Evicenter
P&T meetings

Lirafugratinib (Lyrfigtu)

Previously treated FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement-positive cholangiocarcinoma

Also known as RLY-4008
Regulatory submission
NDA submitted January 2026
Last updated
158 sources

Clinical evidence

ReFocus202

20 evidence topics · 5 sources

Objective
Location and study date
Study dates and enrollment: registry record
MilestoneRegistry record
Study start (actual)“2026-06-04”
Primary completion (estimated)“2027-09”
Study completion (estimated)“2028-12”
Enrollment (estimated)“30”
Study design
Registered design details
Design featureRegistry record
Primary purpose“Treatment”
Allocation“N/A”
Interventional model“Single Group Assignment”
Masking“None (Open Label)”
Eligibility criteria
Treatment
Study outcomes
Rationale for using RECIST v1.1 objective response rate as the primary endpoint
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Participants analyzed

No evidence found.

Description of analysis sets
Results
Participant disposition

No evidence found.

Baseline characteristics

No evidence found.

Efficacy results

No evidence found.

Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

No evidence found.

Safety results

No evidence found.

Study limitations
Summary

ReFocus202 is an ongoing single-arm, open-label phase 2 study that began on June 4, 2026 and plans to enroll 20 to 30 participants with FGFR2 fusion- or rearrangement-positive solid tumors other than cholangiocarcinoma; primary completion is estimated for September 2027 and no results have been reported. It does not evaluate the approved cholangiocarcinoma indication. Its efficacy analysis pools its participants with the 46 participants of ReFocus Group 3, whose objective response rate was 33.3% (95% CI 19.6 to 49.5), so the planned interim analysis of approximately 65 evaluable participants is not an independent replication. Analyses are planned as primarily descriptive, with a threshold of at least 21 responders among 65 participants, and enrollment of any one tumor type may be capped at approximately 20% of the pooled total, which limits precision within individual tumor types.