PARKS
20 evidence topics · 2 sources
Objective
Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability in children and adolescents
Location and study date
Study dates and number of sites
| Field | Quoted record |
|---|---|
| Study start (actual) | “2024-12-26” |
| Primary completion (actual) | “2025-03-14” |
| Study completion (actual) | “2025-05-21” |
| Number of locations | “This study has 8 locations” |
Participating sites in the United States and Canada
“AllerVie Clinical Research” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“UCLA Pediatric Allergy & Immunology” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Children's Hospital Colorado” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Texas Children's Hospital - Feigin Center” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Halton Pediatric Allergy” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Key exclusion criteria
Treatment
Route of administration
Study outcomes
Rationale for using baseline-corrected maximum epinephrine plasma concentration as the primary endpoint
Registered primary outcome measures
Purpose of matching adult exposure to support pediatric labeling
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Planned and actual enrollment
| Field | Quoted record |
|---|---|
| Planned enrollment | “Up to 24 DESF treated pediatric participants are expected to be enrolled.” |
| Enrollment (actual) | “32” |
Participants who completed the study
Description of analysis sets
No evidence found.
Results
Participant disposition
Baseline characteristics
Age and weight of the enrolled population
Efficacy results
Pharmacokinetic profile compared with adult studies
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
No evidence found.
Safety results
Study limitations
Summary: study limitations
The study was open label, gave a single 12 mg dose with no comparator arm, and enrolled 32 participants aged 7 through 17 years who weighed at least 30 kg, so it provides no evidence for younger or lighter children, for whom 0.15 mg injectable products are used. Participants were dosed while well rather than during an allergic reaction. Results have been described only in a company announcement and the registry record carries no posted results, so individual pharmacokinetic parameters, variability, and the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale findings are not publicly reported.