Acetyl-DL-leucine case report
11 evidence topics · 1 source
Objective
Location and study date
Study design
Single-participant report with scheduled assessments
Eligibility criteria
Not applicable.
Treatment
Study outcomes
Rationale for using SARA score as an efficacy outcome
Outcome measures
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Description of analysis sets
Not applicable.
Results
Participant disposition
No evidence found.
Baseline characteristics
Age and sex
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Participant | “a 9-year-old female with AT” |
Efficacy results
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
Safety results
Study limitations
Summary
The report describes one participant, a 9-year-old girl, treated with the racemate N-acetyl-DL-leucine at 4 g per day for 16 weeks without a comparator. The abstract gives the change in SARA score (11.0 points, 48.88%) without the baseline score and does not describe blinding of the assessor. Nausea and constipation occurred in the first week. The evidence quoted here comes from the article's abstract.