CITOSP
14 evidence topics · 2 sources
Objective
Clinical safety objective
Location and study date
Study design
Observational design
Eligibility criteria
Cardiology population
Treatment
Study outcomes
Rationale for using adverse drug reactions as the primary safety endpoint
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Enrolled participants
| Characteristic | Quoted value |
|---|---|
| Cohort size | “36” |
Description of analysis sets
Minimum exposure for analysis
Results
Participant disposition
Study completion
| Characteristic | Quoted value |
|---|---|
| Participants completing the study | “22 (61.1%)” |
Baseline characteristics
Baseline sex
| Characteristic | Quoted value |
|---|---|
| Male participants | “83.3%” |
Efficacy results
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
No evidence found.
Safety results
Study limitations
Summary
The evidence comes from a prospective observational cohort of 36 hospitalized smokers with cardiovascular disease. Its small size and lack of randomized comparison limit causal interpretation and assessment of uncommon cardiovascular harms. The reported longitudinal cessation percentages are self-reported outcomes.