GEMINI-2
16 evidence topics · 7 sources
Objective
Location and study date
GEMINI-2: follow-up reported with the initial extension results
Study design
Treatment assignment according to response in GEMINI-1
Safety follow-up described in the subsequent publication
Eligibility criteria
Prior participation requirement
Treatment
Randomized maintenance treatment for initial responders
Study outcomes
Rationale for using adverse event incidence as the primary endpoint
Not applicable.
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Description of analysis sets
GEMINI-2: statistical hypothesis
Prespecified analysis populations
| Analysis population | Definition excerpt |
|---|---|
| Intention-to-treat population | “all enrolled subjects” |
| Modified intention-to-treat population: previous response threshold | “GPPPGA score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear]” |
| Extension safety population: treatment exposure requirement | “received at least one dose of imsidolimab or placebo” |
Planned comparison of categorical efficacy outcomes
Results
Participant disposition
Extension enrollment and treatment groups
| Population | Participants |
|---|---|
| Rolled over from GEMINI-1 | “42” |
| Initial responders randomized to imsidolimab maintenance | “8” |
| Initial responders randomized to placebo maintenance | “8” |
| Partial responders receiving imsidolimab maintenance | “12” |
| Placebo nonresponders receiving IV rescue followed by SC maintenance | “9” |
| Imsidolimab nonresponders receiving other available therapy | “5” |
Baseline characteristics
No evidence found.
Efficacy results
GEMINI-2: maintenance and flare prevention
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
No evidence found.
Safety results
GEMINI-2: serious adverse events and discontinuation
GEMINI-2: infusion reactions
GEMINI-2: immunogenicity
Study limitations
Summary
The randomized maintenance comparison included 16 initial responders, eight per group, rather than all 42 extension participants. Its results therefore apply to a responder-enriched population. Other extension groups received nonrandomized treatment according to prior response. The statistical analysis plan specified no formal hypothesis and no formal sample size or power calculation. The small randomized groups limit precision for flare prevention and uncommon adverse events.