EMERALD
10 evidence topics · 3 sources
Objective
Location and study date
Countries recruiting in the protocol presentation
Actual study start and completion dates
No evidence found.
Study design
Randomization ratio
Eligibility criteria
Treatment
Relutrigine starting dose
Study outcomes
Rationale for using monthly motor seizure frequency as the primary endpoint
Primary outcome definition
Rationale for endpoint selection
No evidence found.
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
EMERALD: enrollment update
Analyzed population
No evidence found.
Description of analysis sets
No evidence found.
Results
Participant disposition
Baseline characteristics
No evidence found.
Efficacy results
No evidence found.
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
No evidence found.
Safety results
No evidence found.
Study limitations
Summary
The protocol presentation planned approximately 160 participants, while the subsequent corporate update reported approximately 200 enrolled. The study includes a broader DEE population than the indication addressed in this report. Recruitment completion and a planned fourth-quarter 2026 topline announcement do not establish efficacy or safety results, and the report contains no analyzed outcome dataset for EMERALD.