Triac trial II
32 evidence topics · 5 sources
Objective
Principal investigator: early-treatment hypothesis
Location and study date
Registry dates and enrollment
| Field | Quoted record |
|---|---|
| Study start (actual) | “2020-12-07” |
| Primary completion (estimated) | “2027-07-18” |
| Study completion (estimated) | “2027-08-18” |
| Recruitment status | “Active, not recruiting” |
Registry study sites
Study design
Phase 2, open-label, multicentre, single-arm trial
| Design field | Quoted record |
|---|---|
| Phase | “Phase 2” |
| Allocation | “N/A” |
| Interventional model | “Single Group Assignment” |
| Masking | “None (Open Label)” |
Part I and long-term extension (Part II)
Eligibility criteria
Registry exclusion criteria
Treatment
Dose titration and target serum T3 range
Treatment duration and exposure
Study outcomes
Rationale for using GMFM-88 total score as a co-primary endpoint
Co-primary and secondary endpoints
Registry description of the GMFM-88 and BSID-III co-primary measures
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Enrolled and analyzed population
| Population | Quoted record |
|---|---|
| Enrollment (actual) | “22” |
Description of analysis sets
Historical control comparison and post-hoc analyses
Pre-specified historical control thresholds
Results
Participant disposition
Screening, exclusion, discontinuation, and completion
Baseline characteristics
Age, disease severity, and time since diagnosis
Nutritional status, feeding, heart rate, and blood pressure
Efficacy results
Co-primary endpoints versus historical controls
| Co-primary endpoint | Mean difference versus untreated historical cohort after 96 weeks |
|---|---|
| GMFM-88 total score | “-2.42, 95%CI -4.36 to -0.48” |
| BSID-III gross motor domain | “0.21, 90%CI -0.19 to 0.61” |
Co-primary endpoints: change from baseline
Sponsor topline report
Secondary endpoints: serum T3, body weight, blood pressure, and atrial ectopy
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
No evidence found.
Safety results
Overview of treatment-emergent adverse events in Part I
| Event category | Participants, N=22, n (%) | Events |
|---|---|---|
| Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) | “21 (95.5)” | “208” |
| Any TEAE at least possibly related to study treatment | “13 (59.1)” | “20” |
| Any TEAE leading to discontinuation of study treatment | “0” | “0” |
| Any TEAE of CTC Grade 3 or higher | “13 (59.1)” | “19” |
| Any serious treatment-emergent adverse event (SAE) | “10 (45.5)” | “26” |
| Any SAE at least possibly related to study treatment | “1 (4.5)” | “2” |
| Any SAE leading to death | “0” | “0” |
Treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events
Heart rate and bone markers at the higher dose
Congress and sponsor reports of tolerability
Study limitations
Summary
Triac Trial II was a single-arm, open-label phase 2 trial that enrolled 22 participants aged 5 to 28 months (median 16 months), of whom 21 completed 96 weeks. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were compared with historical scores from untreated participants in Triac Trial I; the co-primary endpoints were not met (GMFM-88 mean difference -2.42; BSID-III gross motor mean difference 0.21). The absence of a concurrent control group limits the separation of treatment effect from expected development, and the post-hoc improvements in other domains were not pre-specified. Only two participants were younger than 6 months at baseline. The trial targeted serum T3 at or below the lower limit of normal with a mean dose of 175 mcg/kg, compared with 37 mcg/kg in Triac Trial I; the EMA assessment reported increases in systolic blood pressure and markers of bone loss at these doses, and the G-BA excluded the trial from the German benefit assessment because its titration targets differed from the product information. Serious adverse events occurred in 10 of 22 participants (45.5%). The results summarized here come from a regulatory assessment, a manufacturer topline report, a registry record, and a 2026 congress abstract.