Section 3 of 6
Product information and disease description
131 evidence topics · 38 sources
Product description
Phase of product development
Regulatory submission: BLA approved July 2026
Launch: Anticipated before the end of 2026
Regulatory history: first Complete Response Letter
Regulatory history: NORSE EIGHT trial, second and third Complete Response Letters
Regulatory history: resubmission acceptance and final approval
Regulatory history: European Union and United Kingdom approval and launch
Product information
Generic, brand name and therapeutic class of product
Manufacturer: Outlook Therapeutics
Generic and brand names, therapeutic class
Dosage forms and strengths
Storage and handling
Composition
Average sales price and wholesale acquisition cost
Average sales price
No evidence found.
American hospital formulary service (AHFS), or other drug classification
No evidence found.
Indication
Pharmacology
Mechanism of action
Mechanism of action
Pharmacodynamics
Central foveal thickness as a pharmacodynamic marker
Pharmacokinetics
Systemic pharmacokinetics after intravitreal injection
Immunogenicity
Contraindications/Warnings/Precautions/Adverse effects
Warnings and precautions
Contraindications
Warning: endophthalmitis and retinal detachments
Warning: increases in intraocular pressure
Adverse reactions: clinical trial exposure and most common reaction
Special populations
Pregnancy
Lactation
Females and males of reproductive potential
Drug/Drug, drug/disease interactions
Effects of other drugs on bevacizumab-vikg
No evidence found.
Effects of bevacizumab-vikg on other drugs
No evidence found.
Dosing and administration
Dosage
Recommended dose and dosing interval
Administration
Required devices and preparation
Injection procedure and post-injection monitoring
Access and distribution
Pre-launch preparation and planned launch timing
Reimbursement coding and payer access strategy
Co-prescribed/Concomitant therapies
No evidence found.
Effect of bevacizumab-vikg on quality measures
No evidence found.
Product comparison
NORSE TWO: LYTENAVA versus ranibizumab, dosing regimens and primary endpoint at Month 11
NORSE TWO: patients gaining 15 or more ETDRS letters at 11 months
| Field | LYTENAVA 1.25 mg once monthly (N = 113) | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg once monthly x 3 months then every 3 months (N = 115) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects, n/N (%) | “45/108 (41.7)” | “24/104 (23.1)” |
NORSE TWO: risk difference between LYTENAVA and ranibizumab
NORSE EIGHT: LYTENAVA versus ranibizumab, non-inferiority at Week 8
Comparison with unapproved compounded bevacizumab
Market size and competitive landscape
Place of product in therapy
Disease description
Definition and etiology
Definition of age-related macular degeneration
Dry and wet forms of AMD
Etiology: age as the leading risk factor
Etiology: family history, race, and smoking
Anatomic basis: the retinal pigment epithelium, Bruch's membrane, and drusen
Epidemiology
Incidence of Neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Incidence by age group
Prevalence of Neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Prevalence in a population-based cohort
United States prevalence among Medicare beneficiaries
United States burden estimates
Natural history, survival, and mortality
Untreated disease course
Contribution to overall disease burden
Mortality attributable to neovascular AMD
No evidence found.
Pathophysiology
Progression from early disease to neovascular disease
Diagnosis
Amsler grid self-monitoring
Optical coherence tomography angiography
Home optical coherence tomography as an adjunct to office-based diagnosis
Clinical presentation - signs and symptoms
Visual symptoms: central vision blur and distortion
Vascular signs: leaking, abnormal blood vessels
Long-term morbidity
Anxiety and depression
Burden of Neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Humanistic burden and health-related quality of life
Emotional burden of injection visits
Caregiver involvement in treatment visits
Economic burden and healthcare resource utilization
Outpatient and injection-related resource use
Economic impact of Neovascular age-related macular degeneration on families
Unemployment associated with AMD-related vision loss
Caregiver work absence and added household expense
Caregiver time burden per treatment visit
Economic impact of diagnostic testing
Not applicable.