Evicenter
P&T meetings

Emcitate (tiratricol)

MCT8 deficiency

Last updated
78 sources

Clinical evidence

EMC survival study

16 evidence topics · 5 sources

Objective
Location and study date
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Treatment

No evidence found.

Study outcomes
Rationale for using all-cause mortality as the primary endpoint
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Description of analysis sets
Results
Participant disposition
Baseline characteristics
Efficacy results
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

No evidence found.

Safety results

No evidence found.

Study limitations
Summary

The congress analysis included 228 of 484 screened participants and compared 111 treated participants with 117 untreated participants; it reported 5 versus 27 deaths over a median follow-up of 4.8 years after diagnosis. Treatment was not randomized, and the treated and untreated groups differed in the proportion residing in Western countries (78% versus 57%). The reported hazard ratio (0.28, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.91) is an observational association; the authors state that confounding and immortal time bias remain potential threats to validity and that further analyses were ongoing. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation. Later manufacturer documents describe the EMC Survival Study as including more than 600 participants, while the only quoted estimate comes from the 228-participant congress analysis. As of the second-quarter 2026 interim report, the survival data had not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal.