Section 3 of 6
Product information and disease description
441 evidence topics · 154 sources
Product description
Phase of product development
Regulatory submission: NDA submitted September 2025
Launch: Expected by Citi analysts in the third quarter of 2026
FDA approval: September 2026
| Field | Quoted record |
|---|---|
| Drug name | “Juvmo” |
| Active ingredient | “tavapadon” |
| Approval date | “9/25/2026” |
| FDA-approved use on approval date | “To treat Parkinson’s disease in adults” |
Planned submission timing stated at the final Phase 3 readout
Development history: discovery at Pfizer and transfer to Cerevel Therapeutics
Development history: early-phase trials under Pfizer, including a terminated Phase 2 trial in advanced disease
Development history: acquisition of Cerevel Therapeutics by AbbVie
Development funding agreements with milestone and royalty repayment on approval
FDA expedited program designations
No evidence found.
Product information
Generic, brand name and therapeutic class of product
Brand name, generic name, and established pharmacologic class
Chemical name, formula, and molecular weight
Therapeutic class: selective dopamine D1/D5 receptor partial agonist
Dosage forms and strengths
Tablet descriptions by strength
| Strength | Quoted description |
|---|---|
| 0.25 mg | “Round, orange, film-coated” |
| 1 mg | “Rectangle, orange, film-coated” |
| 5 mg | “Diamond, purple, film-coated” |
| 10 mg | “Oval, purple, film-coated” |
| 15 mg | “Rectangle, purple, film-coated” |
Inactive ingredients
Bioequivalence of the 15 mg tablet and three 5 mg tablets
Relative bioavailability of clinical and commercial tablets
Average sales price and wholesale acquisition cost
Reported list price of tavapadon, attributed to a William Blair analyst and to ICER public meeting slides; no AbbVie price statement published
| Drug | Quoted estimate | Quoted annual cost used in model |
|---|---|---|
| Tavapadon | “Reported WAC” | “$58,800” |
Launch pricing not disclosed at approval
Branded and generic Parkinson's disease comparators: United States National Average Drug Acquisition Cost, week of 23 September 2026
| Product and strength | Quoted record description | Quoted acquisition cost per unit | Quoted pricing unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opicapone 50 mg capsule | “ONGENTYS 50 MG CAPSULE” | “24.76028” | “EA” |
| Safinamide 100 mg tablet | “XADAGO 100 MG TABLET” | “36.32581” | “EA” |
| Carbidopa-levodopa extended-release 36.25 mg-145 mg capsule | “RYTARY ER 36.25 MG-145 MG CAP” | “3.97630” | “EA” |
| Pramipexole 1 mg tablet (generic) | “PRAMIPEXOLE 1 MG TABLET” | “0.06192” | “EA” |
| Ropinirole 3 mg tablet (generic) | “ROPINIROLE HCL 3 MG TABLET” | “0.07680” | “EA” |
| Carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 mg tablet (generic) | “CARBIDOPA-LEVODOPA 25-100 TAB” | “0.07589” | “EA” |
Rotigotine, monoamine oxidase B inhibitor, catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor, and amantadine comparators: United States National Average Drug Acquisition Cost, week of 23 September 2026
| Product and strength | Quoted record description | Quoted acquisition cost per unit | Quoted pricing unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rotigotine 2 mg/24 hours transdermal patch (Neupro) | “NEUPRO 2 MG”/ “24 HR PATCH” | “28.26022” | “EA” |
| Rasagiline 1 mg tablet (generic) | “RASAGILINE MESYLATE 1 MG TAB” | “0.92551” | “EA” |
| Selegiline 5 mg capsule (generic) | “SELEGILINE HCL 5 MG CAPSULE” | “0.75631” | “EA” |
| Entacapone 200 mg tablet (generic) | “ENTACAPONE 200 MG TABLET” | “0.32457” | “EA” |
| Carbidopa-levodopa-entacapone 25-100-200 mg tablet (generic) | “CARBIDOPA-LEVODOPA-ENTACAPONE 25-100-200 MG TAB” | “0.69542” | “EA” |
| Amantadine 100 mg capsule (generic) | “AMANTADINE 100 MG CAPSULE” | “0.14251” | “EA” |
Gocovri and Nourianz: wholesale acquisition cost filings with the California Department of Health Care Access and Information
| Product and package | Quoted manufacturer | Quoted drug product description | Quoted WAC effective date | Quoted WAC increase amount (USD) | Quoted WAC after increase (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gocovri (amantadine extended-release) 137 mg, 60 capsules | “Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc.” | “Gocovri Oral Capsule Extended Release 24 Hour 137 MG Package Size 60 Package Quantity 1” | “01/01/2023” | “149.67” | “3142.96” |
| Nourianz (istradefylline) 20 mg, 90 tablets | “Kyowa Kirin, Inc.” | “Nourianz Oral Tablet 20 MG, 90 Each, Bottle” | “01/05/2024” | “270.39” | “5678.15” |
| Nourianz (istradefylline) 40 mg, 90 tablets | “Kyowa Kirin, Inc.” | “Nourianz Oral Tablet 40 MG, 90 Each, Bottle” | “01/05/2024” | “270.39” | “5678.15” |
Branded Parkinson's disease adjunctive therapies: Medicare Part D spending, 2024
| Brand (generic) | Quoted total spending, 2024 (USD) | Quoted beneficiaries, 2024 | Quoted average spending per dosage unit, 2024 (USD) | Quoted average spending per beneficiary, 2024 (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ongentys (opicapone) | “15354274.26” | “3276” | “21.749437532” | “4686.8969048” |
| Xadago (safinamide) | “7677985.91” | “759” | “37.323213575” | “10115.923465” |
| Nourianz (istradefylline) | “50721486.03” | “3610” | “62.728700759” | “14050.273139” |
| Neupro (rotigotine) | “90068151.36” | “14920” | “27.60090549” | “6036.7393673” |
| Gocovri (amantadine extended-release) | “99842781.69” | “4906” | “55.422069989” | “20351.15811” |
| Inbrija (inhaled levodopa) | “27688440.22” | “2431” | “20.495381225” | “11389.732711” |
| Rytary (carbidopa-levodopa extended-release) | “271784313.29” | “34890” | “4.2578095671” | “7789.7481596” |
Monoamine oxidase B inhibitors, catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, and amantadine products: Medicare Part D beneficiaries, claims, and spending per dosage unit, 2024
| Brand name in the record (generic) | Quoted beneficiaries, 2024 | Quoted claims, 2024 | Quoted average spending per dosage unit, 2024 (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rasagiline Mesylate (rasagiline, generic) | “31737” | “146909” | “3.2972061315” |
| Selegiline HCl (selegiline, generic) | “11299” | “50495” | “0.9994398084” |
| Xadago (safinamide) | “759” | “4385” | “37.323213575” |
| Entacapone (entacapone, generic) | “26289” | “128596” | “0.9670266984” |
| Carbidopa-Levodopa-Entacapone (carbidopa, levodopa, and entacapone, generic) | “9136” | “50738” | “1.3434262576” |
| Ongentys (opicapone) | “3276” | “16686” | “21.749437532” |
| Amantadine (amantadine, generic) | “104318” | “526882” | “0.5229425868” |
| Gocovri (amantadine extended-release) | “4906” | “30705” | “55.422069989” |
Out-of-pocket costs of Parkinson's disease medications after generic entry, United States commercial claims
American hospital formulary service (AHFS), or other drug classification
Established pharmacologic class in the prescribing information
Classification among dopamine agonists by receptor selectivity
AHFS classification
No evidence found.
Indication
Populations in which efficacy was established: without and with concomitant levodopa
Pharmacology
Mechanism of action
Mechanism of action in the prescribing information
Receptor binding affinity and selectivity
Intrinsic activity and potency at D1 and D5 receptors
Striatal direct pathway as the site of D1/D5 receptor action
Non-catechol structure and reduced receptor desensitization
Receptor internalization and binding kinetics in vitro
G protein subtype selectivity: Gαolf and Gαs
Pharmacodynamics
QTc interval in the Phase 1 studies in Parkinson's disease
Blood pressure effects in the Phase 3 trials
Cardiovascular effects in early-phase trials
Onset and duration of motor effect after single doses
Nonhuman primate model: motor effect, dyskinesia, and receptor occupancy
Striatal and cortical electrophysiology in mice
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption and dose proportionality
Effect of food
Metabolism, excretion, and half-life
Phase 1 pharmacokinetics in Parkinson's disease: single and multiple doses
Half-life relative to levodopa and other dopamine agonists
Contraindications/Warnings/Precautions/Adverse effects
Warnings and precautions
Summary of warnings and precautions in the prescribing information highlights
Hypotension and orthostatic hypotension
Impulse control and compulsive behaviors
Hallucinations and psychotic-like behavior
Drug-disease interaction: major psychotic disorder
Adverse reactions without concomitant levodopa: most common reactions and discontinuations
Adverse reactions in at least 3% of participants and at least 2% more than placebo, Studies 1 and 2 (without concomitant levodopa)
| Adverse reaction | Juvmo (N=505), % | Placebo (N=328), % |
|---|---|---|
| Nausea | “27” | “2” |
| Headache (multiple related terms) | “17” | “5” |
| Dizziness | “14” | “4” |
| Fatigue (includes asthenia) | “10” | “3” |
| Dysgeusia | “8” | “0” |
| Vomiting | “7” | “<1” |
| Dry mouth | “5” | “<1” |
| Anxiety | “5” | “2” |
| Hypotension | “4” | “1” |
| Dyspepsia | “4” | “1” |
| Abnormal dreams | “4” | “<1” |
| Orthostatic hypotension | “4” | “<1” |
| Hallucination (multiple related terms) | “3” | “0” |
| Gastroesophageal reflux disease | “3” | “<1” |
| Constipation | “3” | “1” |
Adverse reactions in at least 3% of participants and at least 2% more than placebo, Study 3 (with concomitant levodopa)
Nonclinical carcinogenicity findings
Special populations
Geriatric use and risk of hallucinations
Renal and hepatic impairment, age, sex, body weight, and race
Drug/Drug, drug/disease interactions
Effects of other drugs on tavapadon
CYP3A inhibitors and inducers: prescribing information summary
Strong and moderate CYP3A inhibitors: mechanism and clinical effect
Strong CYP3A inhibitor: itraconazole
Moderate CYP3A inhibitor: fluconazole (model-predicted)
Strong and moderate CYP3A inducers: mechanism and clinical effect
Strong CYP3A inducer: carbamazepine
In vitro substrate profile for enzymes and transporters
Counseling on herbal products and changes in concomitant medications
Effects of tavapadon on other drugs
CYP3A substrates
CYP2C8 substrates
BCRP substrates
In vitro inhibition and induction profile
Dosing and administration
Dosage
Titration schedule
| Treatment days | Quoted dosage |
|---|---|
| Days 1 to 4 | “0.25 mg once daily” |
| Days 5 to 8 | “0.5 mg once daily” |
| Days 9 to 12 | “0.75 mg once daily” |
| Days 13 to 16 | “1 mg once daily” |
| Days 17 to 20 | “1.5 mg once daily” |
| Days 21 to 24 | “2.25 mg once daily” |
| Days 25 to 40 | “3 mg once daily” |
| Maintenance, day 41 and thereafter | “5 mg once daily” |
| Maximum dosage | “15 mg once daily” |
Dose escalation above 5 mg and titration interval
Dosage modification when initiating a CYP3A inhibitor during maintenance
| Current maintenance dosage | Strong CYP3A inhibitor | Moderate CYP3A inhibitor |
|---|---|---|
| 5 mg once daily | “5 mg every 7 days” | “5 mg every 3 days” |
| 10 mg once daily | “10 mg every 7 days” | “10 mg every 3 days” |
| 15 mg once daily | “15 mg every 7 days” | “15 mg every 3 days” |
CYP3A inhibitors during titration and after discontinuation
Dosage for patients already on long-term moderate CYP3A inducers
| Treatment days | Quoted dosage |
|---|---|
| Days 1 to 4 | “0.25 mg twice daily” |
| Days 5 to 8 | “0.5 mg twice daily” |
| Days 9 to 12 | “0.75 mg twice daily” |
| Days 13 to 16 | “1 mg twice daily” |
| Days 17 to 20 | “1.5 mg twice daily” |
| Days 21 to 24 | “2.25 mg twice daily” |
| Days 25 to 40 | “3 mg twice daily” |
| Maintenance, day 41 and thereafter | “5 mg twice daily” |
| Maximum dosage | “45 mg daily” |
Moderate CYP3A inducers started during maintenance, and strong CYP3A inducers
Administration
Titration pack
Patient counseling on orthostatic symptoms during initiation and dose increases
Access and distribution
Package configurations and National Drug Codes
| Presentation | Quoted package configuration | Quoted NDC |
|---|---|---|
| 5 mg tablets | “Bottle of 30” | “0074-6105-30” |
| 10 mg tablets | “Bottle of 30” | “0074-6210-30” |
| 15 mg tablets | “Bottle of 30” | “0074-6315-30” |
| Titration pack (0.25 mg and 1 mg tablets) | “Each carton contains 6 weekly blister cards containing the following total number of tablets:” | “0074-6090-40” |
Security interest held by development funding investors
Co-prescribed/Concomitant therapies
Monotherapy trials: concomitant MAO-B inhibitor permitted
Adjunctive trial: fixed background levodopa
Adjusting other dopaminergic medications for dyskinesia
Antipsychotic medications in patients with Parkinson's disease
Anticipated role alongside existing therapies for advanced disease
Effect of tavapadon on quality measures
Product-specific effect on quality measures
No evidence found.
American Academy of Neurology measure: assessment of impulse control disorders in patients taking Parkinson's disease medications
American Academy of Neurology measure: assessment of dopaminergic medication-related motor complications
Merit-based Incentive Payment System 2026 measure: cognitive assessment in Parkinson's disease
Merit-based Incentive Payment System 2026 measure: rehabilitative therapy referral in Parkinson's disease
Product comparison
Cardiovascular effects of tavapadon and other oral or transdermal dopamine agonists
Hypotension risk in relation to intrinsic activity
Receptor mode of action of dopamine agonists used or in development for Parkinson's disease
| Drug | Quoted mode of action | Quoted indication | Quoted phase of development |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pramipexole | “D2 agonist” | “PD motor symptoms and motor fluctuations” | “In clinical use” |
| Ropinirole | “D2 agonist” | “PD motor symptoms and motor fluctuations” | “In clinical use” |
| Rotigotine | “D2 > D1 agonist” | “PD motor symptoms and motor fluctuations” | “In clinical use” |
| Apomorphine continuous subcutaneous infusion | “D1 and D2 agonist” | “Motor fluctuations” | “In clinical use” |
| Tavapadon | “Selective D1 partial agonist” | “PD motor symptoms and motor fluctuations” | “Phase 3 completed” |
Comparison with levodopa and D2/D3 agonists: mechanism, metabolism, half-life, and dosing frequency
| Parameter | Tavapadon | Levodopa | D2/D3 agonists (e.g., pramipexole) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanism of action | “Selective partial D1/D5 dopamine agonist” | “Non-selective dopamine precursor” | “D2/D3 full agonist” |
| Metabolism pathway | “Primarily CYP3A4” | “MAO-B and COMT” | “Various hepatic pathways” |
| Half-life | “~24 h” | “~60–90 min” | “5–12 h” |
| Dosing frequency | “Once daily” | “2–6 times daily” | “1–3 times daily” |
| Common side effects | “Nausea, headache, dizziness” | “Dyskinesias, severe on-off motor fluctuations” | “Impulsive behavior problems (e.g., gambling, hypersexual)” |
Rationale for D1/D5 selectivity relative to D2/D3 agonists
Pramipexole: receptor pharmacology, dosing frequency, half-life, and sleep-related warning
Ropinirole: receptor pharmacology, dosing frequency, half-life, and sleep-related warning
Rotigotine: receptor pharmacology, dosing frequency, half-life, and sleep-related warning
Tavapadon warnings and precautions for comparison with other dopamine agonists
Receptor selectivity and adverse effects of tavapadon compared with D2 agonists in a commentary
Place of product in therapy
Disease description
Definition and etiology
Clinical and pathological definition of Parkinson's disease
Parkinsonism as the core clinical feature
Parkinson's disease among the parkinsonian disorders
Clinical indicators of advanced Parkinson's disease
Multifactorial etiology and heritability
Genetic etiology: LRRK2 and GBA variants
Genetic etiology: causal and risk variants across ancestries
Genetic etiology: monogenic forms and polygenic risk
Genetic etiology: proportion of genetic cases by age at onset
Environmental etiology: pesticides and other exposures
Factors associated with lower risk: tobacco and caffeine
Family history, constipation, non-smoking, and other associated factors
Epidemiology
Incidence of Parkinson's disease
Incidence in North America among adults aged 45 and 65 years and older
Estimated number of new diagnoses per year in North America
Incidence by sex among adults aged 65 years and older
Incidence by age
Variation in incidence by case ascertainment method
Geographic variation in incidence among Medicare beneficiaries
Prevalence of Parkinson's disease
United States prevalence among adults aged 45 years and older, with projections to 2030
Regional variation in North American prevalence
Diagnosed prevalence in the United States, 2017, with projection to 2037
Global prevalence, 1990 to 2016
Global prevalence projected to 2050
Natural history, survival, and mortality
Prodromal phase before motor diagnosis
Postural instability, dependency, dementia, and death in population-based incidence cohorts
Mortality relative to people without Parkinson's disease
Independent predictors of mortality across cohort studies
| Prognostic factor | Studies finding the factor independently associated with increased mortality / studies that examined the association |
|---|---|
| Increasing age, at onset or at recruitment | “15/17” |
| Presence of dementia | “9/13” |
| Male sex | “6/17” |
| Higher Hoehn and Yahr stage | “5/8” |
| Postural instability and gait difficulty phenotype, prominent bradykinesia, or lack of tremor | “4/8” |
| Higher parkinsonian impairment score | “3/6” |
| Presence of psychosis or hallucinations | “2/4” |
| Presence of extensor plantar response | “2/2” |
Mortality and causes of death over 15 and 20 years in a levodopa-era incident cohort
Six-year survival among United States Medicare beneficiaries with incident Parkinson's disease
Trends in Parkinson's disease mortality in the United States, 1999 to 2019
Global deaths and disability-adjusted life-years
Motor complications and survival in a population-based cohort
Pathophysiology
Nigral dopaminergic neuron loss and Lewy pathology
Time course of nigrostriatal degeneration after diagnosis
Non-dopaminergic involvement
Spread of alpha-synuclein pathology and Braak staging
Cellular mechanisms shared by genetic and environmental causes
Striatal direct and indirect pathways and D1 and D2 dopamine receptors
Basal ganglia oscillatory activity in the off state and in levodopa-induced dyskinesia
Striatal pathway alterations underlying levodopa-induced dyskinesia
Presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms of levodopa-induced motor complications
Diagnosis
Movement Disorder Society clinical diagnostic criteria
Supportive criteria in the Movement Disorder Society clinical diagnostic criteria
Absolute exclusion criteria in the Movement Disorder Society clinical diagnostic criteria
Red flags in the Movement Disorder Society clinical diagnostic criteria
Validation of the criteria against expert clinical diagnosis
UK Brain Bank criteria sensitivity that differs between the abstract and the results
Overall accuracy of the criteria for probable PD that differs among the results, a post hoc analysis, and the discussion
Proportion of PD participants meeting criteria for clinically established PD that differs between the results text and table 1
Validation of the criteria by disease duration, age, and sex
Validation of the criteria: frequency of individual criteria items
| Criterion item | PD (n = 434), % | Non-PD parkinsonism (n = 192), % |
|---|---|---|
| Supportive criterion: excellent levodopa response | “73.4 (n = 364)” | “19.9 (n = 151)” |
| Supportive criterion: dyskinesia | “34.0 (n = 382)” | “7.0 (n = 157)” |
| Supportive criterion: asymmetric rest tremor | “56.5” | “13.6” |
| Supportive criterion: positive ancillary test | “67.6” | “38.3” |
| Supportive criterion: abnormal olfaction | “67.4” | “36.6” |
| Any absolute exclusion | “3.2” | “64.1” |
| Absolute exclusion: cerebellar abnormalities | “0.2” | “14.2” |
| Absolute exclusion: vertical supranuclear gaze palsy | “1.2” | “29.2” |
| Absolute exclusion: frontotemporal dementia | “0.2” | “1.1” |
| Absolute exclusion: leg-only parkinsonism | “0.5” | “2.6” |
| Absolute exclusion: dopamine blocker or depleter | “0.5” | “4.2” |
| Absolute exclusion: absent levodopa response | “1.3 (n = 393)” | “33.8 (n = 157)” |
| Absolute exclusion: cortical sensory loss | “0” | “13.1” |
| Absolute exclusion: normal dopamine imaging | “0 (n = 42)” | “13.0 (n = 23)” |
| Any red flag | “19.1” | “84.4” |
| Red flag 1: rapid progression of gait impairment | “1.4” | “22.7” |
| Red flag 2: absence of progression over 5 years | “1.2” | “0.6” |
| Red flag 3: severe bulbar dysfunction within 5 years | “0” | “18.0” |
| Red flag 4: inspiratory stridor | “0.2” | “9.0” |
| Red flag 5: severe autonomic failure within 5 years | “9.7” | “40.1” |
| Red flag 6: recurrent falls within 3 years | “3.7” | “51.3” |
| Red flag 7: anterocollis or contractures | “2.6” | “10.2” |
| Red flag 8: absent nonmotor features after 5 years | “1.6” | “1.6” |
| Red flag 9: pyramidal tract signs | “1.8” | “25.8” |
| Red flag 10: bilateral symmetric parkinsonism | “1.9” | “25.1” |
Proportion of non-PD participants with any red flag that differs between the results text and table 4
Validation of the criteria: study limitations
Autopsy validation of the criteria
Accuracy of clinical diagnosis against neuropathology
Diagnostic delay and misclassification in early disease
Clinical basis of diagnosis, levodopa response, and role of ancillary testing
Dopamine transporter single-photon emission computed tomography
Role of genetic testing in diagnosis
Alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay in cerebrospinal fluid
Research criteria for prodromal Parkinson's disease
Likelihood ratios of risk and prodromal markers: 2015 research criteria
| Marker type | Marker | Positive likelihood ratio | Negative likelihood ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk marker | Male sex | “1.2 (male)” | “0.8 (female)” |
| Risk marker | Regular pesticide exposure | “1.5” | Not applicable |
| Risk marker | Occupational solvent exposure | “1.5” | Not applicable |
| Risk marker | Nonuse of caffeine | “1.35” | “0.88” |
| Risk marker | Current smoker | Not applicable | “0.45” |
| Risk marker | Never smoker | “1.25” | Not applicable |
| Risk marker | Former smoker | Not applicable | “0.8” |
| Risk marker | Sibling with PD onset before age 50 years | “7.5” | Not applicable |
| Risk marker | Any other first-degree relative with PD | “2.5” | Not applicable |
| Risk marker | Known gene mutation | “see Supporting Table II” | Not applicable |
| Risk marker | Substantia nigra hyperechogenicity | “4.7” | “0.45” |
| Prodromal marker | Polysomnography-proven RBD | “130” | “0.62” |
| Prodromal marker | Positive RBD screening questionnaire with more than 80% specificity | “2.3” | “0.76” |
| Prodromal marker | Dopaminergic PET or SPECT clearly abnormal | “40” | “0.65” |
| Prodromal marker | Possible subthreshold parkinsonism (UPDRS above 3, excluding action tremor) | “10” | “0.70” |
| Prodromal marker | Abnormal quantitative motor testing | “3.5” | “0.60” |
| Prodromal marker | Olfactory loss | “4.0” | “0.43” |
| Prodromal marker | Constipation | “2.2” | “0.80” |
| Prodromal marker | Excessive daytime somnolence | “2.2” | “0.88” |
| Prodromal marker | Symptomatic hypotension | “2.1” | “0.87” |
| Prodromal marker | Severe erectile dysfunction | “2.0” | “0.90” |
| Prodromal marker | Urinary dysfunction | “1.9” | “0.90” |
| Prodromal marker | Depression with or without anxiety | “1.8” | “0.85” |
Prior probability of prodromal Parkinson's disease by age
Likelihood ratios of risk and prodromal markers: 2019 update
| Marker type | Marker | Positive likelihood ratio | Negative likelihood ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk marker | Male sex | “1.2 (male)” | “0.8 (female)” |
| Risk marker | Regular pesticide exposure | “1.5” | Not applicable |
| Risk marker | Occupational solvent exposure | “1.5” | Not applicable |
| Risk marker | Nonuse of caffeine | “1.35” | “0.88” |
| Risk marker | Current smoker | Not applicable | “0.51” |
| Risk marker | Never smoker | “1.2” | Not applicable |
| Risk marker | Former smoker | Not applicable | “0.91” |
| Risk marker | First-degree relative with PD | “2.5” | Not applicable |
| Risk marker | Known gene mutation with intermediate-strength penetrance | “LR+ dependent on age-related penetrance, see Table 2” | Not applicable |
| Risk marker | Polygenic risk score | “1.57 (highest quartile of PRS scores)” | “0.45 (lowest quartile)” |
| Risk marker | Substantia nigra hyperechogenicity | “3.4” | “0.38” |
| Risk marker | Diabetes mellitus (type II) | “1.5” | “0.97” |
| Risk marker | Physical inactivity | “1.3” | “0.91” |
| Risk marker | Low plasma urate levels | “1.8 (in men)” | “0.88 (in men)” |
| Prodromal marker | Polysomnography-proven RBD | “130” | “0.65” |
| Prodromal marker | Possible RBD (questionnaire) | “2.8” | “0.89” |
| Prodromal marker | Dopaminergic PET or SPECT clearly abnormal | “43.3” | “0.66” |
| Prodromal marker | Subthreshold parkinsonism | “9.6” | “0.55” |
| Prodromal marker | Abnormal quantitative motor testing | “3.5” | “0.60” |
| Prodromal marker | Olfactory loss | “6.4” | “0.40” |
| Prodromal marker | Constipation | “2.5” | “0.82” |
| Prodromal marker | Excessive daytime somnolence | “2.7” | “0.86” |
| Prodromal marker | Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension | “18.5” | “0.88” |
| Prodromal marker | Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension | “3.2” | “0.80” |
| Prodromal marker | Erectile dysfunction | “3.4 (in men)” | “0.87 (in men)” |
| Prodromal marker | Urinary dysfunction | “2.0” | “0.90” |
| Prodromal marker | Depression with or without anxiety | “1.6” | “0.88” |
| Prodromal marker | Global cognitive deficit | “1.8” | “0.88” |
Likelihood ratios of intermediate-strength genetic variants by age: 2019 update
| Age group, years | PD risk, noncarriers | PD risk, GBA mutation carriers | GBA positive likelihood ratio | PD risk, LRRK2 mutation carriers | LRRK2 positive likelihood ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 to 54 | “0.4%” | “8%” | “20.0” | “~1%” | “2.5” |
| 55 to 59 | “0.75%” | “11%” | “14.7” | “3%” | “4.0” |
| 60 to 64 | “1.25%” | “14%” | “11.2” | “7%” | “5.6” |
| 65 to 69 | “2.0%” | “18%” | “9.0” | “15%” | “7.5” |
| 70 to 74 | “2.5%” | “21%” | “8.4” | “29%” | “11.6” |
| 75 to 79 | “3.5%” | “25%” | “7.1” | “32%” | “9.1” |
| 80 and over | “4%” | “30%” | “7.5” | “42%” | “10.5” |
Limitations of the prodromal research criteria
Biological research frameworks: neuronal alpha-synuclein disease integrated staging system
Biological research frameworks: SynNeurGe classification
Clinical presentation - signs and symptoms
Motor symptoms: bradykinesia, rigidity, and rest tremor
Motor symptoms: clinical subtypes and rate of progression
Motor symptoms: postural instability and freezing of gait
| Assessment | Participants assessed, n | Freezing of gait, n (%, 95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | “232” | “63 (27, 22–33)” |
| 4-year visit | “143” | “79 (55, 47–64)” |
| 8-year visit | “89” | “67 (75, 65–84)” |
| 9-year visit | “67” | “38 (57, 44–69)” |
| 10-year visit | “47” | “27 (57, 42–72)” |
| 11-year visit | “33” | “12 (36, 20–55)” |
| 12-year visit | “19” | “12 (63, 38–84)” |
| 12-year period prevalence | “232” | “145 (63, 56–69)” |
Freezing of gait: motor fluctuations and levodopa dose as risk factors
| Baseline variable (participants without freezing of gait at baseline) | Odds ratio for incident freezing of gait (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| Age at onset, per 10 years increase | “1.33 (0.89–2.00)” | “0.161” |
| Disease duration, per 10 years increase | “1.07 (0.41–2.78)” | “0.888” |
| Female sex | “0.95 (0.52–1.74)” | “0.872” |
| UPDRS motor score, per 10 points increase | “1.32 (0.94–1.86)” | “0.115” |
| Psychosis | “5.97 (0.71–49.93)” | “0.099” |
| MMSE, per 5 points increase | “1.13 (0.80–1.61)” | “0.486” |
| Levodopa dose (levodopa-equivalent), per 100 mg increase | “1.30 (1.07–1.58)” | “0.009” |
| Dopamine agonist dose (levodopa-equivalent), per 100 mg increase | “1.13 (0.76–1.68)” | “0.558” |
| Dyskinesias | “0.39 (0.15–1.05)” | “0.062” |
| Motor fluctuations | “3.45 (1.08–11.02)” | “0.036” |
| Follow-up time, per year increase | “1.11 (1.02–1.22)” | “0.023” |
Freezing of gait: clinical features associated with freezing of gait during 12 years of follow-up
| Variable at each visit (all participants) | Odds ratio for freezing of gait (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| Age at onset, per 10 years increase | “1.32 (1.00–1.75)” | “0.052” |
| Disease duration, per 10 years increase | “1.38 (0.88–2.18)” | “0.158” |
| Female sex | “0.74 (0.49–1.13)” | “0.166” |
| UPDRS motor score, per 10 points increase | “1.46 (1.25–1.71)” | “<0.001” |
| Psychosis | “1.85 (1.12–3.05)” | “0.016” |
| MMSE, per 5 points increase | “0.94 (0.78–1.13)” | “0.521” |
| Levodopa dose (levodopa-equivalent), per 100 mg increase | “1.12 (1.03–1.21)” | “0.006” |
| Dopamine agonist dose (levodopa-equivalent), per 100 mg increase | “1.16 (0.87–1.55)” | “0.303” |
| Dyskinesias | “1.88 (1.14–3.09)” | “0.013” |
| Motor fluctuations | “1.68 (1.05–2.68)” | “0.030” |
Motor fluctuations: cumulative incidence in a population-based incident cohort
Motor complications: point prevalence and cumulative incidence by year of follow-up in drug-naive participants
| Measure | 1 year | 2 years | 3 years | 4 years | 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any motor complications: point prevalence, % | “10.9” | “13.6” | “22.8” | “23.2” | “38.0” |
| Any motor complications: cumulative incidence, % | “14.3” | “24.3” | “32.8” | “40.7” | “52.4” |
| Motor fluctuations: point prevalence, % | “7.7” | “10.2” | “18.1” | “17.1” | “31.0” |
| Motor fluctuations: cumulative incidence, % | “10.6” | “19.0” | “26.5” | “33.9” | “42.9” |
| Dyskinesias: point prevalence, % | “3.8” | “4.5” | “5.2” | “9.8” | “12.7” |
| Dyskinesias: cumulative incidence, % | “6.3” | “9.5” | “12.7” | “18.0” | “24.3” |
| Concomitant dyskinesias and motor fluctuations: point prevalence, % | “0.5” | “1.1” | “0.5” | “3.7” | “5.7” |
| Concomitant dyskinesias and motor fluctuations: cumulative incidence, % | “2.6” | “4.2” | “6.3” | “11.1” | “14.8” |
| Levodopa use, % | “41.5” | “56.8” | “67.1” | “78.7” | “84.2” |
| Dopamine agonist use, % | “44.8” | “47.7” | “48.6” | “53.7” | “53.8” |
| Other dopaminergic medications, % | “23.5” | “30.7” | “33.5” | “29.9” | “32.9” |
| Total levodopa equivalent dose (SD) | “252 (169)” | “333 (161)” | “424 (224)” | “514 (250)” | “587 (334)” |
Motor complications: baseline risk factors and levodopa dose in drug-naive participants
“A subgroup of patients (36/189) never used levodopa.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
| Outcome and factor (Cox regression) | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Any motor complications: age at diagnosis, per year | “0.97” | “0.95–0.99” | “p = 0.013” |
| Any motor complications: female gender | “1.84” | “1.23–2.77” | “p = 0.003” |
| Any motor complications: baseline UPDRS motor score, per unit | “1.04” | “1.01–1.06” | “p = 0.001” |
| Any motor complications: time since motor onset, per year | “0.97” | “0.86–1.09” | “p = 0.593” |
| Motor fluctuations: age, per year | “0.96” | “0.94–0.98” | “p = 0.001” |
| Motor fluctuations: baseline UPDRS motor score, per unit | “1.03” | “1.01–1.05” | “p = 0.016” |
| Motor fluctuations: female vs. male gender | “1.48” | “0.94–2.33” | “p = 0.087” |
| Motor fluctuations: time since motor onset, per year | “1.03” | “0.91–1.16” | “p = 0.675” |
| Dyskinesias: female gender | “2.73” | “1.49–4.98” | “p = 0.001” |
| Dyskinesias: baseline UPDRS motor score, per unit | “1.05” | “1.02–1.08” | “p = 0.001” |
| Dyskinesias: age, per year | “0.98” | “0.95–1.02” | “p = 0.262” |
| Dyskinesias: time since motor onset, per year | “0.91” | “0.75–1.10” | “p = 0.332” |
| Dyskinesias, model adding body weight: female gender | “2.34” | “1.21–4.53” | “p = 0.011” |
| Dyskinesias, model adding body weight: body weight, per kg | “0.99” | “0.96–1.01” | “p = 0.239” |
| Motor fluctuations: initial levodopa vs. initial dopamine agonist | “1.84” | “1.09–3.10” | “p = 0.023” |
| Dyskinesias: initial levodopa vs. initial dopamine agonist | “0.88” | “0.42–1.85” | “p = 0.744” |
| Motor fluctuations, model adding levodopa dose at onset: initial levodopa vs. initial dopamine agonist | “1.37” | “0.87–2.87” | “p = 0.137” |
| Motor fluctuations, model adding levodopa dose at onset: levodopa dose, per 100 mg | “1.13” | “1.01–1.26” | “p = 0.037” |
| Dyskinesias, model adding levodopa dose at onset: levodopa dose, per 100 mg | “1.28” | “1.16–1.42” | “p < 0.001” |
Motor complications: severity and reversal on oral therapy within 5 years of diagnosis
Motor fluctuations: frequency by duration of levodopa therapy
Motor complications: frequency and risk factors with chronic levodopa exposure
Motor fluctuations: OFF episodes
Motor complications: onset of OFF periods and frequency and severity of dyskinesia
Motor fluctuations: early-morning OFF periods and associated non-motor symptoms
Dyskinesia: cumulative incidence of levodopa-induced dyskinesia
Non-motor symptoms: overall prevalence and most frequent symptoms
Non-motor symptoms: prevalence by domain and Hoehn and Yahr stage
Non-motor symptoms: prodromal onset and under-reporting
Non-motor symptoms: frequency by domain and change with disease progression
Cognitive symptoms: mild cognitive impairment
Psychiatric symptoms: depression
Psychiatric symptoms: depression prevalence by study setting and diagnostic method
| Setting | Major depressive disorder: number of studies | Major depressive disorder: prevalence (%) | Clinically relevant depressive symptoms: number of studies | Clinically relevant depressive symptoms: prevalence (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General population | “4” | “8.1” | “5” | “10.8” |
| General practice | “0” | Not applicable | “2” | “42.3” |
| Outpatient setting | “11” | “24.0” | “25” | “40.4” |
| Inpatient setting | “1” | “21.7” | “3” | “54.3” |
| Nursing home | “0” | Not applicable | “1” | “32.7” |
Psychiatric symptoms: anxiety
Psychiatric symptoms: anxiety disorder prevalence by DSM subtype
| Anxiety disorder | Number of studies | Total participants with Parkinson's disease | Range, % | Weighted prevalence, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any anxiety disorder | “13” | “2399” | “24.5–46.7” | “31.0” |
| Generalized anxiety disorder | “14” | “2080” | “2.6–52.5” | “14.1” |
| Panic disorder | “13” | “2040” | “2.3–30.0” | “6.8” |
| Agoraphobia | “7” | “1684” | “1.6–15.5” | “8.6” |
| Social phobia | “11” | “1823” | “6.8–50.0” | “13.8” |
| Other phobia | “4” | “705” | “2.4–16.7” | “13.0” |
| Obsessive-compulsive disorder | “9” | “1270” | “0.3–13.3” | “2.6” |
| Anxiety not otherwise specified | “4” | “766” | “2.4–22.0” | “13.3” |
| Two or more comorbid anxiety disorders, among participants diagnosed with anxiety | “4” | “1337” | “23.7–37.0” | “31.1” |
| Clinically relevant anxiety symptoms by rating scale cutoff | “27” | “7212” | “6.9–55.0” | “25.7” |
Psychiatric symptoms: psychosis
Psychiatric symptoms: impulse control disorders
Autonomic symptoms: orthostatic hypotension
Autonomic symptoms: constipation in established and prodromal Parkinson's disease
Autonomic symptoms: constipation and Parkinson's disease risk by study subgroup
| Subgroup | Number of studies | Pooled estimate (95% CI) | I2 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study design: case-control | “11” | “2.21 [1.72–2.83]” | “86” |
| Study design: cohort | “6” | “2.57 [2.17–3.05]” | “48” |
| Location: United States | “5” | “2.78 [1.57–4.92]” | “92” |
| Location: Europe | “6” | “2.10 [1.44–3.06]” | “68” |
| Location: China | “3” | “2.24 [2.03–2.49]” | “0.0” |
| Location: other | “3” | “2.75 [1.14–6.63]” | “85” |
| Prodromal duration: 10 years or more | “11” | “2.06 [1.61–2.63]” | “87” |
| Prodromal duration: 5 to 10 years | “3” | “2.43 [1.97–3.00]” | “54” |
| Prodromal duration: 5 years or less | “3” | “5.00 [3.59–6.97]” | “0.0” |
| Diagnosis of constipation: frequency of bowel movement | “5” | “3.60 [2.24–5.78]” | “81” |
| Diagnosis of constipation: medical record | “7” | “2.20 [1.77–2.74]” | “68” |
| Diagnosis of constipation: other | “5” | “1.80 [1.36–2.38]” | “78” |
Bulbar symptoms: oropharyngeal dysphagia
Sleep symptoms: REM sleep behavior disorder
| Subgroup | Number of studies | Estimated prevalence (%; 95% CI) | I2 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnosis: REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Screening Questionnaire | “10” | “35.0 (29.0–41.0)” | “92.4” |
| Diagnosis: ICSD minimal criteria (clinical interview) | “7” | “44.0 (31.6–56.5)” | “96.6” |
| Diagnosis: ICSD-2 (polysomnography) | “11” | “48.5 (40.6–56.4)” | “81.9” |
| Age 60 years or less | “11” | “35.7 (25.6–45.8)” | “96.7” |
| Age more than 60 years | “17” | “46.4 (41.7–51.2)” | “86.5” |
| Ethnicity: Caucasian | “19” | “42.2 (36.5–48.0)” | “92.5” |
| Ethnicity: Asian | “9” | “42.2 (32.8–51.6)” | “95.1” |
| Disease duration 6 years or less | “16” | “41.2 (34.7–47.6)” | “92.8” |
| Disease duration more than 6 years | “12” | “43.7 (36.1–51.2)” | “94.1” |
| Male participants 50% or less | “8” | “41.1 (31.2–51.1)” | “95.0” |
| Male participants more than 50% | “20” | “42.7 (37.0–48.5)” | “93.1” |
| Publication year 2010 to 2012 | “10” | “37.3 (30.3–44.2)” | “86.9” |
| Publication year 2013 to 2016 | “18” | “44.8 (38.8–50.8)” | “94.3” |
| Estimation of prevalence was the primary objective | “13” | “37.8 (32.2–43.4)” | “89.0” |
| Other primary objective | “15” | “46.0 (38.2–53.9)” | “95.1” |
| Sample size 400 or less | “21” | “43.2 (36.1–50.3)” | “91.1” |
| Sample size more than 400 | “7” | “40.5 (32.5–48.5)” | “97.0” |
| Moderator (meta-regression) | Meta-regression coefficient | 95% CI | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of publication | “0.0177002” | “−0.0128755 to 0.048276” | “0.257” |
| Ethnicity | “−0.0020544” | “−0.1136242 to 0.1095155” | “0.971” |
| Primary objective of the study | “0.0785029” | “−0.0216877 to 0.1786934” | “0.125” |
| Sample size | “8.97e−06” | “−0.0001337 to 0.0001516” | “0.902” |
| Diagnostic criteria for RBD | “0.0677628” | “0.0125304 to 0.1229951” | “0.016” |
| Age | “0.0122493” | “0.0020541 to 0.0224445” | “0.019” |
| Male ratio | “−0.0012102” | “−0.005528 to 0.0031076” | “0.583” |
| Duration of Parkinson's disease | “0.0000548” | “−0.0221684 to 0.022278” | “0.996” |
Advanced disease: characteristic motor and non-motor features
Long-term morbidity
Dementia, dependency, and nursing home placement at 15 and 20 years
Motor complications and levodopa-unresponsive disability at 15 and 20 years
Dementia and functional dependency in population-based incidence cohorts
Clinical milestones: hallucinations, recurrent falls, dementia, and nursing home placement
| Milestone present | Relative risk (95% CI) of visual hallucinations | Relative risk (95% CI) of recurrent falls | Relative risk (95% CI) of dementia | Relative risk (95% CI) of nursing home placement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual hallucinations | Not applicable | “2.2 (1.4–3.6)” | “6.3 (3.2–12.4)” | “3.3 (1.6–6.6)” |
| Recurrent falls | “1.9 (1.3–2.7)” | Not applicable | “4.2 (2.5–7.1)” | “4.7 (2.4–9.2)” |
| Dementia | “3.2 (2.3–4.5)” | “3.7 (2.4–5.8)” | Not applicable | “5.6 (2.9–10.9)” |
| Nursing home placement | “2.1 (1.5–3.0)” | “3.2 (2.1–5.0)” | “4.0 (2.5–6.4)” | Not applicable |
Falls and recurrent falls
Hip and non-vertebral fractures
| Subgroup | Hip fracture: studies | Hip fracture: pooled effect size (95% CI) | Non-vertebral fracture: studies | Non-vertebral fracture: pooled effect size (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | “7” | “2.93 (2.05, 4.18)” | “2” | “2.26 (1.37, 3.73)” |
| Women | “6” | “1.81 (1.61, 2.04)” | “2” | “1.82 (1.33, 2.48)” |
| Cohort studies | “14” | “2.34 (1.98, 2.77)” | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Case-control studies | “3” | “3.42 (1.72, 6.79)” | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Clinical diagnostic criteria reported | “3” | “3.00 (1.86, 4.83)” | “3” | “1.89 (1.37, 2.61)” |
| Clinical diagnostic criteria not reported | “14” | “2.37 (2.00, 2.79)” | “6” | “1.82 (1.57, 2.10)” |
| Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease | “14” | “2.36 (1.98, 2.81)” | “8” | “1.80 (1.59, 2.05)” |
| Diagnosis of parkinsonism | “3” | “2.46 (1.87, 3.26)” | “1” | “1.87 (1.27, 2.76)” |
| Asia | “3” | “2.39 (2.02, 2.82)” | “1” | “2.05 (1.71, 2.45)” |
| Europe | “8” | “2.32 (1.87, 2.89)” | “4” | “1.57 (1.45, 1.71)” |
| Oceania | “1” | “1.45 (1.14, 1.84)” | Not reported | Not reported |
| United States | “5” | “3.03 (2.26, 4.05)” | “4” | “1.86 (1.58, 2.19)” |
Hip fracture sensitivity analysis with a confidence interval that does not contain its point estimate and four references for three removed studies
Aspiration pneumonia and causes of death in late-stage disease
Dysphagia-related complications: aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, and difficulty swallowing tablets
Burden of Parkinson's disease
Humanistic burden and health-related quality of life
Health-related quality of life of United States veterans with Parkinson's disease compared with other chronic conditions
Determinants of health-related quality of life
Non-motor symptoms and health-related quality of life
Multiple linear regression models of PDQ-39 and EQ-5D scores on motor and non-motor symptom measures
| Model (dependent variable) | Adjusted R² of the model | Independent variable | Standardized beta | t | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDQ-39 SI | “0.59” | Constant (unstandardized value) | “(23.76)” | “5.55” | “0.000” |
| PDQ-39 SI | “0.59” | NMSS total | “0.52” | “13.64” | “0.000” |
| PDQ-39 SI | “0.59” | SCOPA-motor complications | “0.20” | “4.81” | “0.000” |
| PDQ-39 SI | “0.59” | SCOPA-motor examination | “0.17” | “4.15” | “0.000” |
| EQ-5D index | “0.53” | Constant (unstandardized value) | “(0.83)” | “9.24” | “0.000” |
| EQ-5D index | “0.53” | SCOPA-motor examination | “−0.38” | “−9.11” | “0.000” |
| EQ-5D index | “0.53” | NMSS total | “−0.37” | “−8.74” | “0.000” |
| EQ-5D index | “0.53” | SCOPA-motor complications | “−0.12” | “−2.71” | “0.000” |
Non-motor symptom domains and PDQ-39 summary index in a multicenter survey
OFF episodes and health-related quality of life in the United States
Health-related quality of life by hours of daily OFF time
Patient-reported OFF periods in a United States online cohort
Motor fluctuations and dyskinesia and health-related quality of life in five European countries
Multivariable associations of motor complication subtypes with EQ-5D and PDQ-39 scores, all subtypes and outcomes
| Motor complication subtype | Outcome | Regression coefficient (β) | 95% CI | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| On-off fluctuations | EQ-5D index score (rescaled 0 to 100; higher scores represent better QoL) | “−7.1” | “−10.6; −3.6” | “<0.001” |
| On-off fluctuations | PDQ-39 summary index (0 to 100; higher scores represent worse QoL) | “3.6” | “0.7; 6.5” | “0.01” |
| On-off fluctuations | PDQ-39 mobility | “8.1” | “4.0; 12.2” | “<0.001” |
| On-off fluctuations | PDQ-39 activities of daily living | “7.3” | “3.2; 11.5” | “<0.001” |
| On-off fluctuations | PDQ-39 emotional wellbeing | “3.2” | “−0.5; 6.9” | “0.09” |
| On-off fluctuations | PDQ-39 stigma | “2.5” | “−1.7; 6.7” | “0.23” |
| On-off fluctuations | PDQ-39 social support | “2.3” | “−1.1; 5.7” | “0.19” |
| On-off fluctuations | PDQ-39 cognitions | “2.9” | “−0.4; 6.1” | “0.08” |
| On-off fluctuations | PDQ-39 communication | “2.4” | “−1.0; 5.8” | “0.17” |
| On-off fluctuations | PDQ-39 bodily discomfort | “2.5” | “−1.3; 6.3” | “0.20” |
| Peak-dose dyskinesias | EQ-5D index score (rescaled 0 to 100; higher scores represent better QoL) | “−2.9” | “−6.9; 1.2” | “0.17” |
| Peak-dose dyskinesias | PDQ-39 summary index (0 to 100; higher scores represent worse QoL) | “2.4” | “−0.9; 5.7” | “0.16” |
| Peak-dose dyskinesias | PDQ-39 mobility | “3.3” | “−1.3; 8.0” | “0.16” |
| Peak-dose dyskinesias | PDQ-39 activities of daily living | “5.9” | “1.2; 10.7” | “0.01” |
| Peak-dose dyskinesias | PDQ-39 emotional wellbeing | “2.7” | “−1.6; 7.0” | “0.22” |
| Peak-dose dyskinesias | PDQ-39 stigma | “−0.4” | “−5.3; 4.4” | “0.86” |
| Peak-dose dyskinesias | PDQ-39 social support | “0.1” | “−3.8; 4.0” | “0.96” |
| Peak-dose dyskinesias | PDQ-39 cognitions | “4.0” | “0.3; 7.7” | “0.03” |
| Peak-dose dyskinesias | PDQ-39 communication | “3.6” | “−0.3; 7.6” | “0.07” |
| Peak-dose dyskinesias | PDQ-39 bodily discomfort | “−2.2” | “−6.6; 2.2” | “0.32” |
| Biphasic dyskinesias | EQ-5D index score (rescaled 0 to 100; higher scores represent better QoL) | “−2.4” | “−10.6; 5.8” | “0.56” |
| Biphasic dyskinesias | PDQ-39 summary index (0 to 100; higher scores represent worse QoL) | “6.1” | “−0.9; 13.0” | “0.09” |
| Biphasic dyskinesias | PDQ-39 mobility | “5.4” | “−4.3; 15.1” | “0.28” |
| Biphasic dyskinesias | PDQ-39 activities of daily living | “4.2” | “−5.4; 13.7” | “0.39” |
| Biphasic dyskinesias | PDQ-39 emotional wellbeing | “5.9” | “−3.0; 14.7” | “0.19” |
| Biphasic dyskinesias | PDQ-39 stigma | “12.6” | “2.7; 22.6” | “0.01” |
| Biphasic dyskinesias | PDQ-39 social support | “2.6” | “−5.4; 10.6” | “0.53” |
| Biphasic dyskinesias | PDQ-39 cognitions | “0.5” | “−7.2; 8.2” | “0.90” |
| Biphasic dyskinesias | PDQ-39 communication | “−0.3” | “−8.2; 7.7” | “0.95” |
| Biphasic dyskinesias | PDQ-39 bodily discomfort | “2.3” | “−6.6; 11.2” | “0.61” |
| Off-dystonias | EQ-5D index score (rescaled 0 to 100; higher scores represent better QoL) | “−0.02” | “−5.9; 5.8” | “1.00” |
| Off-dystonias | PDQ-39 summary index (0 to 100; higher scores represent worse QoL) | “1.6” | “−3.1; 6.4” | “0.51” |
| Off-dystonias | PDQ-39 mobility | “1.9” | “−4.9; 8.6” | “0.59” |
| Off-dystonias | PDQ-39 activities of daily living | “1.4” | “−5.4; 8.2” | “0.68” |
| Off-dystonias | PDQ-39 emotional wellbeing | “3.5” | “−2.7; 9.7” | “0.27” |
| Off-dystonias | PDQ-39 stigma | “4.6” | “−2.4; 11.5” | “0.20” |
| Off-dystonias | PDQ-39 social support | “0.5” | “−5.1; 6.1” | “0.85” |
| Off-dystonias | PDQ-39 cognitions | “−2.9” | “−8.3; 2.5” | “0.29” |
| Off-dystonias | PDQ-39 communication | “−0.4” | “−6.2; 5.3” | “0.88” |
| Off-dystonias | PDQ-39 bodily discomfort | “7.4” | “1.1; 13.8” | “0.02” |
Motor complication subtypes and PDQ-39 dimensions
| Motor complication | Participants with the complication, n | Percentage (of all participants for any fluctuation or any dyskinesia; of participants in that class for each subtype) | PDQ-SI mean, with the complication | PDQ-SI mean, without the complication | PDQ-SI, P (Student's t test) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any motor fluctuation | “94” | “66” | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Early-morning akinesia | “55” | “58.5” | “40.9” | “33.6” | “0.005” |
| Nocturnal akinesia | “54” | “57.5” | “44.7” | “31.3” | “<0.0001” |
| End-of-dose fluctuations | “74” | “78.7” | “41” | “31.6” | “0.0002” |
| Paradoxical fluctuations | “47” | “50” | “44.2” | “32.6” | “<0.0001” |
| Unpredictable offs | “34” | “36.2” | “45.5” | “33.5” | “<0.0001” |
| Any levodopa-induced dyskinesia | “81” | “57” | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Peak-dose dyskinesia | “59” | “72.8” | “39.8” | “34.4” | “0.0404” |
| Diphasic dyskinesia | “14” | “17.3” | “46.1” | “35.5” | “0.0127” |
| Off dyskinesia | “10” | “12.4” | “49.9” | “35.7” | “0.0097” |
| Morning dystonia | “27” | “33.3” | “40.7” | “35.6” | “<0.1277” |
Clinical correlates and multivariable predictors of the PDQ-39 Summary Index, including levodopa dosing frequency
Health-related quality of life in patients meeting the 5-2-1 criteria for advanced disease
Good ON-time and humanistic burden in advanced Parkinson's disease
Economic burden and healthcare resource utilization
Total United States economic burden, 2017
Excess direct medical cost per person and by type of service, United States
| Component | Total excess medical cost due to PD, million $ | Percentage of the total | Per PWP, $ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-acute institutional care | “7,144” | “28.2%” | “6,888” |
| Hospital inpatient | “7,190” | “28.4%” | “6,932” |
| Outpatient | “5,506” | “21.7%” | “5,308” |
| Physician office | “1,226” | “4.8%” | “1,182” |
| Durable medical equipment | “145” | “0.6%” | “140” |
| Prescription medication | “4,137” | “16.3%” | “3,988” |
| Overall | “25,348” | “100%” | “24,439” |
Indirect and non-medical costs per person, United States
Projected United States economic burden to 2037
Earlier United States estimate of economic burden, 2010
Longitudinal incremental costs among Medicare beneficiaries
Medicare costs by disease severity
Study population and claims-based definition of advanced disease
Sample characteristics by claims-assigned disease severity, Medicare
Unadjusted 12-month Medicare costs by service category and disease severity
Distribution of costs across patients and drivers of the highest costs
Risk-adjusted costs under alternative definitions of advanced disease
| Cost type and definition of advanced disease | Mild/moderate PD, risk-adjusted mean, 2018 US$ | Advanced PD, risk-adjusted mean, 2018 US$ | Difference | 95% CI of difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All-cause, levodopa > 1000 mg/day | “$22,363” | “$26,688” | “$4325” | “$3862–$4788” |
| All-cause, LED > 800 mg/day | “$21,681” | “$26,433” | “$4751” | “$4426–$5077” |
| Primary PD-related, levodopa > 1000 mg/day | “$2923” | “$5657” | “$2734” | “$2578–$2890” |
| Primary PD-related, LED > 800 mg/day | “$2428” | “$5590” | “$3162” | “$3041–$3283” |
| Any PD-related, levodopa > 1000 mg/day | “$9103” | “$14,119” | “$5016” | “$4678–$5354” |
| Any PD-related, LED > 800 mg/day | “$8372” | “$13,708” | “$5336” | “$5090–$5582” |
Sensitivity analyses, study limitations, and funding
OFF episodes and healthcare resource utilization in the United States
Societal costs by Hoehn and Yahr stage and OFF time, Sweden
Registry population, cost methods, and study limitations, Sweden
Cost per patient-year by cost category and Hoehn and Yahr stage, Sweden
| Cost category | H&Y I (n = 410), mean (SD), SEK 2019 | H&Y II (n = 493), mean (SD), SEK 2019 | H&Y III (n = 334), mean (SD), SEK 2019 | H&Y IV (n = 73), mean (SD), SEK 2019 | H&Y V (n = 14), mean (SD), SEK 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inpatient and outpatient care | “11 245 (22 974)” | “22 865 (55 696)” | “28 492 (50 114)” | “18 765 (19 923)” | “37 035 (94 172)” |
| Drugs | “10 783 (19 237)” | “18 296 (45 897)” | “31 307 (74 725)” | “69 283 (137 407)” | “60 221 (119 896)” |
| Formal care | “1 186 (12 783)” | “13 183 (120 159)” | “79 259 (279 433)” | “306 465 (372 060)” | “855 038 (606 877)” |
| Transport | “447 (844)” | “1 218 (5 254)” | “1147 (3 292)” | “2 061 (5 107)” | “1 075 (2 056)” |
| Informal care | “1 771 (21 700)” | “7 497 (38 903)” | “30 840 (94 830)” | “122 829 (259 001)” | “55 421 (139 705)” |
| Productivity loss | “36 974 (138 760)” | “67 383 (186 770)” | “63 351 (189 042)” | “37 266 (156 303)” | “47 535 (177 858)” |
Cost per patient-year by cost category and time in OFF, Sweden
| Cost category | 0% of waking time in OFF (n = 826), mean (SD), SEK 2019 | 1% to <25% (n = 385), mean (SD), SEK 2019 | 25% to <50% (n = 94), mean (SD), SEK 2019 | 50% to 100% (n = 19), mean (SD), SEK 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inpatient and outpatient care | “16 867 (42 326)” | “26 066 (48 136)” | “29 607 (63 105)” | “27 943 (28 305)” |
| Drugs | “14 050 (39 228)” | “37 372 (85 054)” | “33 738 (75 940)” | “33 355 (82 353)” |
| Formal care | “39 400 (206 111)” | “63 175 (212 497)” | “95 469 (323 878)” | “103 141 (256 321)” |
| Transport | “817 (2 391)” | “1360 (6 095)” | “1 311 (2 459)” | “529 (1 047)” |
| Informal care | “14 684 (86 443)” | “19 692 (84 972)” | “35 577 (90 886)” | “74 223 (117 835)” |
| Productivity loss | “35 368 (139 615)” | “78 878 (200 345)” | “105 617 (233 495)” | “179 653 (309 621)” |
Resource use, drug costs, and formal care by disease stage, Sweden
Long-term care facility residence among Medicare beneficiaries
Hospitalization costs in Parkinson's disease psychosis with incident dementia
Study population, cost methods, and limitations in Parkinson's disease psychosis with incident dementia
Hospitalization and emergency room visit rates by type of stay, psychosis with and without incident dementia
| Outcome during 12-month follow-up | PDP without dementia (n = 1855), n (%) | PDP with incident dementia (n = 1855), n (%) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| All-cause, any hospitalization | “667 (36.0)” | “933 (50.3)” | “<0.05” |
| All-cause, short-term stay | “662 (33.6)” | “839 (45.2)” | “<0.05” |
| All-cause, long-term stay | “113 (6.0)” | “158 (8.6)” | “<0.05” |
| All-cause, skilled nursing facility stay | “291 (15.6)” | “525 (28.4)” | “<0.05” |
| All-cause, emergency room visit | “1123 (60.6)” | “1346 (72.6)” | “<0.05” |
| Psychiatric, any hospitalization | “227 (12.2)” | “358 (19.2)” | “<0.05” |
| Psychiatric, short-term stay | “167 (9.0)” | “228 (12.3)” | “<0.05” |
| Psychiatric, long-term stay | “23 (1.2)” | “43 (2.4)” | “<0.05” |
| Psychiatric, skilled nursing facility stay | “64 (3.4)” | “140 (7.5)” | “<0.05” |
| Psychiatric, emergency room visit | “210 (11.3)” | “246 (13.2)” | “NS” |
All-cause short-term, skilled nursing facility, and long-term stay percentages that differ between the abstract and the results
| Table 3, all-cause, during 12-month follow-up | PDP without dementia (n = 1855), n (%) | PDP with incident dementia (n = 1855), n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Short-term stay | “662 (33.6)” | “839 (45.2)” |
| Skilled nursing facility stay | “291 (15.6)” | “525 (28.4)” |
| Long-term stay | “113 (6.0)” | “158 (8.6)” |
Inpatient costs per patient per year by type of stay, psychosis with and without incident dementia
| Type of inpatient stay | PDP without dementia, mean PPPY cost, 2019 US$ | PDP without dementia, SD | PDP with incident dementia, mean PPPY cost, 2019 US$ | PDP with incident dementia, SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any all-cause hospitalization | “$11,599” | “$25,247” | “$17,891” | “$29,882” |
| Short-term stay | “$6856” | “$16,339” | “$9394” | “$18,360” |
| Skilled nursing facility stay | “$3385” | “$10,056” | “$6700” | “$14,409” |
End-of-life health care use among Medicare decedents
Economic impact of Parkinson's disease on families
Care partner productivity losses in the United States
Direct and indirect costs of working-age caregivers in the 5 years after diagnosis
Caregiving hours and work loss reported in prior literature
Caregiver burden and workforce participation among United States family caregivers
Risk factors for caregiver burden
Care partner burden and good ON-time in advanced Parkinson's disease
Economic impact of diagnostic testing
Reimbursement for dopamine transporter SPECT imaging in the United States
Payer mix and reimbursement per dopamine transporter SPECT study by payer and period
| Measure | July 2011 to October 2012 | January 2014 to December 2014 | Difference between periods |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMS, share of studies | “134/247 (54.2%)” | “73/94 (77.7%)” | Not applicable |
| Private insurance, share of studies | “105/247 (42.5%)” | “21/94 (22.3%)” | Not applicable |
| Veterans Affairs Health Care System, share of studies | “6/247 (2.4%)” | “0/94 (0%)” | Not applicable |
| Self-pay, share of studies | “2/247 (0.9%)” | “0/94 (0%)” | Not applicable |
| CMS, average reimbursement (US$) | “$2,266” | “$1,118” | “-$1,148” |
| CMS, range of reimbursement (US$) | “$0-$2,254” | “$674-$1,621” | Not applicable |
| Private insurance, average reimbursement (US$) | “$2,861” | “$3,470” | “$609” |
| Private insurance, range of reimbursement (US$) | “$0-$8,754” | “$112-$9,675” | Not applicable |
| Private insurance minus CMS, average reimbursement (US$) | “$595” | “$2,369” | Not applicable |
Imaging setting, study volume, and limitations of the reimbursement analysis
Pass-through status, scanner location, and break-even radiopharmaceutical cost
Cost-effectiveness of dopamine transporter SPECT in suspected Parkinson's disease, Germany
Decision model structure, perspective, and treatment costs, Germany
Model inputs, SPECT cost components, and ranges tested in sensitivity analyses
| Parameter | Base case (costs in euros, 2002 values) | Range in sensitivity analyses |
|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of PD among referred patients | “0.53” | “0.20–0.74” |
| Prevalence of parkinsonism among referred patients | “0.74” | Not applicable |
| Sensitivity of FP-CIT SPECT for parkinsonism | “0.975” | “0.90–1.0” |
| Specificity of FP-CIT SPECT for parkinsonism | “1.0” | “0.73–1.0” |
| Sensitivity of clinical examination for PD | “0.911” | “0.60–0.911” |
| Specificity of clinical examination for PD | “0.984” | “0.80–0.984” |
| Radionuclide tracer for FP-CIT SPECT | “746.50” | “373.25–1,493.00” |
| PD medication per year | “1,534.50” | “767.25–3,069.00” |
| Initial examination, including tests | “117.98” | “59.00–236.00” |
| Clinical follow-up examination | “18.50” | “9.25–37.00” |
| Gamma camera cost per SPECT investigation | “16.22” | Not applicable |
| Mean personnel cost per SPECT investigation | “25.88” | Not applicable |
| Total cost per SPECT investigation | “788.60” | Not applicable |
| Consequence ratio | “8.5” | “1–20” |
Base-case expected cost, effectiveness, and ICER by diagnostic strategy
| Strategy | Expected 1-year cost per patient (euros) | Adequate treatment month equivalents | ICER (euros per ATME) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical examination only (EXAM+) | “946” | “52.8” | Not applicable |
| SPECT after positive clinical examination (DOUBLE+) | “1,352” | “53.4” | “733” |
| SPECT after negative clinical examination (SINGLE+) | “1,731” | “32.8” | “Dom” |
| SPECT only (SPECT+) | “2,003” | “33.0” | “Dom” |
One-way sensitivity analyses, SPECT after positive clinical examination versus clinical examination only
| Varied parameter and value | EXAM+ cost (euros) | EXAM+ ATME | DOUBLE+ cost (euros) | DOUBLE+ ATME | DOUBLE+ ICER (euros per ATME) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base case | “946” | “52.8” | “1,352” | “53.4” | “733” |
| Prevalence of PD 0.74 | “1,245” | “34.3” | “1,810” | “34.6” | “2,411” |
| Prevalence of PD 0.40 | “761” | “64.3” | “1,068” | “65.1” | “409” |
| Prevalence of PD 0.20 | “476” | “81.9” | “632” | “83.0” | “148” |
| Sensitivity of clinical examination 0.76 | “864” | “52.2” | “1,249” | “52.8” | “700” |
| Sensitivity of clinical examination 0.60 | “758” | “51.4” | “1,100” | “51.9” | “619” |
| Specificity of clinical examination 0.90 | “1,033” | “47.0” | “1,451” | “50.7” | “113” |
| Specificity of clinical examination 0.80 | “1,131” | “40.6” | “1,563” | “47.5” | “63” |
| Sensitivity of FP-CIT SPECT 1.00 | “946” | “52.8” | “1,663” | “53.5” | “666” |
| Sensitivity of FP-CIT SPECT 0.90 | “946” | “52.8” | “1,319” | “53.2” | “1,109” |
| Specificity of FP-CIT SPECT 0.73 | “946” | “52.8” | “1,355” | “53.2” | “1,062” |
| Tracer cost doubled | “946” | “52.8” | “1,756” | “53.4” | “1,462” |
| Tracer cost halved | “946” | “52.8” | “1,150” | “53.4” | “369” |
| Initial examination cost doubled | “1,064” | “52.8” | “1,470” | “53.4” | “733” |
| Initial examination cost halved | “887” | “52.8” | “1,293” | “53.4” | “733” |
| Medication cost doubled | “1,737” | “52.8” | “2,123” | “53.4” | “696” |
| Medication cost halved | “551” | “52.8” | “967” | “53.4” | “752” |
| Consequence ratio 1 | “946” | “11.6” | “1,352” | “11.5” | “Dom” |
| Consequence ratio 5 | “946” | “33.6” | “1,352” | “33.9” | “1,397” |
| Consequence ratio 12 | “946” | “72.1” | “1,352” | “72.9” | “497” |
| Consequence ratio 20 | “946” | “116.2” | “1,352” | “117.6” | “286” |
Cost of SPECT after positive clinical examination that is inconsistent with its ICER at a SPECT sensitivity of 1.00
Interpretation of the incremental gain and limitations of the decision model
Cost-effectiveness of dopamine transporter SPECT for differentiating essential tremor from Parkinson's disease, Italy
Effect of dopamine transporter SPECT on management of early probable Parkinson's disease
Cost of alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay and skin biopsy testing
No evidence found.
Approaches to treatment
Current treatment options and standard of care
Levodopa
Initial therapy: levodopa compared with dopamine agonists in early disease
| Time point | Change in UPDRS part III score, raw mean difference, levodopa minus dopamine agonist (negative values favor levodopa) | Dyskinesia, risk difference, levodopa minus dopamine agonist (positive values indicate higher risk with levodopa) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 years | “−5.0 [−7.2 to −2.5], moderate confidence” | “18.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.7%–23.8%], moderate confidence” |
| 4 years | “−4.9 [−7.8 to −1.9], low confidence” | “29.2% [19.6%–38.8%], moderate confidence” |
| 5 years | “−3.4 [−5.2 to −1.6], moderate confidence” | “17.5% [4.5%–30.5%], low confidence” |
Guideline recommendations for prescribing levodopa in early disease
First-line treatment recommendations in the United Kingdom
Levodopa as the reference symptomatic therapy
Extended-release levodopa for motor fluctuations
Effect of levodopa on disease progression: placebo-controlled trial
| Characteristic | Placebo | Levodopa 150 mg/day | Levodopa 300 mg/day | Levodopa 600 mg/day | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants, no. | “90” | “92” | “88” | “91” | Not applicable |
| Male sex, % | “72” | “63” | “67” | “68” | “0.62” |
| White race, % | “90” | “91” | “93” | “88” | “0.67” |
| Age, years, mean ± SD | “64.9±10.3” | “64.3±10.6” | “63.8±12.1” | “65.2±10.7” | “0.84” |
| Duration of disease, months, mean ± SD | “5.3±5.6” | “5.7±6.1” | “7.6±7.5” | “6.0±6.1” | “0.10” |
| Total UPDRS score, mean ± SD | “27.7±12.0” | “27.2±12.6” | “27.5±11.6” | “29.4±13.9” | “0.63” |
| UPDRS motor component, mean ± SD | “18.8±8.9” | “18.6±9.1” | “18.9±8.8” | “20.5±10.8” | “0.51” |
| Hoehn–Yahr scale score, mean ± SD | “1.8±0.5” | “1.9±0.6” | “1.8±0.5” | “1.9±0.6” | “0.57” |
| Change from baseline to week 42, mean ± SD | Placebo | Levodopa 150 mg/day | Levodopa 300 mg/day | Levodopa 600 mg/day | P value for trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary rater, participants, no. | “70” | “78” | “82” | “81” | Not applicable |
| Primary rater, total UPDRS score | “7.8±9.0” | “1.9±6.0” | “1.9±6.9” | “−1.4±7.7” | “<0.001” |
| Primary rater, mental component | “0.3±1.5” | “0.0±1.5” | “0.1±1.2” | “0.1±1.4” | “0.18” |
| Primary rater, ADL component | “2.3±3.4” | “0.5±2.3” | “0.4±2.9” | “−0.3±3.0” | “<0.001” |
| Primary rater, motor component | “5.2±6.4” | “1.4±5.5” | “1.4±5.3” | “−1.4±5.9” | “<0.001” |
| Treating investigator, total UPDRS score | “9.0±10.4” | “4.0±8.2” | “4.0±8.4” | “1.0±9.9” | “<0.001” |
| Treating investigator, mental component | “0.5±1.3” | “−0.1±1.4” | “0.1±1.4” | “0.1±1.6” | “0.31” |
| Treating investigator, ADL component | “2.5±4.0” | “0.8±3.1” | “1.0±2.8” | “0.3±3.5” | “<0.001” |
| Treating investigator, motor component | “6.0±7.6” | “3.2±6.4” | “3.0±6.4” | “0.6±7.7” | “<0.001” |
| Striatal β-CIT uptake, change from baseline to week 40 | Placebo | Levodopa 150 mg/day | Levodopa 300 mg/day | Levodopa 600 mg/day | P value for dose–response |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Substudy cohort, participants, no. | “29” | “33” | “37” | “36” | Not applicable |
| Substudy cohort, change, %, mean ± SD | “−2.6±11.3” | “−4.7±10.8” | “−3.7±9.1” | “−6.9±8.1” | “0.15” |
| Substudy cohort, P value compared with placebo | Not applicable | “0.46” | “0.63” | “0.11” | Not applicable |
| Excluding scans without dopaminergic deficit, participants, no. | “26” | “28” | “34” | “28” | Not applicable |
| Excluding scans without dopaminergic deficit, change, %, mean ± SD | “−1.4±10.0” | “−6.0±10.3” | “−4.0±9.4” | “−7.2±7.6” | “0.036” |
| Excluding scans without dopaminergic deficit, P value compared with placebo | Not applicable | “0.16” | “0.40” | “0.015” | Not applicable |
Dose-dependent dyskinesia, wearing off, and other adverse events over 40 weeks of levodopa
| Adverse event | Placebo (N = 90) | Levodopa 150 mg/day (N = 92) | Levodopa 300 mg/day (N = 88) | Levodopa 600 mg/day (N = 91) | P value for trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dyskinesia, no. (%) | “3 (3.3)” | “3 (3.3)” | “2 (2.3)” | “15 (16.5)” | “<0.001” |
| Dystonia, no. (%) | “19 (21.1)” | “19 (20.7)” | “14 (15.9)” | “12 (13.2)” | “0.30” |
| Wearing off, no. (%) | “12 (13.3)” | “15 (16.3)” | “16 (18.2)” | “27 (29.7)” | “0.06” |
| On–off, no. (%) | “3 (3.3)” | “1 (1.1)” | “0” | “3 (3.3)” | “0.26” |
| Freezing of gait, no. (%) | “13 (14.4)” | “9 (9.8)” | “6 (6.8)” | “5 (5.5)” | “0.15” |
| Nausea, no. (%) | “12 (13.3)” | “15 (16.3)” | “23 (26.1)” | “29 (31.9)” | “0.001” |
| Headache, no. (%) | “3 (3.3)” | “7 (7.6)” | “5 (5.7)” | “12 (13.2)” | “0.03” |
| Hypertonia, no. (%) | “1 (1.1)” | “0” | “1 (1.1)” | “5 (5.5)” | “0.03” |
| Infection, no. (%) | “1 (1.1)” | “0” | “0” | “6 (6.6)” | “0.01” |
| Dizziness, no. (%) | “6 (6.7)” | “10 (10.9)” | “5 (5.7)” | “14 (15.4)” | “0.13” |
| Somnolence, no. (%) | “2 (2.2)” | “0” | “5 (5.7)” | “5 (5.5)” | “0.07” |
| Fracture, no. (%) | “4 (4.4)” | “0” | “0” | “0” | “0.01” |
| Leg pain, no. (%) | “7 (7.8)” | “6 (6.5)” | “3 (3.4)” | “0” | “0.006” |
Effect of levodopa on disease progression: delayed-start trial
Effect of levodopa on disease progression: 5-year follow-up of the delayed-start trial
| Outcome | Early-start group, change from baseline, mean ± SD | Delayed-start group, change from baseline, mean ± SD | Estimated difference, square root transformed (SE) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 years, UPDRS total (I + II + III) | “2.6±11.4” | “0.9±12.8” | “0.17 (0.13)” | “0.18” |
| 3 years, UPDRS I | “−0.2±1.8” | “−0.3±1.8” | “0.07 (0.09)” | “0.45” |
| 3 years, UPDRS II | “1.3±4.2” | “1.1±3.7” | “0.03 (0.08)” | “0.68” |
| 3 years, UPDRS III | “1.5±8.8” | “0.1±9.7” | “0.16 (0.11)” | “0.18” |
| 3 years, UPDRS IV | “1.0±1.9” | “1.4±2.4” | “−0.13 (0.09)” | “0.18” |
| 3 years, Levy A | “0.6±7.2” | “−0.4±8.1” | “0.14 (0.11)” | “0.20” |
| 3 years, Levy B | “0.7±2.1” | “0.6±2.2” | “0.02 (0.08)” | “0.83” |
| 5 years, UPDRS total (I + II + III) | “11.5±17.0” | “8.2±16.2” | “0.24 (0.13)” | “0.07” |
| 5 years, UPDRS I | “0.4±2.2” | “0.2±1.9” | “0.11 (0.08)” | “0.17” |
| 5 years, UPDRS II | “3.7±4.7” | “3.2±5.3” | “0.09 (0.08)” | “0.25” |
| 5 years, UPDRS III | “7.4±13.7” | “4.7±11.9” | “0.21 (0.12)” | “0.09” |
| 5 years, UPDRS IV | “2.4±2.9” | “2.2±2.4” | “<0.01 (0.09)” | “0.97” |
| 5 years, Levy A | “4.7±10.9” | “2.9±9.4” | “0.15 (0.12)” | “0.20” |
| 5 years, Levy B | “2.1±3.0” | “1.5±2.4” | “0.11 (0.08)” | “0.16” |
Timing of levodopa initiation and motor complications: meta-analysis
Initial levodopa compared with levodopa-sparing therapy: evidence-based review conclusions
Levodopa compared with levodopa-sparing initial therapy: pragmatic trial
Dopamine agonists
Guideline recommendations for dopamine agonists as initial therapy
Comparative evidence among dopamine agonists and formulations
Dopamine agonists compared with levodopa in early disease: impulse control disorders and other adverse effects
Non-ergot dopamine agonists: evidence-based review implications for clinical practice by indication
| Agent | Implication for clinical practice: symptomatic monotherapy | Implication for clinical practice: adjunct to levodopa in early or stable disease | Implication for clinical practice: motor fluctuations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pramipexole immediate release | “Clinically useful” | “Clinically useful” | “Clinically useful” |
| Pramipexole extended release | “Clinically useful” | “Clinically useful” | “Clinically useful” |
| Ropinirole immediate release | “Clinically useful” | “Clinically useful” | “Clinically useful” |
| Ropinirole prolonged release | “Possibly useful” | Not reported | “Clinically useful” |
| Rotigotine | “Clinically useful” | “Clinically useful” | “Clinically useful” |
Adjunctive dopamine agonists for motor fluctuations: guideline recommendation
Efficacy conclusions for dopamine agonists in motor fluctuations
Adjunctive dopamine agonists: pooled off-time reduction
Adjunctive dopamine agonists: network meta-analysis ranking
Efficacy and safety profile of non-ergot dopamine agonists
Receptor selectivity of currently available dopamine agonists
Dopamine agonist receptor targets, motor complication risk, and adverse effects
Prolonged-release dopamine agonists and early-morning OFF periods: observational study
Monoamine oxidase B inhibitors
Guideline recommendations for MAO-B inhibitors in early disease
Levodopa compared with MAO-B inhibitors in early disease: systematic review findings
Efficacy conclusions for MAO-B inhibitors in motor fluctuations
MAO-B inhibitors compared with dopamine agonists as initial therapy
Clinical usefulness for monotherapy of early disease
Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors
Efficacy conclusions for COMT inhibitors in motor fluctuations
Opicapone added early in motor fluctuations compared with added levodopa
Levodopa initiated with entacapone in early disease
| Baseline characteristic | Levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (n = 373) | Levodopa/carbidopa (n = 372) |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years, mean ± SD | “60.6±8.7” | “59.8±8.2” |
| Men, no. (%) | “245 (65.7%)” | “222 (59.7%)” |
| Caucasian, no. (%) | “352 (94.4%)” | “357 (96.0%)” |
| Weight, kg, mean ± SD | “79.7±15.8” | “79.1±16.9” |
| Duration of disease, years, mean ± SD | “2.0±1.6” | “2.0±1.7” |
| UPDRS total (II + III), mean ± SD | “32.7±12.6” | “31.5±11.9” |
| UPDRS Part III (motor), mean ± SD | “23.1±9.5” | “22.4±9.0” |
| Hoehn & Yahr stage, mean ± SD | “1.9±0.5” | “1.9±0.5” |
| PDQ-39, mean ± SD | “25.2±15.0” | “22.9±13.7” |
| Previous antiparkinson medication, no. (%) | “263 (70.5%)” | “266 (71.5%)” |
| Dopamine agonist use, no. (%) | “217 (58.2%)” | “217 (58.3%)” |
Evidence-based review conclusions for COMT inhibitors
Levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone compared with levodopa/carbidopa: dyskinesia, wearing off, and dose equivalents
| Outcome | Levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (n = 373) | Levodopa/carbidopa (n = 372) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dyskinesia frequency at 208 weeks, no. (%) | “144 (38.6)” | “123 (33.1)” | “0.110” |
| Time to dyskinesia, first-quartile estimate, weeks (95% CI) | “90.7 (65.3–104.0)” | “117.1 (92.1–132.6)” | “0.038” |
| Disabling dyskinesia, no. (%) | “32 (8.6)” | “23 (6.2)” | “0.201” |
| Dyskinesia by direct observation, no. (%) | “130 (34.9)” | “110 (29.6)” | “0.118” |
| Dyskinesia by patient history, no. (%) | “141 (37.8)” | “113 (30.4)” | “0.031” |
| Dyskinesia by direct observation or patient history on 2 consecutive visits, no. (%) | “120 (32.2)” | “99 (26.6)” | “0.092” |
| Dyskinesia by direct observation on 2 consecutive visits, no. (%) | “84 (22.5)” | “77 (20.7)” | “0.550” |
| Dyskinesia frequency at 134 weeks, no. | “128” | “103” | “0.016” |
| UPDRS II + III, change from baseline to week 130 | “8.4” | “7.2” | “0.18” |
| Wearing off frequency at 208 weeks, no. (%) | “165 (44.2%)” | “189 (50.8%)” | “0.07” |
| Wearing off frequency at 130 weeks, no. (%) | “139 (45.6%)” | “161 (48.3%)” | “0.53” |
| Time to wearing off, weeks, mean ± SD | “72.9±50.9” | “78.5±51.5” | “0.53” |
| Time to wearing off, first-quartile estimate, weeks | “78.0” | “76.0” | “0.6” |
| Time to wearing off, hazard ratio (95% CI) | “0.94 (0.76–1.17)” | Not applicable | Not reported |
| Hoehn & Yahr stage, change from baseline | “0.4” | “0.3” | “NS” |
| Schwab & England score, change from baseline | “−1.4” | “−1.4” | “0.95” |
| PDQ-39, change from baseline | “2.2” | “2.4” | “0.77” |
| Levodopa dose equivalents at end of titration | “533.4” | “420.1” | “0.001” |
| Levodopa dose equivalents at onset of dyskinesia | “659.9” | “535.2” | “0.001” |
| Levodopa dose equivalents at final study visit | “524.1” | “432.6” | “0.001” |
Adverse events with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone compared with levodopa/carbidopa in early disease
| Adverse event | Levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (n = 373), no. (%) | Levodopa/carbidopa (n = 371), no. (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Any adverse event | “348 (93.3)” | “336 (90.6)” |
| Nausea | “114 (30.6)” | “71 (19.1)” |
| Diarrhea | “66 (17.7)” | “28 (7.5)” |
| Dizziness | “59 (15.8)” | “46 (12.4)” |
| Somnolence | “37 (9.9)” | “28 (7.5)” |
| Vomiting | “22 (5.9)” | “10 (2.7)” |
| Dyskinesia | “21 (5.6)” | “10 (2.7)” |
| Orthostatic hypotension | “20 (5.4)” | “13 (3.5)” |
| Myocardial infarction | “7 (1.9)” | “0 (0.0)” |
| Prostate cancer | “9 (2.4)” | “2 (0.5)” |
| Skin cancer | “7 (1.9)” | “12 (3.2)” |
Amantadine
Efficacy conclusion for amantadine in motor fluctuations
Amantadine for levodopa-induced dyskinesia
Amantadine for dyskinesia: evidence-based review conclusion
Guideline position on amantadine for dyskinesia
Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists
Efficacy conclusion for istradefylline in motor fluctuations
Regulatory status and pooled effect of istradefylline
Approval of istradefylline in Japan and the United States
Istradefylline for motor fluctuations and as monotherapy: evidence-based review conclusions
On-demand therapies
Evidence for intermittent apomorphine as rescue therapy
Intermittent apomorphine injections: evidence-based review conclusion
Inhaled levodopa for off episodes
Sublingual apomorphine for off episodes
Rescue therapies omitted from the evidence-based review
Device-aided therapies
Efficacy conclusions for infusion therapies
Levodopa-carbidopa enteral suspension: off time, on time without troublesome dyskinesia, and device-related adverse events
Subcutaneous foslevodopa/foscarbidopa: approval and tolerability
Deep brain stimulation: efficacy conclusions
Deep brain stimulation compared with best medical therapy in advanced disease
Deep brain stimulation in early motor complications
Deep brain stimulation in early motor complications: serious adverse events
| Serious adverse event | Neurostimulation (N = 124), participants with event (%) | Medical therapy (N = 127), participants with event (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Any serious adverse event | “68 (54.8)” | “56 (44.1)” |
| Death, all by suicide | “2 (1.6)” | “1 (0.8)” |
| Event related to medication or stimulation | “24 (19.4)” | “38 (29.9)” |
| Worsening of mobility | “5 (4.0)” | “11 (8.7)” |
| Motor fluctuations | “0” | “7 (5.5)” |
| Psychosis or hallucinations | “0” | “6 (4.7)” |
| Impulse control disorder | “1 (0.8)” | “5 (3.9)” |
| Depression | “6 (4.8)” | “1 (0.8)” |
| Suicide attempt | “2 (1.6)” | “2 (1.6)” |
| Event related to surgery or device | “22 (17.7)” | Not applicable |
| Impaired wound healing | “4 (3.2)” | Not applicable |
| Intracerebral abscess or edema | “2 (1.6)” | Not applicable |
| Dislocation of device | “4 (3.2)” | Not applicable |
| Reoperation necessary | “2 (1.6)” | Not applicable |
Deep brain stimulation in early motor complications: trial population and funding
Focused ultrasound pallidotomy
Focused ultrasound pallidotomy: procedural and trial limitations
Focused ultrasound subthalamotomy
Device-aided therapies: evidence-based review conclusions and setting of care
Focused ultrasound subthalamotomy: selected population and trial limitations
Guideline position on device-aided therapy
Limitations of current therapies
Summary
No available therapy has been shown to modify the course of Parkinson's disease. The 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society evidence-based review found no clinically useful interventions to prevent or delay progression, and in the LEAP delayed-start trial (445 participants) early levodopa had no disease-modifying effect over 80 weeks. Treatment is therefore symptomatic, and each symptomatic class carries a trade-off.
Initial levodopa gives greater motor benefit than initial dopamine agonists, but long-term oral use is complicated by motor and nonmotor fluctuations in up to 80% of patients. In STRIDE-PD (747 participants), dyskinesia was present at week 134 in 42% of participants who started levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone and 32% of those who started levodopa/carbidopa. In the 5-year follow-up of LEAP, 46 of 160 early-start and 62 of 161 delayed-start participants had dyskinesia.
Adjunctive oral therapy for motor fluctuations yields off-time reductions near the 1-hour minimal clinically important difference. In a network meta-analysis of 74 randomized controlled trials (18,693 participants), the weighted mean reduction in daily off-time relative to placebo was 1.1 hours for dopamine agonists, 0.9 hours for MAO-B inhibitors, and 0.8 hours for COMT inhibitors, and all three classes increased the odds of dyskinesia (odds ratios 3.0, 1.6, and 3.3). Head-to-head evidence is limited. In the PD MED trial of initial therapy (1,620 participants), 179 of 632 participants (28%) assigned dopamine agonists and 104 of 460 (23%) assigned MAO-B inhibitors discontinued their allocated treatment because of side effects, compared with 11 of 528 (2%) assigned levodopa.
The currently available dopamine agonists act mainly on D2/D3 receptors and carry neuropsychiatric and sleep-related risks. In a cross-sectional study of 3,090 participants, impulse control disorders were present in 17.1% of those taking a dopamine agonist and 6.9% of those not taking one (odds ratio 2.72). In a longitudinal cohort of 306 participants without impulse control disorders at baseline, the 5-year cumulative incidence was 46.1% overall and 51.5% among dopamine agonist users. The pooled relative risk of somnolence with pramipexole or ropinirole compared with placebo was 4.98. Reducing or stopping a dopamine agonist can cause dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome, which occurred in 5 of 26 participants (19%) in a retrospective cohort and 12 of 51 (24%) in a prospective cohort.
Device-aided therapies add procedural and tolerability burdens. In EARLYSTIM, serious adverse events related to surgical implantation or the device occurred in 17.7% of participants. Discontinuation with subcutaneous foslevodopa/foscarbidopa was 35.1% in the 12-week randomized trial and 44.8% in the 12-month open-label study.
No intervention prevents or delays disease progression
Motor complications with long-term levodopa
Response oscillations and dyskinesia as drivers of continued development
Dyskinesia and wearing-off prevalence after early or delayed levodopa initiation
Levodopa motor complications: pooled risk estimate at 4 to 6 years and its clinical significance
| Duration of levodopa therapy, modern era series | Dyskinesia, median %, unweighted | Dyskinesia, median %, weighted by N | Dyskinesia, range | Dyskinesia, total N | Motor fluctuations, median %, unweighted | Motor fluctuations, median %, weighted by N | Motor fluctuations, range | Motor fluctuations, total N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7–12 months | “7.5” | “7.0” | “0–38.9%” | “432” | “1.5” | “3.0” | “0–16%” | “112” |
| 13–24 months | “25.9” | “28.7” | “10.3–35.4%” | “575” | “45.7” | “47.9” | “0–50.4%” | “700” |
| 2.5–3.5 years | “28.0” | “26.9” | “13.2–40%” | “747” | “23.3” | “31.0” | “5–35.1%” | “849” |
| 4–6 years | “38.5” | “36.2” | “8–64%” | “1,599” | “42.1” | “40.8” | “11.8–60%” | “1,817” |
| 9–15+ years | “87.8” | “87.8” | “60.7–95.5%” | “514” | “69.6” | “69.6” | “40.9–82.9%” | “514” |
Levodopa equivalent daily dose 3 and 5 years after early or delayed levodopa initiation
| Visit | Early-start group, LEDD change from baseline, median (IQR) | Delayed-start group, LEDD change from baseline, median (IQR) | Estimated difference, square root transformed (SE) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 years | “400 (300–600)” | “450 (300–600)” | “−0.61 (0.69)” | “0.38” |
| 5 years | “600 (400–800)” | “600 (450–800)” | “−0.16 (0.78)” | “0.84” |
Dyskinesia risk with levodopa and dopamine agonist initiation strategies
Dyskinesia risk with adjunctive oral therapy
Discontinuation of levodopa-sparing therapy because of side effects
Limited comparative evidence to guide adjunct selection
Side-effect profile of non-ergot dopamine agonists and gaps in comparative safety evidence
Impulse control disorders with dopamine agonists: cross-sectional study
Impulse control disorders with dopamine agonists: longitudinal cohort
Somnolence with dopamine agonists
Dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome: retrospective cohort
Dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome: prospective cohort
Dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome: review
Unmet need for sustained, predictable relief with fewer adverse events
Place in treatment, anticipated use, and care setting
Summary
Tavapadon was studied in 2 settings. As monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease, TEMPO-1 (529 participants) and TEMPO-2 (304 participants) enrolled adults aged 40 to 80 years with disease duration under 3 years who were treatment-naive or had less than 3 months of prior dopaminergic treatment. As an adjunct to levodopa, TEMPO-3 (507 participants) enrolled adults with motor fluctuations on a fixed levodopa dose. The company describes the drug as studied as a once-daily oral treatment.
In early disease, tavapadon enters a setting in which the AAN guideline asks clinicians to counsel on the benefits and risks of levodopa, dopamine agonists, and MAO-B inhibitors, permits a dopamine agonist as initial therapy in select patients younger than 60 years at higher risk of dyskinesia, and advises against dopamine agonists in patients older than 70 years or with impulse control disorders, cognitive impairment, excessive daytime sleepiness, or hallucinations.
As an adjunct, tavapadon joins dopamine agonists, MAO-B inhibitors, COMT inhibitors, extended-release amantadine, and istradefylline. In pooled analyses, oral adjunct classes reduce off-time by 0.8 to 1.1 hours per day relative to placebo; TEMPO-3 reported a 1.1-hour increase in good on-time relative to placebo.
The proposed differentiation is D1/D5 selectivity, hypothesized to lower the risk of impulse control disorders, somnolence, and other adverse events attributed to D2/D3 stimulation. A 2026 meta-analysis rated the estimates for impulse control disorder (relative risk 2.02, 95% CI 0.51 to 8.00; 1 trial) and somnolence (pooled relative risk 1.20, 95% CI 0.37 to 3.92) as very low certainty and found that no trial used an active comparator or lasted longer than 27 weeks. A 2026 review stated that studies of drugs selectively targeting D1 receptors do not support improved safety and tolerability.
NICE advises seeking specialist advice before modifying therapy once dyskinesia or motor fluctuations develop. Analysts quoted at approval expected gradual uptake while Medicare coverage was negotiated.
Populations studied in the TEMPO trials
Place in therapy stated in a 2026 review
Unmet need in early disease addressed by the monotherapy trials
Rationale for adjunctive use in motor fluctuations
Background and interpretation of the flexible-dose monotherapy trial
Pharmacological rationale for D1/D5 partial agonism
Certainty of evidence for the D1/D5 partial agonist class
Positioning against existing dopamine agonists and adjuncts in a meta-analysis
Positioning against D2 agonists and levodopa in a commentary on TEMPO-2
Tavapadon among emerging therapies for motor fluctuations
Potential role where dopamine agonist withdrawal is a concern
Care setting: specialist input when fluctuations develop
Anticipated uptake after approval
Heterogeneity of treatment effect
Tavapadon: predefined subgroups in the fixed-dose monotherapy trial
Tavapadon: predefined subgroups in the flexible-dose monotherapy trial
Tavapadon: representativeness of the adjunctive trial population
Patient characteristics that modify the risk of dyskinesia and impulse control disorders
Predisposing factors for dyskinesia and dopamine agonist adverse effects in early disease
Clinical and demographic correlates of impulse control disorders
Impulse control disorders across dopaminergic therapies and disease stages
Concomitant dopamine agonists and dyskinesia with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone
Dyskinesia frequency by age, sex, body weight, disease duration, and MAO-B inhibitor use with levodopa/carbidopa with or without entacapone
| Subgroup | Levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone, no./total (%) | Levodopa/carbidopa, no./total (%) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age <65 years | “102/223 (45.7)” | “95/253 (37.5)” | “0.021” |
| Age ≥65 years | “42/150 (28.0)” | “28/119 (23.5)” | “0.162” |
| Men | “90/245 (36.7)” | “65/222 (29.3)” | “0.043” |
| Women | “54/128 (42.2)” | “58/150 (38.7)” | “0.191” |
| Body weight <75 kg | “61/142 (43.0)” | “67/164 (40.9)” | “0.374” |
| Body weight ≥75 kg | “83/231 (35.9)” | “56/208 (26.9)” | “0.018” |
| Disease duration <2 years | “75/157 (47.8)” | “50/168 (29.8)” | “<0.001” |
| Disease duration ≥2 years | “69/216 (31.9)” | “73/204 (35.8)” | “0.514” |
| Without MAO-B inhibitor | “123/335 (36.7)” | “115/343 (33.5)” | “0.170” |
| With MAO-B inhibitor | “21/38 (55.3)” | “8/29 (27.6)” | “0.005” |
Dopamine agonist subgroup in early versus delayed levodopa
Age and the comparison of initial levodopa with levodopa-sparing therapy
Levodopa response in participants without a dopaminergic deficit on baseline imaging
Young-onset disease, disease duration, and the frequency of levodopa motor complications
Patient characteristics associated with deep brain stimulation outcomes
Duration of motor fluctuations and response to opicapone
Patient profile and disease stage in adjunct selection
D1/D5 agonism in late-stage disease: pilot crossover study
Fixed-dose versus flexible-dose comparison of the monotherapy trials in a meta-analysis
Heterogeneity of pooled adverse event estimates between monotherapy and adjunctive trials
Care management intervention strategies
Counseling and screening before starting a dopamine agonist
Ongoing monitoring with caregiver involvement and validated questionnaires
Tapering dopamine agonists after adverse effects
Tapering dopamine agonists: approach and management of withdrawal syndrome
Tapering dopamine agonists: proposed reduction rates by agent
| Dopamine agonist and dose setting | Quoted rate of reduction |
|---|---|
| Pramipexole, low doses | “At low doses (e.g., ≤ 1.5 mg/d.): reduce by 25–33% every 7–14 days” |
| Pramipexole, higher doses | “At higher doses (e.g., > 1.5 mg/d.): reduce by 10–25% every 1–2 weeks” |
| Pramipexole, long-term treatment or impulse control disorder | “Long-term treatment or ICD, the rate 10% every 1–2 weeks” |
| Pramipexole extended release | “Reduction by 0.375 mg every second day” |
| Rotigotine | “Reduction by 2 mg every second day, until discontinuation” |
| Ropinirole immediate release (one of two listed rates) | “2 mg every second day” |
| Piribedil | “50 mg every third day” |
| Apomorphine pump | “0.5 mg/h every second day” |
Information, review, and management of impulse control disorders
Continuity of medication during hospital or care home admission
Nurse specialist, rehabilitation therapy, and nutrition
Physiotherapy and exercise as adjuncts to medication
Practical adjustments before adding an adjunct
Sequence of interventions for motor fluctuations in clinical practice
Caregiver-directed cognitive behavior therapy and palliative care: meta-analysis of effect on caregiver burden
Other product development or post-marketing obligations required by the FDA
Postmarketing requirements and commitments in the FDA approval letter
No evidence found.
Ongoing post-approval monitoring
Long-term open-label extension trial
Expected outcomes of therapy
Summary
Available treatments, tavapadon included, are symptomatic. Clinically meaningful thresholds used in this indication are about 1 hour per day for change in off-time or on-time without troublesome dyskinesia (MDS review threshold 1 hour; pramipexole extended-release trials 1.0 to 1.3 hours), 4 points for MDS-UPDRS Part III in the MDS review (anchor-based estimates of -3.25 points for improvement and 4.63 points for worsening), and 4.9 points for combined MDS-UPDRS Parts II and III as cited by TEMPO-1. In early disease, tavapadon reduced the combined Parts II and III score from baseline by 9.7 points (5 mg) and 10.2 points (15 mg) at week 26 in TEMPO-1, which the investigators described as approximately twice the minimal clinically important difference, and a meta-analysis of 2 monotherapy trials estimated a placebo-adjusted improvement of 10.55 points. As an adjunct, TEMPO-3 reported a least-squares mean reduction in off-time of 1.88 hours from baseline and a placebo-adjusted increase in good on-time of 1.1 hours; the pooled estimate from 2 adjunctive trials was 1.09 hours. No randomized trial of tavapadon identified by that meta-analysis lasted longer than 27 weeks.