MOL-001
18 evidence topics · 2 sources
Objective
Safety and clinical pharmacology
Location and study date
Study location and enrollment period
| Attribute | Quoted specification |
|---|---|
| Clinical research facility | “Celerion” |
| Location | “Belfast” |
| Enrollment period | “May through September 2015” |
Study design
Phase 1 randomized pharmacology study
Eligibility criteria
Healthy nonsmoking adult population
Age limits
| Eligibility measure | Reported range |
|---|---|
| Age, years | “18 to 55” |
Treatment
Repeated-dose duration
| Treatment component | Reported duration |
|---|---|
| Consecutive daily doses in the multiple ascending-dose study | “six” |
Study outcomes
Rationale for using adverse events as the primary endpoint
Not applicable.
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Description of analysis sets
Pharmacokinetic analysis method
Formal analysis-set definitions
No evidence found.
Results
Participant disposition
Study completion
| Disposition measure | Participants |
|---|---|
| Enrolled and completed the study | “42” |
Baseline characteristics
Overall demographic characteristics
| Characteristic | Reported value |
|---|---|
| Age, years, mean and standard deviation | “33.7±11.7” |
| Age range, years | “(18, 53)” |
| Male, number and percentage | “40 (95)” |
| Female, number and percentage | “2 (5)” |
| White, number and percentage | “40 (95)” |
| Black, number and percentage | “2 (5)” |
Efficacy results
Disease-specific efficacy
Not applicable.
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
Not applicable.
Safety results
Adverse events by dosing component
| Study component | Molgramostim: participants with adverse events | Placebo: participants with adverse events |
|---|---|---|
| Single ascending dose | “7 (58%)” | “4 (67%)” |
| Multiple ascending dose | “15 (83%)” | “6 (100%)” |
Serious adverse events
Study limitations
Summary
This study enrolled 42 healthy participants, including two women, and evaluated single doses or six consecutive daily doses. It does not establish efficacy in autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis or the safety of prolonged daily treatment. The sample size and short exposure limit assessment of uncommon or delayed adverse events. Statistical comparisons were not adjusted for multiple testing.