SKY-0515-001 part C
41 evidence topics · 12 sources
Objective
Registered objectives
Location and study date
Recruitment dates
| Milestone | Registry record |
|---|---|
| Date of first participant enrolment (actual) | “12/07/2024” |
| Date of last participant enrolment (actual) | “31/03/2025” |
Study design
Randomized placebo-controlled period followed by blinded active extension
Observational run-in and randomization ratio
Treatment duration extension and volumetric MRI endpoint
Eligibility criteria
HD-ISS stage criteria
Treatment
Study outcomes
Rationale for using safety and tolerability as the primary endpoint
Externally controlled cUHDRS analysis: designated primary timepoint
Rationale for endpoint selection
No evidence found.
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Participants analyzed by timepoint and external control sizes
Description of analysis sets
15-month analysis: included participants and exclusions
Interim analyses: exclusions and pooled doses
Results
Participant disposition
Discontinuations and reasons
No evidence found.
Baseline characteristics
Extension dose groups, mean ± SD
| Characteristic | SKY-0515 4 mg (n=7) | SKY-0515 9 mg (n=16) |
|---|---|---|
| Sex, % M/F | “57/43” | “38/62” |
| Age | “52.3 ± 8.8” | “57.8 ± 6.4” |
| CAG repeats | “42.4 ± 1.7” | “42.6 ± 2.1” |
| CAP score | “453.5 ± 64.4” | “510.2 ± 88.1” |
| cUHDRS | “12.1 ± 3.1” | “11.8 ± 2.3” |
| TFC | “11.4 ± 1.8” | “11.8 ± 1.7” |
Efficacy results
Month 15 change from baseline versus overlap-weighted external control
| Endpoint | Treated LS mean (SE), M15 (n=15) | External control LS mean (SE), M15 | Treatment difference | 95% CI | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cUHDRS (composite) | “+0.94 (0.42)” | “-0.65 (0.27)” | “+1.59” | “1.09, 2.09” | “<0.001” |
| TFC | “+0.38 (0.43)” | “-0.60 (0.26)” | “+0.98” | “0.34, 1.61” | “0.003” |
| TMS | “-6.85 (1.02)” | “+2.53 (0.59)” | “-9.38” | “-11.58, -7.19” | “<0.001” |
| SDMT | “+4.63 (1.60)” | “+0.48 (0.98)” | “+4.15” | “1.04, 7.25” | “0.009” |
| SWRT | “+3.55 (1.62)” | “-0.63 (0.98)” | “+4.18” | “0.55, 7.80” | “0.024” |
cUHDRS change by timepoint versus overlap-weighted external control
| Timepoint | Treated LS mean (SE) | Treated participants | External control LS mean (SE) | Treatment difference | 95% CI | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month 3 | “+0.70 (0.30)” | “n=24” | “+0.05 (0.47)” | “+0.66” | “-0.33, 1.64” | “0.191” |
| Month 6 | “+0.47 (0.39)” | “n=20” | “-0.31 (0.21)” | “+0.78” | “0.00, 1.56” | “0.051” |
| Month 9 | “+0.70 (0.38)” | “n=20” | “-0.34 (0.23)” | “+1.04” | “0.39, 1.70” | “0.002” |
| Month 12 | “+0.29 (0.44)” | “n=18” | “-0.50 (0.26)” | “+0.79” | “0.11, 1.48” | “0.023” |
| Month 15 | “+0.94 (0.42)” | “n=15” | “-0.65 (0.27)” | “+1.59” | “1.09, 2.09” | “<0.001” |
Month 12 interim cUHDRS subcomponents versus propensity score-weighted natural history
Month 12 interim cUHDRS versus propensity score-weighted natural history: June 2026 poster
Pharmacodynamic results at day 84 and month 12
Placebo-controlled comparison of clinical outcomes at day 84
No evidence found.
Volumetric MRI and caudate atrophy results
No evidence found.
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
Clinician and Patient Global Impression at 12 months
Interpretation of global impression data: independent commentary
Health-related quality-of-life instrument results
No evidence found.
Safety results
Adverse event severity and laboratory findings through month 9
Severe or serious adverse events: February 2026 poster
Serious adverse events and most common related TEAEs: June 2026 poster
Adverse event incidence by treatment arm and discontinuations due to adverse events
No evidence found.
Study limitations
Summary
The placebo-controlled period lasted 84 days in 26 randomized participants (6 on placebo), and no placebo comparison of clinical outcomes has been reported. All clinical efficacy estimates (cUHDRS and components at months 3 to 15) compare treated participants with overlap-weighted external natural-history controls from Enroll-HD, 2CARE, and CREST-E, which cannot account for unmeasured confounding or for expectation effects after all participants were known to be receiving active drug. The month 15 analysis included 15 participants, pooled the 4 mg and 9 mg groups and HD-ISS stages, and excluded some participant-timepoints after intercurrent events; the 9 mg group had higher baseline CAP scores. The posters report differing TFC eligibility thresholds and differing attributions of a serious headache event. Data are available only in company press releases and posters, not in a peer-reviewed publication.