ONO-4059-02
24 evidence topics · 6 sources
Objective
Location and study date
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Eligibility and exclusions
Treatment
Dose groups and treatment duration
Study outcomes
Rationale for using IPCG overall response rate as the primary endpoint
Validation as a surrogate for survival
No evidence found.
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Description of analysis sets
Safety and efficacy analysis sets
Quality-of-life analysis population and statistical testing
Results
Participant disposition
Treatment continuation and subsequent therapy
Baseline characteristics
Age, performance status, and prior treatment
Efficacy results
Long-term progression-free survival
Radiological response in the autopsy case
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
Performance status and quality-of-life findings
Safety results
Long-term adverse-event incidence
Study limitations
Summary
The study was uncontrolled and enrolled 44 participants with KPS scores of at least 70. Results therefore do not establish comparative efficacy or directly characterize participants with lower performance status. Subsequent therapy was reported for 32 participants, limiting attribution of long-term overall survival to tirabrutinib alone. Quality-of-life analyses were exploratory, were not planned when the protocol was fixed, and lacked follow-up after tirabrutinib discontinuation. The autopsy publication describes a participant from this trial, not an independent efficacy cohort.