Clinical evidence
3.1.1SUMMIT
32 evidence topics · 22 sources
Comparison of safety and efficacy
3.1.1.2Location and study date
SUMMIT Part 2 primary analysis: data cutoff
European study participation
SUMMIT NCT05186753: study design
SUMMIT Part 2: randomization
3.1.1.4Eligibility criteria
SUMMIT Part 2: symptom-based eligibility
Avapritinib-switch substudy: population
SUMMIT Part 2: bezuclastinib dose
SUMMIT Part 2: background therapy in both randomized groups
3.1.1.6.1Rationale for using MS2D2 total symptom score as the primary endpoint
Outcome-instrument validation: MS2D2
3.1.1.7Statistical analysis description
3.1.1.7.1Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
SUMMIT Part 2: randomized treatment groups
SUMMIT Part 1a: enrollment
3.1.1.7.2Description of analysis sets
Biomarker responder analysis: intention-to-treat handling of missing observations
Exploratory individual-symptom analysis: covariates and multiplicity
3.1.1.8.1Participant disposition
SUMMIT Part 2: withdrawal before treatment
Avapritinib-switch extension: anticipated results
3.1.1.8.2Baseline characteristics
SUMMIT Part 2: baseline age
SUMMIT Part 2: baseline symptom burden and smoldering subtype
3.1.1.8.3Efficacy results
SUMMIT Part 2: primary endpoint, 24-week total symptom score
SUMMIT Part 2: symptom-response endpoints at 24 weeks
SUMMIT Part 2: serum tryptase at 24 weeks
SUMMIT Part 2: 48-week follow-up, November 2025 cutoff
SUMMIT Part 1b: symptom severity at 12 weeks
SUMMIT selected 100 mg dose and open-label extension: 12-week assessment
SUMMIT Part 1: 48-week follow-up
SUMMIT Part 2: exploratory bone assessments
SUMMIT: correlation between symptom improvement and objective disease markers
3.1.1.8.4Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
SUMMIT selected 100 mg dose: 12-week MC-QoL change
SUMMIT Part 2: selected treatment-emergent adverse events
SUMMIT Part 2: treatment-related discontinuations
Summary
SUMMIT compares bezuclastinib with placebo rather than an active KIT inhibitor. Eligibility requires inadequate symptom control despite at least two anti-mediator therapies, limiting direct applicability to less symptomatic or untreated populations. Baseline mean TSS was 57.1 versus 52.6, and the smoldering SM groups contained only 8 and 4 participants. Reported subgroup changes are within-arm estimates rather than treatment-by-subgroup interaction tests. The individual-symptom analyses report no multiplicity adjustment. Biomarker responder analyses count missing baseline or week 24 observations as nonresponse; those rules should not be assumed to describe every efficacy analysis.