Evicenter
P&T meetings

Emcitate (tiratricol)

MCT8 deficiency

Last updated
78 sources

Clinical evidence

ReTRIACt

31 evidence topics · 7 sources

Objective
Location and study date
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Treatment
Study outcomes
Rationale for using serum t3 rate of change as the primary endpoint
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Description of analysis sets
Prescribing information: analysis set and model
Analysis elementQuoted record
Analysis set for both primary endpoints“Full Analysis Set”
Model for primary endpoint 1“Estimates from random effects model”
Results
Participant disposition
Baseline characteristics
Efficacy results
Primary endpoints in SI units, observed-case rescue analysis, and reinitiation
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

No evidence found.

Safety results
Prescribing information: Study 1 adverse reactions
Adverse reactionStudy 1, EMCITATE, N = 20, n (%)
Diarrhea“0”
Vomiting“2 (10)”
Rash“2 (10)”
Hyperhidrosis“1 (5)”
Study limitations
Summary

ReTRIACt enrolled 20 participants and randomized 15 of them (eight to placebo withdrawal, seven to continued tiratricol); in 2024 the manufacturer described the planned study as including 16 evaluable participants. The study was closed at the FDA's recommendation, and the analysis plan was revised to add the T3 rate-of-change endpoint (primary endpoint 1) before that endpoint was reported. Primary endpoint 1 met its significance criterion (ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.2; p=0.034). For the rescue endpoint (primary endpoint 2), the difference in proportions was 0.36 with a 95% CI of -0.16 to 0.77 (p=0.182); one discontinuation in the tiratricol group for non-medical family reasons was counted as rescue, and the observed-case comparison was 4 versus 0 (p=0.070). The randomized period lasted at most 30 days and evaluated withdrawal after stable maintenance treatment; it did not evaluate treatment initiation or long-term clinical outcomes. The prescribing information reports adverse reactions for all 20 enrolled participants and does not report them by randomized arm. The congress report lists six serious adverse events in four participants and one death from aspiration pneumonia, none considered treatment-related. Enrolled participants were aged 5 to 31 years, so the study did not include infants.