B-Well 1
105 evidence topics · 19 sources
Objective
Purpose stated in the ClinicalTrials.gov brief summary
Main objective in the EU Clinical Trials Information System record
Main and secondary objectives in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Aims of both B-Well trials stated by the company
Location and study date
Study dates and status in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
“Study Start (Actual) 2022-12-07” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Primary Completion (Actual) 2025-11-11” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Study Completion (Actual) 2026-04-15” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“First Posted 2022-11-30” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Last Update Posted 2026-07-08” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Completed” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“No Results Posted” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
Number of locations in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Study locations by country in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
EU and EEA member states, trial start, and end of trial in the EU Clinical Trials Information System record
Planned sites in the European Economic Area and regulatory and ethics decisions in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Regions with planned trial sites in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Countries in both B-Well trials stated by the company
Trial start in the company pipeline appendix
Initiation of the two phase 3 studies announced by the licensor
Study design
Official title in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Design details in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
| Field | Registry value |
|---|---|
| Phase | “Phase 3” |
| Primary purpose | “Treatment” |
| Allocation | “Randomized” |
| Interventional model | “Parallel Assignment” |
| Model description | “This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.” |
| Masking | “Quadruple” |
| Masking description | “This will be a double blinded study in which investigators/site staff and the Sponsor will remain blinded to treatment assignment.” |
Four study stages, stratification, and total duration in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Two identically designed phase 3 trials in the prescribing information
Nucleos(t)ide analogue cessation at week 48 and cessation eligibility criteria
Criteria to restart nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy after cessation
Replicate double-blind design in the primary publication
“In two replicate, double-blind trials (B-Well 1 and B-Well 2), we randomly assigned adults with noncirrhotic chronic HBV infection in a 2:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous bepirovirsen (at a weekly dose of 300 mg) or placebo for 24 weeks.” (opens the original PubMed page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Eligible patients discontinued NA therapy at 48 weeks.” (opens the original PubMed page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
Placebo control, treatment arms, and data monitoring committee in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
“Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Placebo Yes” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Number of treatment arms in the trial 2” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
Design of both B-Well trials stated by the company
Eligibility criteria
Key inclusion and exclusion criteria summarized in the prescribing information
Population described in the primary publication
Inclusion criteria in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Exclusion criteria: coinfection, cirrhosis, malignancy, vasculitis, and extrahepatic disorders in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Exclusion criteria: prior and concomitant therapy in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Definition of cirrhosis for exclusion in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Other exclusion criteria in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Treatment
Hibsago or placebo dosing regimen with background nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy
Arms and interventions in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
| Arm | Registry value |
|---|---|
| Experimental arm | “Experimental: Bepirovirsen”; “Bepirovirsen will be administered.” |
| Placebo arm | “Placebo Comparator: Placebo”; “Matching placebo will be administered.” |
Treatment arms in the company pipeline appendix
Investigational product and placebo in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
| Field | Registry value |
|---|---|
| Pharmaceutical form | “Solution for injection” |
| Route of administration | “Subcutaneous use” |
| Concentration unit | “mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre” |
| Concentration number | “Concentration number 150” |
| Current sponsor code | “GSK3228836” |
| Placebo used | “Is a Placebo used in this Trial? Yes” |
| Pharmaceutical form of the placebo | “Pharmaceutical form of the placebo Solution for injection” |
| Route of administration of the placebo | “Route of administration of the placebo Subcutaneous use” |
| Care after the trial | “To continue with standard of care.” |
Study outcomes
Rationale for using functional cure as the primary endpoint
Registered primary outcome measure in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Registered secondary outcome measures in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Primary and secondary end points and time point in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Primary and three key secondary endpoints assessed at week 72 in the prescribing information
Functional cure definition and assay thresholds in the company release
Functional cure definition and primary outcome in the primary publication
“Treatment with bepirovirsen, an antisense oligonucleotide targeting hepatitis B virus (HBV) transcripts, has the potential to result in a functional cure, defined by at least 24 weeks of a sustained HBV DNA level below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss after fixed-duration therapy.” (opens the original PubMed page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“The primary outcome was a functional cure at week 72.” (opens the original PubMed page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
Functional cure as the preferred primary endpoint: AASLD-EASL treatment endpoints conference
“Of all these surrogate endpoints, HBsAg loss is considered to be the most relevant because HBsAg seroclearance is associated with sustained off-treatment improvement in clinical outcomes.” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Moreover, HBsAg seroclearance is easy to measure with standardized and widely available assays.” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“The recommended endpoint of novel therapy is functional cure defined as HBsAg loss using a conventional assay for detection of HBsAg (limit of detection 0.05 IU/mL) and HBV DNA below the lower limit of quantification (i.e. < 10 IU/ml) at 24 weeks off-therapy.” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
Clinical endpoints are unfeasible as trial endpoints: AASLD-EASL treatment endpoints conference
“These clinical endpoints however typically develop over decades and are therefore unfeasible to be used as primary therapeutic endpoints for clinical trials of new investigational agents.” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Although long-term sustained off-treatment HBV DNA suppression is associated with similar improvements in clinical outcomes as HBsAg loss, in patients with cirrhosis, it is not reliably durable, and there is a 15-40% lifetime chance of disease reactivation.” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
Nucleos(t)ide analogue withdrawal in trial control arms: AASLD-EASL treatment endpoints conference
“If off-treatment response is a primary endpoint, then NA should be withdrawn from both active treatment and control arms but only if stringent predetermined criteria based on HBsAg levels and other parameters are met to ensure safety.” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
Efficacy endpoints and add-on placebo-controlled design for finite therapy: FDA guidance
Functional cure as the primary endpoint of phase II/III trials: EASL clinical practice guideline
Functional cure as the optimal endpoint for new therapies: bepirovirsen phase 2b design report
“Recently, functional cure, defined as durable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss with or without HBsAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA, has been accepted as the optimal endpoint for new HBV therapies” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Functional cure is rare (≤ 5%) with NA therapy” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Planned number of participants in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
“In the EEA 191” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“In the whole clinical trial 900” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Number of subjects for this age range: 738” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Number of subjects for this age range: 162” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
Actual enrollment in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Randomized participants and full analysis set in the prescribing information
Participants analyzed for the primary endpoint in the primary publication
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: participants in both trials
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: participants in the pooled safety population
Description of analysis sets
Full analysis set used for efficacy
Statistical methods for the primary endpoint: stratified common rate difference and exact Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test
Statistical methods for the key secondary endpoints in participants with baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL
Ranked order of the primary and key secondary endpoints
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: pooled safety data set, weeks 1 to 36
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: subgroup analyses of the pooled population
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: post hoc analysis of predictors of nonresponse
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: durability population of participants who stopped nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy
Results
Participant disposition
Randomized participants and full analysis set
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: participants who received at least one dose
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: participants who stopped NrtI therapy at week 48
Baseline characteristics
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: participants aged 65 years and older
Efficacy results
Primary and key secondary endpoints met
Primary endpoint: sustained HBV DNA suppression and HBsAg not detected 24 weeks after NrtI cessation, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL
| Measure (full analysis set) | Value |
|---|---|
| Hibsago, n/N (%) | “127/650 (20)” |
| Placebo, n/N (%) | “0/328 (0)” |
| Common rate difference, % (95% CI) | “17 (14.6, 20.3)” |
| p-value | “<0.0001” |
“The percentage of patients with a functional cure at week 72 was significantly higher with bepirovirsen than with placebo both in the B-Well 1 trial (in 127 of 650 patients [20%] vs. none of 328 patients)” (opens the original PubMed page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
Key secondary endpoint: sustained HBV DNA suppression and HBsAg not detected, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL
| Measure (full analysis set) | Value |
|---|---|
| Hibsago, n/N (%) | “105/426 (25)” |
| Placebo, n/N (%) | “0/214 (0)” |
| Rate difference, % (95% CI) | “25 (20.8, 29.0)” |
| p-value | “<0.0001” |
Key secondary endpoints: sustained HBV DNA suppression below the LLOQ 24 weeks after NrtI cessation
| Measure (full analysis set) | Value |
|---|---|
| Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: Hibsago, n/N (%) | “151/650 (23)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: placebo, n/N (%) | “0/328 (0)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: common rate difference, % (95% CI) | “21 (17.9, 24.0)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: Hibsago, n/N (%) | “124/426 (29)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: placebo, n/N (%) | “0/214 (0)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: rate difference, % (95% CI) | “29 (25.0, 33.6)” |
| p-value, each stratum | “<0.0001” |
Functional cure at week 72 by baseline HBsAg stratum, pooled and B-Well 1
| Population | Value |
|---|---|
| Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: rate | “19% vs. 0% (placebo)” |
| Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: participants | “233 of 1,220 vs. 0 of 614” |
| B-Well 1, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: rate | “B-Well 1: 20% vs. 0%” |
| B-Well 1, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: participants | “127 of 650 vs. 0 of 328” |
| Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: rate | “26% vs. 0% (placebo)” |
| Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: participants | “200 of 768 vs. 0 of 393” |
| B-Well 1, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: rate | “B-Well 1: 25% vs. 0%” |
| B-Well 1, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: participants | “105 of 426 vs. 0 of 214” |
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: sustained HBV DNA suppression below the LLOQ
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: HBsAg at or below 100 IU/mL, exploratory analysis
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: subgroups with lower response
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: response by HBV genotype
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: HBsAg below 1 IU/mL at treatment week 12 as a predictor of response, post hoc analysis
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: durability of response at weeks 72 and 96 after NrtI cessation
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: NrtI restart through week 96
Nucleotide polymorphisms in the bepirovirsen binding site
| Population and measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: baseline polymorphisms, % (n/N) | “6 (7/123)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: treatment-emergent mutations, % (n/N) | “5 (2/42)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: baseline polymorphisms, % (n/N) | “3 (2/69)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: treatment-emergent mutations, % (n/N) | “5 (1/22)” |
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
No evidence found.
Safety results
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: overall, serious, and grade 3 or higher adverse events
“In a pooled analysis at 72 weeks, adverse events were reported in 91% of the patients in the bepirovirsen groups and in 73% of those in the placebo groups; serious adverse events were reported in 7% and 4% of the patients, respectively.” (opens the original PubMed page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“During the treatment period, adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 16% of the patients who received bepirovirsen and in 3% of those who received placebo; increases in the alanine aminotransferase level were the most common grade 3 adverse events with bepirovirsen (in 6% of the patients).” (opens the original PubMed page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: discontinuation due to adverse events
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: adverse reactions in at least 3% of Hibsago recipients, weeks 1 to 36
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: injection site reactions, weeks 1 to 36
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: selected laboratory abnormalities worsened from baseline, weeks 1 to 36
| Laboratory category | Hibsago (N = 1,223) | Placebo (N = 611) |
|---|---|---|
| ALT 3 to less than 5 times ULN | “10%” | “<1%” |
| ALT 5 to less than 10 times ULN | “8%” | “0” |
| ALT 10 to less than 20 times ULN | “4%” | “0” |
| ALT 20 times ULN or higher | “2%” | “<1%” |
| AST 3 to less than 5 times ULN | “6%” | “<1%” |
| AST 5 to less than 10 times ULN | “4%” | “<1%” |
| AST 10 to less than 20 times ULN | “1%” | “<1%” |
| AST 20 times ULN or higher | “<1%” | “0” |
| Total bilirubin ULN to less than 1.5 times ULN | “8%” | “11%” |
| Total bilirubin 1.5 to less than 2 times ULN | “2%” | “2%” |
| Total bilirubin 2 times ULN or higher | “<1%” | “<1%” |
| Platelets 100 to less than 140 x 10^9/L | “37%” | “7%” |
| Platelets 75 to less than 100 x 10^9/L | “8%” | “<1%” |
| Platelets 50 to less than 75 x 10^9/L | “2%” | “<1%” |
| Platelets 25 to less than 50 x 10^9/L | “<1%” | “0” |
| Platelets less than 25 x 10^9/L | “<1%” | “0” |
| ANC 500 to less than 1,000 cells/mm3 | “8%” | “3%” |
| ANC 100 to less than 500 cells/mm3 | “1%” | “<1%” |
| eGFR decline of 15% to less than 30% from baseline | “51%” | “30%” |
| eGFR decline of 30% to less than 50% from baseline | “17%” | “6%” |
| eGFR decline of 50% or more from baseline | “1%” | “<1%” |
| uACR 0.3 mg/mg or higher | “2%” | “1%” |
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: ALT increases leading to treatment pause or discontinuation
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: thrombocytopenia and platelet count decline
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: neutrophil count decline
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: eGFR decline
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: cutaneous vasculitis
Less common adverse reactions: hypersensitivity and angioedema
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: anti-drug antibodies
Most frequently observed adverse events
Study limitations
Summary: study limitations
B-Well 1 administered bepirovirsen for 24 weeks and assessed the primary endpoint at week 72, 24 weeks after possible cessation of NrtI therapy; the longest reported follow-up is week 96, and it covers the 295 of 1,220 pooled bepirovirsen recipients who stopped NrtI therapy at week 48. Eligibility required stable NrtI therapy, HBsAg above 100 and up to 3,000 IU/mL, HBV DNA below 90 IU/mL, and ALT up to 2 times the upper limit of normal, and excluded participants with cirrhosis, HCV, HIV, or HDV coinfection, eGFR at or below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, or platelet count below 140 × 10⁹/L. Participants were randomized to bepirovirsen or placebo added to background NrtI therapy, with no active-comparator group. In the full analysis set, 92% of participants were HBeAg negative and 7% were enrolled in the US and Canada, and the label states that efficacy differences in participants aged 75 years and older “cannot be determined due to the small number of participants”. The label reports safety data for B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 only as pooled results, and neither the label nor the published abstract reports health-related quality of life or patient-reported outcome results.