OTX-TKI-2020-101
53 evidence topics · 12 sources
Objective
Company-stated objectives
Location and study date
Registry dates
| Milestone | Registry record |
|---|---|
| Study start (actual) | “2021-07-28” |
| Primary completion (actual) | “2023-02-06” |
| Study completion (actual) | “2023-12-18” |
| Last update posted | “2024-01-26” |
Interim and final data cutoff dates
| Analysis | Data cutoff |
|---|---|
| 7-month interim analysis | “Interim review: data cut off August 24, 2022” |
| Analysis | Data cutoff |
|---|---|
| 10-month interim analysis | “Interim review: data cut off December 12, 2022” |
| Analysis | Data cutoff |
|---|---|
| 12-month analysis | “Data cut off April 14, 2023” |
Study design
Registered design
| Field | Registry record |
|---|---|
| Allocation | “Randomized” |
| Interventional model | “Parallel Assignment” |
| Interventional model description | “3:1” |
| Masking | “Triple (ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator)” |
Rescue anti-VEGF injection criteria
Follow-up beyond Week 52
Eligibility criteria
Registered inclusion criteria
Registered exclusion criteria
Age
| Field | Registry record |
|---|---|
| Ages eligible for study | “50 Years and older” |
Population compared with the Australian phase 1 trial
Treatment
Axitinib implant 600 µg with aflibercept at Week 4 compared with aflibercept every 8 weeks
Registered interventions
| Arm | Registered intervention description |
|---|---|
| OTX-TKI | “OTX-TKI is one dose so subsequent visits will be sham to maintain the mask” |
| Aflibercept | “Aflibercept administered every 8 weeks” |
Implant characteristics and administration
First-generation formulation differs from the phase 3 formulation
Study outcomes
Rationale for using treatment-emergent adverse events as the primary endpoint
Registered primary outcome measure
| Field | Registry record |
|---|---|
| Outcome measure | “Safety and Tolerability” |
| Description | “Incidence and severity of treatment emergent adverse events” |
| Time frame | “Through study completion, an average of 1 year” |
Registered secondary outcome measures
| Outcome measure | Registered description |
|---|---|
| BCVA changes | “BCVA Changes from Baseline” |
| Central subfield thickness changes | “Central subfield thickness changes from baseline” |
| Rescue therapy | “Proportion of subjects receiving rescue therapy” |
| Absence of fluid | “Proportion of subjects with absence of foveal fluid” |
| Number of injections | “Number of injections from baseline” |
Measures of biological activity
Definition of reduction in treatment burden
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Registry enrollment
| Field | Registry record |
|---|---|
| Enrollment (actual) | “21” |
Participants by arm and analysis
Participants analyzed after censoring rescued participants
Description of analysis sets
Exclusion of one participant from the efficacy analysis
Per protocol analysis and rescue-free rate calculation
Statistical testing
No evidence found.
Results
Participant disposition
No dropouts through the 12-month data cutoff
Baseline characteristics
Safety population, data cutoff April 14, 2023
| Characteristic | Axitinib implant 600 µg (N=16) | Aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks (N=5) |
|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) age, years | “76 (8)” | “84 (8)” |
| Male, n (%) | “8 (50)” | “3 (60)” |
| Female, n (%) | “8 (50)” | “2 (40)” |
| Mean (SD) months since wet AMD diagnosis | “18 (12)” | “18 (12)” |
| Mean (SD) number of anti-VEGF injections within 12 months prior to baseline (annualized) | “8 (3)” | “8 (4)” |
| Mean (SD) BCVA, ETDRS letters | “70.9 (17.7)” | “73.8 (9.0)” |
| Mean (SD) CSFT, µm | “273.8 (43.0)” | “240.6 (29.6)” |
Efficacy population baseline BCVA and CSFT
“Mean baseline CSFT” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“OTX-TKI: 269.2 (40.3) μm” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Aflibercept Q8W: 240.6 (29.6) μm” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Mean baseline BCVA” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“OTX-TKI: 73.7 (14.4) letters” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Aflibercept Q8W: 73.8 (9.0) letters” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
Efficacy results
Week 52 mean change in BCVA and CSFT
| Outcome, mean (SD) change from baseline to Week 52 | Axitinib implant 600 µg (n=15) | Axitinib implant 600 µg, censoring rescued participants | Aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks (n=5) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BCVA, letters | “OTX-TKI: -1.0 (6.0) letters” | “OTX-TKI: +0.6 (2.6) letters” | “Aflibercept 2mg Q8W: +2.0 (7.2)” |
| CSFT, µm | “OTX-TKI: +20.2 (41.6) μm” | “OTX-TKI: +17.2 (47.6) μm” | “Aflibercept 2mg Q8W: -2.2 (8.5)” |
Rescue-free participants in the axitinib implant arm up to each visit (n=15)
Rescue-free rate including rescue injections given at the Week 52 visit
Month 12 rescue and treatment burden reduction
No rescue injections meeting protocol criteria before 6 months
Injections compared with the year before baseline and with aflibercept
Month 10 interim analysis
| Outcome, mean (SD) change from baseline to Month 10 | Axitinib implant 600 µg | Axitinib implant 600 µg, censoring rescued participants | Aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks |
|---|---|---|---|
| BCVA, letters | “OTX-TKI: -0.3 (5.1) letters” | “OTX-TKI: -0.1 (5.3) letters” | “Aflibercept Q8W: -0.8 (2.8) letters” |
| CSFT, µm | “OTX-TKI: -1.3 (23.7) μm” | “OTX-TKI: -2.1 (26.9) μm” | “Aflibercept Q8W: -4.5 (4.4) μm” |
Rescues up to Month 10 initiated at investigator discretion
Month 7 interim analysis
“Mean change in CSFT from baseline to Month 7:” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“OTX-TKI: +9.2 (38.6) μm” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Aflibercept: +0.4 (9.1) μm” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Mean change in BCVA from baseline to Month 7:” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“OTX-TKI: -1.3 (5.2) letters” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Aflibercept: -1.0 (5.3) letters” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
Hydrogel bioresorption timing: about 9 months (10-month analysis)
Hydrogel bioresorption timing: about 8 to 9 months (12-month analysis)
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
No evidence found.
Safety results
Adverse events in the study eye at 12 months (data cutoff April 14, 2023)
| Event, n (%) | Axitinib implant 600 µg (N=16) | Aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks (N=5) |
|---|---|---|
| Elevated IOP | “2 (12.5)” | “1 (20.0)” |
| Retinal detachment | “0” | “0” |
| Retinal vasculitis | “0” | “0” |
| Implant migration into the anterior chamber | “0” | “N/A” |
| Acute endophthalmitis | “1 (6.25)” | “0” |
| Ocular AEs | “16 (100.0)” | “3 (60.0)” |
| Mild | “14 (87.5)” | “2 (40.0)” |
| Moderate | “2 (12.5)” | “1 (20.0)” |
| Severe | “0” | “0” |
| SAEs | “1 (6.25)” | “0” |
Serious adverse event percentage reported as 12.5% (June 2023 presentation)
Endophthalmitis after protocol-mandated aflibercept injection
Elevated intraocular pressure: none in the axitinib implant arm at the 10-month cutoff
Systemic pharmacokinetics
No evidence found.
Study limitations
Summary
OTX-TKI-2020-101 randomized 21 participants (16 axitinib implant, 5 aflibercept), and efficacy analyses included 15 implant participants after one participant received aflibercept instead of sham injections at Months 3 and 5; no statistical comparisons, peer-reviewed publication, or registry results were identified. All implant participants received protocol-mandated aflibercept at Month 1, so outcomes reflect combination exposure rather than implant monotherapy, and the population was limited to previously treated, anti-VEGF-responsive eyes without excess fluid. The trial used a first-generation 600 µg implant, whereas phase 3 trials use a different 450 µg formulation. Sources disagree on elevated IOP in the implant arm: none at the December 12, 2022 cutoff (10-K and 10-month presentation) and 2 of 16 participants (12.5%) at the April 14, 2023 cutoff; the serious adverse event percentage for the single endophthalmitis event is reported as 12.5% in the June 2023 presentation and 6.25% in the October 2024 presentation. Reported bioresorption time was about 9 months at the 10-month analysis and about 8 to 9 months at the 12-month analysis. No systemic pharmacokinetic data were reported for this trial.