Evicenter
P&T meetings

Tovecimig (CTX-009)

Second-line advanced biliary tract cancer

Also known as ABL001
Last updated
89 sources

Product information and disease descriptionPlace of product in therapyApproaches to treatment

Heterogeneity of treatment effect

13 evidence topics · 14 sources

Summary: reported and anticipated modifiers of treatment effect

COMPANION-002 prespecified three stratification factors that define the subgroups in which effect modification would be examined: stage (locally advanced versus metastatic), anatomic subtype of the primary tumor (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma versus other), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 or 1). No subgroup analysis by tumor site, prior therapy, or geography has been reported in the sponsor's disclosures of the primary and key secondary endpoints, and the full dataset was scheduled for presentation in October 2026, so subgroup results are not yet available.

The heterogeneity that the sponsor has reported concerns crossover rather than baseline characteristics. Of 57 participants randomized to paclitaxel alone, 31 (54%) crossed over after centrally confirmed progression. Within that control arm, participants who crossed over had a median overall survival of 12.8 months versus 6.1 months for those who did not (hazard ratio 0.54, p=0.04), despite having progressed faster on initial paclitaxel monotherapy (median progression-free survival 1.9 versus 3.6 months, hazard ratio 2.31, p=0.007). In the same 31 participants, median progression-free survival after crossover was 3.5 months compared with 1.9 months before crossover (hazard ratio 0.36, p=0.0016). These are post hoc or within-participant comparisons in a non-randomized subset, and the sponsor states that the rank-preserving structural failure time adjustment for crossover rested on assumptions that were not met and is largely uninterpretable.

No predictive biomarker for DLL4 or VEGF-A blockade has been established in biliary tract cancer. The COMPANION-002 investigators describe DLL4 as highly expressed in biliary tract cancer with up-regulation associated with poor survival, and VEGF-A overexpression as correlating with stage, presence of metastases, and prognosis, but these are prognostic observations and the trial did not select participants by DLL4 or VEGF-A expression. By contrast, the comparator landscape is strongly biomarker-defined: response rates differ from 37.0% with pemigatinib and 42% with futibatinib in FGFR2 fusion-positive disease, to 41·3% with zanidatamab and 46.7% with tucatinib plus trastuzumab in HER2-positive disease, to 61.3% with trastuzumab deruxtecan in centrally confirmed HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+ tumors, to 51% with dabrafenib plus trametinib in BRAF V600E-mutated disease, against 5% with FOLFOX in unselected second-line participants.

Modifiers observed in the comparator trials are mainly clinical rather than molecular. In ABC-06 the survival benefit of FOLFOX was independent of platinum sensitivity, subgroups with suspected poorer prognosis appeared to benefit most, and the benefit appeared weaker in the extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma subgroup, though the investigators state that the subgroup analyses were insufficiently powered. In SWOG S1815, the addition of nab-paclitaxel improved progression-free survival more in gallbladder carcinoma than in intrahepatic or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (interaction P = .01) without a corresponding overall survival interaction. In the ABC-06 biomarker analysis, median overall survival fell from 8.9 months when no tumor marker was elevated to 3.2 months when carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen, and cancer antigen 125 were all elevated.