Evicenter
P&T meetings

Relutrigine

SCN2A- and SCN8A-related developmental and epileptic encephalopathies

Regulatory submission
NDA submitted in early 2026
Launch
Not announced
72 sources

Section 3 of 6

Product information and disease description

88 evidence topics · 63 sources

Product description

Phase of product development

Launch

No evidence found.

Product information

Generic, brand name and therapeutic class of product
Manufacturer: Praxis Precision Medicines
Dosage forms and strengths
Clinical product formulation: material safety data sheet

No evidence found.

Formulation strength

No evidence found.

Average sales price and wholesale acquisition cost
Product price and anticipated annual cost per patient

Not applicable.

American hospital formulary service (AHFS), or other drug classification
AHFS classification

No evidence found.

Indication
Pharmacology
Mechanism of action
Pharmacodynamics
Pharmacokinetics
Contraindications/Warnings/Precautions/Adverse effects
Warnings and precautions
FDA-approved prescribing information, contraindications, boxed warnings, and REMS

Not applicable.

Special populations
Renal impairment, hepatic impairment, pregnancy, and lactation

No evidence found.

Drug/Drug, drug/disease interactions
Effects of other drugs on Relutrigine
Effects of Relutrigine on other drugs
Dosing and administration
Dosage
Administration
Access and distribution
Co-prescribed/Concomitant therapies
EMBOLD cohort 2: baseline medication use among relutrigine-exposed participants
Baseline ASMsParticipants
1 to 2“17 (33%)”
3 to 6“34 (67%)”
Effect of Relutrigine on quality measures

No evidence found.

Product comparison
Preclinical comparison: protective index in mouse seizure and locomotor assays
CompoundProtective index
PRAX-562“16.2”
Lamotrigine“4.7”
Carbamazepine“5.9”
Direct clinical comparison with another active antiseizure medication

No evidence found.

Place of product in therapy

Disease description

Definition and etiology
Epidemiology
Incidence of SCN2A- and SCN8A-related developmental and epileptic encephalopathies
SCN2A-related epilepsy: estimated Danish incidence, broader than DEE
Prevalence of SCN2A- and SCN8A-related developmental and epileptic encephalopathies
Natural history, survival, and mortality
Pathophysiology
Diagnosis
Clinical presentation - signs and symptoms
Long-term morbidity
Burden of SCN2A- and SCN8A-related developmental and epileptic encephalopathies
Humanistic burden and health-related quality of life
Literature review: impact of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies on caregivers
Economic burden and healthcare resource utilization
German burden-of-illness study: registry recruitment status
Economic impact of SCN2A- and SCN8A-related developmental and epileptic encephalopathies on families

No evidence found.

Economic impact of diagnostic testing

Approaches to treatment

Current treatment options and standard of care
Sodium channel blockers
Benzodiazepines
Other antiseizure medications
Corticosteroids and immunoglobulins
SCN8A: corticosteroids and immunoglobulins when standard ASMs are ineffective
Ketogenic dietary therapy
Vagus nerve stimulation
SCN8A: vagus nerve stimulation when standard ASMs are ineffective
Cannabinoids
Developmental and supportive therapies
Limitations of current therapies
Summary

Current treatment is heterogeneous and frequently involves several antiseizure medications. The SCN8A caregiver survey found that 77% were taking at least two ASMs and 50% had tried and stopped at least four. Sodium channel blocker recommendations depend on variant function and phenotype: consensus guidance favors them in SCN8A gain-of-function disease but relatively contraindicates them in loss-of-function disease. In SCN2A epilepsy, later-onset disease was associated with less benefit and occasional seizure worsening. The cenobamate evidence cited here is a 12-participant observational series, not a randomized comparison with relutrigine.

Place in treatment, anticipated use, and care setting
Summary

The studied use of relutrigine is as an investigational treatment for SCN2A- and SCN8A-related DEEs in participants already receiving antiseizure medications. In EMBOLD cohort 2, 34 participants exposed to relutrigine, representing 67%, were taking three to six ASMs at baseline. The manufacturer describes an oral or G/J-tube liquid formulation. Expanded-access requests require submission by the treating physician and are considered individually. These data describe study use and access arrangements, not an approved treatment position.

Heterogeneity of treatment effect
Care management intervention strategies
Other product development or post-marketing obligations required by the FDA

Not applicable.

Ongoing post-approval monitoring

Not applicable.

Expected outcomes of therapy