DRAGON II
12 evidence topics · 4 sources
Objective
Location and study date
UK protocol: ethics opinion
| Field | Quoted record |
|---|---|
| Ethics opinion date | “14 Jun 2024” |
| Ethics committee | “Wales REC 3” |
Study design
DRAGON II phase 1b and phase 2/3 trials: randomization
DRAGON II phase 1b and phase 2/3 trials: study duration and visits
Design of the phase 1b and phase 2/3 components
| Component and feature | Quoted record |
|---|---|
| Phase 1b masking | “open-label” |
| Phase 2/3 masking | “double-masked” |
| Phase 2/3 treatment duration | “24-month” |
Eligibility criteria
DRAGON II phase 1b and phase 2/3 trials: inclusion criterion
DRAGON II phase 1b and phase 2/3 trials: age range
DRAGON II phase 1b and phase 2/3 trials: exclusion criterion
Treatment
Study outcomes
Rationale for using atrophic lesion growth as the primary endpoint
Primary efficacy outcome and safety assessments
Trial-specific endpoint-validation analysis
No evidence found.
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
DRAGON II phase 1b and phase 2/3 trials: enrollment
Description of analysis sets
No evidence found.
Results
Participant disposition
No evidence found.
Baseline characteristics
No evidence found.
Efficacy results
No evidence found.
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
No evidence found.
Safety results
No evidence found.
Study limitations
Summary
The available update establishes enrollment of 73 participants, including 15 Japanese participants, in the phase 2/3 component. The evidence collected here describes its design and eligibility rather than treatment-effect estimates or completed safety results. Its age range of 12–20 years and requirement for clinically diagnosed STGD1 with an identified ABCA4 mutation constrain the population to which future findings can directly apply.