EMC survival study
16 evidence topics · 5 sources
Objective
Survival objective
Location and study date
International data collection
Study design
Sponsor analysis of the Erasmus University Medical Center cohort
Eligibility criteria
Exclusion criteria and mutation classification
Treatment
No evidence found.
Study outcomes
Rationale for using all-cause mortality as the primary endpoint
Mortality in MCT8 deficiency and the link to thyrotoxicosis
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Screened and included populations in the congress analysis
Study size reported in the New Drug Application
Description of analysis sets
Baseline comparisons, missing data, and survival models
Results
Participant disposition
Screening, exclusion, and follow-up
Baseline characteristics
Efficacy results
All-cause mortality: congress analysis
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
No evidence found.
Safety results
No evidence found.
Study limitations
Summary
The congress analysis included 228 of 484 screened participants and compared 111 treated participants with 117 untreated participants; it reported 5 versus 27 deaths over a median follow-up of 4.8 years after diagnosis. Treatment was not randomized, and the treated and untreated groups differed in the proportion residing in Western countries (78% versus 57%). The reported hazard ratio (0.28, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.91) is an observational association; the authors state that confounding and immortal time bias remain potential threats to validity and that further analyses were ongoing. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation. Later manufacturer documents describe the EMC Survival Study as including more than 600 participants, while the only quoted estimate comes from the 228-participant congress analysis. As of the second-quarter 2026 interim report, the survival data had not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal.