Evicenter
P&T meetings

Duravyu (vorolanib intravitreal insert)

Wet age-related macular degeneration

Also known as EYP-1901
Manufacturer
EyePoint
Launch
Not announced
Last updated
136 sources

Clinical evidence

DAVIO 2

54 evidence topics · 17 sources

Objective
Location and study date
Registry dates
FieldQuoted record
First submitted“2022-05-09”
Results first posted“2025-10-02”
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Treatment
Study outcomes
Rationale for using Best-Corrected visual acuity as the primary endpoint
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Participants by analysis population
PopulationAflibercept 2 mgEYP-1901 2060 mcgEYP-1901 3090 mcg
Started“54”“53”“54”
Baseline and primary endpoint analysis (full analysis set)“54”“50”“52”
Description of analysis sets
Results
Participant disposition
Disposition through week 56
Milestone or reasonAflibercept 2 mgEYP-1901 2060 mcgEYP-1901 3090 mcg
Started“54”“53”“54”
Completed“52”“47”“52”
Not completed“2”“6”“2”
Adverse event: ocular, study eye“0”“1”“0”
Adverse event: non-ocular“0”“1”“0”
Lost to follow-up“1”“0”“0”
Protocol deviation“0”“2”“0”
Withdrawal by subject“1”“0”“1”
Death“0”“2”“0”
Discontinued study without receiving study drug“0”“0”“1”
Baseline characteristics
Demographics: full analysis set
CharacteristicAflibercept 2 mg, 54 participantsEYP-1901 2060 mcg, 50 participantsEYP-1901 3090 mcg, 52 participants
Age, mean (SD), years“75.9(7.59)”“76.4(6.66)”“75.4(7.19)”
Female“29”“32”“35”
White“53”“50”“51”
Ocular characteristics and prior treatment: full analysis set
CharacteristicEYP-1901 2 mg, 50 participantsEYP-1901 3 mg, 52 participantsAflibercept every 8 weeks, 54 participants
BCVA, mean (range), letters“73.9 (52–84)”“74.9 (46–85)”“73.4 (41–85)”
CST, mean (range), µm“264.5 (192–400)”“262.9 (186–345)”“265.7 (178–348)”
Duration of neovascular AMD, mean (range), years“2.0 (0.1–7.9)”“2.2 (0.2–10.8)”“2.2 (0.2–20.2)”
Anti-VEGF injections per 12 months, normalized mean (range)“9.8 (2–13)”“10.0 (2–13)”“9.5 (2–13)”
Efficacy results
Summary: DAVIO 2 efficacy through week 56

DAVIO 2 randomized 161 participants; the full analysis set included 156 (54 aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks, 50 EYP-1901 2060 mcg, 52 EYP-1901 3090 mcg). For the primary endpoint (BCVA change averaged over weeks 28 and 32), the registry reports least-squares mean changes of 1.17, 1.05, and 0.87 letters, with differences versus aflibercept of -0.12 letters (95% CI, -2.48 to 2.24) for 2060 mcg and -0.31 letters (95% CI, -2.63 to 2.02) for 3090 mcg; both lower confidence limits were above the -4.5-letter noninferiority margin. EyePoint's topline release reported differences of -0.3 and -0.4 letters. At week 56, mean BCVA change was 1.1 letters with aflibercept, 0.3 letters with 2060 mcg, and -1.9 letters with 3090 mcg. Up to week 32, 62.5% and 63.5% of EYP-1901 participants received no supplemental aflibercept, compared with 94.3% of aflibercept participants; at week 56, the proportions were 42.6%, 46.2%, and 82.7%. The normalized number of aflibercept injections through week 56 was 3.45 and 3.36 in the EYP-1901 arms and 6.33 in the aflibercept arm.

Primary endpoint: BCVA change averaged over weeks 28 and 32
StatisticAflibercept 2 mgEYP-1901 2060 mcgEYP-1901 3090 mcg
Least-squares mean change, letters“1.17”“1.05”“0.87”
Least-squares mean difference vs aflibercept, lettersNot applicable“-0.12”“-0.31”
95% CI lower limitNot applicable“-2.48”“-2.63”
95% CI upper limitNot applicable“2.24”“2.02”
P valueNot applicable“0.919”“0.795”
BCVA mean change from baseline at weeks 32 and 56
VisitAflibercept 2 mgEYP-1901 2060 mcgEYP-1901 3090 mcg
Baseline, mean letters“73.4”“73.9”“74.9”
Week 32, mean change, letters“1.6”“1.0”“0.8”
Week 56, mean change, letters“1.1”“0.3”“-1.9”
Categorical BCVA change at weeks 32 and 56
Category, percentage of participantsAflibercept 2 mg, 53 participantsEYP-1901 2060 mcg, 48 participantsEYP-1901 3090 mcg, 52 participants
Week 32, gain of 5 or more letters“34.0”“25.0”“21.2”
Week 32, loss of 5 or more letters“13.2”“20.8”“11.5”
Week 32, loss of 15 or more letters“1.9”“0”“1.9”
Week 56, gain of 5 or more letters“32.7”“23.4”“15.4”
Week 56, loss of 5 or more letters“23.1”“23.4”“32.7”
Week 56, loss of 10 or more letters“11.5”“10.6”“13.5”
Week 56, loss of 15 or more letters“7.7”“4.3”“3.8”
Participants without supplemental aflibercept
Visit, percentage of participantsAflibercept 2 mg, 53 participantsEYP-1901 2060 mcg, 48 participantsEYP-1901 3090 mcg, 52 participants
Up to week 32“94.3”“62.5”“63.5”
Up to week 56“82.7”“42.6”“46.2”
Median time to first supplemental aflibercept injection after week 8
StatisticEYP-1901 2060 mcg, 50 participantsEYP-1901 3090 mcg, 52 participants
Median, weeks“37.00”“40.79”
95% CI“(20.14 to NA)”“(20.00 to NA)”
Normalized aflibercept injections, including loading doses
Visit, mean (SD)Aflibercept 2 mg, 54 participantsEYP-1901 2060 mcg, 50 participantsEYP-1901 3090 mcg, 52 participants
Week 32“3.23(0.357)”“2.06(0.583)”“2.13(0.747)”
Week 56“6.33(0.754)”“3.45(1.738)”“3.36(1.854)”
Anatomic outcomes at weeks 32 and 56
MeasureAflibercept 2 mgEYP-1901 2060 mcgEYP-1901 3090 mcg
CST, baseline mean, µm“265.7”“264.5”“262.9”
CST, week 32 mean change, µm“5.4”“17.8”“10.6”
CST, week 56 mean change, µm“8.1”“12.2”“16.7”
No detectable intraretinal fluid in the central subfield, week 32, %“62.3”“52.1”“51.9”
No detectable intraretinal fluid in the central subfield, week 56, %“59.6”“59.6”“51.9”
Subgroup: supplement-free eyes, BCVA difference versus aflibercept at month 7/8
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

No evidence found.

Safety results
Participants with treatment-emergent adverse events through week 56
CategoryAflibercept 2 mg, 54 participantsEYP-1901 2060 mcg, 50 participantsEYP-1901 3090 mcg, 52 participants
Any TEAE, study eye“30”“30”“30”
Any TEAE, fellow eye“21”“11”“20”
Any TEAE, systemic“40”“28”“39”
Serious TEAE, study eye“2/54 (3.70%)”“0/50 (0.00%)”“4/52 (7.69%)”
Serious TEAE, fellow eye“1/54 (1.85%)”“0/50 (0.00%)”“0/52 (0.00%)”
Serious TEAE, systemic“6/54 (11.11%)”“6/50 (12.00%)”“9/52 (17.31%)”
All-cause mortality, systemic“0/54 (0.00%)”“2/50 (4.00%)”“0/52 (0.00%)”
Selected non-serious adverse events
EventAflibercept 2 mgEYP-1901 2060 mcgEYP-1901 3090 mcg
Visual acuity reduced, study eye“3/54 (5.56%)”“1/50 (2.00%)”“8/52 (15.38%)”
Vitreous floaters, study eye“1/54 (1.85%)”“2/50 (4.00%)”“6/52 (11.54%)”
Hypertension, systemic“4/54 (7.41%)”“2/50 (4.00%)”“7/52 (13.46%)”
Systemic and ocular exposure to EYP-1901
Matrix and visitEYP-1901 2060 mcgEYP-1901 3090 mcg
Plasma, week 20, mean, pg/mL“23.206”“27.121”
Plasma, week 56, mean, pg/mL“7.733”“10.392”
Aqueous humor, week 20, mean, ng/mL“17.426”“25.066”
Aqueous humor, week 32, mean, ng/mL“11.890”“19.813”
Study limitations
Summary

DAVIO 2 was a phase 2 trial with 50 to 54 participants per arm in the full analysis set, conducted at 39 sites in the United States, with 154 of 156 participants (98.7%) reported as White. Eligibility required a documented anatomic response to prior anti-VEGF therapy, at least 2 anti-VEGF injections in the prior 6 months, and CST of 350 µm or less, so treatment-naive eyes and eyes with greater baseline exudation were not studied. All arms received aflibercept loading at day 1, week 4, and week 8, including an aflibercept injection given with the EYP-1901 insert at week 8. The tested doses (2060 mcg and 3090 mcg, single administration) differ from the 2.7-mg dose given every 6 months in phase 3. The primary endpoint was measured 20 to 24 weeks after insert administration; the week 56 BCVA, supplement-free, and injection-count outcomes are descriptive secondary outcomes without reported hypothesis tests. Company presentations defined the full analysis set as participants who received both day 1 and week 8 treatments, whereas the registry describes it as participants who received at least 1 dose, and company-reported differences for the primary endpoint (-0.3 and -0.4 letters) differ from the registry least-squares differences (-0.12 and -0.31 letters). Several subgroup and time-in-range analyses were post hoc. No peer-reviewed full publication of DAVIO 2 was identified; most results come from sponsor press releases, sponsor-funded congress presentations, and the registry record.