Evicenter
P&T meetings

Lirafugratinib (Lyrfigtu)

Previously treated FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement-positive cholangiocarcinoma

Also known as RLY-4008
Regulatory submission
NDA submitted January 2026
Last updated
158 sources

Product information and disease descriptionPlace of product in therapyDisease descriptionEpidemiology

Prevalence of Previously treated FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement-positive cholangiocarcinoma

19 evidence topics · 14 sources

Summary: prevalence of FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements in cholangiocarcinoma

Reported frequencies of FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are 13.6% (9 of 66) by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, 13% (12 of 96) by fluorescence in situ hybridization, 14% in a sequenced institutional cohort, and 13.9% in a European routine-testing cohort. Central prescreening for FIGHT-202 confirmed FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements in 107 of 1,206 participants (9%), which the investigators describe as broadly consistent with the published range of 10% to 16%. In a comprehensive genomic profiling dataset of 6,802 cholangiocarcinoma samples, 9.2% had FGFR2 rearrangements, of which 76.1% were classified as fusions and 20.7% as other rearrangements, with BICC1 the most common partner (26.7%). In the FIGHT-202 prescreening cohort analysed for clinicogenomic correlates, 74 participants (6.1%) had FGFR2 rearrangements, 15.2% in the United States, 7.4% in Europe, and 2.2% in the rest of the world, which the investigators attribute partly to inclusion of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. In a multicentre Italian cohort of 312 participants with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements occurred in 10.6%. In a surgical FISH series, FGFR2 rearrangements were found in 12/96 intrahepatic, 0/25 perihilar, and 0/31 extrahepatic tumours. Frequency varied with the biopsy site sampled (9% of primary tumour biopsies, 6% and 4% of other sites) and was enriched 2.1-fold in participants with African ancestry. The FGFR2 cohort of FIGHT-202 contained greater proportions of women and of participants younger than 65 years than the other cohorts, and in a resected cohort FGFR2 fusion was more often present in younger (53 vs. 62 years) and female (83 vs. 49%) participants, whereas a European routine-testing cohort found no association between FGFR2 fusions and age or sex.

Overall prevalence of the underlying cancer is limited by short survival: SEER estimated 116,514 people living with liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancer in the United States in 2023, and the 16-year limited-duration prevalence of cholangiocarcinoma from 2001 to 2017 was reported as 5.92, higher for extrahepatic (4.23) than intrahepatic (1.69) disease. Nearly 40% of biliary tract cancers harbour a genetic alteration that is a potential target for precision medicine.

FGFR2 rearrangement frequency in a comprehensive genomic profiling dataset of cholangiocarcinoma
FGFR2 rearrangement classes and fusion partners in a comprehensive genomic profiling dataset

“Of the 6802 samples tested, 629 (9.2%) had a total of 632 FGFR2 rearrangement events. These events were further classified as fusions (n = 481; 76.1%), rearrangements (n = 131; 20.7%), truncations (n = 18; 2.8%), and duplications (n = 2; 0.3%) (Figure 1A).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The most common fusion partner was BICC1 (n = 169; 26.7%), followed by AHCYL1 (n = 19; 3.0%), TACC2 (n = 17; 2.7%), and CCDC6 (n = 16; 2.5%); 126 (19.9%) rearrangement events had a partner gene that was unique to a single patient (N-of-One), and 35 (11.1%) for which the partner was observed in only two patients (N-of-Two) (Figure 1B and Supplemental Table S5).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Most FGFR2 rearrangements (54.4%) involved intrachromosomal rearrangements on chromosome 10, with BICC1, CCDC6, and TACC2 being the most common rearrangement partners.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The frequency of FGFR2 rearrangements observed in our real-world data set of 6802 patients with CCA was 9.2%, which is slightly lower than estimates for iCCA of 10% to 15%.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Given the lack of detailed clinical information in this data set, the cohort is likely not strictly iCCA and may include eCCA, perihilar CCA, and cancers of unknown primary, as the genomic test may have been ordered before the physician received the results of a full diagnostic assessment.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)