficient evidence of peripheral cardiac sympathetic denervation to define the presence of neurodegeneration in people with Parkinson’s disease.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The first category includes the most likley fully penetrant variants: SNCA triplications, SNCA missense variants, and biallelic PRKN, PINK1, and PARK7 missense, nonsense, small indels, and copy number variants.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The second category includes the genetic variants that confer a strong predisposition to Parkinson’s disease but with incomplete penetrance, such as SNCA duplications and variants in LRRK2, VPS35, and CHCHD2.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The third category includes the genetic variants that result in intermediate and lower predispositions, including pathogenic GBA1 variants” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Biallelic variants in PRKN predispose to a Parkinson’s type synucleinopathy in approximately 20% of cases.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“No regulatory agencies, such as the US Food and Drug Administration, have formally approved the methods for defining the presence of pathological α-synuclein that we have endorsed.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We emphasise the initial application of these criteria exclusively for research.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Clinical presentation - signs and symptoms
Motor symptoms: clinical subtypes and rate of progression

“Individuals with a diffuse malignant subtype (9%-16% of individuals with Parkinson disease) have prominent early motor and nonmotor symptoms, poor response to medication, and faster disease progression.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Individuals with mild motor-predominant Parkinson disease (49%-53% of individuals with Parkinson disease) have mild symptoms, a good response to dopaminergic medications (eg, carbidopa-levodopa, dopamine agonists), and slower disease progression.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“When individuals are categorized this way, the mild motor-predominant form is the most common (49%-53%), followed by the intermediate form (35%-39%).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In a clinical-pathologic assessment of the 3 proposed subtypes, the diffuse malignant group had a mean (SD) time from diagnosis to first milestone (regular falls, wheelchair dependence, dementia, or residential/nursing home placement) of 3.5 (3.2) years, compared with 8.2 (5.3) years for the intermediate form and 14.3 (5.7) years for the mild motor-predominant form.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Mean (SD) survival after diagnosis was 8.1 (5.4) years for the diffuse malignant group, 13.2 (6.7) years for the intermediate subtype, and 20.2 (7.8) years for the mild motor-predominant form.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Motor symptoms: postural instability and freezing of gait
AssessmentParticipants assessed, nFreezing of gait, n (%, 95% CI)
Baseline“232”“63 (27, 22–33)”
4-year visit“143”“79 (55, 47–64)”
8-year visit“89”“67 (75, 65–84)”
9-year visit“67”“38 (57, 44–69)”
10-year visit“47”“27 (57, 42–72)”
11-year visit“33”“12 (36, 20–55)”
12-year visit“19”“12 (63, 38–84)”
12-year period prevalence“232”“145 (63, 56–69)”
Freezing of gait: motor fluctuations and levodopa dose as risk factors

“Thus, 232 patients whose PD diagnosis remained unchanged were eligible for this long-term study of FOG in PD.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Mean (SD) age at motor onset was 64.9 (9.9) years and mean age at baseline was 73.5 (8.4) years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The majority of patients (75%) had mild to moderate disease (HY stage ≤3) at study entry.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We found that higher doses of levodopa, but not dopamine agonists, at baseline were a significant predictor of new-onset FOG during follow-up in a dose-dependent fashion.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“For a 100 mg increase in levodopa dose at baseline, the risk of incident FOG during the 12-year study period increased with 30%.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We found that non-freezers who presented with motor fluctuations at study entry were at more than 3-fold increased risk to develop incident FOG during the 12-year follow-up period as compared with patients without motor fluctuations at baseline.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“This finding also implies that motor fluctuations not only co-exist but may precede the onset of FOG in PD.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In contrast, dyskinesias at baseline were associated with a statistically non-significant but still more than 60% reduced risk of incident FOG during follow-up.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Finally, FOG was assessed by history using a single item derived from the UPDRS.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Baseline variable (participants without freezing of gait at baseline)Odds ratio for incident freezing of gait (95% CI)p-value
Age at onset, per 10 years increase“1.33 (0.89–2.00)”“0.161”
Disease duration, per 10 years increase“1.07 (0.41–2.78)”“0.888”
Female sex“0.95 (0.52–1.74)”“0.872”
UPDRS motor score, per 10 points increase“1.32 (0.94–1.86)”“0.115”
Psychosis“5.97 (0.71–49.93)”“0.099”
MMSE, per 5 points increase“1.13 (0.80–1.61)”“0.486”
Levodopa dose (levodopa-equivalent), per 100 mg increase“1.30 (1.07–1.58)”“0.009”
Dopamine agonist dose (levodopa-equivalent), per 100 mg increase“1.13 (0.76–1.68)”“0.558”
Dyskinesias“0.39 (0.15–1.05)”“0.062”
Motor fluctuations“3.45 (1.08–11.02)”“0.036”
Follow-up time, per year increase“1.11 (1.02–1.22)”“0.023”
Freezing of gait: clinical features associated with freezing of gait during 12 years of follow-up
Variable at each visit (all participants)Odds ratio for freezing of gait (95% CI)p-value
Age at onset, per 10 years increase“1.32 (1.00–1.75)”“0.052”
Disease duration, per 10 years increase“1.38 (0.88–2.18)”“0.158”
Female sex“0.74 (0.49–1.13)”“0.166”
UPDRS motor score, per 10 points increase“1.46 (1.25–1.71)”“<0.001”
Psychosis“1.85 (1.12–3.05)”“0.016”
MMSE, per 5 points increase“0.94 (0.78–1.13)”“0.521”
Levodopa dose (levodopa-equivalent), per 100 mg increase“1.12 (1.03–1.21)”“0.006”
Dopamine agonist dose (levodopa-equivalent), per 100 mg increase“1.16 (0.87–1.55)”“0.303”
Dyskinesias“1.88 (1.14–3.09)”“0.013”
Motor fluctuations“1.68 (1.05–2.68)”“0.030”
Motor complications: point prevalence and cumulative incidence by year of follow-up in drug-naive participants
Measure1 year2 years3 years4 years5 years
Any motor complications: point prevalence, %“10.9”“13.6”“22.8”“23.2”“38.0”
Any motor complications: cumulative incidence, %“14.3”“24.3”“32.8”“40.7”“52.4”
Motor fluctuations: point prevalence, %“7.7”“10.2”“18.1”“17.1”“31.0”
Motor fluctuations: cumulative incidence, %“10.6”“19.0”“26.5”“33.9”“42.9”
Dyskinesias: point prevalence, %“3.8”“4.5”“5.2”“9.8”“12.7”
Dyskinesias: cumulative incidence, %“6.3”“9.5”“12.7”“18.0”“24.3”
Concomitant dyskinesias and motor fluctuations: point prevalence, %“0.5”“1.1”“0.5”“3.7”“5.7”
Concomitant dyskinesias and motor fluctuations: cumulative incidence, %“2.6”“4.2”“6.3”“11.1”“14.8”
Levodopa use, %“41.5”“56.8”“67.1”“78.7”“84.2”
Dopamine agonist use, %“44.8”“47.7”“48.6”“53.7”“53.8”
Other dopaminergic medications, %“23.5”“30.7”“33.5”“29.9”“32.9”
Total levodopa equivalent dose (SD)“252 (169)”“333 (161)”“424 (224)”“514 (250)”“587 (334)”
Motor complications: baseline risk factors and levodopa dose in drug-naive participants

“We found that lower age but not gender was a strong and independent predictor of motor fluctuations, with a nearly 6-fold increased risk in patients younger than 60 years compared to those aged 80 or older.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“For example, the cumulative 5-year incidence of motor fluctuations in patients aged >80 was 11% while it was 41% for patients aged 60–79 and 64% for patients below 60 years at baseline (Fig. 2a).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In contrast, gender was the most important independent predictor of dyskinesias, with an almost 3-fold increased risk in females.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We found that more severe parkinsonism at diagnosis (in the drug-naïve state) independently predicted early development of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias, suggesting that dopamine depletion is a principal underlying cause of both of these motor complications.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A subgroup of patients (36/189) never used levodopa.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Among these, only 5 (13.9%) experienced motor fluctuations, and 4 (11.1%) had dyskinesias.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The corresponding rates in levodopa-treated patients were 49.7% and 27.5%, respectively.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“This implies that actual levodopa dose rather than initial treatment with levodopa is crucial for the development of motor complications.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Overall, these data indicate that levodopa treatment in low doses should not be withheld in patients with early PD.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Outcome and factor (Cox regression)Hazard ratio95% CIp-value
Any motor complications: age at diagnosis, per year“0.97”“0.95–0.99”“p = 0.013”
Any motor complications: female gender“1.84”“1.23–2.77”“p = 0.003”
Any motor complications: baseline UPDRS motor score, per unit“1.04”“1.01–1.06”“p = 0.001”
Any motor complications: time since motor onset, per year“0.97”“0.86–1.09”“p = 0.593”
Motor fluctuations: age, per year“0.96”“0.94–0.98”“p = 0.001”
Motor fluctuations: baseline UPDRS motor score, per unit“1.03”“1.01–1.05”“p = 0.016”
Motor fluctuations: female vs. male gender“1.48”“0.94–2.33”“p = 0.087”
Motor fluctuations: time since motor onset, per year“1.03”“0.91–1.16”“p = 0.675”
Dyskinesias: female gender“2.73”“1.49–4.98”“p = 0.001”
Dyskinesias: baseline UPDRS motor score, per unit“1.05”“1.02–1.08”“p = 0.001”
Dyskinesias: age, per year“0.98”“0.95–1.02”“p = 0.262”
Dyskinesias: time since motor onset, per year“0.91”“0.75–1.10”“p = 0.332”
Dyskinesias, model adding body weight: female gender“2.34”“1.21–4.53”“p = 0.011”
Dyskinesias, model adding body weight: body weight, per kg“0.99”“0.96–1.01”“p = 0.239”
Motor fluctuations: initial levodopa vs. initial dopamine agonist“1.84”“1.09–3.10”“p = 0.023”
Dyskinesias: initial levodopa vs. initial dopamine agonist“0.88”“0.42–1.85”“p = 0.744”
Motor fluctuations, model adding levodopa dose at onset: initial levodopa vs. initial dopamine agonist“1.37”“0.87–2.87”“p = 0.137”
Motor fluctuations, model adding levodopa dose at onset: levodopa dose, per 100 mg“1.13”“1.01–1.26”“p = 0.037”
Dyskinesias, model adding levodopa dose at onset: levodopa dose, per 100 mg“1.28”“1.16–1.42”“p < 0.001”
Motor complications: severity and reversal on oral therapy within 5 years of diagnosis

“Motor fluctuations were predictable in the majority of patients, with no more than 5.1% experiencing unpredictable or sudden off periods, respectively, during follow-up.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Few patients (≤5.1%) spent larger proportions (>25%) of their day in off.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Similarly, few patients (≤3.8%) experienced dyskinesias larger proportions of their day and very few rated their dyskinesias as severe (≤0.6%) or painful (≤1.8%) within the first 5 years of diagnosis.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Of 78 patients who had experienced motor fluctuations during follow-up, 29 did not so at study end, indicating reversal in 37%.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Patients with persistent motor fluctuations were younger than those in whom motor fluctuations reversed on oral treatment (62.3 (SD 9.1) vs. 68.8 (SD 6.9) years, p = 0.001), but did not differ in gender, baseline motor severity, or LED at final visit (all p > 0.05).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Nineteen of the 39 had no dyskinesias at final visit, indicating reversal in 49%.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Patients whose dyskinesias reversed did not differ from those with persistent dyskinesias in terms of age, gender, baseline motor severity or LED at final visit (all p > 0.05).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“No patients were considered in need of advanced, device-aided therapies by their study neurologists during follow-up.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A further caveat of our observation of substantial reversal is that follow-up was limited to the first 5 years of the disease, which may be regarded a relative limitation of our study given the slowly progressive nature of the disease.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Motor fluctuations: early-morning OFF periods and associated non-motor symptoms

“We report data from a consecutive series of 320 patients with a mean age of 70.0 years (range: 42–90 years) and a mean disease duration of 7.0 years (range: 0–24 years).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The results demonstrate that EMO periods are common and occur in 59.7% of subjects across all disease stages in line with other reports.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“However, importantly, in 88.0% of those, EMOs were found to be associated with NMS.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“with a mean disease duration of 8.0 years (range: 0–24) and a median H&Y stage of 3.0 (range: 1.0–5.0)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“129 patients (40.3%), mean age 70.7 years (range: 42–90), mean disease duration of 5.5 years (range: 0–20) and a median H&Y stage of 2.5 (range: 1.0–5.0) reported no EMO.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The predominant NMS associated with EMO were urinary urgency, anxiety, dribbling of saliva, pain, low mood, limb paresthesia and dizziness.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The most common NMS during EMO included urinary urgency (61.3% of all EMO positive cases), anxiety (49.7%), dribbling of saliva (46.6%), pain (46.6%), low mood (45.5%) or paresthesia (42.6%)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In some patients these NMS were exclusive to the morning and did not reoccur throughout the day (pain in 23.4%, urgency in 23.3%, anxiety in 20.6%, dribbling of saliva in 18.6%).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We found that the clinical characteristics of the EMO positive and the EMO negative group match quite closely in terms of age, but differ slightly in H&Y and noticeably in duration of disease, both being higher in the EMO positive group.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“This suggests that EMO is more likely to occur with advanced motor disease.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“An important issue was that prior to this study these NMS were never discussed by patients with any healthcare professionals although they were intrusive and have an adverse effect on QoL” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The definition of EMO and NMS were arbitrary and NMS were recorded in a retrospective fashion based on the recollection of patients.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Non-motor symptoms: overall prevalence and most frequent symptoms

“We found that 98.6% of patients with PD reported the presence of NMSs.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The most common were as follows: fatigue (58%), anxiety (56%), leg pain (38%), insomnia (37%), urgency and nocturia (35%), drooling of saliva and difficulties in maintaining concentration (31%).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Mean (SD) number of NMS per patient was 7.8 (4.9), ranging from 0 to 32.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Frequency of NMS increased along with the disease duration and severity.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We performed a multicenter survey using a semistructured interview in 1,072 consecutive patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) enrolled during 12 months in 55 Italian centers to assess the prevalence of nonmotor symptoms (NMSs), their association with cognitive impairment, and the impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“There were 647 (60.4%) males with a mean age of 66.8 (SD, 9.6) years, and 425 (39.6%) females with a mean age of 68.2 (SD, 9.1) years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Dopaminergic treatment was as follows: levodopa (N = 189 patients, 17.6%), dopamine agonists (N = 199 patients, 18.6%), or both (N = 577 patients, 53.8%).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“NMS in the psychiatric domain were the most frequent (67%).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Pain, fatigue, and psychiatric NMSd were significantly more prevalent in women, namely 67.5, 65.9, and 73.9%, respectively, versus 56.6, 53.0, and 62.1% in men (Chi-square test, P < 0.0042, with Bonferroni’s correction).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Eleven percent (N = 119) of patients with PD had MMSE score lower than 23.8.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 23.8) was associated with greater frequency of apathy, attention/memory, fatigue, psychiatric, and respiratory features (Fisher exact Test; P < 0.0001).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“When patients were asked about NMS at PD onset, joint/muscular pain (298; 27.8%), anxiety (272; 25.4%), fatigue (252; 23.5%), and depression (240; 22.4%) were the most frequently recalled.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In particular, psychiatric NMS, mainly anxiety and depression, were reported by 61.1% of patients at HY stage 1, representing the most common NMS in early disease” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We acknowledge that our study has two major limitations: (1) lack of normal controls to assess differences with PD, (2) recruitment of patients mainly in early stages of disease, as revealed by the low mean score of the UPDRS-part III scale (mean = 24.2), the low median stage of the Hoehn and Yahr scale (2), and the relative short mean disease duration (5.1 years).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Non-motor symptoms: prevalence by domain and Hoehn and Yahr stage
Psychiatric symptoms: depression prevalence by study setting and diagnostic method
SettingMajor depressive disorder: number of studiesMajor depressive disorder: prevalence (%)Clinically relevant depressive symptoms: number of studiesClinically relevant depressive symptoms: prevalence (%)
General population“4”“8.1”“5”“10.8”
General practice“0”Not applicable“2”“42.3”
Outpatient setting“11”“24.0”“25”“40.4”
Inpatient setting“1”“21.7”“3”“54.3”
Nursing home“0”Not applicable“1”“32.7”

“For major depressive disorder, population studies report significantly lower prevalences than studies in outpatient samples” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Studies in hospital inpatient settings report significantly higher prevalences than studies in the population, general practices, outpatient settings, and nursing homes” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The reported prevalence of major depressive disorder in studies using a (semi) structured interview to establish DSM criteria ranges from 2.3% to 55.6% with a weighted mean of 19%.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In studies using DSM criteria without a structured interview the prevalence rates of major depressive disorder ranges from 2.9% to 7.7% with a weighted mean of 7%.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Clinically significant depressive symptoms were present in 2.7% to 57.8% with a weighted mean of 33% in studies using a (semi) structured interview, 7.3% to 47% with a weighted mean of 27% in studies using DSM criteria, and in 13% to 89% with a weighted mean of 42% in studies using a cut-off on a depression rating scale.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Especially the fact that PD patients may be effectively treated with an antidepressant for their depressive disorder, and hence not be recognized as having suffered from depression, may lead to under-reporting in this review.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Psychiatric symptoms: anxiety

“The average point prevalence of anxiety disorders in PD was 31%, with nonepisodic anxiety being more prevalent than episodic anxiety.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Based on anxiety rating scale cutoff scores, clinically significant anxiety symptoms were present in a weighted average of 25.7%.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A total of 39 studies were in outpatient settings, often in movement disorder clinics, and 5 were population based.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Of the 49 studies included in the qualitative synthesis, 45 met the cut-off score of 14 points on the QUADAS tool (92%).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“This is a substantial percentage that exceeds the average point prevalence of depressive disorders in PD (17%).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A large community survey from the World Health Organization found a 12-month prevalence of 8.3% of any anxiety disorder.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In addition, an extensive review of epidemiological surveys on anxiety disorders in the general population found a 12-month prevalence of panic disorder, with a range of 0.7% to 3.1%, GAD 0.2% to 4.3%, and social phobia 0.6% to 7.9%.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Most of the studies were conducted at specialized movement disorder clinics where they may encounter more complex patients with a higher prevalence of anxiety disorders.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“However, studies have indicated that still more than half of clinically significant anxiety cases are not recognized by clinicians, and therefore anxiety is undertreated both in PD and in the general elderly population.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Psychiatric symptoms: anxiety disorder prevalence by DSM subtype
Anxiety disorderNumber of studiesTotal participants with Parkinson's diseaseRange, %Weighted prevalence, %
Any anxiety disorder“13”“2399”“24.5–46.7”“31.0”
Generalized anxiety disorder“14”“2080”“2.6–52.5”“14.1”
Panic disorder“13”“2040”“2.3–30.0”“6.8”
Agoraphobia“7”“1684”“1.6–15.5”“8.6”
Social phobia“11”“1823”“6.8–50.0”“13.8”
Other phobia“4”“705”“2.4–16.7”“13.0”
Obsessive-compulsive disorder“9”“1270”“0.3–13.3”“2.6”
Anxiety not otherwise specified“4”“766”“2.4–22.0”“13.3”
Two or more comorbid anxiety disorders, among participants diagnosed with anxiety“4”“1337”“23.7–37.0”“31.1”
Clinically relevant anxiety symptoms by rating scale cutoff“27”“7212”“6.9–55.0”“25.7”
Autonomic symptoms: constipation and Parkinson's disease risk by study subgroup
SubgroupNumber of studiesPooled estimate (95% CI)I2 (%)
Study design: case-control“11”“2.21 [1.72–2.83]”“86”
Study design: cohort“6”“2.57 [2.17–3.05]”“48”
Location: United States“5”“2.78 [1.57–4.92]”“92”
Location: Europe“6”“2.10 [1.44–3.06]”“68”
Location: China“3”“2.24 [2.03–2.49]”“0.0”
Location: other“3”“2.75 [1.14–6.63]”“85”
Prodromal duration: 10 years or more“11”“2.06 [1.61–2.63]”“87”
Prodromal duration: 5 to 10 years“3”“2.43 [1.97–3.00]”“54”
Prodromal duration: 5 years or less“3”“5.00 [3.59–6.97]”“0.0”
Diagnosis of constipation: frequency of bowel movement“5”“3.60 [2.24–5.78]”“81”
Diagnosis of constipation: medical record“7”“2.20 [1.77–2.74]”“68”
Diagnosis of constipation: other“5”“1.80 [1.36–2.38]”“78”
Bulbar symptoms: oropharyngeal dysphagia

“The 10 studies with subjective outcomes were statistically heterogeneous (p < 0.001), with prevalence rates ranging from 16% to 55%, giving a pooled prevalence estimate with random effect analysis of 35% (95% CI 28–41).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The four studies with objective measurements were statistically homogeneous (p = 0.23), with prevalence rates between 72% and 87%, giving a pooled prevalence estimate of 82% (95% CI 77–87).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In controls the pooled subjective prevalence was 9% (95% CI 2–17), while the pooled objective prevalence was 23% (95% CI 13–32).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The pooled relative risk was 3.2 for both subjective outcomes (95% CI 2.32–4.41) and objective outcomes (95% CI 2.08–4.98).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“All studies used in our analysis dealt with community-dwelling patients with idiopathic PD.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Overall, PD patients are three times more likely to have swallowing disorders than healthy controls.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We even included two studies that reported both subjective and objective judgments within the same patient population; both studies identified much higher prevalence rates for objective ratings compared to subjective ratings (30% vs. 72% in one study; and 37% vs. 84% in the other study)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Overall, there was a significant correlation between subjective dysphagia and disease severity according to five studies” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“For example, when focusing on the three largest studies (>400 patients), the study with the lowest dysphagia prevalence included only 5% of patients with late stage PD (Hoehn & Yahr stage 4 or 5)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“whereas the study with the highest dysphagia prevalence (55%) included 20% of patients with late stage PD” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“This is further corroborated by one study which included only late stage PD patients (which we excluded from the meta-analysis), where subjective dysphagia was reported to be present in no less than 68% of patients” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“This implies that the prevalence is likely to be higher for the total population, including hospitalized and institutionlized PD patients.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Although esophageal dysphagia has been reported to be present in 60–70% of PD patients” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“While most questionnaires included in this review investigated oropharyngeal complaints, others (e.g. SCOPA-AUT and PD NMSQuest) did not differentiate between oropharyngeal and esophageal dysphagia, so the possibility that esophageal complaints have contributed to dysphagia in some PD patients cannot be excluded.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Sleep symptoms: REM sleep behavior disorder

“A total of 28 studies with 6869 PD cases were deemed eligible and included in our meta-analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The RBD prevalence rate ranged from 19 to 70 % with an estimated random-effects pooled prevalence of 42.3 % (95 % CI 37.4–47.1 %) as shown in Fig. 2.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Besides, the shape of funnel plot for our meta-analysis seemed symmetrical, and Begg’s test (z = 1.15, P = 0.252) indicated no statistical evidence of publication bias among studies.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“And in 11 articles, RBD was diagnosed according to ICSD-2, which included both REM sleep without atonia (RWA) on polysomnography (PSG) and violent dream-enactment behavior” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“As we expected, studies that used a stricter diagnosis criteria would report a higher prevalence.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In our subgroup analysis, the difference of prevalence is not significant between the studies with the ICSD-RBD and ICSD-2 criteria (44 vs. 48.5 %).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In meta-regression analysis, we found that the diagnosis criteria of RBD (P = 0.016) and age of PD patients (P = 0.019) were two important causes for the heterogeneity.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Older age and longer duration are risk factors for RBD in PD, while male gender is not a risk factor.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Second, our meta-analysis is based on cross-sectional designs, and then, the inferences about causality cannot be made.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

SubgroupNumber of studiesEstimated prevalence (%; 95% CI)I2 (%)
Diagnosis: REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Screening Questionnaire“10”“35.0 (29.0–41.0)”“92.4”
Diagnosis: ICSD minimal criteria (clinical interview)“7”“44.0 (31.6–56.5)”“96.6”
Diagnosis: ICSD-2 (polysomnography)“11”“48.5 (40.6–56.4)”“81.9”
Age 60 years or less“11”“35.7 (25.6–45.8)”“96.7”
Age more than 60 years“17”“46.4 (41.7–51.2)”“86.5”
Ethnicity: Caucasian“19”“42.2 (36.5–48.0)”“92.5”
Ethnicity: Asian“9”“42.2 (32.8–51.6)”“95.1”
Disease duration 6 years or less“16”“41.2 (34.7–47.6)”“92.8”
Disease duration more than 6 years“12”“43.7 (36.1–51.2)”“94.1”
Male participants 50% or less“8”“41.1 (31.2–51.1)”“95.0”
Male participants more than 50%“20”“42.7 (37.0–48.5)”“93.1”
Publication year 2010 to 2012“10”“37.3 (30.3–44.2)”“86.9”
Publication year 2013 to 2016“18”“44.8 (38.8–50.8)”“94.3”
Estimation of prevalence was the primary objective“13”“37.8 (32.2–43.4)”“89.0”
Other primary objective“15”“46.0 (38.2–53.9)”“95.1”
Sample size 400 or less“21”“43.2 (36.1–50.3)”“91.1”
Sample size more than 400“7”“40.5 (32.5–48.5)”“97.0”
Long-term morbidity
Dementia, dependency, and nursing home placement at 15 and 20 years

“One-third of the 149 people recruited 15 to 18 years ago in the Sydney Multicentre Study of Parkinson’s disease have survived.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The average follow-up for the 52 surviving patients was 15.2 years (SD = 0.7 years); mean prestudy disease duration 23.5 months.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Their average age at presentation was 56 years (SD = 7.9 years) compared to 62 years for the total initial group and their average age at follow-up was 71 years (SD = 7.9; range, 55–86 years).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Falls occur in 81% of patients, and 23% sustained fractures.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Cognitive decline is present in 84%, and 48% fulfill the criteria for dementia.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The mean score of the MMSE was 22.5 (SD = 8.3).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Of 46 patients, 22 tested scored ≥ 26 of 30, and 11 of 46 patients scored <20.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“No patient is still employed, and 40% of patients live in aged care facilities.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A total of 30 (58%) were deemed unable to live alone due to physical and/or cognitive disabilities” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Forty-two patients (81%) had fallen due to their Parkinson’s disease with a mean onset of 11.5 years (SD = 2.8).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A total of 7 people had fractured their femur neck, 1 a humerus, 1 her jaw, and 4 various other bones due to falling.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A striking finding in this study was that 48% of our patients who survived 15 years were demented; this rate compares to a prevalence of 4.8% to 11% in general population studies of people of similar age” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The GDS was fully administered to 41 patients: the mean score was 11.7 of 30 (SD = 5.7).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“There were 19 patients who scored <11 (not depressed), 19 who scored 11 to 20 (mildly depressed), and 3 people scored >20 (definite depression).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Formed visual hallucinations were reported at some time by 26 of 52 (50%) by 15 years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The mean time to onset of hallucinations was 10.7 years (SD = 4.0).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Orthostatic hypotension (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.08–5.78) remained as the significant factor associated with hallucinations multivariately.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Only 7 of 136 (5%) continued to follow a less troublesome course without severe fluctuations, significant imbalance, or dementia.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Thirty patients (15 men and 15 women) have survived to be included in the 20-year follow-up that ranged from 19.8 to 22 years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Their average age is now 74 years (SD = 7.9), and was 54 years at presentation compared to 62 years for the initial total group.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Dementia is present in 83% of 20-year survivors.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Only one person lives independently and 48% are in nursing homes.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“At 20 years, the mean Hoehn and Yahr stage ‘‘on’’ was 4.2 and ‘‘off’’ was 4.6.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Patients lived there for a mean of 34 months (SD = 27) before death.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The mean activities of daily living score (UPDRS items 5–17) ‘‘on’’ was 19 (SD = 8) and ‘‘off’’ was 27 (SD = 8).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Excessive daytime sleepiness is noted in 70%, falls have occurred in 87%, freezing in 81%, fractures in 35%, symptomatic postural hypotension in 48%, urinary incontinence in 71%, moderate dysarthria in 81%, choking in 48%, and hallucinations in 74%.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Another 70 patients were demented before they died prior to 20 years, giving a total of 97 (75%) demented predeath.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Urinary incontinence occurred in 22 (71%), fecal incontinence in 5 (17%), and constipation requiring daily laxatives was present in 12 (40%).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Of the original cohort, 78 were known to have suffered visual hallucinations prior to death” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In this group, only 14/30 (47%) still see their neurologist after 20 years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Clinical Dementia Rating at 20 yearsParticipants examinedMean age at 20 yearsMean MMSEConstructional apraxia (%)
0 to 0.5“5”“64”“29”“0”
1“15”“75”“25”“80”
2“5”“76”“14”“100”
3“5”“79”“2”“100”
Motor complications and levodopa-unresponsive disability at 15 and 20 years

“Although approximately 95% have experienced L-dopa–induced dyskinesia/dystonia and end of dose failure of medication, in the majority, these symptoms are not disabling.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Dyskinesia and dystonia were delayed by early use of bromocriptine, but end-of-dose failure appeared at a similar time once L-dopa was added.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The average dose of L-dopa for 49 patients was 734 mg per day (SD = 481) taken on average 4.4 times per day (SD = 2.0).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“By 15 years, 49 of 52 (94%) had experienced dyskinesia.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In this group of survivors, the mean duration of treatment before the onset of dyskinesia was 5.3 years (SD = 3.6): 4.2 years (SD = 2.9) for the L-dopa group and 6.9 years (SD = 4.0) for the bromocriptine group, a significant difference (t test, P = 0.009).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Thus, 6 of 52 (12%) had experienced severe dyskinesia by 15 years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Conversely, 28 of 52 (54%) did not consider their dyskinesia disabling.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“End of dose failure was reported by 50 of 52 (96%) patients.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Mean duration of L-dopa treatment was 6.2 years (SD = 3.6) before the onset of end of dose failure: 5.8 years for the L-dopa group and 6.6 years for the bromocriptine group (t test, P = 0.36, not significant)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Predictable offs occurred in 44 of 52 (85%), unpredictable offs in 18 of 52 (35%), and sudden offs in 12 of 52 (23%).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Offs occupied ≤ 25% of the day in 36 of 52 (69%), and 25 to 50% of the day in 7 of 52 (13%).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Nine patients were considered off for ≥ 75% of the day.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“All were demented: Stage 4 to 5 on low doses of L-dopa (mean 311 mg/day) or on no L-dopa (3).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Dystonia, particularly involving the feet in the early morning had occurred in 29 of 52 (56%), mean onset being 4.1 years (SD = 3.4).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The mean onset time for the bromocriptine group was 6.0 years (SD = 1.7), but it was significantly earlier at 2.4 years (SD =1.7, t test, P = 0.002) for the L-dopa group.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The major causes of disability in patients surviving for 15 or more years are falls, autonomic disturbance, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and dementia, aspects of the disease that are not improved by L-dopa.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Motor fluctuations and dyskinesia are common but are a less disabling aspect of the disease in the majority.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Clinical milestones: hallucinations, recurrent falls, dementia, and nursing home placement

“One or more milestones were reached in 53.0%.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The risk of contracting a milestone condition during the study was independently predicted by two baseline factors: Higher age (age 70 years or more resulted in a hazard rate (HR) of 3.5 (95% confidence interval 2.3–5.5), p < 0.001) and presence of PD-MCI (HR 2.1 (1.3–3.4), p = 0.003).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In these models, we analyzed the baseline factors age, gender, UPDRS motor score, MADRS score and presence or absence of PD-MCI using Enter method.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Of the patients who reached the milestones, visual hallucinations appeared after a median of 3.3 (interquartile range 1.3–4.9) years from diagnosis, recurrent falls after 3.8 (2.8–5.2) years, dementia after 4.0 (2.1–4.8) years and nursing home placement after 5.4 (3.9–6.7) years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We recruited 185 patients with incident PD and monitored prospectively every six months through seven years for emergence and consequences of four clinical milestones.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The main reason for loss to follow-up was death; only 9 patients (4.9%) withdrew from study follow-up.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Median follow-up time was 7.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 6.8–7.1) years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Visual hallucinations represented the earliest and most frequent milestone, and almost 40% had experienced hallucinations during 7 years of follow-up.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The two most frequent milestones, visual hallucinations and recurrent falls, were highly reversible (in 69.1% and 64.9%, respectively).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Among patients with reversible visual hallucinations, the RRs of experiencing recurrent falls, dementia and nursing home placement were 2.4 (1.4–4.0), 6.6 (3.3–13.2) and 3.5 (1.7–7.3)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In patients with reversible recurrent falling status, the RRs of experiencing visual hallucinations, dementia and nursing home placement were 1.8 (1.2–2.8), 4.2 (2.4–7.3) and 4.4 (2.1–9.3), respectively (all p < 0.01), comparable to the overall RRs presented in Table 2.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Presence of any milestone was associated with occurrence of other milestones (relative risks 1.9–6.3; all p ≤ 0.001).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Overall, 34 PD patients (18.4%) died during the study.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The remaining 23 deaths were preceded by one or more milestone conditions in 69.6% of cases.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The median (IQR) time from visual hallucinations to death was 2.7 (1.3–4.6) years, whereas recurrent falls preceded death by 2.4 (1.3–2.6) years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Development of one milestone condition resulted in a trend towards increased mortality (RR of death during the study 2.0 (0.9–4.7, p = 0.1)), and suffering two or more milestones resulted in an RR for death of 2.7 (1.1–6.5, p = 0.03).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Experiencing two or more milestones increased the risk of death during the study (relative risk 2.7, p = 0.03).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“No patients admitted to a nursing home ever returned to independent living, and death ensued after 2.1 years on average.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“For example, the majority (67.6%) of PD patients with visual hallucinations were classified as still having mild disease according to the Hoehn and Yahr scale, whereas only 10.3% were classified as having severe disease.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Despite the long follow-up, most patients did not undergo all milestone conditions, and none of the milestones occurred in half or more of patients.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Milestone presentRelative risk (95% CI) of visual hallucinationsRelative risk (95% CI) of recurrent fallsRelative risk (95% CI) of dementiaRelative risk (95% CI) of nursing home placement
Visual hallucinationsNot applicable“2.2 (1.4–3.6)”“6.3 (3.2–12.4)”“3.3 (1.6–6.6)”
Recurrent falls“1.9 (1.3–2.7)”Not applicable“4.2 (2.5–7.1)”“4.7 (2.4–9.2)”
Dementia“3.2 (2.3–4.5)”“3.7 (2.4–5.8)”Not applicable“5.6 (2.9–10.9)”
Nursing home placement“2.1 (1.5–3.0)”“3.2 (2.1–5.0)”“4.0 (2.5–6.4)”Not applicable
Hip and non-vertebral fractures

“Overall, PD patients had an increased risk for both hip fractures (2.40, 95% CI 2.04 to 2.82) and non-vertebral fractures (1.80, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.01) compared to controls.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The relative risk for hip fractures was higher in men (2.93, 95% CI 2.05 to 4.18) than in women (1.81, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.04).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Seventeen studies (14 cohort and 3 case-control), with a total of 2,329,424 participants, were included in the meta-analysis for hip fractures” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“However, there was substantial heterogeneity between results of the studies (I2=87.4%, p value <0.001).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The adjusted estimate using the trim and fill method was 2.26, 95% CI: 1.93 to 2.65.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Nine cohort studies, with a total of 1,356,711 participants, were included in the meta-analysis for non-vertebral fractures” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The heterogeneity observed between the studies was not statistically significant (I2=30.1%, p value= 0.18).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Overall, the effect size for non-vertebral fractures in male patients with PD (2.26, 95% CI: 1.37 to 3.73), was higher than the one in women (1.82, 95% CI: 1.33 to 2.48), but the confidence intervals overlapped.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“This is a clinically important increased risk of hip fracture; for example, the risk is similar to the increased risk of hip fracture in analyses of patients who ever used corticosteroids (2.07 in female and 2.62 in male)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In a cross-sectional study, BMD was found to be 7% lower than in controls” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The mortality rate of patients with this disorder has been reported to be doubled after a hip fracture compared with those without the disease” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A recent study showed that only 40% of the PD patients diagnosed with fragility fractures were receiving evidence-based treatment for osteoporosis” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The majority of the published studies have data from white/Caucasian population and were mainly oriented in Europe and the USA; therefore, this might have affected the results.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The effect of PD medication would also be an interesting subgroup analysis, but it was not included in our priori analyses, so the data were not extracted.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

SubgroupHip fracture: studiesHip fracture: pooled effect size (95% CI)Non-vertebral fracture: studiesNon-vertebral fracture: pooled effect size (95% CI)
Men“7”“2.93 (2.05, 4.18)”“2”“2.26 (1.37, 3.73)”
Women“6”“1.81 (1.61, 2.04)”“2”“1.82 (1.33, 2.48)”
Cohort studies“14”“2.34 (1.98, 2.77)”Not applicableNot applicable
Case-control studies“3”“3.42 (1.72, 6.79)”Not applicableNot applicable
Clinical diagnostic criteria reported“3”“3.00 (1.86, 4.83)”“3”“1.89 (1.37, 2.61)”
Clinical diagnostic criteria not reported“14”“2.37 (2.00, 2.79)”“6”“1.82 (1.57, 2.10)”
Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease“14”“2.36 (1.98, 2.81)”“8”“1.80 (1.59, 2.05)”
Diagnosis of parkinsonism“3”“2.46 (1.87, 3.26)”“1”“1.87 (1.27, 2.76)”
Asia“3”“2.39 (2.02, 2.82)”“1”“2.05 (1.71, 2.45)”
Europe“8”“2.32 (1.87, 2.89)”“4”“1.57 (1.45, 1.71)”
Oceania“1”“1.45 (1.14, 1.84)”Not reportedNot reported
United States“5”“3.03 (2.26, 4.05)”“4”“1.86 (1.58, 2.19)”
Burden of Parkinson's disease
Humanistic burden and health-related quality of life
Non-motor symptoms and health-related quality of life

“The sample was made up of 411 Parkinson’s disease patients, recruited in 12 movement disorders clinics across 10 countries.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Mean age (±standard deviation) was 64.48 (±9.92) years old, and disease duration was 8.07 (±5.75) years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Higher scores mean poorer HRQoL.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“For each group, PDQ-39 and EQ-5D means and standard deviations were calculated, and group differences were assessed by the Mann-Whitney test.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The Benjamini-Hochberg test for multiple comparisons was applied.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Nocturia (68.4% of the sample), fatigue (65.9%), and dribbling saliva (56.7%), were the most frequent complaints.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The mean number of non-motor symptoms per patient was 11.80 ± 6.03 (range: 0–29), and there was a high correlation between the number of nonmotor symptoms and PDQ-39 and EQ-5D (Table 4).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“For each NMSS domain, patients with symptoms had significantly worse HRQoL scores than patients without symptoms.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“SCOPA-motor (total, motor examination, and activities of daily living subscales) reached the strongest relationship with the EQ-5D index (rS = from −0.58 to −0.67).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The correlation between NMSS and SCOPA-Motor was 0.43.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“For each NMSS domain, patients with symptoms had significantly worse HRQoL than patients with no symptoms, except for the EQ-5D in the sexual dysfunction domain and the EQ-5D VAS in the urinary domain (Table 5).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The corresponding models accounted for 53% (EQ-5D) and 59% (PDQ-39) of the variance.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“NMSS score had the strongest influence on HRQoL as measured by the PDQ-39, whereas considering EQ5D, both SCOPA-motor examination and NMSS were the strongest predictors and almost equivalent.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In the models that included the NMSS domains as independent variables, mood/apathy, sleep/fatigue, and miscellaneous domains were the most significant factors for both the PDQ-39 SI and the EQ-5D index, accounting for 50% and 38% of the variance, respectively.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Most of the patient population in the study was on dopaminergic therapy and, therefore, the impact of the motor manifestations may be neutralized by effective antiparkinsonian effect.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The results show that non-motor symptoms have, as a whole, a greater impact on HRQoL than motor symptoms and non-motor symptoms progression contributes importantly to HRQoL decline in patients with Parkinson's disease.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

NMSS domainWith symptoms, nWithout symptoms, nPDQ-39 SI, with symptoms, mean ± SDPDQ-39 SI, without symptoms, mean ± SDPDQ-39 SI, PEQ-5D index, with symptoms, mean ± SDEQ-5D index, without symptoms, mean ± SDEQ-5D index, PEQ-5D VAS, with symptoms, mean ± SDEQ-5D VAS, without symptoms, mean ± SDEQ-5D VAS, P
Cardiovascular“173”“238”“32.45 ± 17.85”“24.79 ± 15.66”“<0.0001”“0.48 ± 0.37”“0.62 ± 0.32”“0.0001”“61.49 ± 21.23”“65.17 ± 23.01”“0.05”
Sleep/fatigue“356”“54”“30.11 ± 16.80”“14.48 ± 11.57”“<0.0001”“0.52 ± 0.35”“0.79 ± 0.20”“<0.0001”“61.75 ± 21.77”“75.74 ± 22.45”“<0.0001”
Mood/apathy“310”“100”“31.31 ± 16.87”“17.64 ± 13.01”“<0.0001”“0.50 ± 0.35”“0.74 ± 0.27”“<0.0001”“61.66 ± 22.01”“70.51 ± 21.21”“0.0002”
Perceptual problems/hallucinations“123”“288”“36.89 ± 17.25”“24.22 ± 15.47”“<0.0001”“0.38 ± 0.39”“0.63 ± 0.30”“<0.0001”“57.15 ± 25.19”“66.40 ± 20.39”“0.0004”
Attention/memory“296”“115”“30.65 ± 16.93”“21.27 ± 15.37”“<0.0001”“0.52 ± 0.36”“0.66 ± 0.30”“0.0005”“61.35 ± 22.21”“69.52 ± 21.58”“0.0005”
Gastrointestinal“302”“109”“31.02 ± 17.84”“19.76 ± 10.92”“<0.0001”“0.49 ± 0.36”“0.74 ± 0.23”“<0.0001”“61.00 ± 22.48”“71.04 ± 20.16”“<0.0001”
Urinary“338”“73”“29.52 ± 17.44”“21.12 ± 12.97”“0.0002”“0.54 ± 0.36”“0.66 ± 0.28”“0.001”“62.82 ± 22.56”“67.38 ± 20.87”“0.13”
Sexual dysfunction“177”“234”“29.71 ± 15.97”“26.75 ± 17.71”“0.03”“0.53 ± 0.34”“0.58 ± 0.35”“0.09”“63.17 ± 21.92”“63.94 ± 22.65”“0.53”
Miscellaneous“99”“312”“30.38 ± 17.36”“20.61 ± 13.54”“<0.0001”“0.50 ± 0.36”“0.73 ± 0.25”“<0.0001”“61.61 ± 22.32”“70.02 ± 21.20”“0.0006”
Multiple linear regression models of PDQ-39 and EQ-5D scores on motor and non-motor symptom measures
Model (dependent variable)Adjusted R² of the modelIndependent variableStandardized betatSig.
PDQ-39 SI“0.59”Constant (unstandardized value)“(23.76)”“5.55”“0.000”
PDQ-39 SI“0.59”NMSS total“0.52”“13.64”“0.000”
PDQ-39 SI“0.59”SCOPA-motor complications“0.20”“4.81”“0.000”
PDQ-39 SI“0.59”SCOPA-motor examination“0.17”“4.15”“0.000”
EQ-5D index“0.53”Constant (unstandardized value)“(0.83)”“9.24”“0.000”
EQ-5D index“0.53”SCOPA-motor examination“−0.38”“−9.11”“0.000”
EQ-5D index“0.53”NMSS total“−0.37”“−8.74”“0.000”
EQ-5D index“0.53”SCOPA-motor complications“−0.12”“−2.71”“0.000”
Motor fluctuations and dyskinesia and health-related quality of life in five European countries

“Data were collected cross-sectionally in clinical practice settings via nationally representative samples of specialized physicians (neurologists, plus geriatricians in the UK) and their PD patients between March and July, 2008.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In total, 817 patients were included in our analyses.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“All multivariable models were adjusted for age, gender, HY stage, disease duration, and country.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“To facilitate the comparison of the regression coefficients (β) across the QoL instruments the EQ-5D IS was rescaled from 0 (poor QoL) to 100 (good QoL).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“For the primary hypotheses, the association of motor complication subtypes with QoL, the global significance level was set at 5% and was adjusted per outcome using a Bonferroni correction. A difference was considered statistically significant if p < 0.025.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“PDQ-39 scores range from 0 to 100. Contrary to the EQ-5D lower values indicate better QoL.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“These analyses were regarded as explorative, and the p-values of the corresponding regression models are presented for descriptive reasons only.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Thirty-three percent of the patients (varying from 23% in Italy to 58% in France) suffered from motor complications, either a single subtype or a combination of different subtypes.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Twenty percent of all patients suffered from a single motor complication, 10.0% from two, 2.3% from three, and 0.5% from all four types of motor complications.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Twenty-eight percent of all patients had off-times.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The mean EQ-5D IS of the total sample was 0.7 (SD 0.2) based on the ratings in the dimensions mobility (33.9% of the patients reported no, 64.8% some,1.2% extreme problems), self-care (55.3% no, 39.9% some, 4.8% extreme problems), usual activities (36.4%, 57.8% some, 5.8% extreme problems), pain/discomfort (45.4% no, 51.1% some, 3.4% extreme problems), and anxiety/depression (54.1% no, 41.6% some, 4.3% extreme problems). The mean PDQ-39 SI was 25.4 (SD 18.5).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“On-off fluctuations were associated with a 7.1 percentage point decrease in the EQ-5D (p < 0.001) and a 3.6 percentage point deterioration in the PDQ-39 (p = 0.01).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“None of the dyskinesia subtypes had a significant effect on the EQ-5D IS or the PDQ-39 SI (Table 2).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Sensitivity analyses considering motor complication severity indicated that compared to patients without on-off fluctuations the detrimental effect of on-off fluctuations was greater in patients with more severe complications (mild: β=−6.0, p < 0.01; moderate: β=−9.0, p < 0.001; severe: β = −3.2, p = 0.58). A linear trend was, however, not confirmed in the trend analysis (p = 0.48). The same was true for the severity of on-off fluctuations and the PDQ-39 SI (mild: β=2.9, p = 0.09; moderate: β = 5.4, p = 0.01; severe: β = 7.7, p = 0.1; test for linear trend p = 0.07).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Dyskinesias were not seen to affect global QoL scores, but had detrimental effects on the PDQ-39 dimensions activities of daily living, cognitions, stigma, and bodily discomfort.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In subgroup analyses that excluded patients with present symptoms of depression and/or cognitive impairment the results did not notably alter.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“On-off fluctuations were associated with poorer EQ-5D IS (β = −6.4, p = 0.003) and PDQ-39 SI (β = 4.5, p = 0.01) whereas dyskinesias did not impact QoL.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The motor complications observed in our sample were mainly mild or moderate limiting the generalizability of results for patients with more severe motor complications as well as the power of the linear trend tests.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The Adelphi PD Specific Programme is an independent study conducted by the Adelphi group on behalf of Solvay Pharmaceuticals.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Multivariable associations of motor complication subtypes with EQ-5D and PDQ-39 scores, all subtypes and outcomes
Motor complication subtypeOutcomeRegression coefficient (β)95% CIp-Value
On-off fluctuationsEQ-5D index score (rescaled 0 to 100; higher scores represent better QoL)“−7.1”“−10.6; −3.6”“<0.001”
On-off fluctuationsPDQ-39 summary index (0 to 100; higher scores represent worse QoL)“3.6”“0.7; 6.5”“0.01”
On-off fluctuationsPDQ-39 mobility“8.1”“4.0; 12.2”“<0.001”
On-off fluctuationsPDQ-39 activities of daily living“7.3”“3.2; 11.5”“<0.001”
On-off fluctuationsPDQ-39 emotional wellbeing“3.2”“−0.5; 6.9”“0.09”
On-off fluctuationsPDQ-39 stigma“2.5”“−1.7; 6.7”“0.23”
On-off fluctuationsPDQ-39 social support“2.3”“−1.1; 5.7”“0.19”
On-off fluctuationsPDQ-39 cognitions“2.9”“−0.4; 6.1”“0.08”
On-off fluctuationsPDQ-39 communication“2.4”“−1.0; 5.8”“0.17”
On-off fluctuationsPDQ-39 bodily discomfort“2.5”“−1.3; 6.3”“0.20”
Peak-dose dyskinesiasEQ-5D index score (rescaled 0 to 100; higher scores represent better QoL)“−2.9”“−6.9; 1.2”“0.17”
Peak-dose dyskinesiasPDQ-39 summary index (0 to 100; higher scores represent worse QoL)“2.4”“−0.9; 5.7”“0.16”
Peak-dose dyskinesiasPDQ-39 mobility“3.3”“−1.3; 8.0”“0.16”
Peak-dose dyskinesiasPDQ-39 activities of daily living“5.9”“1.2; 10.7”“0.01”
Peak-dose dyskinesiasPDQ-39 emotional wellbeing“2.7”“−1.6; 7.0”“0.22”
Peak-dose dyskinesiasPDQ-39 stigma“−0.4”“−5.3; 4.4”“0.86”
Peak-dose dyskinesiasPDQ-39 social support“0.1”“−3.8; 4.0”“0.96”
Peak-dose dyskinesiasPDQ-39 cognitions“4.0”“0.3; 7.7”“0.03”
Peak-dose dyskinesiasPDQ-39 communication“3.6”“−0.3; 7.6”“0.07”
Peak-dose dyskinesiasPDQ-39 bodily discomfort“−2.2”“−6.6; 2.2”“0.32”
Biphasic dyskinesiasEQ-5D index score (rescaled 0 to 100; higher scores represent better QoL)“−2.4”“−10.6; 5.8”“0.56”
Biphasic dyskinesiasPDQ-39 summary index (0 to 100; higher scores represent worse QoL)“6.1”“−0.9; 13.0”“0.09”
Biphasic dyskinesiasPDQ-39 mobility“5.4”“−4.3; 15.1”“0.28”
Biphasic dyskinesiasPDQ-39 activities of daily living“4.2”“−5.4; 13.7”“0.39”
Biphasic dyskinesiasPDQ-39 emotional wellbeing“5.9”“−3.0; 14.7”“0.19”
Biphasic dyskinesiasPDQ-39 stigma“12.6”“2.7; 22.6”“0.01”
Biphasic dyskinesiasPDQ-39 social support“2.6”“−5.4; 10.6”“0.53”
Biphasic dyskinesiasPDQ-39 cognitions“0.5”“−7.2; 8.2”“0.90”
Biphasic dyskinesiasPDQ-39 communication“−0.3”“−8.2; 7.7”“0.95”
Biphasic dyskinesiasPDQ-39 bodily discomfort“2.3”“−6.6; 11.2”“0.61”
Off-dystoniasEQ-5D index score (rescaled 0 to 100; higher scores represent better QoL)“−0.02”“−5.9; 5.8”“1.00”
Off-dystoniasPDQ-39 summary index (0 to 100; higher scores represent worse QoL)“1.6”“−3.1; 6.4”“0.51”
Off-dystoniasPDQ-39 mobility“1.9”“−4.9; 8.6”“0.59”
Off-dystoniasPDQ-39 activities of daily living“1.4”“−5.4; 8.2”“0.68”
Off-dystoniasPDQ-39 emotional wellbeing“3.5”“−2.7; 9.7”“0.27”
Off-dystoniasPDQ-39 stigma“4.6”“−2.4; 11.5”“0.20”
Off-dystoniasPDQ-39 social support“0.5”“−5.1; 6.1”“0.85”
Off-dystoniasPDQ-39 cognitions“−2.9”“−8.3; 2.5”“0.29”
Off-dystoniasPDQ-39 communication“−0.4”“−6.2; 5.3”“0.88”
Off-dystoniasPDQ-39 bodily discomfort“7.4”“1.1; 13.8”“0.02”
Motor complication subtypes and PDQ-39 dimensions

“The impact of motor complications of Parkinson’s disease (PD), especially levodopa-induced dyskinesias, on quality of life (QL) was studied in 143 patients with PD.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Two groups of patients were excluded, those having undergone surgery of the basal ganglia and those having an alteration of cognitive functions (Mini-Mental State Examination score lower than 24).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The range of possible values of each QL dimension is 0 (best QL) to 100 (worst QL), and the PDQ-SI is obtained by adding the dimension scores and reducing the range to 0 to 100.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Motor complications significantly worsened the PDQ-39 Summary Index (PDQ-SI) of patients with PD.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Morning akinesia, end-of-dose fluctuations, and “unpredictable offs” decreased QL on the dimensions of Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, Stigma, and Communication.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Nocturnal akinesia led to a deterioration of all dimensions of the PDQ-39.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“All the motor fluctuations studied significantly worsened the PDQ-SI.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Apart from morning dystonias, all the self-reported LIDs studied (peak dose, diphasic, and off) were significantly related to a higher PDQ-SI, as was the dyskinesia score.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We were particularly surprised by the impact of nocturnal akinesia, which often faded into the background at the consultation.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Motor complicationParticipants with the complication, nPercentage (of all participants for any fluctuation or any dyskinesia; of participants in that class for each subtype)PDQ-SI mean, with the complicationPDQ-SI mean, without the complicationPDQ-SI, P (Student's t test)
Any motor fluctuation“94”“66”Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Early-morning akinesia“55”“58.5”“40.9”“33.6”“0.005”
Nocturnal akinesia“54”“57.5”“44.7”“31.3”“<0.0001”
End-of-dose fluctuations“74”“78.7”“41”“31.6”“0.0002”
Paradoxical fluctuations“47”“50”“44.2”“32.6”“<0.0001”
Unpredictable offs“34”“36.2”“45.5”“33.5”“<0.0001”
Any levodopa-induced dyskinesia“81”“57”Not reportedNot reportedNot reported
Peak-dose dyskinesia“59”“72.8”“39.8”“34.4”“0.0404”
Diphasic dyskinesia“14”“17.3”“46.1”“35.5”“0.0127”
Off dyskinesia“10”“12.4”“49.9”“35.7”“0.0097”
Morning dystonia“27”“33.3”“40.7”“35.6”“<0.1277”
Clinical correlates and multivariable predictors of the PDQ-39 Summary Index, including levodopa dosing frequency

“A two-tailed 5% threshold of significance was retained, and only P values lying below this threshold are reported.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The disease duration led to a significant alteration of the dimensions Mobility (r = +0.46; P < 0.0001), Activities of Daily Living (r = +0.35; P < 0.0001), Stigma (r = +0.27; P = 0.0014), Social Support (r = +0.18; P = 0.03), and Communication (r = +0.35; P < 0.0001).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A degradation of the QL was observed with the duration of dopatherapy, in the dimensions Mobility (r = +0.53; P < 0.0001), Activities of Daily Living (r = +0.44; P < 0.0001), Emotional Well-Being (r = +0.26; P < 0.014), Stigma (r = +0.26; P < 0.013), and Communication (r = +0.41; P < 0.0001) and in the PDQ-SI (r = +0.42; P = 0.0002).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The severity of disease (H&Y) affected the QL in the dimensions Mobility (r = +0.44; P < 0.0001), Activities of Daily Living (r = +0.49; P < 0.0001), and Communication (r = +0.29; P = 0.0005) and in the PDQ-SI (r = +0.37; P < 0.0001).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A higher total Motor score evaluated in an on state according to Part III of the UPDRS led to a degradation of the QL in the dimensions Mobility (r = +0.24; P = 0.0054) and Activities of Daily Living (r = +0.37; P < 0.0001) and in the PDQ-SI (r = +0.24; P = 0.0092).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A greater daily dosage of L-dopa significantly worsened the QL in the dimensions Mobility (r = +0.33; P = 0.0003), Activities of Daily Living (r = +0.31; P = 0.0007), Emotional Well-Being (r = +0.26; P = 0.0048), Stigma (r = +0.31; P = 0.0004), Social Support (r = +0.20; P = 0.027), and Communication (r = +0.28; P = 0.0019) and in the PDQ-SI (r = +0.42; P < 0.0001).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A larger number of doses of L-dopa was likewise detrimental for the QL in the dimensions Mobility (r = +0.40; P < 0.0001), Activities of Daily Living (r = +0.30; P = 0.0008), Emotional Well-Being (r = +0.26; P = 0.0048), Stigma (r = +0.33; P = 0.0002), Social Support (r = +0.24; P = 0.01), and Communication (r = +0.24; P = 0.007) and in the PDQ-SI (r = +0.42; P < 0.0001).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Inclusion of all factors concerning PD patients (sex and age at PD onset), disease (duration of PD at assessment, H&Y stage, and UPDRS III score), L-dopa treatment (daily dose and number of doses/day) and motor complications (occurrence or not of MF/LIDs and AIMS) in a multivariate linear model showed a contribution of 43% (part of total R-square) to the PDQ-SI.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Among the explanatory variables, the individual contribution determined by partial R-square was 17% for the number of L-dopa doses per day, 10% for the UPDRS III score, 7% for AIMS, and less than 2% for the other variables.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Among clinical characteristics, the number of L-dopa doses was significantly related to age at the onset of PD (r = −0.43; P < 0.0001), disease duration (r = +0.47; P < 0.0001), H&Y stage (r = +0.22; P = 0.012), L-dopa dose (r = +0.83; P < 0.0001), and AIMS (r = +0.47; P = 0.0021) but not to the UPDRS III score.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“It may only mean that there is an information overlap between MF/LIDs and the “complexity” of treatment (number of L-dopa doses), which might be the best indication of a difficult case of PD management and, thus, a poor QL in the patient.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The levels of causality among PD characteristics are somewhat difficult to analyze, because our study did not take into account the chronological sequence of events.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Economic burden and healthcare resource utilization
Excess direct medical cost per person and by type of service, United States
ComponentTotal excess medical cost due to PD, million $Percentage of the totalPer PWP, $
Non-acute institutional care“7,144”“28.2%”“6,888”
Hospital inpatient“7,190”“28.4%”“6,932”
Outpatient“5,506”“21.7%”“5,308”
Physician office“1,226”“4.8%”“1,182”
Durable medical equipment“145”“0.6%”“140”
Prescription medication“4,137”“16.3%”“3,988”
Overall“25,348”“100%”“24,439”
Study population and claims-based definition of advanced disease

“Our data source was the 2013 Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse 100% Medicare dataset, which contains comprehensive claims for all patients with fee-for-service Medicare.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Next, the algorithm searched chronologically for any consecutive 30-day period where the average LED was > 1000 mg/day. Patients with dosing satisfying this criterion were categorized as having advanced PD, regardless of whether they maintained dosing at that level throughout the year.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Our LED > 1000 mg dosing threshold was based on the average medication dose observed in clinical trials of device-aided therapies, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Our final study sample included 144,703 Medicare beneficiaries with PD (Supporting Information Fig. S1). Twenty percent (n = 28,974) were categorized as having advanced PD via our medication-based algorithm; the remaining 80% were categorized as having mild/moderate PD (Table 1).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Compared with the mild/moderate PD group, the advanced PD group had a greater percentage of individuals who were younger and male, who had a lower mean RxHCC risk score, and who had an outpatient neurologist visit during the year.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Sample characteristics by claims-assigned disease severity, Medicare
CharacteristicOverall (N = 144,703)Mild/moderate PD (n = 115,729)Advanced PD (n = 28,974)
Age 65–69 years, n (%)“16,702 (11.5)”“11,964 (10.3)”“4738 (16.4)”
Age 70–74 years, n (%)“27,882 (19.3)”“20,685 (17.9)”“7197 (24.8)”
Age 75–79 years, n (%)“33,141 (22.9)”“26,039 (22.5)”“7102 (24.5)”
Age ≥80 years, n (%)“66,978 (46.3)”“57,041 (49.3)”“9937 (34.3)”
Male sex, n (%)“70,127 (48.5)”“53,321 (46.1)”“16,806 (58.0)”
Race, White, n (%)“126,830 (87.6)”“100,878 (87.2)”“25,952 (89.6)”
Race, Black, n (%)“6666 (4.6)”“5860 (5.1)”“806 (2.8)”
Race, other, n (%)“11,207 (7.7)”“8991 (7.8)”“2216 (7.6)”
Region, Northeast, n (%)“28,430 (19.6)”“23,061 (19.9)”“5369 (18.5)”
Region, Midwest, n (%)“38,687 (26.7)”“30,487 (26.3)”“8200 (28.3)”
Region, South, n (%)“52,885 (36.5)”“43,040 (37.2)”“9845 (34.0)”
Region, West, n (%)“24,701 (17.1)”“19,141 (16.5)”“5560 (19.2)”
RxHCC risk score, mean (SD)“1.48 (0.46)”“1.50 (0.46)”“1.40 (0.45)”
Outpatient neurologist visit during the study year, n (%)“101,146 (69.9)”“76,762 (66.3)”“24,384 (84.2)”
Unadjusted 12-month Medicare costs by service category and disease severity
Cost categoryOverall (N = 144,703), mean (SD), 2018 US$Mild/moderate PD (n = 115,729), mean (SD), 2018 US$Advanced PD (n = 28,974), mean (SD), 2018 US$P value
All-cause, total“$23,041 ($34,045)”“$22,553 ($34,147)”“$24,988 ($33,563)”“<0.001”
All-cause, medical“$16,741 ($31,925)”“$16,737 ($32,309)”“$16,763 ($30,348)”“0.896”
All-cause, outpatient“$8747 ($9983)”“$8627 ($10,062)”“$9230 ($9645)”“<0.001”
All-cause, inpatient“$3183 ($22,656)”“$3214 ($22,840)”“$3059 ($21,903)”“0.272”
All-cause, durable medical equipment“$535 ($1636)”“$519 ($1589)”“$599 ($1811)”“<0.001”
All-cause, skilled nursing facility“$1038 ($6818)”“$1092 ($7020)”“$825 ($5932)”“<0.001”
All-cause, home health services“$2282 ($5053)”“$2270 ($5068)”“$2327 ($4994)”“0.077”
All-cause, hospice“$955 ($6177)”“$1014 ($6399)”“$722 ($5187)”“<0.001”
All-cause, pharmaceutical“$6300 ($9567)”“$5818 ($8568)”“$8225 ($12,620)”“<0.001”
Primary PD-related, total“$3429 ($7431)”“$2640 ($5646)”“$6580 ($11,667)”“<0.001”
Primary PD-related, medical“$1882 ($5795)”“$1634 ($5265)”“$2877 ($7468)”“<0.001”
Primary PD-related, outpatient“$763 ($2344)”“$619 ($1821)”“$1334 ($3716)”“<0.001”
Primary PD-related, inpatient“$67 ($1643)”“$44 ($1047)”“$156 ($3017)”“<0.001”
Primary PD-related, durable medical equipment“$94 ($737)”“$74 ($606)”“$175 ($1111)”“<0.001”
Primary PD-related, skilled nursing facility“$65 ($1561)”“$60 ($1515)”“$84 ($1732)”“0.037”
Primary PD-related, home health services“$483 ($2004)”“$428 ($1863)”“$700 ($2476)”“<0.001”
Primary PD-related, hospice“$411 ($3902)”“$406 ($3926)”“$428 ($3803)”“0.387”
Primary PD-related, pharmaceutical“$1546 ($4431)”“$1006 ($1947)”“$3701 ($8783)”“<0.001”
Any PD-related, total“$9924 ($22,140)”“$8922 ($21,524)”“$13,923 ($24,037)”“<0.001”
Any PD-related, medical“$7133 ($21,473)”“$6674 ($21,282)”“$8968 ($22,124)”“<0.001”
Any PD-related, outpatient“$2199 ($3942)”“$1925 ($3401)”“$3289 ($5468)”“<0.001”
Any PD-related, inpatient“$2049 ($17,781)”“$1970 ($17,781)”“$2367 ($17,780)”“0.001”
Any PD-related, durable medical equipment“$145 ($904)”“$120 ($787)”“$241 ($1262)”“<0.001”
Any PD-related, skilled nursing facility“$550 ($4732)”“$558 ($4781)”“$519 ($4529)”“0.218”
Any PD-related, home health services“$1693 ($4279)”“$1597 ($4181)”“$2074 ($4629)”“<0.001”
Any PD-related, hospice“$499 ($4274)”“$504 ($4337)”“$477 ($4011)”“0.327”
Any PD-related, pharmaceutical“$2789 ($5103)”“$2247 ($3147)”“$4956 ($9201)”“<0.001”
Distribution of costs across patients and drivers of the highest costs

“For instance, when examining any PD-related costs across patient deciles, mean costs were as low as $483 (SD, $166) in the lowest decile and as high as $48,145 (SD, $55,111) in the highest decile.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“More than half (57%) of the patients in the advanced PD group were in the four deciles with the highest costs (as compared with 35% of patients in the mild/moderate group), whereas more than half (54%) of the patients in the mild/moderate group were in the five deciles with the lowest costs (as compared with 30% of the advanced PD group).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Further exploration of specific costs among the tenth (highest) decile compared with the next highest (ninth) decile revealed higher costs in every category we examined, with the biggest differences evident for inpatient and skilled nursing facility care (ie, inpatient costs $27,676 vs $2732 for the tenth vs ninth decile, respectively; skilled nursing care $9926 vs $408; Supporting Information Table S1).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Among those in the mild/moderate group who incurred the highest (tenth decile) costs, 42% of those costs were related to inpatient services, 16% were due to home health care, and 13% were due to skilled nursing facility claims (Supporting Information Table S2).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The pattern was even more pronounced for primary PD-related costs; the majority of patients in the advanced PD group (57%) were concentrated in the top three deciles (as compared with 23% of patients in the mild/moderate group; Fig. 2).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The advanced PD group had mean unadjusted total all-cause costs ($24,988 [SD, $33,563]) that were approximately 10% higher than those of the mild/moderate group ($22,553 [SD, $34,147]), with the majority of the difference coming from higher pharmaceutical costs in the advanced PD group.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In keeping with the fact that disease severity was assigned based on medication dose, mean primary PD-related pharmaceutical costs for the advanced PD group were more than triple those of the mild/moderate group ($3701 vs $1006, respectively) and represented a higher proportion of their overall primary PD-related costs (56% vs 38%; data not shown).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“One in three individuals in our mild/moderate PD group did not have a claim for a neurologist visit during our study year, nor did one in six individuals in our advanced PD group.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Risk-adjusted costs under alternative definitions of advanced disease
Cost type and definition of advanced diseaseMild/moderate PD, risk-adjusted mean, 2018 US$Advanced PD, risk-adjusted mean, 2018 US$Difference95% CI of difference
All-cause, levodopa > 1000 mg/day“$22,363”“$26,688”“$4325”“$3862–$4788”
All-cause, LED > 800 mg/day“$21,681”“$26,433”“$4751”“$4426–$5077”
Primary PD-related, levodopa > 1000 mg/day“$2923”“$5657”“$2734”“$2578–$2890”
Primary PD-related, LED > 800 mg/day“$2428”“$5590”“$3162”“$3041–$3283”
Any PD-related, levodopa > 1000 mg/day“$9103”“$14,119”“$5016”“$4678–$5354”
Any PD-related, LED > 800 mg/day“$8372”“$13,708”“$5336”“$5090–$5582”
Sensitivity analyses, study limitations, and funding

“Sensitivity analyses using alternate medication thresholds to define advanced PD (ie, levodopa dose > 1000 mg and LED > 800 mg) produced incremental costs of advanced PD that were smaller across all categories, although patterns were similar (Table 3).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The medication-based algorithm we used to determine advanced disease status is newly developed and has not undergone full validation testing.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In contrast, the nature of Medicare claims may have led us to overestimate the true costs of pharmaceutical treatment, because the Part D event files do not capture manufacturer rebates, remuneration (price concessions), and final adjustment for risk sharing.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Although our study offers important insights into the health care cost burden of advanced PD within fee-for-service Medicare, our results did not include and may not generalize to patients covered by Medicare Advantage plans that offer coverage for Medicare Parts A, B, and D together, or to those with fee-for-service Medicare without a Part D prescription drug plan.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Further, Medicare does not cover the considerable costs of treatment in long-term care facilities, which have been shown to represent a substantial proportion of overall costs to Medicare beneficiaries.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Financial support for the study was provided by AbbVie.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Registry population, cost methods, and study limitations, Sweden

“Annual costs of healthcare contacts, drugs, formal and informal care, and productivity loss associated with PD were estimated using data from PARKreg linked with regional and national healthcare registers between 2013 and 2019.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In total, 960 patients and 1324 observations (patient-years) were included.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In this study, we defined H&Y I-II as early stage, III-IV as advanced stage and V as late stage.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Most patient-years were found in H&Y I and II (68%), whereas 25% were in H&Y III, 6% in H&Y IV and 1% in H&Y V.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The variable was presented in the following categories: 0%, 1-<25%, 25-<50%, and 50–100%.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Costs are expressed in Swedish kronor (SEK), 2019 prices.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A limitation of the study is that total costs for PD might be underestimated since only healthcare contacts registered with a PD diagnosis as main diagnosis were included.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Even though the sample in this study covers all disease severity stages, it should be noted that the sample size in H&Y IV-V is relatively low compared to stages I-III, that is, 6% of all the patient-years are found in H&Y stage IV and only 1% in H&Y stage V.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Moreover, off-time is a rough patient-reported estimate which may be affected by a recall bias.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The research has received financial support from AbbVie, Medtronic, and Nordic Infucare (Air Liquide Healthcare).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Cost per patient-year by cost category and Hoehn and Yahr stage, Sweden
Cost per patient-year by cost category and time in OFF, Sweden
Cost category0% of waking time in OFF (n = 826), mean (SD), SEK 20191% to <25% (n = 385), mean (SD), SEK 201925% to <50% (n = 94), mean (SD), SEK 201950% to 100% (n = 19), mean (SD), SEK 2019
Inpatient and outpatient care“16 867 (42 326)”“26 066 (48 136)”“29 607 (63 105)”“27 943 (28 305)”
Drugs“14 050 (39 228)”“37 372 (85 054)”“33 738 (75 940)”“33 355 (82 353)”
Formal care“39 400 (206 111)”“63 175 (212 497)”“95 469 (323 878)”“103 141 (256 321)”
Transport“817 (2 391)”“1360 (6 095)”“1 311 (2 459)”“529 (1 047)”
Informal care“14 684 (86 443)”“19 692 (84 972)”“35 577 (90 886)”“74 223 (117 835)”
Productivity loss“35 368 (139 615)”“78 878 (200 345)”“105 617 (233 495)”“179 653 (309 621)”
Resource use, drug costs, and formal care by disease stage, Sweden

“The percentage of patient-years with at least one stay increased from less than 1% in H&Y I to 14% in H&Y III, and 21% in H&Y V, whereas only 7% in H&Y IV had inpatient admissions.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Overall mean drug cost was SEK 22,506. The mean costs in H&Y IV and V were considerable higher than for stages I and II.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The mean (SD) cost for apomorphine infusion, LCIG, and LECIG was SEK 21,635 (85,168) for the 1-<25% off category compared to SEK 4053 (38,622) for the 0% (p < .001), SEK 17,756 (75,592) for the ≥25 to <50% (p < .01) and SEK 19,300 (84,127) for the ≥50% category (p < .01).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Overall mean costs for formal care, including costs for nursing home, home help, personal assistance, home health care and electric wheelchair and scooter, were SEK 51,209. Home help and nursing home accounted for most of the costs, 50 and 30%, respectively.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The use of informal care was considerably higher in H&Y IV than in the other stages, for 36% of the patient-years informal care of at least 1 h per week was reported and the mean number of hours per year was 634 h.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In our study, the cost ranged from about a similar level in H&Y I, SEK 62,000, but to a considerably higher level in stage V, SEK 1 million mainly driven by costs for formal care and especially cost for nursing home (50% of the patient-years in H&Y V included costs for nursing home).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Study population, cost methods, and limitations in Parkinson's disease psychosis with incident dementia

“A total of 12,484 patients were eligible after our applying the study inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 85.3% (n = 10,609) patients with PDP had a diagnosis for dementia in the post-PDP diagnosis period, while 14.7% (n = 1875) PDP patients did not have a diagnosis of dementia.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Patients in both groups were matched using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) methodology using 31 variables (age, sex, race, region and 27 Elixhauser comorbidity characteristics).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Patients were propensity score‐matched in a 1:1 ratio from the unmatched pool of PDP + D and PDP groups, yielding 1855 PDP + D and 1855 PDP patients.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“While other studies have posited that 80% of patients with PD progress to dementia in 2 decades, our analysis shows that approximately 85% of patients with PDP have incident dementia within a year after PDP diagnosis.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Mean age (72 years), gender (50% males), race, and comorbidity profile were similar for both groups.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Total cost for each claim, were calculated by adding the inpatient Medicare claim payment amount plus the claim pass through amount paid for the days stayed from the inpatient files.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“All cost amounts were inflated to 2019 dollars using the Medical Consumer Price Index (CPI) as reported by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Second, identification of psychosis was based on a diagnosis of psychosis-related hallucinations and delusions – so it is likely that PDP diagnosis is underestimated.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Third, residual confounding may still exist, even though the study was adjusted for potential confounding issues through appropriate propensity score matching and covariate adjustment.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Finally, it is important to acknowledge that diagnosis of dementia among patients with PDP may be difficult and, as such, result in underestimates of dementia diagnosis among these patients.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“This study was financially sponsored by Acadia Pharmaceuticals.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Hospitalization and emergency room visit rates by type of stay, psychosis with and without incident dementia
Outcome during 12-month follow-upPDP without dementia (n = 1855), n (%)PDP with incident dementia (n = 1855), n (%)p-value
All-cause, any hospitalization“667 (36.0)”“933 (50.3)”“<0.05”
All-cause, short-term stay“662 (33.6)”“839 (45.2)”“<0.05”
All-cause, long-term stay“113 (6.0)”“158 (8.6)”“<0.05”
All-cause, skilled nursing facility stay“291 (15.6)”“525 (28.4)”“<0.05”
All-cause, emergency room visit“1123 (60.6)”“1346 (72.6)”“<0.05”
Psychiatric, any hospitalization“227 (12.2)”“358 (19.2)”“<0.05”
Psychiatric, short-term stay“167 (9.0)”“228 (12.3)”“<0.05”
Psychiatric, long-term stay“23 (1.2)”“43 (2.4)”“<0.05”
Psychiatric, skilled nursing facility stay“64 (3.4)”“140 (7.5)”“<0.05”
Psychiatric, emergency room visit“210 (11.3)”“246 (13.2)”“NS”
Inpatient costs per patient per year by type of stay, psychosis with and without incident dementia
Type of inpatient stayPDP without dementia, mean PPPY cost, 2019 US$PDP without dementia, SDPDP with incident dementia, mean PPPY cost, 2019 US$PDP with incident dementia, SD
Any all-cause hospitalization“$11,599”“$25,247”“$17,891”“$29,882”
Short-term stay“$6856”“$16,339”“$9394”“$18,360”
Skilled nursing facility stay“$3385”“$10,056”“$6700”“$14,409”
Economic impact of Parkinson's disease on families
Care partner cost components per person with Parkinson's disease
Cost componentCare partner loss, million $Care partner loss per PWP, $
Reduced employment“802”“773”
Absenteeism“3,655”“3,524”
Presenteeism“1,684”“1,623”
Social productivity loss in volunteer work“410”“396”
Risk factors for caregiver burden

“Forty-nine articles that involved 5387 caregivers of patients with PD were included in this study.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“All scales revealed caregivers of PD patients had mild to moderate caregiver burden. For the PD patients with longer disease duration, severer disease severity, more negative emotion and cognition impairment, their caregivers intended to have higher caregiver burden.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Thirty-eight were cross-sectional studies, and eleven were clinic trails.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“As the included articles had a great deal of clinical heterogeneity in terms of participants, statistical methods and measurement tools. The results of systematic review were described by qualitative analysis.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Caregiver spent 6.1 ± 4.5 h per day and 8.1 ± 4.9 years on caregiving.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Sixty-four per cent (1465/2264) of patients were in H&Y stage ≤ 2.5, and thirty-two per cent (729/2264) had H&Y stage ≥ 3.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“All of these studies indicated a higher CB in both patients and caregivers with depression and anxiety.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The caregiver burden was not improved after deep brain stimulation (DBS).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Economic impact of diagnostic testing
Reimbursement for dopamine transporter SPECT imaging in the United States
Payer mix and reimbursement per dopamine transporter SPECT study by payer and period
MeasureJuly 2011 to October 2012January 2014 to December 2014Difference between periods
CMS, share of studies“134/247 (54.2%)”“73/94 (77.7%)”Not applicable
Private insurance, share of studies“105/247 (42.5%)”“21/94 (22.3%)”Not applicable
Veterans Affairs Health Care System, share of studies“6/247 (2.4%)”“0/94 (0%)”Not applicable
Self-pay, share of studies“2/247 (0.9%)”“0/94 (0%)”Not applicable
CMS, average reimbursement (US$)“$2,266”“$1,118”“-$1,148”
CMS, range of reimbursement (US$)“$0-$2,254”“$674-$1,621”Not applicable
Private insurance, average reimbursement (US$)“$2,861”“$3,470”“$609”
Private insurance, range of reimbursement (US$)“$0-$8,754”“$112-$9,675”Not applicable
Private insurance minus CMS, average reimbursement (US$)“$595”“$2,369”Not applicable
Cost-effectiveness of dopamine transporter SPECT in suspected Parkinson's disease, Germany

“Compared strategies were CE only (EXAM+), SPECT only (SPECT+), SPECT following negative CE (SINGLE+), and SPECT following positive CE (DOUBLE+).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Costs of SPECT amounted to €789 per investigation.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Based on our model, expected costs (and ATME) were €946 (52.85 ATME) for EXAM+, €1352 (53.40 ATME) for DOUBLE+, €1731 (32.82 ATME) for SINGLE+, and €2003 (32.96 ATME) for SPECT+; performance of SPECT was induced in 0%, 54%, 56%, and 100% of the patients, respectively.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“DOUBLE+ was more effective and less expensive than SINGLE+ or SPECT+; thus these two do not offer reasonable choices. The ICER of DOUBLE+ compared to EXAM+ was €733 per ATME gained. In sensitivity analyses, the ICER of DOUBLE+ versus EXAM+ ranged from €63 to €2411 per ATME gained.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“If the decision-maker is not willing to spend approximately €733 for the equivalent of a patient-month with adequate treatment, the diagnostic work-up should include only a clinical examination.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“SPECT should be used as a confirmatory test before treatment initiation and limited to patients with a positive test result in the clinical examination.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Decision model structure, perspective, and treatment costs, Germany

“We developed a decision tree model for several diagnostic work-up strategies to determine diagnostic, therapeutic, and economic outcomes in patients with symptoms of PD who present to a specialized movement disorder outpatient clinic.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We assumed that the correct diagnosis (PD or not) will be available in all patients after 12 months, and therefore chose a time horizon of 12 months.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We considered that only patients in Hoehn and Yahr (HY) stage I or II would be examined.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In the model, we counted how many months during the 1-year time horizon each individual was treated appropriately, that is, the number of months a patient with PD received antiparkinsonian therapy or the number of months an individual without PD did not receive such treatment.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The consequence ratio ranged from 5 to 12, with a mean of 8.5.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Economic outcomes included the cost for diagnostic procedures and PD treatment costs. All costs were based on 2002 values. We adopted the perspective of the health care provider.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“1 full year of PD treatment is associated with medication costs of €1,535 or €128 per patient-month. Including initial and follow-up clinical examinations but assuming no SPECT investigation increases the 1-year health care costs to a total of €1,689, which translates to an average of €141 per patient month.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Model inputs, SPECT cost components, and ranges tested in sensitivity analyses
ParameterBase case (costs in euros, 2002 values)Range in sensitivity analyses
Prevalence of PD among referred patients“0.53”“0.20–0.74”
Prevalence of parkinsonism among referred patients“0.74”Not applicable
Sensitivity of FP-CIT SPECT for parkinsonism“0.975”“0.90–1.0”
Specificity of FP-CIT SPECT for parkinsonism“1.0”“0.73–1.0”
Sensitivity of clinical examination for PD“0.911”“0.60–0.911”
Specificity of clinical examination for PD“0.984”“0.80–0.984”
Radionuclide tracer for FP-CIT SPECT“746.50”“373.25–1,493.00”
PD medication per year“1,534.50”“767.25–3,069.00”
Initial examination, including tests“117.98”“59.00–236.00”
Clinical follow-up examination“18.50”“9.25–37.00”
Gamma camera cost per SPECT investigation“16.22”Not applicable
Mean personnel cost per SPECT investigation“25.88”Not applicable
Total cost per SPECT investigation“788.60”Not applicable
Consequence ratio“8.5”“1–20”
Base-case expected cost, effectiveness, and ICER by diagnostic strategy
StrategyExpected 1-year cost per patient (euros)Adequate treatment month equivalentsICER (euros per ATME)
Clinical examination only (EXAM+)“946”“52.8”Not applicable
SPECT after positive clinical examination (DOUBLE+)“1,352”“53.4”“733”
SPECT after negative clinical examination (SINGLE+)“1,731”“32.8”“Dom”
SPECT only (SPECT+)“2,003”“33.0”“Dom”
One-way sensitivity analyses, SPECT after positive clinical examination versus clinical examination only
Varied parameter and valueEXAM+ cost (euros)EXAM+ ATMEDOUBLE+ cost (euros)DOUBLE+ ATMEDOUBLE+ ICER (euros per ATME)
Base case“946”“52.8”“1,352”“53.4”“733”
Prevalence of PD 0.74“1,245”“34.3”“1,810”“34.6”“2,411”
Prevalence of PD 0.40“761”“64.3”“1,068”“65.1”“409”
Prevalence of PD 0.20“476”“81.9”“632”“83.0”“148”
Sensitivity of clinical examination 0.76“864”“52.2”“1,249”“52.8”“700”
Sensitivity of clinical examination 0.60“758”“51.4”“1,100”“51.9”“619”
Specificity of clinical examination 0.90“1,033”“47.0”“1,451”“50.7”“113”
Specificity of clinical examination 0.80“1,131”“40.6”“1,563”“47.5”“63”
Sensitivity of FP-CIT SPECT 1.00“946”“52.8”“1,663”“53.5”“666”
Sensitivity of FP-CIT SPECT 0.90“946”“52.8”“1,319”“53.2”“1,109”
Specificity of FP-CIT SPECT 0.73“946”“52.8”“1,355”“53.2”“1,062”
Tracer cost doubled“946”“52.8”“1,756”“53.4”“1,462”
Tracer cost halved“946”“52.8”“1,150”“53.4”“369”
Initial examination cost doubled“1,064”“52.8”“1,470”“53.4”“733”
Initial examination cost halved“887”“52.8”“1,293”“53.4”“733”
Medication cost doubled“1,737”“52.8”“2,123”“53.4”“696”
Medication cost halved“551”“52.8”“967”“53.4”“752”
Consequence ratio 1“946”“11.6”“1,352”“11.5”“Dom”
Consequence ratio 5“946”“33.6”“1,352”“33.9”“1,397”
Consequence ratio 12“946”“72.1”“1,352”“72.9”“497”
Consequence ratio 20“946”“116.2”“1,352”“117.6”“286”
Cost of SPECT after positive clinical examination that is inconsistent with its ICER at a SPECT sensitivity of 1.00
Table 5 rowEXAM+ cost (euros)EXAM+ ATMEDOUBLE+ cost (euros)DOUBLE+ ATMEDOUBLE+ ICER (euros per ATME)
Base case“946”“52.8”“1,352”“53.4”“733”
Sensitivity of FP-CIT SPECT 1.00“946”“52.8”“1,663”“53.5”“666”
Interpretation of the incremental gain and limitations of the decision model

“Although DOUBLE+ was more expensive than EXAM+, DOUBLE+ also yielded between 0.23 and 6.91 additional ATMEs with ICERs varying from €63 to €2,411 per ATME, depending on the parameters varied in the sensitivity analyses. Only for consequence ratios smaller than 1.2, which was outside of the expert’s range, EXAM+ was more effective than DOUBLE+. The ICER of DOUBLE+ compared to EXAM+ improved (i.e., decreased) with decreasing prevalence of PD, decreasing accuracy of clinical examination, increasing accuracy of SPECT, and increasing consequence ratio.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“This strategy remains more expensive than clinical examination only: the expected clinical gain was 0.55 ATMEs and the additional average costs were €406 for each patient of the target population (including those after negative clinical examination).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“This result represents either assigning 17 additional days of treatment to a patient with PD or withholding about 2 additional days (i.e., 17 divided by 8.5) of treatment and side effects from a patient without PD.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“However, as in all diagnostic studies, the optimal test strategy depends on the pretest probability of the disease, in this case the prevalence of PD.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Increasing PD prevalence to 74%, which may not be entirely unlikely for a highly specialized movement disorder clinic, leads to an ICER of more than €2,400 per ATME.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“As data were lacking on health-related quality of life indices (utilities) in early treated and nontreated patients with and without PD, we were unable to convert this outcome into QALYs, which was suggested for the reference case of a cost–effectiveness analyses.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Hence, our analysis may be biased against SPECT and overestimating the true cost–effectiveness ratios of this technology.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Third, we did not consider other types of parkinsonian syndromes such as multisystem atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal ganglionic degeneration (CBGD), or Lewy body disease in our decision analysis.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Fifth, it must be kept in mind that the results of this study are limited to a specialized movement disorder clinic.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Cost of alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay and skin biopsy testing

No evidence found.

Approaches to treatment

Current treatment options and standard of care
Levodopa
Initial therapy: levodopa compared with dopamine agonists in early disease

“Initial treatment with levodopa provides superior motor benefit compared to treatment with dopamine agonists, whereas levodopa is more likely than dopamine agonists to cause dyskinesia.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Long-acting forms of levodopa and levodopa with entacapone do not appear to differ in efficacy from immediate-release levodopa for motor symptoms in early disease.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“There is a higher risk of impulse control disorders associated with the use of dopamine agonists than levodopa.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The trend over time demonstrates that levodopa provides greater benefit for motor symptoms than DAs, with the majority of studies demonstrating significantly greater improvement in the participants’ UPDRS part III score for up to 5 years of follow-up.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“With longer periods of follow-up, an increasing proportion of participants (90% of patients at 6 years and 100% at 10 years) originally randomized to DAs were taking supplemental levodopa, therefore minimizing the difference between groups for this outcome.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Initial treatment with levodopa is more likely to induce dyskinesia than initial treatment with DAs for up to 5 years of follow-up, but the prevalence of severe or disabling dyskinesia during this 5-year period is low.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the UPDRS part III score was determined by consensus to be 3 points; changes of 1 point or less were considered unimportant.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The MCID in the risk of dyskinesia was determined by consensus to be 15%; RDs ≤5% were considered clinically unimportant.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Time pointChange in UPDRS part III score, raw mean difference, levodopa minus dopamine agonist (negative values favor levodopa)Dyskinesia, risk difference, levodopa minus dopamine agonist (positive values indicate higher risk with levodopa)
2 years“−5.0 [−7.2 to −2.5], moderate confidence”“18.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.7%–23.8%], moderate confidence”
4 years“−4.9 [−7.8 to −1.9], low confidence”“29.2% [19.6%–38.8%], moderate confidence”
5 years“−3.4 [−5.2 to −1.6], moderate confidence”“17.5% [4.5%–30.5%], low confidence”
Effect of levodopa on disease progression: placebo-controlled trial

“The severity of parkinsonism increased more in the placebo group than in all the groups receiving levodopa: the mean difference between the total score on the UPDRS at baseline and at 42 weeks was 7.8 units in the placebo group, 1.9 units in the group receiving levodopa at a dose of 150 mg daily, 1.9 in those receiving 300 mg daily, and −1.4 in those receiving 600 mg daily (P<0.001).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The subjects receiving the highest dose of levodopa had significantly more dyskinesia, hypertonia, infection, headache, and nausea than those receiving placebo.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Of a total of 361 subjects enrolled in the study, 317 (88 percent) took the study medication for 40 weeks, and 311 (86 percent) completed the 2 weeks of washout (Fig. 1).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We need to consider that a two-week washout from levodopa may have been insufficient to eliminate fully the effect of the medication on symptoms, and the results observed may be related to a profound effect of levodopa on symptoms that persists for a long time after the drug has been withdrawn.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The clinical data suggest that levodopa either slows the progression of Parkinson’s disease or has a prolonged effect on the symptoms of the disease.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In contrast, the neuroimaging data suggest either that levodopa accelerates the loss of nigrostriatal dopamine nerve terminals or that its pharmacologic effects modify the dopamine transporter.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The potential long-term effects of levodopa on Parkinson’s disease remain uncertain.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“At the end of the study, when the SPECT neuroimaging studies were performed, the subjects were still taking levodopa, so it is possible to assume that levodopa has a pharmacologic effect on the dopamine transporter that interferes with and reduces the binding of the β-CIT ligand.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

CharacteristicPlaceboLevodopa 150 mg/dayLevodopa 300 mg/dayLevodopa 600 mg/dayP value
Participants, no.“90”“92”“88”“91”Not applicable
Male sex, %“72”“63”“67”“68”“0.62”
White race, %“90”“91”“93”“88”“0.67”
Age, years, mean ± SD“64.9±10.3”“64.3±10.6”“63.8±12.1”“65.2±10.7”“0.84”
Duration of disease, months, mean ± SD“5.3±5.6”“5.7±6.1”“7.6±7.5”“6.0±6.1”“0.10”
Total UPDRS score, mean ± SD“27.7±12.0”“27.2±12.6”“27.5±11.6”“29.4±13.9”“0.63”
UPDRS motor component, mean ± SD“18.8±8.9”“18.6±9.1”“18.9±8.8”“20.5±10.8”“0.51”
Hoehn–Yahr scale score, mean ± SD“1.8±0.5”“1.9±0.6”“1.8±0.5”“1.9±0.6”“0.57”
Change from baseline to week 42, mean ± SDPlaceboLevodopa 150 mg/dayLevodopa 300 mg/dayLevodopa 600 mg/dayP value for trend
Primary rater, participants, no.“70”“78”“82”“81”Not applicable
Primary rater, total UPDRS score“7.8±9.0”“1.9±6.0”“1.9±6.9”“−1.4±7.7”“<0.001”
Primary rater, mental component“0.3±1.5”“0.0±1.5”“0.1±1.2”“0.1±1.4”“0.18”
Primary rater, ADL component“2.3±3.4”“0.5±2.3”“0.4±2.9”“−0.3±3.0”“<0.001”
Primary rater, motor component“5.2±6.4”“1.4±5.5”“1.4±5.3”“−1.4±5.9”“<0.001”
Treating investigator, total UPDRS score“9.0±10.4”“4.0±8.2”“4.0±8.4”“1.0±9.9”“<0.001”
Treating investigator, mental component“0.5±1.3”“−0.1±1.4”“0.1±1.4”“0.1±1.6”“0.31”
Treating investigator, ADL component“2.5±4.0”“0.8±3.1”“1.0±2.8”“0.3±3.5”“<0.001”
Treating investigator, motor component“6.0±7.6”“3.2±6.4”“3.0±6.4”“0.6±7.7”“<0.001”
Striatal β-CIT uptake, change from baseline to week 40PlaceboLevodopa 150 mg/dayLevodopa 300 mg/dayLevodopa 600 mg/dayP value for dose–response
Substudy cohort, participants, no.“29”“33”“37”“36”Not applicable
Substudy cohort, change, %, mean ± SD“−2.6±11.3”“−4.7±10.8”“−3.7±9.1”“−6.9±8.1”“0.15”
Substudy cohort, P value compared with placeboNot applicable“0.46”“0.63”“0.11”Not applicable
Excluding scans without dopaminergic deficit, participants, no.“26”“28”“34”“28”Not applicable
Excluding scans without dopaminergic deficit, change, %, mean ± SD“−1.4±10.0”“−6.0±10.3”“−4.0±9.4”“−7.2±7.6”“0.036”
Excluding scans without dopaminergic deficit, P value compared with placeboNot applicable“0.16”“0.40”“0.015”Not applicable
Dose-dependent dyskinesia, wearing off, and other adverse events over 40 weeks of levodopa
Adverse eventPlacebo (N = 90)Levodopa 150 mg/day (N = 92)Levodopa 300 mg/day (N = 88)Levodopa 600 mg/day (N = 91)P value for trend
Dyskinesia, no. (%)“3 (3.3)”“3 (3.3)”“2 (2.3)”“15 (16.5)”“<0.001”
Dystonia, no. (%)“19 (21.1)”“19 (20.7)”“14 (15.9)”“12 (13.2)”“0.30”
Wearing off, no. (%)“12 (13.3)”“15 (16.3)”“16 (18.2)”“27 (29.7)”“0.06”
On–off, no. (%)“3 (3.3)”“1 (1.1)”“0”“3 (3.3)”“0.26”
Freezing of gait, no. (%)“13 (14.4)”“9 (9.8)”“6 (6.8)”“5 (5.5)”“0.15”
Nausea, no. (%)“12 (13.3)”“15 (16.3)”“23 (26.1)”“29 (31.9)”“0.001”
Headache, no. (%)“3 (3.3)”“7 (7.6)”“5 (5.7)”“12 (13.2)”“0.03”
Hypertonia, no. (%)“1 (1.1)”“0”“1 (1.1)”“5 (5.5)”“0.03”
Infection, no. (%)“1 (1.1)”“0”“0”“6 (6.6)”“0.01”
Dizziness, no. (%)“6 (6.7)”“10 (10.9)”“5 (5.7)”“14 (15.4)”“0.13”
Somnolence, no. (%)“2 (2.2)”“0”“5 (5.7)”“5 (5.5)”“0.07”
Fracture, no. (%)“4 (4.4)”“0”“0”“0”“0.01”
Leg pain, no. (%)“7 (7.8)”“6 (6.5)”“3 (3.4)”“0”“0.006”
Effect of levodopa on disease progression: delayed-start trial

“A total of 445 patients were randomly assigned: 222 to the early-start group and 223 to the delayed-start group.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The change in UPDRS score from baseline to week 80 was −1.0±13.1 points and −2.0±13.0 points, respectively (difference, 1.0 point; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.5 to 3.5; P = 0.44); this finding of no significant between-group difference at week 80 implies that levodopa had no disease-modifying effect.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The change in the UPDRS score from baseline to week 40 was −3.1±10.2 in the early-start group and 2.0±12.3 in the delayed-start group (difference, −5.1 points; 95% CI, −7.2 to −2.9), favoring the early-start group and reflecting the effect of levodopa on symptoms of the disease.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Because of a need for symptomatic relief, 87 patients in the delayed-start group proceeded to receive the phase 2 trial medication (levodopa) before week 40, and 24 patients in the early-start group proceeded to open-label treatment with the same dose of levodopa.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The rates of dyskinesia and levodopa-related fluctuations in motor response did not differ significantly between the two groups.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“During the first 40 weeks of the trial, the incidence of nausea was higher in the early-start group than in the delayed start-group (23.0% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.02) (Table 3).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“At 80 weeks, the percentage of patients with motor complications, including dyskinesias and fluctuations in motor response, did not differ significantly between the two groups (Table S5 in the Supplementary Appendix).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In patients with early Parkinson’s disease, the clinical diagnosis may be incorrect in up to 15% of patients.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Among patients with early Parkinson's disease who were evaluated over the course of 80 weeks, treatment with levodopa in combination with carbidopa had no disease-modifying effect.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Effect of levodopa on disease progression: 5-year follow-up of the delayed-start trial

“A total of 321 patients completed the 5-year visit.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The adjusted square root transformed total Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale did not differ between treatment groups at 3 (estimated difference, 0.17; standard error, 0.13; P = 0.18) and 5 years (estimated difference, 0.24; standard error, 0.13; P = 0.07).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“We did not find a difference in disease progression or in prevalence of motor complications between patients with early PD starting treatment with a low dose of levodopa 40 weeks earlier versus 40 weeks later over the subsequent 5 years.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A total of 413 patients (93%) still had the diagnosis PD, and 27 patients (6%) did not have PD.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A substantial strength of the study is the high proportion of originally randomly assigned patients (77%) who completed the 5-year follow-up, minimizing the risk of bias caused by dropout.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Another limitation is the absence of a distinction between on or off drug state (ie, wearing off) while the UPDRS motor score was administrated.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“During the study, 11 of 205 patients (5%) in the earlystart group and 22 of 213 patients (10%) in the delayed-start group died (P = 0.06).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“However, the difference in unadjusted between-group total UPDRS change score from baseline to 5 years is below the clinically important difference” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The outcomes were square root transformed due to skewness.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“An estimate higher than zero indicates a higher score in the early-start group.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

OutcomeEarly-start group, change from baseline, mean ± SDDelayed-start group, change from baseline, mean ± SDEstimated difference, square root transformed (SE)P value
3 years, UPDRS total (I + II + III)“2.6±11.4”“0.9±12.8”“0.17 (0.13)”“0.18”
3 years, UPDRS I“−0.2±1.8”“−0.3±1.8”“0.07 (0.09)”“0.45”
3 years, UPDRS II“1.3±4.2”“1.1±3.7”“0.03 (0.08)”“0.68”
3 years, UPDRS III“1.5±8.8”“0.1±9.7”“0.16 (0.11)”“0.18”
3 years, UPDRS IV“1.0±1.9”“1.4±2.4”“−0.13 (0.09)”“0.18”
3 years, Levy A“0.6±7.2”“−0.4±8.1”“0.14 (0.11)”“0.20”
3 years, Levy B“0.7±2.1”“0.6±2.2”“0.02 (0.08)”“0.83”
5 years, UPDRS total (I + II + III)“11.5±17.0”“8.2±16.2”“0.24 (0.13)”“0.07”
5 years, UPDRS I“0.4±2.2”“0.2±1.9”“0.11 (0.08)”“0.17”
5 years, UPDRS II“3.7±4.7”“3.2±5.3”“0.09 (0.08)”“0.25”
5 years, UPDRS III“7.4±13.7”“4.7±11.9”“0.21 (0.12)”“0.09”
5 years, UPDRS IV“2.4±2.9”“2.2±2.4”“<0.01 (0.09)”“0.97”
5 years, Levy A“4.7±10.9”“2.9±9.4”“0.15 (0.12)”“0.20”
5 years, Levy B“2.1±3.0”“1.5±2.4”“0.11 (0.08)”“0.16”
Levodopa compared with levodopa-sparing initial therapy: pragmatic trial
Dopamine agonists
Dopamine agonists compared with levodopa in early disease: impulse control disorders and other adverse effects
Non-ergot dopamine agonists: evidence-based review implications for clinical practice by indication
AgentImplication for clinical practice: symptomatic monotherapyImplication for clinical practice: adjunct to levodopa in early or stable diseaseImplication for clinical practice: motor fluctuations
Pramipexole immediate release“Clinically useful”“Clinically useful”“Clinically useful”
Pramipexole extended release“Clinically useful”“Clinically useful”“Clinically useful”
Ropinirole immediate release“Clinically useful”“Clinically useful”“Clinically useful”
Ropinirole prolonged release“Possibly useful”Not reported“Clinically useful”
Rotigotine“Clinically useful”“Clinically useful”“Clinically useful”
Monoamine oxidase B inhibitors
MAO-B inhibitors compared with dopamine agonists as initial therapy
Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors
Levodopa initiated with entacapone in early disease

“We performed a prospective 134-week double-blind trial comparing the risk of developing dyskinesia in 747 PD patients randomized to initiate L-dopa therapy with L-dopa/carbidopa (LC) or L-dopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE), administered 4× daily at 3.5-hour intervals.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Eligible subjects were men or women aged 30 to 70 years with a diagnosis of PD based on UK brain bank criteria and a disease duration of <5 years from time of diagnosis.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Prior exposure to L-dopa for >30 days or within 8 weeks prior to entry, and previous use of a COMT inhibitor, were not permitted.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“L-dopa/carbidopa in both groups was initiated at a dose of 50/12.5mg twice daily, and titrated to 100/25 (target dose) or 150/37.5mg 4× daily administered at 3.5-hour intervals.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“With a follow-up time of 134 weeks and an estimated dropout rate of 15%, a sample size of 740 patients provided >80% power to detect a 25% reduction in dyskinesia frequency using the 2-sided log-rank test at an alpha level of 5%.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In comparison to LC, patients receiving LCE had a shorter time to onset of dyskinesia (hazard ratio, 1.29; p = 0.04) and increased frequency at week 134 (42% vs 32%; p = 0.02).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Kaplan-Meier survival curves show that patients randomized to L-dopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE) had greater risk of developing dyskinesia than patients receiving L-dopa/carbidopa (LC) (Cox proportional hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0–1.65; p = 0.038).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Patients in the LCE group received greater L-dopa dose equivalents than LC-treated patients (p < 0.001).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“There was a trend to improved UPDRS scores in LCE-treated subjects (difference at final visit, 1.2 points; p = 0.1).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Survival time estimates for the first quartile of patients were 90.7 weeks (95% CI, 65.3–104.0) for the LCE group and 117.1 weeks (95% CI, 92.1–132.6) for LC-treated patients.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A total of 541 subjects (72.6%) completed their study drug treatment as planned; 265 (71.0%) in the LCE group and 276 (74.2%) in the LC group.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“LCE showed a trend toward improved UPDRS scores and reduced wearing off compared to LC, consistent with the approved indication of entacapone as an adjunct to L-dopa.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The mean L-dopa dose at the end of the titration period was 305.2 and 306.8mg/day in the LCE and LC groups, respectively, and they remained comparable throughout the study.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“This analysis indicates that LCE-treated patients received significantly more L-dopa dose equivalents than LC patients at the completion of titration, at the time of onset of dyskinesia, and at the final study visit (see Table 5).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“STRIDE-PD does not support the early administration of L-dopa in combination with entacapone to reduce the risk of motor complications using the dosing regimen employed in this trial.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Baseline characteristicLevodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (n = 373)Levodopa/carbidopa (n = 372)
Age, years, mean ± SD“60.6±8.7”“59.8±8.2”
Men, no. (%)“245 (65.7%)”“222 (59.7%)”
Caucasian, no. (%)“352 (94.4%)”“357 (96.0%)”
Weight, kg, mean ± SD“79.7±15.8”“79.1±16.9”
Duration of disease, years, mean ± SD“2.0±1.6”“2.0±1.7”
UPDRS total (II + III), mean ± SD“32.7±12.6”“31.5±11.9”
UPDRS Part III (motor), mean ± SD“23.1±9.5”“22.4±9.0”
Hoehn & Yahr stage, mean ± SD“1.9±0.5”“1.9±0.5”
PDQ-39, mean ± SD“25.2±15.0”“22.9±13.7”
Previous antiparkinson medication, no. (%)“263 (70.5%)”“266 (71.5%)”
Dopamine agonist use, no. (%)“217 (58.2%)”“217 (58.3%)”
Levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone compared with levodopa/carbidopa: dyskinesia, wearing off, and dose equivalents
OutcomeLevodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (n = 373)Levodopa/carbidopa (n = 372)P value
Dyskinesia frequency at 208 weeks, no. (%)“144 (38.6)”“123 (33.1)”“0.110”
Time to dyskinesia, first-quartile estimate, weeks (95% CI)“90.7 (65.3–104.0)”“117.1 (92.1–132.6)”“0.038”
Disabling dyskinesia, no. (%)“32 (8.6)”“23 (6.2)”“0.201”
Dyskinesia by direct observation, no. (%)“130 (34.9)”“110 (29.6)”“0.118”
Dyskinesia by patient history, no. (%)“141 (37.8)”“113 (30.4)”“0.031”
Dyskinesia by direct observation or patient history on 2 consecutive visits, no. (%)“120 (32.2)”“99 (26.6)”“0.092”
Dyskinesia by direct observation on 2 consecutive visits, no. (%)“84 (22.5)”“77 (20.7)”“0.550”
Dyskinesia frequency at 134 weeks, no.“128”“103”“0.016”
UPDRS II + III, change from baseline to week 130“8.4”“7.2”“0.18”
Wearing off frequency at 208 weeks, no. (%)“165 (44.2%)”“189 (50.8%)”“0.07”
Wearing off frequency at 130 weeks, no. (%)“139 (45.6%)”“161 (48.3%)”“0.53”
Time to wearing off, weeks, mean ± SD“72.9±50.9”“78.5±51.5”“0.53”
Time to wearing off, first-quartile estimate, weeks“78.0”“76.0”“0.6”
Time to wearing off, hazard ratio (95% CI)“0.94 (0.76–1.17)”Not applicableNot reported
Hoehn & Yahr stage, change from baseline“0.4”“0.3”“NS”
Schwab & England score, change from baseline“−1.4”“−1.4”“0.95”
PDQ-39, change from baseline“2.2”“2.4”“0.77”
Levodopa dose equivalents at end of titration“533.4”“420.1”“0.001”
Levodopa dose equivalents at onset of dyskinesia“659.9”“535.2”“0.001”
Levodopa dose equivalents at final study visit“524.1”“432.6”“0.001”
Adverse events with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone compared with levodopa/carbidopa in early disease
Adverse eventLevodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (n = 373), no. (%)Levodopa/carbidopa (n = 371), no. (%)
Any adverse event“348 (93.3)”“336 (90.6)”
Nausea“114 (30.6)”“71 (19.1)”
Diarrhea“66 (17.7)”“28 (7.5)”
Dizziness“59 (15.8)”“46 (12.4)”
Somnolence“37 (9.9)”“28 (7.5)”
Vomiting“22 (5.9)”“10 (2.7)”
Dyskinesia“21 (5.6)”“10 (2.7)”
Orthostatic hypotension“20 (5.4)”“13 (3.5)”
Myocardial infarction“7 (1.9)”“0 (0.0)”
Prostate cancer“9 (2.4)”“2 (0.5)”
Skin cancer“7 (1.9)”“12 (3.2)”
Amantadine
Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists
On-demand therapies
Device-aided therapies
Deep brain stimulation in early motor complications

“In this 2-year trial, we randomly assigned 251 patients with Parkinson's disease and early motor complications (mean age, 52 years; mean duration of disease, 7.5 years) to undergo neurostimulation plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“For the primary outcome of quality of life, the mean score for the neurostimulation group improved by 7.8 points, and that for the medical-therapy group worsened by 0.2 points (between-group difference in mean change from baseline to 2 years, 8.0 points; P = 0.002).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Time with good mobility and no troublesome dyskinesia, as recorded by the patients in daily diaries, increased by 20% in the neurostimulation group, with a between-group difference of 1.9 hours (P = 0.01)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Time with bad mobility was significantly shortened in the neurostimulation group, with a between-group difference of 1.8 hours (P = 0.006)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The levodopa-equivalent daily dose was reduced by 39% in the neurostimulation group but was increased by 21% in the medical-therapy group” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Serious adverse events related to surgical implantation or the neurostimulation device occurred in 17.7% of patients.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Deep brain stimulation in early motor complications: serious adverse events
Serious adverse eventNeurostimulation (N = 124), participants with event (%)Medical therapy (N = 127), participants with event (%)
Any serious adverse event“68 (54.8)”“56 (44.1)”
Death, all by suicide“2 (1.6)”“1 (0.8)”
Event related to medication or stimulation“24 (19.4)”“38 (29.9)”
Worsening of mobility“5 (4.0)”“11 (8.7)”
Motor fluctuations“0”“7 (5.5)”
Psychosis or hallucinations“0”“6 (4.7)”
Impulse control disorder“1 (0.8)”“5 (3.9)”
Depression“6 (4.8)”“1 (0.8)”
Suicide attempt“2 (1.6)”“2 (1.6)”
Event related to surgery or device“22 (17.7)”Not applicable
Impaired wound healing“4 (3.2)”Not applicable
Intracerebral abscess or edema“2 (1.6)”Not applicable
Dislocation of device“4 (3.2)”Not applicable
Reoperation necessary“2 (1.6)”Not applicable
Deep brain stimulation in early motor complications: trial population and funding
Focused ultrasound pallidotomy

“In the active-treatment group, 45 patients (69%) had a response, as compared with 7 (32%) in the control group (difference, 37 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 15 to 60; P = 0.003).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Pallidotomy-related adverse events in the active-treatment group included dysarthria, gait disturbance, loss of taste, visual disturbance, and facial weakness.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“At 6 months, among 50 patients who initially underwent FUSA of the globus pallidus internus and had available data, 38 (76%) had a response; 53 of 65 patients in the active-treatment group were available for the 12-month follow-up, and 37 of 53 (70%) had a response at 12 months” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Of the 45 patients in the active-treatment group who had a response at 3 months, 6 were lost to follow-up and 9 no longer had a response at 12 months” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Gait disturbance and loss of taste were mild, and they resolved; however, moderate dysarthria in one patient persisted for 1 year. Visual disturbance and mild facial weakness were observed in one patient each at 3 months and were resolved by 1 year.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Fifteen adverse events in the active-treatment group (10 patients) and 1 adverse event in the control group fulfilled FDA criteria for a serious adverse event during the 12-month follow-up.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The nonfatal pulmonary embolism, which occurred within 1 week after treatment, was the only serious adverse event categorized by the data and safety monitoring board as procedure-related.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Focused ultrasound subthalamotomy

“Among 40 enrolled patients, 27 were assigned to focused ultrasound subthalamotomy (active treatment) and 13 to the sham procedure (control).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Focused ultrasound subthalamotomy in one hemisphere improved motor features of Parkinson's disease in selected patients with asymmetric signs. Adverse events included speech and gait disturbances, weakness on the treated side, and dyskinesia.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“the between-group difference was 8.1 points (95% CI, 6.0 to 10.3; P<0.001)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The change from baseline to 12 months in the MDS-UPDRS III score for the more affected side among 25 patients with available data in the active-treatment group was 11.6 points (95% CI, 9.9 to 13.3).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Among the 27 patients in the active-treatment group, new-onset dyskinesia on the treated side occurred in 12 patients, persisted in 3 at the 4-month primary safety evaluation, and persisted in 2 at 12 months.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Speech disturbance developed in 15 patients (56%) in the active-treatment group and persisted in 3 patients at 4 months and in 1 patient at 12 months.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Strength in both patients had recovered at 12 months, but hand clumsiness and asymmetric stride persisted in both.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In 6 patients in the active-treatment group, some of these deficits were present at 12 months.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“No complications of the active procedure were detected by MRI, except for perilesional edema, which resolved by 4 months in all the patients in this group” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“There were no intracerebral hemorrhages.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Limitations of current therapies
Summary

No available therapy has been shown to modify the course of Parkinson's disease. The 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society evidence-based review found no clinically useful interventions to prevent or delay progression, and in the LEAP delayed-start trial (445 participants) early levodopa had no disease-modifying effect over 80 weeks. Treatment is therefore symptomatic, and each symptomatic class carries a trade-off.

Initial levodopa gives greater motor benefit than initial dopamine agonists, but long-term oral use is complicated by motor and nonmotor fluctuations in up to 80% of patients. In STRIDE-PD (747 participants), dyskinesia was present at week 134 in 42% of participants who started levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone and 32% of those who started levodopa/carbidopa. In the 5-year follow-up of LEAP, 46 of 160 early-start and 62 of 161 delayed-start participants had dyskinesia.

Adjunctive oral therapy for motor fluctuations yields off-time reductions near the 1-hour minimal clinically important difference. In a network meta-analysis of 74 randomized controlled trials (18,693 participants), the weighted mean reduction in daily off-time relative to placebo was 1.1 hours for dopamine agonists, 0.9 hours for MAO-B inhibitors, and 0.8 hours for COMT inhibitors, and all three classes increased the odds of dyskinesia (odds ratios 3.0, 1.6, and 3.3). Head-to-head evidence is limited. In the PD MED trial of initial therapy (1,620 participants), 179 of 632 participants (28%) assigned dopamine agonists and 104 of 460 (23%) assigned MAO-B inhibitors discontinued their allocated treatment because of side effects, compared with 11 of 528 (2%) assigned levodopa.

The currently available dopamine agonists act mainly on D2/D3 receptors and carry neuropsychiatric and sleep-related risks. In a cross-sectional study of 3,090 participants, impulse control disorders were present in 17.1% of those taking a dopamine agonist and 6.9% of those not taking one (odds ratio 2.72). In a longitudinal cohort of 306 participants without impulse control disorders at baseline, the 5-year cumulative incidence was 46.1% overall and 51.5% among dopamine agonist users. The pooled relative risk of somnolence with pramipexole or ropinirole compared with placebo was 4.98. Reducing or stopping a dopamine agonist can cause dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome, which occurred in 5 of 26 participants (19%) in a retrospective cohort and 12 of 51 (24%) in a prospective cohort.

Device-aided therapies add procedural and tolerability burdens. In EARLYSTIM, serious adverse events related to surgical implantation or the device occurred in 17.7% of participants. Discontinuation with subcutaneous foslevodopa/foscarbidopa was 35.1% in the 12-week randomized trial and 44.8% in the 12-month open-label study.

Levodopa motor complications: pooled risk estimate at 4 to 6 years and its clinical significance
Duration of levodopa therapy, modern era seriesDyskinesia, median %, unweightedDyskinesia, median %, weighted by NDyskinesia, rangeDyskinesia, total NMotor fluctuations, median %, unweightedMotor fluctuations, median %, weighted by NMotor fluctuations, rangeMotor fluctuations, total N
7–12 months“7.5”“7.0”“0–38.9%”“432”“1.5”“3.0”“0–16%”“112”
13–24 months“25.9”“28.7”“10.3–35.4%”“575”“45.7”“47.9”“0–50.4%”“700”
2.5–3.5 years“28.0”“26.9”“13.2–40%”“747”“23.3”“31.0”“5–35.1%”“849”
4–6 years“38.5”“36.2”“8–64%”“1,599”“42.1”“40.8”“11.8–60%”“1,817”
9–15+ years“87.8”“87.8”“60.7–95.5%”“514”“69.6”“69.6”“40.9–82.9%”“514”
Levodopa equivalent daily dose 3 and 5 years after early or delayed levodopa initiation
VisitEarly-start group, LEDD change from baseline, median (IQR)Delayed-start group, LEDD change from baseline, median (IQR)Estimated difference, square root transformed (SE)P value
3 years“400 (300–600)”“450 (300–600)”“−0.61 (0.69)”“0.38”
5 years“600 (400–800)”“600 (450–800)”“−0.16 (0.78)”“0.84”
Dyskinesia risk with levodopa and dopamine agonist initiation strategies
Dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome: review

“Dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome affects even up to 24% of PD patients treated with DAs in whom the medication was tapered.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome remains a therapeutic challenge as it is refractory to levodopa (LD), other PD therapies, anti-depressants, and anti-psychotics.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Based on a thorough literature review, it may develop in around 8–24% of PD patients during DAs withdrawal” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The majority of the literature agrees that the major risk factors for the development of DAWS are as follows: high cumulative DAs exposure, high baseline dose (the higher the dose and the longer the duration of use, the greater the risk of developing DAWS), high peak DAs dose (≥ 150 mg LEDD), diagnosis of ICD in the past, increased vulnerability to addictive behaviors, and neurobiological causes such as mesocorticolimbic dysfunction” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Symptoms of DAWS can last for several months or even years or resolve spontaneously without management” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“There is no specific treatment of DAWS with proven efficacy. Treatment in this syndrome should always be individualized, symptomatic, and long-term. This syndrome is refractory to LD. Reintroduction of DAs seems to be the only procedure alleviating the symptoms of DAWS” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Place in treatment, anticipated use, and care setting
Summary

Tavapadon was studied in 2 settings. As monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease, TEMPO-1 (529 participants) and TEMPO-2 (304 participants) enrolled adults aged 40 to 80 years with disease duration under 3 years who were treatment-naive or had less than 3 months of prior dopaminergic treatment. As an adjunct to levodopa, TEMPO-3 (507 participants) enrolled adults with motor fluctuations on a fixed levodopa dose. The company describes the drug as studied as a once-daily oral treatment.

In early disease, tavapadon enters a setting in which the AAN guideline asks clinicians to counsel on the benefits and risks of levodopa, dopamine agonists, and MAO-B inhibitors, permits a dopamine agonist as initial therapy in select patients younger than 60 years at higher risk of dyskinesia, and advises against dopamine agonists in patients older than 70 years or with impulse control disorders, cognitive impairment, excessive daytime sleepiness, or hallucinations.

As an adjunct, tavapadon joins dopamine agonists, MAO-B inhibitors, COMT inhibitors, extended-release amantadine, and istradefylline. In pooled analyses, oral adjunct classes reduce off-time by 0.8 to 1.1 hours per day relative to placebo; TEMPO-3 reported a 1.1-hour increase in good on-time relative to placebo.

The proposed differentiation is D1/D5 selectivity, hypothesized to lower the risk of impulse control disorders, somnolence, and other adverse events attributed to D2/D3 stimulation. A 2026 meta-analysis rated the estimates for impulse control disorder (relative risk 2.02, 95% CI 0.51 to 8.00; 1 trial) and somnolence (pooled relative risk 1.20, 95% CI 0.37 to 3.92) as very low certainty and found that no trial used an active comparator or lasted longer than 27 weeks. A 2026 review stated that studies of drugs selectively targeting D1 receptors do not support improved safety and tolerability.

NICE advises seeking specialist advice before modifying therapy once dyskinesia or motor fluctuations develop. Analysts quoted at approval expected gradual uptake while Medicare coverage was negotiated.

Background and interpretation of the flexible-dose monotherapy trial

“Current dopaminergic therapies for Parkinson’s disease carry significant limitations: levodopa can cause long-term motor complications, while D2/D3 receptor-targeting dopamine agonists can produce non-motor adverse effects.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Although a broad range of investigative therapies are in development for symptomatic treatment of Parkinson’s disease, many recent trials have focused on the treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease, and few novel therapies have been approved for monotherapy in early-stage Parkinson’s disease.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A key unmet need for Parkinson’s disease is the availability of treatment modalities that provide a balance of dopamine signalling to improve motor symptoms while reducing the risk of specific adverse events associated with current D2/D3 receptor-targeting dopamine agonists.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Tavapadon showed significant and clinically meaningful improvements in Parkinson’s disease motor symptoms, with low incidence of somnolence and impulse control disorders. However, the short observation period limits conclusions about long-term tolerability.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The results of TEMPO-2, alongside the evidence from the TEMPO-1 and TEMPO-3 trials, provide a comprehensive body of evidence supporting the efficacy of tavapadon across the different stages of Parkinson’s disease.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“More data are required to compare tavapadon with approved D2/D3 dopamine agonists.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Heterogeneity of treatment effect
Concomitant dopamine agonists and dyskinesia with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone

“These effects were more pronounced in patients receiving dopamine agonists at baseline.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In patients receiving dopamine agonists, LCE-treated patients had a greater risk of dyskinesia (hazard ration, 1.55; p = 0.006), and a greater frequency of dyskinesia (41.9% vs 31.3%).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“However, there was no difference in the time to onset (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.68–1.45; p = 0.96) or frequency (34% vs 35.5%) of dyskinesia between patients in the LCE and LC groups for those not receiving dopamine agonists.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Kaplan-Meier survival curves show that among patients who were receiving dopamine agonists at baseline, those randomized to L-dopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE) had greater risk of developing dyskinesia than those receiving L-dopa/carbidopa (LC) (Cox proportional hazard ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–2.13; p = 0.006).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The estimated first quartile time to onset of dyskinesia was 78.9 weeks for the LCE group and 117.4 weeks for LC.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The adjusted mean difference in change from baseline to final visit in UPDRS score between the LCE and LC groups was greater in those receiving concomitant dopamine agonists (difference, 1.8; p = 0.08) than in those who were not (difference, −0.1; p = 0.95).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Patients on dopamine agonists were younger (58.7±8.6 vs 62.3±7.8 years; p < 0.001), had longer disease duration (2.5±1.6 vs 1.3±1.5 years; p < 0.001)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Patients receiving dopamine agonists had a higher frequency of dyskinesias, and LCE was significantly more prone than LC to induce dyskinesias in this subpopulation.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“This is likely because patients on dopamine agonists were younger at baseline, were about 5 years younger at disease onset, had longer disease duration, and probably had greater disease severity as they had comparable baseline UPDRS scores despite receiving dopamine agonists.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“It is interesting that LCE did not increase the frequency or shorten the time to onset of dyskinesia in patients not on dopamine agonists, despite higher L-dopa dose equivalents, similar to what was observed in the FIRST-STEP study.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Dyskinesia frequency by age, sex, body weight, disease duration, and MAO-B inhibitor use with levodopa/carbidopa with or without entacapone
SubgroupLevodopa/carbidopa/entacapone, no./total (%)Levodopa/carbidopa, no./total (%)P value
Age <65 years“102/223 (45.7)”“95/253 (37.5)”“0.021”
Age ≥65 years“42/150 (28.0)”“28/119 (23.5)”“0.162”
Men“90/245 (36.7)”“65/222 (29.3)”“0.043”
Women“54/128 (42.2)”“58/150 (38.7)”“0.191”
Body weight <75 kg“61/142 (43.0)”“67/164 (40.9)”“0.374”
Body weight ≥75 kg“83/231 (35.9)”“56/208 (26.9)”“0.018”
Disease duration <2 years“75/157 (47.8)”“50/168 (29.8)”“<0.001”
Disease duration ≥2 years“69/216 (31.9)”“73/204 (35.8)”“0.514”
Without MAO-B inhibitor“123/335 (36.7)”“115/343 (33.5)”“0.170”
With MAO-B inhibitor“21/38 (55.3)”“8/29 (27.6)”“0.005”
Care management intervention strategies
Tapering dopamine agonists: approach and management of withdrawal syndrome

“There is scarce information or guidelines on how to discontinue DAs.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“When reducing the DAs dose, the general rule is to individualize the process, reducing in small doses, and with careful observation. Authors suggest even slower tapering than proposed (according to available sources) in Table 3.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The implementation of these new methods implicates the reduction or withdrawal of previously used medications. Dopamine agonists are usually the first ones to be reduced. Thus, advanced therapies can be considered as a factor possibly contributing to the development of DAWS” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A practical conclusion is to cautiously reduce DAs and LD after implementation of advanced therapies. Our suggestion is even to increase this time and prolong the reduction at small steps during the first 6 months after surgery or pump therapy initiation.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Therapeutic decision: consider reintroducing DAs (another type and dose), carefully monitor for ICD or other side effects, consider personalized symptomatic treatment, consider non-pharmacologic treatment (psychotherapy, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, psychosocial support).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Nevertheless, the most important management is the slow-as-possible tapering of DAs, and only when necessary.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Tapering dopamine agonists: proposed reduction rates by agent
Dopamine agonist and dose settingQuoted rate of reduction
Pramipexole, low doses“At low doses (e.g., ≤ 1.5 mg/d.): reduce by 25–33% every 7–14 days”
Pramipexole, higher doses“At higher doses (e.g., > 1.5 mg/d.): reduce by 10–25% every 1–2 weeks”
Pramipexole, long-term treatment or impulse control disorder“Long-term treatment or ICD, the rate 10% every 1–2 weeks”
Pramipexole extended release“Reduction by 0.375 mg every second day”
Rotigotine“Reduction by 2 mg every second day, until discontinuation”
Ropinirole immediate release (one of two listed rates)“2 mg every second day”
Piribedil“50 mg every third day”
Apomorphine pump“0.5 mg/h every second day”
Other product development or post-marketing obligations required by the FDA
Postmarketing requirements and commitments in the FDA approval letter

No evidence found.

Ongoing post-approval monitoring
Expected outcomes of therapy
Summary

Available treatments, tavapadon included, are symptomatic. Clinically meaningful thresholds used in this indication are about 1 hour per day for change in off-time or on-time without troublesome dyskinesia (MDS review threshold 1 hour; pramipexole extended-release trials 1.0 to 1.3 hours), 4 points for MDS-UPDRS Part III in the MDS review (anchor-based estimates of -3.25 points for improvement and 4.63 points for worsening), and 4.9 points for combined MDS-UPDRS Parts II and III as cited by TEMPO-1. In early disease, tavapadon reduced the combined Parts II and III score from baseline by 9.7 points (5 mg) and 10.2 points (15 mg) at week 26 in TEMPO-1, which the investigators described as approximately twice the minimal clinically important difference, and a meta-analysis of 2 monotherapy trials estimated a placebo-adjusted improvement of 10.55 points. As an adjunct, TEMPO-3 reported a least-squares mean reduction in off-time of 1.88 hours from baseline and a placebo-adjusted increase in good on-time of 1.1 hours; the pooled estimate from 2 adjunctive trials was 1.09 hours. No randomized trial of tavapadon identified by that meta-analysis lasted longer than 27 weeks.