SOL-R
58 evidence topics · 15 sources
Objective
Company-stated objective: non-inferiority of dosing every 24 weeks
Original role as the second registrational trial
Revised role after the May 2026 FDA Type C meeting
Location and study date
Summary: registry sites compared with company-reported countries
The ClinicalTrials.gov record (last updated 2025-06-17) lists 97 locations: 84 in the United States, 10 in Argentina, 2 in Australia, and 1 in Puerto Rico. It lists no sites in India, whereas company filings and releases from 2025 and 2026 describe sites in the United States, Argentina, India, and Australia, and a November 2025 release describes approximately 100 sites. The registry study start date (2024-11-27) is later than the company-reported initiation (June 2024) and first enrollment (July 2024); the registry start date coincides with the month in which direct enrollment opened (November 2024), according to a June 2025 presentation.
Registry dates
| Milestone | Registry record |
|---|---|
| Study start (actual) | “2024-11-27” |
| Primary completion (estimated) | “2027-01-08” |
| Study completion (estimated) | “2027-01-08” |
| Last update posted | “2025-06-17” |
Registry location count
Company-reported initiation and first enrollment
Enrollment periods
Company-reported countries and number of sites
Earlier description of site regions: January 2025
Study design
Three-arm randomized design with a 2:2:1 ratio
Six-month screening and loading lead-in before randomization
Aflibercept 8 mg arm for masking instead of sham injections
Rescue criteria: loss of more than 5 letters combined with CSFT increase
Rescue criteria: May 2025 description with a 10-letter threshold
Redosing schedule: 2024 description with a single redose at Week 24
Redosing schedule: current description with redosing at Weeks 24, 48, and 72
Interim safety analysis and alpha penalty
FDA written responses on registrational adequacy
Eligibility criteria
Registered inclusion criteria
Registered exclusion criteria
Company-described diagnosis window and visual acuity threshold
Retinal thickness stability criteria before randomization
Enrollment of SOL-1 loading and randomization failures
Treatment
Registered interventions
| Arm | Registered intervention description |
|---|---|
| OTX-TKI Re-dose | “Intravitreal Injection of OTX-TKI” |
| Aflibercept 2mg on label | “Intravitreal Injection of 2mg of aflibercept” |
| Aflibercept 8mg high dose | “Intravitreal Injection of 8mg of aflibercept” |
Supplemental aflibercept after randomization
Study outcomes
Rationale for using mean change in best corrected visual acuity as the primary endpoint
Primary endpoint: registry definition at Week 48
| Field | Registry record |
|---|---|
| Primary outcome measure | “Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)” |
| Description | “Mean change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) from baseline at Week 48” |
| Time frame | “Week 48” |
Primary endpoint: earlier descriptions at one year and Week 48
Company rationale for screening out early persistent fluid
Interpretation of rescue injections in non-inferiority trials
Key secondary endpoint added in 2026: superiority to aflibercept 8 mg at Week 96
Secondary endpoints added in 2026: fibrosis and atrophy at Week 96
Registered secondary outcome measures
No evidence found.
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Registry estimated enrollment
| Field | Registry record |
|---|---|
| Enrollment (estimated) | “825” |
Planned randomization: approximately 825 subjects (2024)
Planned randomization: at least 555 subjects (2025)
Randomized participants: 631 (February and June 2026)
Randomized participants: 640 (August 2026)
Description of analysis sets
Primary non-inferiority comparison excludes the aflibercept 8 mg arm
Efficacy analysis population and handling of rescue injections
No evidence found.
Results
Participant disposition
Discontinuations and reasons
No evidence found.
Baseline characteristics
No evidence found.
Efficacy results
Topline timing: first half of 2027 (November 2025)
Topline timing: first quarter of 2027 (February 2026)
Topline timing: first quarter of 2028 (June and August 2026)
Primary and secondary efficacy results
No evidence found.
Exploratory SOL-1 analysis applying SOL-R rescue criteria: Week 24
Post hoc SOL-1 analysis applying SOL-R rescue criteria: Week 52 and treatment burden
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
No evidence found.
Safety results
Planned interim safety analysis in the fourth quarter of 2026
Adverse events
No evidence found.
Study limitations
Summary
SOL-R has reported no efficacy or safety results as of 2026-09-17; topline data are expected in the first quarter of 2028, and only interim Week 52 safety data are planned for the NDA submission in the fourth quarter of 2026. Company sources report the randomized sample as 631 participants (February and June 2026) and 640 participants (August 2026), both described as completed in December 2025, while the registry still lists an estimated 825 participants. The primary endpoint timepoint is Week 56 in company sources and Week 48 in the registry, which was last updated 2025-06-17, and a 2024 congress presentation. Company descriptions of the rescue criteria changed between May 2025 (loss of at least 10 letters from baseline, or anatomic worsening combined with vision loss) and November 2025 onward (loss of more than 5 letters combined with a CSFT increase of at least 75 µm). The six-month lead-in excluded participants with early persistent fluid or CSFT fluctuation, so the randomized population is enriched for anti-VEGF-responsive disease and may not represent all patients with newly diagnosed neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Supplemental aflibercept is permitted in all arms, so outcomes in the axitinib implant arm will reflect combined exposure in rescued participants. The June 2026 amendment added a key secondary superiority comparison with aflibercept 8 mg and fibrosis and atrophy endpoints after enrollment was complete, and the interim safety analysis carries a 0.0001 alpha penalty.