Itraconazole and rifampin drug interaction study in healthy participants
19 evidence topics · 4 sources
Objective
Effect of a strong CYP3A inhibitor and a strong CYP3A4 inducer on zilurgisertib
Location and study date
Study dates, site, and ethics approval
Study design
Two fixed-sequence cohorts in healthy participants
Rationale for the zilurgisertib dose and fixed-sequence design
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Treatment
Zilurgisertib 100 mg alone and with itraconazole or rifampin
Study outcomes
Rationale for using zilurgisertib maximum concentration and area under the curve as the primary endpoints
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Description of analysis sets
Pharmacokinetic-evaluable and safety populations
Results
Participant disposition
Enrollment, completion, and withdrawals by cohort
Baseline characteristics
Age, sex, and body weight by cohort
Efficacy results
Change in zilurgisertib exposure with itraconazole and rifampin
Additional exposure parameters: AUC0-t, clearance, and half-life
Label statement of the interaction results and resulting dosing instructions
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
Not applicable.
Safety results
Adverse event incidence, discontinuations, and clinical monitoring
Study limitations
Summary: limitations of the drug interaction study
Each cohort enrolled 18 healthy adults and used an open-label, fixed-sequence design in which zilurgisertib 100 mg was given alone and then with itraconazole or rifampin, so each participant served as their own control rather than being randomized to a comparator arm. The study tested a single zilurgisertib dose of 100 mg, one-fifth of the highest dose evaluated in earlier phase 1 studies, together with a single regimen of one strong CYP3A4 inhibitor (itraconazole 200 mg once daily) and one strong CYP3A4 inducer (rifampin 600 mg once daily); the label's statements on moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors, moderate CYP3A4 inducers, and CYP2D6 inhibitors remain model predictions rather than results of a clinical study, and the full-text discussion notes that more potent strong CYP3A4 inhibitors than itraconazole could produce a larger increase in zilurgisertib exposure than observed here. Sample size for each cohort was set empirically, following precedent from similar studies, rather than by a statistical power calculation, and two participants in the rifampin cohort discontinued before the second treatment period and were replaced. The study enrolled healthy adults rather than participants with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva, and the reason for the variability in interaction magnitude observed across participants was not determined. The cardiac safety publication cites a 2.5-fold increase in AUC under strong CYP3A inhibition, which differs from the 2.13-fold increase in AUC0-inf reported by this study and by the label.