Evicenter
P&T meetings

Emcitate (tiratricol)

MCT8 deficiency

Last updated
78 sources

Clinical evidence

Triac trial II

32 evidence topics · 5 sources

Objective
Location and study date
Registry dates and enrollment
FieldQuoted record
Study start (actual)“2020-12-07”
Primary completion (estimated)“2027-07-18”
Study completion (estimated)“2027-08-18”
Recruitment status“Active, not recruiting”
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Treatment
Study outcomes
Rationale for using GMFM-88 total score as a co-primary endpoint
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Description of analysis sets
Results
Participant disposition
Baseline characteristics
Efficacy results
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

No evidence found.

Safety results
Overview of treatment-emergent adverse events in Part I
Event categoryParticipants, N=22, n (%)Events
Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)“21 (95.5)”“208”
Any TEAE at least possibly related to study treatment“13 (59.1)”“20”
Any TEAE leading to discontinuation of study treatment“0”“0”
Any TEAE of CTC Grade 3 or higher“13 (59.1)”“19”
Any serious treatment-emergent adverse event (SAE)“10 (45.5)”“26”
Any SAE at least possibly related to study treatment“1 (4.5)”“2”
Any SAE leading to death“0”“0”
Study limitations
Summary

Triac Trial II was a single-arm, open-label phase 2 trial that enrolled 22 participants aged 5 to 28 months (median 16 months), of whom 21 completed 96 weeks. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were compared with historical scores from untreated participants in Triac Trial I; the co-primary endpoints were not met (GMFM-88 mean difference -2.42; BSID-III gross motor mean difference 0.21). The absence of a concurrent control group limits the separation of treatment effect from expected development, and the post-hoc improvements in other domains were not pre-specified. Only two participants were younger than 6 months at baseline. The trial targeted serum T3 at or below the lower limit of normal with a mean dose of 175 mcg/kg, compared with 37 mcg/kg in Triac Trial I; the EMA assessment reported increases in systolic blood pressure and markers of bone loss at these doses, and the G-BA excluded the trial from the German benefit assessment because its titration targets differed from the product information. Serious adverse events occurred in 10 of 22 participants (45.5%). The results summarized here come from a regulatory assessment, a manufacturer topline report, a registry record, and a 2026 congress abstract.