Evicenter
P&T meetings

LB-102

Schizophrenia

Regulatory submission
Not announced
Launch
Not announced
Last updated
345 sources

Section 3 of 6

Product information and disease description

519 evidence topics · 325 sources

Product description

Phase of product development

FDA end-of-phase 2 feedback on the registration package
Regulatory submission

No evidence found.

Launch

No evidence found.

Fast track, breakthrough therapy, or priority review designation

No evidence found.

Planned NDA pathway under section 505(b)(1) or section 505(b)(2)

No evidence found.

Patent protection: composition of matter expiry
Marketing application, scientific advice, or designation from a regulator outside the United States

No evidence found.

Product information

Generic, brand name and therapeutic class of product
International nonproprietary name, United States adopted name, and brand name

No evidence found.

Dosage forms and strengths
Oral tablet: phase 3 NOVA-2
Commercial dosage form, strengths, and package configurations

No evidence found.

Average sales price and wholesale acquisition cost
Product price and anticipated annual cost of treatment

Not applicable.

American hospital formulary service (AHFS), or other drug classification
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification of the parent compound amisulpride
AHFS Pharmacologic-Therapeutic Classification and ATC code assigned to LB-102

No evidence found.

Indication
Proposed labeled indication submitted to a regulator

No evidence found.

Pharmacology
Mechanism of action
Limbic versus striatal selectivity measured for LB-102

No evidence found.

In vivo 5-HT7 receptor occupancy of LB-102

No evidence found.

Pharmacodynamics
QTc interval in NOVA-1
ParameterLB-102 50 mg (n = 107)LB-102 75 mg (n = 108)LB-102 100 mg (n = 36)Placebo (n = 108)
QTc, mean (SD) change from baseline to day 28, millisecond“4.9 (13.39)”“4.3 (12.55)”“5.4 (9.44)”“1.2 (12.56)”
Mean change ≥30 millisecond, No. participants (%)“5 (4.7)”“1 (0.9)”“1 (2.8)”“1 (0.9)”
Mean change ≥60 millisecond, No. participants (%)“0”“0”“0”“0”
Concentration-QTc modeling and a thorough QT study

No evidence found.

Pharmacokinetics
Food effect study results for LB-102

No evidence found.

Absolute bioavailability, plasma protein binding, volume of distribution, mass balance, and routes of excretion of LB-102

No evidence found.

Pharmacokinetics of LB-102 in participants with schizophrenia

No evidence found.

Contraindications/Warnings/Precautions/Adverse effects
Warnings and precautions
NOVA-1: adverse events by dose
Outcome, No. (%)LB-102 50 mg (n = 107)LB-102 75 mg (n = 108)LB-102 100 mg (n = 36)Placebo (n = 108)
Any TEAE“74 (69.2)”“62 (57.4)”“27 (75.0)”“60 (55.6)”
Any treatment-related TEAE“49 (45.8)”“34 (31.5)”“17 (47.2)”“23 (21.3)”
Any serious TEAE“1 (0.9)”“1 (0.9)”“1 (2.8)”“2 (1.9)”
TEAE leading to early withdrawal“2 (1.9)”“3 (2.8)”“3 (8.3)”“2 (1.9)”
Insomnia“27 (25.2)”“23 (21.3)”“14 (38.9)”“24 (22.2)”
Weight (increase)“13 (12.1)”“8 (7.4)”“3 (8.3)”“4 (3.7)”
Blood prolactin (increase)“7 (6.5)”“6 (5.6)”“3 (8.3)”“0”
Hyperprolactinemia“4 (3.7)”“2 (1.9)”“3 (8.3)”“0”
Somnolence“1 (0.9)”“4 (3.7)”“2 (5.6)”“0”
Blood creatine phosphokinase (increase)“4 (3.7)”“1 (0.9)”“2 (5.6)”“3 (2.8)”
Alanine aminotransferase (increase)“3 (2.8)”“1 (0.9)”“2 (5.6)”“1 (0.9)”
Constipation“4 (3.7)”“1 (0.9)”“2 (5.6)”“0”
NOVA-1: extrapyramidal symptoms, dystonia, and akathisia
Preferred termLB-102 50 mg (N=107)LB-102 75 mg (N=108)LB-102 100 mg (N=36)Placebo (N=108)
Dystonia“0”“3 (2.8%)”“1 (2.8%)”“1 (0.9%)”
Akathisia“1 (0.9%)”“2 (1.8%)”“0”“1 (0.9%)”
Extrapyramidal disorder“0”“1 (0.9%)”“1 (2.8%)”“2 (1.9%)”
Total EPS“1 (1.0%)”“6 (5.6%)”“2 (5.6%)”“4 (3.7%)”
NOVA-1: weight gain and metabolic parameters
Parameter, mean (SD) change from baseline to day 28LB-102 50 mg (n = 107)LB-102 75 mg (n = 108)LB-102 100 mg (n = 36)Placebo (n = 108)
Weight, kg“4.3 (3.2)”“3.3 (2.8)”“2.9 (2.5)”“2.0 (2.9)”
Fasting glucose, mg/dL“2.3 (24.52)”“2.0 (13.62)”“7.0 (19.39)”“0.2 (12.07)”
Total cholesterol, mg/dL“7.7 (24.75)”“5.4 (23.98)”“5.8 (25.52)”“0.8 (25.06)”
Phase 1: dose-limiting acute dystonia and maximum tolerated dose
Class context: amisulpride labeling on QT prolongation
Safety beyond 4 weeks of treatment, tardive dyskinesia, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome with LB-102

No evidence found.

Special populations
QTc and laboratory exclusion thresholds in NOVA-2 and NOVA-3

No evidence found.

Renal impairment study, hepatic impairment study, pediatric data, and data in adults older than 65 years for LB-102

No evidence found.

Drug/Drug, drug/disease interactions
Effects of other drugs on LB-102
Clinical drug interaction studies with LB-102

No evidence found.

In vitro CYP and transporter substrate findings for LB-102

No evidence found.

Restrictions on QT-prolonging medications in the LB-102 trial protocols

No evidence found.

Effects of LB-102 on other drugs
Clinical drug interaction studies with LB-102

No evidence found.

In vitro CYP inhibition, CYP induction, and transporter inhibition by LB-102

No evidence found.

Dosing and administration
Dosage
Proposed labeled dose, maximum dose, and dose adjustment in renal or hepatic impairment

No evidence found.

Administration
Fasted or fed dosing conditions in NOVA-1, NOVA-2, and NOVA-3

No evidence found.

Missed dose instructions and administration with other medications

No evidence found.

Access and distribution
Distribution channel, specialty pharmacy requirement, and risk evaluation and mitigation strategy

No evidence found.

Co-prescribed/Concomitant therapies
NOVA-1: discontinuation and washout of prior antipsychotics
NOVA-1: dose limits for permitted rescue medications
MedicationStudy periodDose permitted
LorazepamScreening phase through day 7“Maximum of 6 mg/day”
LorazepamDay 8 through day 14“Maximum of 4 mg/day”
LorazepamDay 15 through day 28“Maximum of 2 mg/day”
BenztropineScreening phase through day 28“Maximum 4 mg/day”
PropranololScreening phase through day 28“Maximum of 40 mg/day”
Reported use of rescue and concomitant medications in NOVA-1

No evidence found.

Permitted and prohibited concomitant medications in NOVA-2 and NOVA-3

No evidence found.

Use of LB-102 in combination with another antipsychotic

No evidence found.

Effect of LB-102 on quality measures
LB-102-specific effect on quality measures

No evidence found.

Product comparison
Summary

No trial has compared LB-102 with an active drug. NOVA-1 had no active comparator arm, the company states that it has not conducted a head-to-head clinical trial against amisulpride, and the phase 3 NOVA-2 trial compares LB-102 50 mg and 100 mg with placebo over 6 weeks. Every comparison in this section is therefore indirect, across trials that differ in duration, baseline severity, and placebo response.

In NOVA-1 (4 weeks, 359 participants randomized, mean baseline PANSS total score about 94), the least-squares mean difference from placebo in PANSS total score at week 4 was -5.0 points with 50 mg (95% CI -8.0 to -2.1), -4.7 points with 75 mg (95% CI -7.7 to -1.7), and -6.8 points with the exploratory 100 mg dose (95% CI -11.1 to -2.6; 36 participants). The placebo group improved by 9.3 points. Post hoc Hedges g was 0.61, 0.41, and 0.83.

Amisulpride, the parent compound, is approved in Europe for acute and chronic schizophrenia at 400 to 800 mg per day for acute episodes (up to 1200 mg per day in individual cases), with doses above 400 mg divided in two. In the United States it is approved only as intravenous BARHEMSYS for postoperative nausea and vomiting. The company states that dopamine receptor occupancy at 50 mg of LB-102 is approximately equivalent to that at 300 to 400 mg of amisulpride. In the 2019 network meta-analysis of 32 oral antipsychotics (402 studies, 53,463 participants), amisulpride had the largest standardized mean difference from placebo for positive symptoms (-0.69, 95% CrI -0.86 to -0.52) and was one of five drugs that reduced overall symptoms significantly more than many other drugs. The NOVA-1 authors cite its overall-symptom estimate as -0.73 (95% CrI -0.89 to -0.58), beside -0.56 for olanzapine and -0.55 for risperidone. The meta-analysis authors note that no placebo-controlled amisulpride study was available for overall symptoms and that confidence in the evidence was often low or very low. In the 2013 multiple-treatments meta-analysis (212 trials, 43,049 participants), the amisulpride estimate was 0.66 (95% CrI 0.53 to 0.78). In BeSt InTro (144 participants, 52 weeks), the PANSS total score fell by 32.7 points with amisulpride, 21.9 points with aripiprazole, and 23.3 points with olanzapine. In predominant negative symptoms, amisulpride was superior to placebo across 4 trials with 590 participants (standardized mean difference 0.47, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.71).

Placebo-subtracted PANSS total score differences in the registration trials of other oral agents were as follows. Xanomeline-trospium: -9.6 points (EMERGENT-2, 5 weeks, 252 participants) and -8.4 points (EMERGENT-3, 5 weeks, 256 participants), with a pooled estimate of -9.9 points across three 5-week trials (640 participants). An independent meta-analysis of the same three trials (690 participants) gave a standardized mean difference of -0.56 (95% CI -0.72 to -0.40); the company presentation states that the LB-102 100 mg effect sizes (0.83 in completers and 0.64 by mixed model) are greater than that value. Lumateperone 42 mg: -4.2 points (4 weeks, 450 participants) and -5.8 points (4 weeks, 335 participants). Cariprazine: -6.0 to -10.4 points across three 6-week trials (711, 604, and 439 participants). Brexpiprazole: -3.1 to -8.7 points across two 6-week trials. Lurasidone: -2.1 to -16.2 points across three 6-week trials (473, 489, and 482 participants). Olanzapine and samidorphan: -6.4 points (4 weeks, 401 participants dosed). Meta-analyses of placebo-controlled antipsychotic trials report that placebo response has increased over time and that the drug-placebo difference decreased with later publication year, lower baseline severity, and longer study duration.

In NOVA-1, mean prolactin rose by 51.2 to 59.9 ng/mL in the LB-102 groups and by 1.3 ng/mL with placebo. Elevated prolactin at day 28 was reported in 87.5% to 94.0% of LB-102 participants and 5.2% of placebo participants, and 5 participants had a prolactin-related clinical adverse event. In the 2019 network meta-analysis, mean differences from placebo in prolactin ranged from -77.05 ng/mL (clozapine) to 48.51 ng/mL (paliperidone), and amisulpride was one of eight drugs with significantly elevated prolactin. Mean weight change over 4 weeks was 2.9 to 4.3 kg with LB-102 and 2.0 kg with placebo; a weight increase of 7% or more occurred in 9% to 26% of LB-102 participants and 10% of placebo participants; the company reports approximately 1.6 kg of placebo-adjusted weight gain. The network meta-analysis range for weight gain against placebo was -0.16 kg (ziprasidone) to 3.21 kg (zotepine), and the NOVA-1 authors place LB-102 between xanomeline-trospium (-0.37 kg) and olanzapine (2.78 kg). Mean QTc change was 4.3 to 5.4 milliseconds with LB-102 and 1.2 milliseconds with placebo; the network meta-analysis range was -2.21 milliseconds (lurasidone) to 23.90 milliseconds (sertindole). Extrapyramidal symptom incidence in the publication was 0% to 2.8% with LB-102 and 1.9% with placebo. The company total, which adds dystonia and akathisia, was 1.0%, 5.6%, and 5.6% at 50 mg, 75 mg, and 100 mg and 3.7% with placebo. In EMERGENT-2, extrapyramidal symptoms were reported in 0% of both groups, nausea in 19% and vomiting in 14% of xanomeline-trospium participants, and weight gain in 0% of xanomeline-trospium participants and 1% of placebo participants.

Among investigational agents, emraclidine did not meet the primary endpoint in two 6-week phase 2 trials reported in November 2024. Brilaroxazine 50 mg differed from placebo by 10.1 points at week 4 in the phase 3 RECOVER trial (412 participants), and the FDA recommended a second phase 3 trial. Ulotaront was not superior to placebo in the 6-week phase 3 DIAMOND 1 trial (435 participants), and in DIAMOND 2 (464 participants) its reductions were numerically larger than with placebo (-16.4 and -18.1 points against -14.3 points). Iclepertin did not meet its primary and key secondary endpoints for cognition in the phase 3 CONNEX program (1,840 participants). NBI-1117568 20 mg once daily differed from placebo by 7.5 points at week 6 in phase 2, and a phase 3 program began in 2025. ML-007C-MA twice daily differed from placebo by 4.5 points in the phase 2 ZEPHYR trial (307 participants) reported in July 2026. Adjunctive xanomeline-trospium differed from placebo by 2.0 points in the phase 3 ARISE trial (P = 0.11). Evenamide added to current antipsychotic therapy differed from placebo by 2.5 points at 4 weeks (291 participants). The FDA approved milsaperidone (BYSANTI) for schizophrenia in February 2026 and a lumateperone relapse-prevention supplement in April 2026, and an application for olanzapine extended-release injection (TEV-749) is under review with a decision expected in the fourth quarter of 2026. SEP-4199, a non-racemic amisulpride, was studied in bipolar I depression, and its phase 3 trial was terminated after 83 participants enrolled.

No editorial accompanying the NOVA-1 publication was identified, and no network meta-analysis or indirect treatment comparison that includes LB-102 was identified. A 2026 review describes LB-102 as a potential first benzamide antipsychotic for the United States market with an effect size of 0.61 at 50 mg. A 2025 review states that hyperprolactinemia “may limit its usability in the future”. A NOVA-1 investigator stated that the full clinical value will depend on phase 3 data, longer-term metabolic and endocrine outcomes, relapse prevention, functioning, adherence, and head-to-head comparisons.

LB-102 against amisulpride: design goals stated by the company

“LB-102 is a new chemical entity and a methylated derivative of amisulpride, a second-generation antipsychotic drug approved in over 50 countries, not including the United States, because the development and regulatory requirements of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for amisulpride were incompatible with patent coverage on the drug.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The methylation we incorporated into LB-102 was designed to improve the tolerability and efficacy profile of amisulpride by addressing its shortcomings, such as limited blood-brain barrier, or BBB, permeability and dosing frequency.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Enhanced BBB permeability was expected to improve the potency of the molecule with respect to dopamine receptor binding and enable the use of lower doses compared with amisulpride.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“By dosing LB-102 at a lower level, we are aiming to decrease side effects common to amisulpride and other antipsychotic drugs currently used to treat schizophrenia.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“If approved for schizophrenia, we expect to commercialize the oral formulation of LB-102 in jurisdictions where amisulpride is unavailable as a generic, and we expect to commercialize an LAI form of LB-102 worldwide.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

LB-102 against amisulpride: dose and dopamine receptor occupancy
Amisulpride efficacy standing: network meta-analysis of 32 oral antipsychotics

“We identified 54 417 citations and included 402 studies with data for 53 463 participants.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Effect size estimates suggested all antipsychotics reduced overall symptoms more than placebo (although not statistically significant for six drugs), with standardised mean differences ranging from −0·89 (95% CrI −1·08 to −0·71) for clozapine to −0·03 (−0·59 to 0·52) for levomepromazine (40 815 participants).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Clozapine, amisulpride, zotepine, olanzapine, and risperidone reduced overall symptoms significantly more than many other drugs” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The SMDs for the 17 (81%) drugs that significantly reduced positive symptoms compared with placebo ranged between −0·69 (95% CrI −0·86 to −0·52) for amisulpride to −0·17 (−0·31 to −0·04) for brexpiprazole” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The SMDs for the 18 (86%) antipsychotics that significantly reduced negative symptoms compared with placebo ranged between −0·62 (95% CrI −0·84 to −0·39) for clozapine to −0·22 (−0·33 to −0·11) for iloperidone” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Clozapine, amisulpride, olanzapine, and, to a lesser extent, zotepine and risperidone reduced negative symptoms significantly more than many other drugs.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Amisulpride was among the most efficacious antipsychotics, but no placebo-controlled study was available, making this evidence entirely indirect.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Nevertheless, amisulpride was significantly superior to placebo in older patients (≥60 years of age; SMD 0·86) and in patients with predominant negative symptoms (SMD 0·47).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“However, overlapping CrIs between antipsychotics suggest that differences between most individual drugs were not significant.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The confidence in evidence was often low or very low.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Weight gain, prolactin, QTc, akathisia, and antiparkinson medication use across oral antipsychotics: network meta-analysis ranges

“Mean differences compared to placebo for weight gain (28 317 participants) ranged from −0·16 kg (−0·73 to 0·40; ziprasidone) to 3·21 kg (2·10 to 4·31; zotepine), for prolactin elevation (21 569 participants) from −77·05 ng/mL (−120·23 to −33·54; clozapine) to 48·51 ng/mL (43·52 to 53·51; paliperidone) and for QTc prolongation (15 467 participants) from −2·21 ms (−4·54 to 0·15; lurasidone) to 23·90 ms (20·56 to 27·33; sertindole).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Seven (50%) of 14 antipsychotics caused significantly more QTc prolongation than placebo with mean differences ranging from 3·43 ms (95% CrI 0·94–6·00) for quetiapine to 23·90 ms (95% CrI 20·56–27·33) for sertindole” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Risk ratios for the 21 (66%) of 32 antipsychotics that were associated with significantly increased use of antiparkinson medication compared with placebo ranged from 1·61 (95% CrI 1·17–2·10) for paliperidone to 6·14 (4·81–6·55) for pimozide” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The hierarchy was similar to use of antiparkinson medication, with significant risk ratios for 20 (67%) of 30 drugs ranging from 1·95 (95% CrI 1·30–2·74) for aripiprazole to 23·81 (7·41–142·86) for zuclopenthixol” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In contrast to our previous report, we present QTc prolongation in original units (ms), which facilitates clinical interpretation; lurasidone and the partial dopamine agonists were the most benign drugs.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Company characterization of the comparative evidence for amisulpride
Lumateperone: CAPLYTA prescribing information, primary efficacy results at week 4
StudyTreatment groupNMean baseline PANSS total score (SD)LS mean change from baseline (SE)Placebo-subtracted difference (95% CI)
Study 1CAPLYTA 42 mg“84”“88.1 (11.0)”“-13.2 (1.7)”“-5.8 (-10.5, -1.1)”
Study 1Placebo“85”“86.3 (13.1)”“-7.4 (1.7)”Not reported
Study 2CAPLYTA 42 mg“150”“90.0 (9.6)”“-14.5 (1.3)”“-4.2 (-7.8, -0.6)”
Study 2Placebo“150”“89.0 (10.3)”“-10.3 (1.3)”Not reported
Cariprazine: VRAYLAR prescribing information, primary efficacy results at week 6

“The efficacy of VRAYLAR for the treatment of schizophrenia was established in three, 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients (mean age of 37 years, aged 18 to 60 years; 31% were female; and 45% were Caucasian) who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for schizophrenia. An active control arm (risperidone or aripiprazole) was included in two trials to assess assay sensitivity.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Study 1: In a 6-week, placebo-controlled trial (N = 711) involving three fixed doses of VRAYLAR (1.5, 3, or 4.5 mg/day) and an active control (risperidone), all VRAYLAR doses and the active control were superior to placebo on the PANSS total score and the CGI-S.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Study 2: In a 6-week, placebo-controlled trial (N = 604) involving two fixed doses of VRAYLAR (3 or 6 mg/day) and an active control (aripiprazole), both VRAYLAR doses and the active control were superior to placebo on the PANSS total score and the CGI-S.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Study 3: In a 6-week, placebo-controlled trial (N = 439) involving two flexible-dose range groups of VRAYLAR (3 to 6 mg/day or 6 to 9 mg/day), both VRAYLAR groups were superior to placebo on the PANSS total score and the CGI-S.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

StudyTreatment groupMean baseline PANSS total score (SD)LS mean change from baseline (SE)Placebo-subtracted difference (95% CI)
Study 1VRAYLAR 1.5 mg/day“97.1 (9.1)”“-19.4 (1.6)”“-7.6 (-11.8, -3.3)”
Study 1VRAYLAR 3 mg/day“97.2 (8.7)”“-20.7 (1.6)”“-8.8 (-13.1, -4.6)”
Study 1VRAYLAR 4.5 mg/day“96.7 (9.0)”“-22.3 (1.6)”“-10.4 (-14.6, -6.2)”
Study 1Placebo“97.3 (9.2)”“-11.8 (1.5)”Not reported
Study 2VRAYLAR 3 mg/day“96.1 (8.7)”“-20.2 (1.5)”“-6.0 (-10.1, -1.9)”
Study 2VRAYLAR 6 mg/day“95.7 (9.4)”“-23.0 (1.5)”“-8.8 (-12.9, -4.7)”
Study 2Placebo“96.5 (9.1)”“-14.3 (1.5)”Not reported
Study 3VRAYLAR 3 to 6 mg/day“96.3 (9.3)”“-22.8 (1.6)”“-6.8 (-11.3, -2.4)”
Study 3VRAYLAR 6 to 9 mg/day“96.3 (9.0)”“-25.9 (1.7)”“-9.9 (-14.5, -5.3)”
Study 3Placebo“96.6 (9.3)”“-16.0 (1.6)”Not reported
Brexpiprazole: REXULTI prescribing information, primary efficacy results at week 6
StudyTreatment groupNMean baseline PANSS total score (SD)LS mean change from baseline (SE)Placebo-subtracted difference (95% CI)
Study 3REXULTI 2 mg/day“180”“95.9 (13.8)”“-20.7 (1.5)”“-8.7 (-13.1, -4.4)”
Study 3REXULTI 4 mg/day“178”“94.7 (12.1)”“-19.7 (1.5)”“-7.6 (-12.0, -3.1)”
Study 3Placebo“178”“95.7 (11.5)”“-12.0 (1.6)”Not reported
Study 4REXULTI 2 mg/day“179”“96.3 (12.9)”“-16.6 (1.5)”“-3.1 (-7.2, 1.1)”
Study 4REXULTI 4 mg/day“181”“95.0 (12.4)”“-20.0 (1.5)”“-6.5 (-10.6, -2.4)”
Study 4Placebo“180”“94.6 (12.8)”“-13.5 (1.5)”Not reported
Lurasidone: LATUDA prescribing information, primary efficacy results at week 6 in the PANSS studies
StudyTreatment groupMean baseline PANSS total score (SD)LS mean change from baseline (SE)Placebo-subtracted difference (95% CI)
Study 3LATUDA 40 mg/day“96.6 (10.7)”“-25.7 (2.0)”“-9.7 (-15.3, -4.1)”
Study 3LATUDA 120 mg/day“97.9 (11.3)”“-23.6 (2.1)”“-7.5 (-13.4, -1.7)”
Study 3Olanzapine 15 mg/day“96.3 (12.2)”“-28.7 (1.9)”“-12.6 (-18.2, -7.9)”
Study 3Placebo“95.8 (10.8)”“-16.0 (2.1)”Not reported
Study 4LATUDA 40 mg/day“96.5 (11.5)”“-19.2 (1.7)”“-2.1 (-7.0, 2.8)”
Study 4LATUDA 80 mg/day“96.0 (10.8)”“-23.4 (1.8)”“-6.4 (-11.3, -1.5)”
Study 4LATUDA 120 mg/day“96.0 (9.7)”“-20.5 (1.8)”“-3.5 (-8.4, 1.4)”
Study 4Placebo“96.8 (11.1)”“-17.0 (1.8)”Not reported
Study 5LATUDA 80 mg/day“97.7 (9.7)”“-22.2 (1.8)”“-11.9 (-16.9, -6.9)”
Study 5LATUDA 160 mg/day“97.5 (11.8)”“-26.5 (1.8)”“-16.2 (-21.2, -11.2)”
Study 5Quetiapine extended-release 600 mg/day“97.7 (10.2)”“-27.8 (1.8)”“-17.5 (-22.5, -12.4)”
Study 5Placebo“96.6 (10.2)”“-10.3 (1.8)”Not reported
NOVA-1 tolerability: weight, prolactin, glucose, cholesterol, and QTc change from baseline to day 28
MeasureLB-102 50 mg (n = 107)LB-102 75 mg (n = 108)LB-102 100 mg (n = 36)Placebo (n = 108)
Weight, mean (SD) change, kg“4.3 (3.2)”“3.3 (2.8)”“2.9 (2.5)”“2.0 (2.9)”
Weight increase of 7% or more, number of participants (%)“27 (26%)”“20 (19%)”“3 (9%)”“11 (10%)”
Prolactin, mean (SD) change, ng/mL“59.9 (55.11)”“51.4 (52.02)”“51.2 (48.07)”“1.3 (6.03)”
Fasting glucose, mean (SD) change, mg/dL“2.3 (24.52)”“2.0 (13.62)”“7.0 (19.39)”“0.2 (12.07)”
Total cholesterol, mean (SD) change, mg/dL“7.7 (24.75)”“5.4 (23.98)”“5.8 (25.52)”“0.8 (25.06)”
QTc, mean (SD) change, milliseconds“4.9 (13.39)”“4.3 (12.55)”“5.4 (9.44)”“1.2 (12.56)”
QTc mean change of 30 milliseconds or more, number of participants (%)“5 (4.7)”“1 (0.9)”“1 (2.8)”“1 (0.9)”
NOVA-1 tolerability: weight increase
NOVA-1 adverse events of special interest as reported by the company
Adverse eventLB-102 50 mg (N=107)LB-102 75 mg (N=108)LB-102 100 mg (N=36)Placebo (N=108)
Dystonia“0”“3 (2.8%)”“1 (2.8%)”“1 (0.9%)”
Akathisia“1 (0.9%)”“2 (1.8%)”“0”“1 (0.9%)”
Extrapyramidal disorder“0”“1 (0.9%)”“1 (2.8%)”“2 (1.9%)”
Total extrapyramidal symptoms“1 (1.0%)”“6 (5.6%)”“2 (5.6%)”“4 (3.7%)”
Total adverse events related to prolactin increase“2 (1.9%)”“1 (0.9%)”“2 (5.6%)”“0”
Hyperprolactinemia“11 (10.3%)”“8 (7.4%)”“6 (16.7%)”“0”
Sedation“0”“1 (0.9%)”“0”“0”
QTcF change from baseline at day 28, milliseconds“4.9”“4.3”“5.4”“1.2”
Emraclidine (M4 positive allosteric modulator): EMPOWER-1 and EMPOWER-2 primary endpoint at week 6
Trial and armParticipantsLeast squares mean change in PANSS total score at week 6 (95% CI)
EMPOWER-1, placebo“N= 127”“-13.5 (-17.0, -10.0)”
EMPOWER-1, emraclidine 10 mg once daily“N = 125”“-14.7 (-18.1, -11.2)”
EMPOWER-1, emraclidine 30 mg once daily“N = 127”“-16.5 (-20.0, -13.1)”
EMPOWER-2, placebo“N = 128”“-16.1 (-19.4, -12.8)”
EMPOWER-2, emraclidine 15 mg once daily“N = 122”“-18.5 (-22.0, -15.0)”
EMPOWER-2, emraclidine 30 mg once daily“N = 123”“-14.2 (-17.6, -10.8)”
Ulotaront (TAAR1 agonist): DIAMOND 1 and DIAMOND 2 phase 3 primary endpoint at week 6

“The multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, fixed-dosed DIAMOND 1 study, evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ulotaront (50 mg/day and 75 mg/day) versus placebo over six weeks in 435 acutely psychotic adults with schizophrenia.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In the DIAMOND 1 study all three groups showed a reduction in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score over time, however neither ulotaront treatment group was superior to placebo on the primary endpoint of change from baseline in PANSS total score at Week 6 (least squares [LS] mean: -16.9 and -19.6 in ulotaront 50 mg/day and 75 mg/day-treated patients, respectively, compared to -19.3 in placebo-treated patients).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, fixed-dosed DIAMOND 2 study, evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ulotaront (75 mg/day and 100 mg/day) versus placebo over six weeks in 464 acutely psychotic adults with schizophrenia.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“At Week 6 both ulotaront treatment groups showed numerically larger mean reductions in PANSS total score from baseline compared to placebo (LS mean: -16.4 and -18.1 in ulotaront 75 mg/day and 100 mg/day-treated patients, respectively, compared to -14.3 in placebo-treated patients).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In both the DIAMOND 1 study and the DIAMOND 2 study, a large placebo effect was observed which may have masked the molecule’s therapeutic effect.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Ulotaront: registration plan for schizophrenia after the DIAMOND results

No evidence found.

SEP-4199: clinical trial in schizophrenia

No evidence found.

Editorial or invited commentary accompanying the JAMA Psychiatry publication of NOVA-1

No evidence found.

Network meta-analysis or indirect treatment comparison that includes LB-102

No evidence found.

Direct head-to-head clinical comparison of LB-102 with amisulpride, xanomeline-trospium, or another antipsychotic

No evidence found.

Place of product in therapy

Disease description

Definition and etiology
Epidemiology
Incidence of Schizophrenia
Prevalence of Schizophrenia
United States prevalence: Mental and Substance Use Disorders Prevalence Study, adults aged 18 to 65 years
Natural history, survival, and mortality
Relapse after antipsychotic discontinuation
Suicide: lifetime risk and rates
Pathophysiology
Role of the 5-HT7 receptor in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia

No evidence found.

Glutamate and NMDA receptor hypofunction
Diagnosis
DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia
CriterionQuoted text
A: characteristic symptoms“Two (or more) of the following, each present for a significant portion of time during a 1-month period (or less if successfully treated). At least one of these must be (1), (2), or (3):”
A1“delusions”
A2“hallucinations”
A3“disorganized speech (e.g., frequent derailment or incoherence)”
A4“grossly disorganized or catatonic behavior”
A5“Negative symptoms (i.e., diminished emotional expression or avolition).”
B: functioning“For a significant portion of the time since the onset of the disturbance, level of functioning in one or more major areas, such as work, interpersonal relations, or self-care, is markedly below the level achieved prior to the onset (or when the onset is in childhood or adolescence, there is failure to achieve expected level of interpersonal, academic, or occupational functioning).”
C: duration“Continuous signs of the disturbance persist for at least 6 months. This 6-month period must include at least 1 month of symptoms (or less if successfully treated) that meet Criterion A (i.e., active-phase symptoms) and may include periods of prodromal or residual symptoms.”
D: mood disorder exclusion“Schizoaffective disorder and depressive or bipolar disorder with psychotic features have been ruled out because either (1) no major depressive or manic episodes have occurred concurrently with the active-phase symptoms, or (2) if mood episodes have occurred during active-phase symptoms, they have been present for a minority of the total duration of the active and residual periods of the illness.”
E: substance and medical exclusion“The disturbance is not attributable to the physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, a medication) or another medical condition.”
F: developmental disorder“If there is a history of autism spectrum disorder or a communication disorder of childhood onset, the additional diagnosis of schizophrenia is made only if prominent delusions or hallucinations, in addition to the other required symptoms of schizophrenia, are also present for at least 1 month (or less if successfully treated).”
Rating scales used in practice and research
Clinical presentation - signs and symptoms
Proportion of people with schizophrenia who experience agitation during an acute exacerbation

No evidence found.

Long-term morbidity
Burden of Schizophrenia
Humanistic burden and health-related quality of life
Health state utilities for stable schizophrenia, relapse, and antipsychotic adverse events: time trade-off in patients and laypersons
Health statePatient sample, mean utility (standard error)Lay sample, mean utility (standard error)
Stable schizophrenia“0.919 (0.023)”“0.865 (0.021)”
Weight gain“0.825 (0.028)”“0.779 (0.024)”
Hyperprolactinemia“0.815 (0.030)”“0.783 (0.025)”
Diabetes“0.769 (0.036)”“0.712 (0.028)”
Extrapyramidal symptoms“0.722 (0.037)”“0.574 (0.032)”
Relapse“0.604 (0.042)”“0.479 (0.033)”
Economic burden and healthcare resource utilization
Readmissions: 30-day all-cause readmissions after Medicaid index admissions for schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, 2018
MetricValue
Number of index admissions“166,100”
Rank among Medicaid principal diagnoses by number of readmissions“2”
Number of 30-day readmissions“39,300”
Readmission rate, percent“23.7”
Percent of total Medicaid readmissions“5.4”
Share of antipsychotic pharmacy spending attributable to branded oral atypical antipsychotics and long-acting injectables

No evidence found.

Economic impact of Schizophrenia on families
Economic impact of diagnostic testing
Diagnostic or companion diagnostic testing required for LB-102 eligibility

Not applicable.

Cost of laboratory, prolactin, and electrocardiographic monitoring during antipsychotic treatment

No evidence found.

Approaches to treatment

Current treatment options and standard of care
Second-generation antipsychotics
First-generation antipsychotics
Long-acting injectable antipsychotics
Clozapine
Muscarinic receptor agonists
Recommendations on muscarinic receptor agonists in the APA, VA/DoD, NICE, and Australian and New Zealand guidelines

No evidence found.

Psychosocial interventions
Limitations of current therapies
Summary

Treatment discontinuation is frequent. In CATIE, 1,061 of 1,432 participants (74%) stopped the assigned antipsychotic before 18 months, from 64% with olanzapine to 82% with quetiapine. In a Swedish cohort of 29,823 individuals with schizophrenia followed from 2006 to 2013, 43.7% were rehospitalized and 71.7% of 28,189 had treatment failure. A meta-analysis pooled psychotropic medication nonadherence in schizophrenia at 56%, and an earlier review reported mean nonadherence rates of 41.2% and 49.5% under two sets of inclusion criteria.

Response is incomplete. Across 167 placebo-controlled trials with 28,102 participants, at least a minimal response occurred in 51% of participants receiving an antipsychotic and 30% receiving placebo, and a good response in 23% and 14%. Treatment resistance developed in 22.8% of first-episode cohorts (12 studies, 11,958 participants) and in 24.4% of first-episode schizophrenia cohorts. Clozapine, the agent guidelines recommend for treatment resistance, produced response in 40.1% of treated participants, which the authors translate into 12% to 20% of people with schizophrenia being ultra-resistant. Clozapine carries a boxed warning for severe neutropenia, orthostatic hypotension, seizure, and myocarditis.

Negative and cognitive symptoms remain. Up to 60% of people with schizophrenia have prominent, clinically relevant negative symptoms, and a meta-analysis of 168 placebo-controlled trials found that no treatment reached the threshold for clinically significant improvement in negative symptoms. The VA/DoD guideline found insufficient evidence to recommend for or against augmentation with any non-antipsychotic medication for cognitive or negative symptoms.

Adverse effects differ by agent. Metabolic syndrome was present in 32.5% of people with schizophrenia and related disorders. Mean weight gain against placebo ranged up to 3.01 kg for clozapine in one network meta-analysis and up to 3.21 kg for zotepine in another. Rating scale-based tardive dyskinesia prevalence was 25.3% across 41 studies (20.7% with current second-generation and 30.0% with current first-generation treatment), and risk ratios for antiparkinson medication use against placebo ranged from 1.61 for paliperidone to 6.14 for pimozide among the 21 agents with a significant increase. Prolactin change against placebo ranged from a decrease of 77.05 ng/mL with clozapine to an increase of 48.51 ng/mL with paliperidone, and the highest rates of hyperprolactinemia are reported with amisulpride, risperidone, and paliperidone.

Relapse occurs during treatment. Maintenance antipsychotic treatment reduced relapse at 1 year from 64% to 27% in one meta-analysis and from 61% to 24% in a Cochrane review, and pooled relapse incidence during long-acting injectable treatment was 22.97 per 100 participant-years. The median proportion of people meeting recovery criteria was 13.5% across 50 studies. Among agents with a mechanism other than dopamine receptor blockade, adjunctive xanomeline and trospium chloride did not reach statistical significance on its primary endpoint in ARISE (2.0-point PANSS difference, P = 0.11), and emraclidine did not meet the primary endpoint in two phase 2 trials.

Place in treatment, anticipated use, and care setting
Summary

LB-102 is investigational and has no established place in therapy. LB Pharmaceuticals states that LB-102 has the potential to be the first benzamide antipsychotic approved for neuropsychiatric disorders in the United States and describes it as a potential alternative to branded and generic therapeutics for schizophrenia. The parent compound, amisulpride, is approved in more than 50 countries excluding the United States; the company reports that Sanofi announced in 2000 that it would not pursue U.S. approval for schizophrenia. The company expects to commercialize the oral formulation where amisulpride is unavailable as a generic and a long-acting injectable formulation worldwide.

The studied setting is acute inpatient care. NOVA-1 randomized 359 participants at 25 U.S. inpatient sites to 28 days of inpatient treatment, and its authors state that further studies are needed to assess whether the findings generalize to outpatients and that the trial was not designed to evaluate long-term durability. The company describes NOVA-2 as the pivotal phase 3 trial and NOVA-3 as an outpatient open-label trial that accrues the safety population for the NDA. Long-term outpatient maintenance use is therefore anticipated and has no controlled evidence yet.

Guidelines do not rank agents. The APA guideline states that an evidence-based ranking of antipsychotics is not possible and notes no preference between generations, the VA/DoD guideline bases the choice on patient characteristics and side effect profiles, and a 2026 Australian and New Zealand guideline names aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, and lurasidone as first-line agents and lists amisulpride among agents to consider second. Evidence for amisulpride comes from European trials and network meta-analysis: amisulpride had the largest standardized mean difference against placebo for positive symptoms (−0.69) among the 17 agents with a significant reduction, and the authors note that no placebo-controlled amisulpride study was available, which makes that evidence indirect; in EUFEST, 12-month all-cause discontinuation was 40% with amisulpride and 72% with haloperidol; in OPTiMiSE, 250 of 446 participants (56%) achieved remission on open-label amisulpride; and in BeSt InTro, the 52-week PANSS reduction was 32.7 points with amisulpride, 21.9 with aripiprazole, and 23.3 with olanzapine. The company reports at least two million monthly amisulpride prescriptions in 2023 in 16 continental European countries. Amisulpride is among the agents with the highest reported rates of hyperprolactinemia.

Recommendations on benzamide antipsychotics in United States guidelines

No evidence found.

Heterogeneity of treatment effect
NOVA-1 subgroup analyses by sex, race, age, or baseline severity

No evidence found.

Care management intervention strategies
Other product development or post-marketing obligations required by the FDA
Post-marketing requirements or commitments

Not applicable.

Ongoing post-approval monitoring
Post-approval monitoring requirements

Not applicable.

Expected outcomes of therapy
Summary

Guidelines state three aims of treatment planning: to promote and maintain recovery, to maximize quality of life and adaptive functioning, and to reduce or eliminate symptoms. In trials, symptom outcomes are measured on the PANSS (range 30 to 210). A CGI rating of minimally improved corresponds to a PANSS reduction of 19% to 28% and a rating of much improved to 40% to 53%, which is the basis for the 20% and 50% response thresholds; the authors recommend at least a 50% reduction as the response criterion in acute trials and note that a 25% cut-off might be appropriate in treatment-resistant populations. An absolute reduction of about 15 PANSS points corresponds to minimal improvement on the CGI, and an anchor-based analysis of CATIE data estimated the minimum clinically important difference at 15.3 points (34.0%) with the clinician-rated CGI and 11.2 points (24.6%) with the patient-rated CGI.

Against these thresholds, 51% of participants receiving antipsychotics and 30% receiving placebo had at least a minimal response in placebo-controlled trials of mainly chronic participants, and 23% and 14% had a good response. In first-episode trials, 81.3% reached a 20% reduction and 51.9% a 50% reduction. Absence of a 20% reduction at week 2 predicted nonresponse at endpoint with a positive predictive value of 90%. The mean drug-placebo difference in PANSS change rises with baseline severity, from 9.5 points at a baseline score of 58 to 24.0 points at a baseline score of 116. In NOVA-1, the week 4 change in PANSS total score was −14.3 points with LB-102 50 mg, −14.0 with 75 mg, and −9.3 with placebo.

Remission is defined by consensus criteria as no more than mild positive and negative symptoms sustained for at least 6 months. With maintenance treatment, relapse at 1 year occurred in 24% to 27% of participants receiving antipsychotics and 61% to 64% receiving placebo, and hospitalization in 7% and 18%. The median proportion meeting recovery criteria that combine clinical and social outcomes was 13.5%.