Economic information and modeling report
Budget impact model
1 evidence topic · 5 sources
Approach and framework
No evidence found.
Perspective and time frame
No evidence found.
Epidemiology and eligible population inputs
No evidence found.
Cost assumptions
No evidence found.
Model outcomes
No evidence found.
Results
Base case
No evidence found.
Scenario analyses
No evidence found.
Budget impact model discussion
Summary: absence of a published budget impact model
No budget impact model of bepirovirsen has been published, and no U.S. list price is public: GSK states that the “list price will become public once pricing and reimbursement discussions have wrapped with payers”, and the UK horizon-scanning briefing states that the cost “is not yet known”. A plan building its own model would need the eligible population defined by the label (adults without cirrhosis who “have been on NrtI therapy for at least 6 months and have suppressed HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)” and have HBsAg levels “less than or equal to 3,000 IU/mL”), measured locally with quantitative HBsAg testing. Published U.S. inputs are an estimated 300,000 individuals diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B and 143,500 individuals on antiviral treatment, without restriction to the label population, and GSK states that HBsAg ≤1000 IU/mL represents “approximately 45% of diagnosed CHB cases globally”; no source reports the share of U.S. adults on NrtI therapy with HBsAg ≤3,000 IU/mL. The plan would also need the price, the treatment duration (the label states that “The maximum recommended duration of HIBSAGO treatment is 24 weeks”, given as 300 mg twice weekly in weeks 1 and 2 and once weekly in weeks 3 to 24, each dose as two 150 mg prefilled syringes supplied in cartons of 2), the cost of required laboratory monitoring, and continued NrtI therapy costs.