Evicenter
MarkdownP&T meetings
Hibsago (bepirovirsen)

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection in adults without cirrhosis

Also known as GSK3228836
Manufacturer
GSK
Last updated
190 sources

Clinical evidence

B-Well 1

105 evidence topics · 19 sources

Objective
Location and study date
Study locations by country in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
CountryLocations listed in the record
United States“Chandler, Arizona, United States, 85224”; “Davis, California, United States, 95817”; “Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027”; “Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304”; “San Jose, California, United States, 95116”; “Littleton, Colorado, United States, 80120”; “Miami, Florida, United States, 33134”; “Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242”; “Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287”; “Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48377”; “Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23249”; “Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298”
Argentina“Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1061”; “Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1061AAS”; “Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1125ABE”; “Capital Federal, Argentina, C1181ACI”; “Derqui Pilar, Argentina, B1629AHJ”; “Rosario, Argentina, S2002KDT”
Brazil“Aracaju, Brazil, 49060-010”; “Campinas, Brazil, 13034-685”; “Curitiba, Brazil, 80810-050”; “Manaus, Brazil, 69040-000”; “Porto Alegre, Brazil, 90035003”; “Santa Maria, Brazil, 97105-900”; “São Paulo, Brazil, 05403-000”; “São Paulo, Brazil, 08270-070”; “Vila Mariana, Brazil, 04121-000”
Bulgaria“Sofia, Bulgaria, 1431”; “Sofia, Bulgaria, 1606”; “Sofia, Bulgaria”; “Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria, 5000”
Canada“Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 2K5”; “Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8V 3M9”; “Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6”; “Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4”; “Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 0A9”; “Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3J1”; “Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G2”; “Saint-Jérôme, Quebec, Canada, J7Z 2V4”
China“Beijing, China, 100015”; “Beijing, China, 100050”; “Beijing, China”; “Changchun, China, 130021”; “Chengdu, China”; “Chongqing, China, 400042”; “Fuzhou, China, 350025”; “Guangzhou, China, 510060”; “Guangzhou, China, 510515”; “Guangzhou, China, 510630”; “Hangzhou, China, 310003”; “Hangzhou, China, 310022”; “Kunming, China, 650021”; “Nanjing, China, 210008”; “Shanghai, China, 200025”; “Shanghai, China, 200040”; “Shanghai, China, 200083”; “Shenyang, China, 110022”; “Shenzhen, China, 518112”; “Ürümqi, China, 830054”; “Wuhan, China, 430022”; “Xi'an, China, 710061”; “Zhengzhou, China, 450000”; “Zhenjiang, China”
France“Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003”; “Clichy, France, 92118”; “Dijon, France, 21079”; “Lille, France, 59037”; “Pessac, France, 33604”; “Poitiers, France, 86021”; “Rennes, France, 35033”; “Strasbourg, France, 67091”; “Toulouse, France, 31059”
Germany“Berlin, Germany, 10243”; “Berlin, Germany, 10439”; “Berlin, Germany, 10787”; “Berlin, Germany, 12163”; “Bochum, Germany, 44787”; “Cologne, Germany, 50668”; “Düsseldorf, Germany, 40225”; “München, Germany, 80336”
Greece“Athens, Greece, 10676”; “Athens, Greece, 11527”; “Periohi Dragana Alexand, Greece, 68100”; “Rio Patras, Greece, 26504”
Hong Kong“Kowloon, Hong Kong”; “Pokfulam, Hong Kong”; “Shatin, Hong Kong”
Hungary“Budapest, Hungary, 1097”; “Eger, Hungary, 3300”; “Gyula, Hungary, 5700”; “Miskolc, Hungary, 3530”
India“Belagavi, India, 590010”; “Chandigarh, India, 160012”; “Chennai, India, 600113”; “Coimbatore, India, 641005”; “Guhawati, India, 781006”; “Hyderabad, India, 500033”; “HyderabadTelangana, India, 500048”; “Jaipur, India, 302001”; “Ludhiana, India, 141001”; “Manipal, India, 576104”; “Mumbai, India, 400 008”; “Mumbai, India, 400012”; “Mumbai, India, 400026”; “Pune, India, 411001”; “Surat, India, 395002”
Italy“Brescia, Italy, 25123”; “Foggia, Italy, 71100”; “Messina, Italy, 98124”; “Milan, Italy, 20122”; “Milan, Italy, 20162”; “Modena, Italy, 40126”
Japan“Chiba, Japan, 272-8516”; “Ehime, Japan, 790-8524”; “Fukuoka, Japan, 820-8505”; “Fukuoka, Japan, 839-0863”; “Gifu, Japan, 500-8717”; “Gifu, Japan, 503-8502”; “Hiroshima, Japan, 734-8551”; “Hiroshima, Japan, 737-0023”; “Hokkaido, Japan, 053-8506”; “Hyōgo, Japan, 660-8550”; “Kumamoto, Japan, 862-8655”; “Miyagi, Japan, 980-8574”; “Tokyo, Japan, 113-8519”; “Tokyo, Japan, 173-8610”; “Tokyo, Japan, 180-8610”
Malaysia“George Town, Malaysia”; “Johor Bahru, Malaysia, 80100”; “Kota Bharu Kelantan, Malaysia”; “Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia”; “Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia”; “Kuantan, Malaysia”
Mexico“Guadalajara, Mexico, 44160”; “Oaxaca City, Mexico, 68000”
Panama“Panama City, Panama, 07206”
Poland“Bytom, Poland, 41-902”; “Krakow, Poland, 31-202”; “Łańcut, Poland, 37-100”
Romania“Bucharest, Romania, 021105”; “Bucharest, Romania, 20125”; “Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 400162”; “Iași, Romania, 700116”; “Suceava, Romania, 720224”; “Timișoara, Romania, 300001”
Singapore“Singapore, Singapore, 119074”; “Singapore, Singapore, 169608”
South Korea“Ansan, South Korea, 15355”; “Busan, South Korea, 47392”; “Daegu, South Korea, 41944”; “Daegu, South Korea, 42601”; “Seoul, South Korea, 03080”; “Seoul, South Korea, 06351”; “Seoul, South Korea, 07061”; “Seoul, South Korea, 08308”
Spain“Barcelona, Spain, 08035”; “Barcelona, Spain, 08036”; “León, Spain, 24080”; “Madrid, Spain, 28041”; “Málaga, Spain, 29010”; “Salamanca, Spain, 37007”; “Santander, Spain, 39008”; “Valencia, Spain, 46014”; “Valladolid, Spain, 47003”; “Vigo, Spain, 36002”
Taiwan“Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 807”; “Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 833”; “Taichung, Taiwan, 40705”; “Taipei, Taiwan, 104”; “Tau-Yuan, Taiwan, 333”
Thailand“Bangkok, Thailand, 10330”
Turkey (Türkiye)“Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye), 06230”
United Kingdom“Birmingham, United Kingdom, B15 2TH”; “Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH4 2XU”; “Leeds West Yorkshire, United Kingdom, LS9 7TF”; “London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RS”; “London, United Kingdom, SW17 0QT”
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Exclusion criteria: coinfection, cirrhosis, malignancy, vasculitis, and extrahepatic disorders in the ClinicalTrials.gov record

“Co-infection with: a) Current history of Hepatitis C infection or participants that have been cured for <12 months at the time of screening b) Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), c) Hepatitis D virus.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“History of or suspected liver cirrhosis and/or evidence of cirrhosis.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Diagnosed or suspected hepatocellular carcinoma.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“History of malignancy within the past 5 years except for specific cancers that are cured by surgical resection (e.g., skin cancer).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“History of vasculitis or presence of symptoms and signs of potential vasculitis (e.g., vasculitic rash, skin ulceration, repeated blood detected in urine without identified cause) current or history of an autoimmune condition or history/presence of other diseases that may be associated with vasculitis condition (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, relapsing polychondritis, mononeuritis multiplex).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“History of extrahepatic disorders possibly related to HBV immune conditions (e.g., nephrotic syndrome, any type of glomerulonephritis, polyarteritis nodosa, cryoglobulinemia, uncontrolled hypertension).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“History of alcohol or drug abuse/dependence.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Treatment
Investigational product and placebo in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Study outcomes
Rationale for using functional cure as the primary endpoint
Primary and three key secondary endpoints assessed at week 72 in the prescribing information

“At Week 72, twenty-four weeks after possible cessation of NrtI treatment in eligible participants and 48 weeks after the last HIBSAGO dose, the primary and three key secondary efficacy endpoints were assessed.” (opens the prescribing information at this quote)

“The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained suppression of HBV DNA (<LLOQ) and HBsAg not detected (LOD = 0.05 IU/mL), with or without hepatitis B surface antibodies, at 24 weeks after discontinuation of all chronic HBV treatment in the absence of rescue medication in participants with baseline HBsAg ≤3,000 IU/mL.” (opens the prescribing information at this quote)

“The first key secondary endpoint was assessed by applying the same criteria to participants with baseline HBsAg ≤1,000 IU/mL.” (opens the prescribing information at this quote)

“The second key secondary efficacy endpoint was sustained suppression of HBV DNA (<LLOQ), at 24 weeks after discontinuation of all chronic HBV treatment in the absence of rescue medication in participants with baseline HBsAg ≤3,000 IU/mL.” (opens the prescribing information at this quote)

“The third key secondary endpoint was assessed by applying the same criteria of sustained suppression of HBV DNA (<LLOQ) to participants with baseline HBsAg ≤1,000 IU/mL.” (opens the prescribing information at this quote)

“Blips in the Week 72 analysis window were permitted for the primary and key secondary endpoint analyses.” (opens the prescribing information at this quote)

Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Participants analyzed for the primary and first key secondary endpoints by treatment group
Analysis populationHibsago (n/N)Placebo (n/N)
Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL (primary endpoint)“127/650”“0/328”
Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL (first key secondary endpoint)“105/426”“0/214”
Description of analysis sets
Results
Participant disposition
Baseline characteristics
Efficacy results
Key secondary endpoint: sustained HBV DNA suppression and HBsAg not detected, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL
Measure (full analysis set)Value
Hibsago, n/N (%)“105/426 (25)”
Placebo, n/N (%)“0/214 (0)”
Rate difference, % (95% CI)“25 (20.8, 29.0)”
p-value“<0.0001”
Key secondary endpoints: sustained HBV DNA suppression below the LLOQ 24 weeks after NrtI cessation
Measure (full analysis set)Value
Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: Hibsago, n/N (%)“151/650 (23)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: placebo, n/N (%)“0/328 (0)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: common rate difference, % (95% CI)“21 (17.9, 24.0)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: Hibsago, n/N (%)“124/426 (29)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: placebo, n/N (%)“0/214 (0)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: rate difference, % (95% CI)“29 (25.0, 33.6)”
p-value, each stratum“<0.0001”
Functional cure at week 72 by baseline HBsAg stratum, pooled and B-Well 1
PopulationValue
Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: rate“19% vs. 0% (placebo)”
Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: participants“233 of 1,220 vs. 0 of 614”
B-Well 1, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: rate“B-Well 1: 20% vs. 0%”
B-Well 1, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: participants“127 of 650 vs. 0 of 328”
Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: rate“26% vs. 0% (placebo)”
Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: participants“200 of 768 vs. 0 of 393”
B-Well 1, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: rate“B-Well 1: 25% vs. 0%”
B-Well 1, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: participants“105 of 426 vs. 0 of 214”
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: HBsAg below 1 IU/mL at treatment week 12 as a predictor of response, post hoc analysis
Nucleotide polymorphisms in the bepirovirsen binding site
Population and measureValue
Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: baseline polymorphisms, % (n/N)“6 (7/123)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: treatment-emergent mutations, % (n/N)“5 (2/42)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: baseline polymorphisms, % (n/N)“3 (2/69)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: treatment-emergent mutations, % (n/N)“5 (1/22)”
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

No evidence found.

Safety results
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: adverse reactions in at least 3% of Hibsago recipients, weeks 1 to 36
Adverse reactionHibsago (N = 1,223)Placebo (N = 611)
Injection site reactions (all types)“57%”“15%”
Pyrexia“20%”“4%”
Fatigue“16%”“8%”
Headache“14%”“12%”
Myalgia“8%”“4%”
Nausea or vomiting“5%”“3%”
Erythema“5%”“<1%”
Pruritus“5%”“2%”
Influenza-like illness“4%”“2%”
Rash“3%”“1%”
Contusion“3%”“1%”
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: selected laboratory abnormalities worsened from baseline, weeks 1 to 36
Laboratory categoryHibsago (N = 1,223)Placebo (N = 611)
ALT 3 to less than 5 times ULN“10%”“<1%”
ALT 5 to less than 10 times ULN“8%”“0”
ALT 10 to less than 20 times ULN“4%”“0”
ALT 20 times ULN or higher“2%”“<1%”
AST 3 to less than 5 times ULN“6%”“<1%”
AST 5 to less than 10 times ULN“4%”“<1%”
AST 10 to less than 20 times ULN“1%”“<1%”
AST 20 times ULN or higher“<1%”“0”
Total bilirubin ULN to less than 1.5 times ULN“8%”“11%”
Total bilirubin 1.5 to less than 2 times ULN“2%”“2%”
Total bilirubin 2 times ULN or higher“<1%”“<1%”
Platelets 100 to less than 140 x 10^9/L“37%”“7%”
Platelets 75 to less than 100 x 10^9/L“8%”“<1%”
Platelets 50 to less than 75 x 10^9/L“2%”“<1%”
Platelets 25 to less than 50 x 10^9/L“<1%”“0”
Platelets less than 25 x 10^9/L“<1%”“0”
ANC 500 to less than 1,000 cells/mm3“8%”“3%”
ANC 100 to less than 500 cells/mm3“1%”“<1%”
eGFR decline of 15% to less than 30% from baseline“51%”“30%”
eGFR decline of 30% to less than 50% from baseline“17%”“6%”
eGFR decline of 50% or more from baseline“1%”“<1%”
uACR 0.3 mg/mg or higher“2%”“1%”
Study limitations
Summary: study limitations

B-Well 1 administered bepirovirsen for 24 weeks and assessed the primary endpoint at week 72, 24 weeks after possible cessation of NrtI therapy; the longest reported follow-up is week 96, and it covers the 295 of 1,220 pooled bepirovirsen recipients who stopped NrtI therapy at week 48. Eligibility required stable NrtI therapy, HBsAg above 100 and up to 3,000 IU/mL, HBV DNA below 90 IU/mL, and ALT up to 2 times the upper limit of normal, and excluded participants with cirrhosis, HCV, HIV, or HDV coinfection, eGFR at or below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, or platelet count below 140 × 10⁹/L. Participants were randomized to bepirovirsen or placebo added to background NrtI therapy, with no active-comparator group. In the full analysis set, 92% of participants were HBeAg negative and 7% were enrolled in the US and Canada, and the label states that efficacy differences in participants aged 75 years and older “cannot be determined due to the small number of participants”. The label reports safety data for B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 only as pooled results, and neither the label nor the published abstract reports health-related quality of life or patient-reported outcome results.