Evicenter
MarkdownP&T meetings
Hibsago (bepirovirsen)

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection in adults without cirrhosis

Also known as GSK3228836
Manufacturer
GSK
Last updated
190 sources

Clinical evidence

B-Well 2

82 evidence topics · 18 sources

Objective
Main and secondary objectives in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Location and study date
Study locations by country in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
CountryLocations listed in the record
United States“Centreville, Alabama, United States, 35042”; “Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033”; “San Francisco, California, United States, 94115”; “San Francisco, California, United States, 94121”; “Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80907”; “Ft. Pierce, Florida, United States, 34982”; “Miami, Florida, United States, 33136”; “Glen Burnie, Maryland, United States, 21061”; “Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55404”; “Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104”; “Denison, Texas, United States, 75020”; “Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104”
Argentina“Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1023”; “Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1425AGC”; “Ciudad Autonoma de Bueno, Argentina, C1056ABI”; “Santa Fe, Argentina, 3000”
Australia“Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2145”; “Herston, Queensland, Australia, 4029”; “Box Hill, Victoria, Australia, 3128”; “Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia, 3065”
Brazil“Botucatu, Brazil, 18618-686”; “Fortaleza, Brazil, 60430-372”; “Nova Iguaçu, Brazil, 26030-380”; “Porto Alegre, Brazil, 90020-090”; “Porto Alegre, Brazil, 90035003”; “Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 21045-900”; “Salvador, Brazil, 40110160”; “Vitória, Brazil, 29043260”
Bulgaria“Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 4002”; “Sliven, Bulgaria, 8800”; “Sofia, Bulgaria, 1797”; “Varna, Bulgaria, 9020”
Canada“Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N1”; “Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7”; “Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2X8”; “Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 2Y9”; “Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M6H 3M1”; “Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2L 4E9”; “Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2L 4P9”; “Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, S4P 0W5”
China“Beijing, China, 100015”; “Beijing, China, 100032”; “Changchun, China, 130021”; “Chengdu, China, 610072”; “Chongqing, China, 400042”; “Guangzhou, China, 510515”; “Guangzhou, China, 510630”; “Hangzhou, China, 310003”; “Hangzhou, China, 310022”; “Hefei, China, 230022”; “Kunming, China, 650021”; “Liuzhou, China, 545006”; “Nanjing, China, 210003”; “Shanghai, China, 200025”; “Shanghai, China, 200052”; “Shenzhen, China, 518112”; “Taiyuan, China, 030001”; “Tianjin, China, 300000”; “Ürümqi, China, 830054”; “Wuhan, China, 430022”; “Xi'an, China, 710061”; “Xiamen, China, 361015”; “Zhengzhou, China, 450000”; “Zunyi, China, 563114”
France“Créteil, France, 94010”; “Grenoble, France, 38043”; “Limoges, France, 87042”; “Lyon, France, 69317”; “Paris, France, 75651”; “Rouen, France, 76031”; “Toulouse, France, 31059”
Germany“Frankfurt, Germany, 60329”; “Frankfurt, Germany, 60596”; “Hamburg, Germany, 20146”; “Hanover, Germany, 30625”
Greece“Athens, Greece, 115 27”; “Heraklion Crete, Greece, 715 00”; “Thessaloniki, Greece, 54642”
Hungary“Szeged, Hungary, 6725”; “Székesfehérvár, Hungary, 8000”; “Zalaegerszeg, Hungary”
India“Ahmedabad, India, 380009”; “Chennai, India, 600035”; “Kanpur, India, 208002”; “Kochi, India, 682026”; “Kolkata, India, 700150”; “Kolkata, India”; “Mumbai, India, 400012”; “Mumbai, India, 400022”; “Nagpur, India, 441108”; “New Delhi, India, 110029”; “New Delhi, India, 110060”; “New Delhi, India, 110070”; “Pune, India, 411001”; “Raipur, India”; “Secunderabad, India, 500003”
Italy“Milan, Italy, 20157”; “Naples, Italy, 80131”; “Padova, Italy, 35128”; “Palermo, Italy, 90127”; “Pisa, Italy, 56124”; “Roma, Italy, 00133”; “Sassari, Italy, 07100”; “Torino, Italy, 10126”
Japan“Fukui, Japan, 918-8503”; “Hiroshima, Japan, 730-8619”; “Hokkaido, Japan, 006-8555”; “Hokkaido, Japan, 060-8648”; “Hokkaido, Japan, 062-8618”; “Ishikawa, Japan, 920-8650”; “Kagawa, Japan, 760-8557”; “Kumamoto, Japan, 860-8556”; “Nagasaki, Japan, 856-8562”; “Nara, Japan, 634-8522”; “Niigata, Japan, 950-1104”; “Osaka, Japan, 565-0871”; “Tokyo, Japan, 113-8603”; “Yamaguchi, Japan, 750-0061”; “Yamanashi, Japan, 409-3898”
Malaysia“Johor Bahru, Malaysia, 80100”; “Kota Bharu Kelantan, Malaysia”; “Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia”; “Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 59100”; “Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia, 20400”; “Kuantan, Malaysia, 25100”
Mexico“Aguascalientes, Mexico, 20010”
New Zealand“Auckland, New Zealand, 1023”; “Auckland, New Zealand, 2025”
Panama“Panama City, Panama”
Philippines“Cebu City, Philippines, 6000”; “Makati City, Philippines, 1229”; “Pasig, Philippines, 1605”; “Silang, Philippines, 4118”
Poland“Gdansk, Poland, 80-405”; “Mysłowice, Poland, 41-400”; “Żychlin, Poland, 62-571”
Romania“Bucharest, Romania, 020475”; “Bucharest, Romania, 030303”; “Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 400348”; “Constanța, Romania, 900709”; “Galati, Romania, 800179”; “Oradea, Romania, 410469”
South Korea“Ansan, South Korea, 15355”; “Incheon, South Korea, 405-760”; “Pusan, South Korea, 49241”; “Seoul, South Korea, 03312”; “Seoul, South Korea, 05505”; “Ulsan, South Korea, 44033”
Spain“Alcorcon Madrid, Spain”; “Badajoz, Spain, 06080”; “Granada, Spain, 18016”; “Madrid, Spain, 28006”; “Madrid, Spain, 28032”; “Madrid, Spain, 28046”; “Sabadell Barcelona, Spain, 08208”; “Seville, Spain, 41013”; “Valencia, Spain, 46026”; “Valladolid, Spain, 47012”; “Zaragoza, Spain, 50009”
Taiwan“Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 824”; “Taichung, Taiwan, 404”; “Tainan, Taiwan, 704”; “Taipei, Taiwan, 100”
Thailand“Chiang Mai, Thailand, 50200”
Turkey (Türkiye)“Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye), 06590”; “Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye), 34010”; “Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye), 35100”
United Kingdom“Liverpool, United Kingdom, L7 8XP”; “London, United Kingdom, WC1E 6JB”; “Middlesbrough, United Kingdom, TS4 3BW”; “Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE7 7DN”
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Exclusion criteria: coinfection, cirrhosis, malignancy, vasculitis, and extrahepatic disorders in the ClinicalTrials.gov record

“Co-infection with: a) Current history of Hepatitis C infection or participants that have been cured for <12 months at the time of screening b) Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), c) Hepatitis D virus.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“History of or suspected liver cirrhosis and/or evidence of cirrhosis.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Diagnosed or suspected hepatocellular carcinoma.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“History of malignancy within the past 5 years except for specific cancers that are cured by surgical resection (e.g., skin cancer).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“History of vasculitis or presence of symptoms and signs of potential vasculitis (e.g., vasculitic rash, skin ulceration, repeated blood detected in urine without identified cause) or history/presence of other diseases that may be associated with vasculitis condition (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, relapsing polychondritis, mononeuritis multiplex).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“History of extrahepatic disorders possibly related to HBV immune conditions (e.g., nephrotic syndrome, any type of glomerulonephritis, polyarteritis nodosa, cryoglobulinemia, uncontrolled hypertension).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“History of alcohol or drug abuse/dependence.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Treatment
Investigational product and placebo in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Study outcomes
Rationale for using functional cure as the primary endpoint
Primary and three key secondary endpoints assessed at week 72 in the prescribing information

“At Week 72, twenty-four weeks after possible cessation of NrtI treatment in eligible participants and 48 weeks after the last HIBSAGO dose, the primary and three key secondary efficacy endpoints were assessed.” (opens the prescribing information at this quote)

“The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained suppression of HBV DNA (<LLOQ) and HBsAg not detected (LOD = 0.05 IU/mL), with or without hepatitis B surface antibodies, at 24 weeks after discontinuation of all chronic HBV treatment in the absence of rescue medication in participants with baseline HBsAg ≤3,000 IU/mL.” (opens the prescribing information at this quote)

“The first key secondary endpoint was assessed by applying the same criteria to participants with baseline HBsAg ≤1,000 IU/mL.” (opens the prescribing information at this quote)

“The second key secondary efficacy endpoint was sustained suppression of HBV DNA (<LLOQ), at 24 weeks after discontinuation of all chronic HBV treatment in the absence of rescue medication in participants with baseline HBsAg ≤3,000 IU/mL.” (opens the prescribing information at this quote)

“The third key secondary endpoint was assessed by applying the same criteria of sustained suppression of HBV DNA (<LLOQ) to participants with baseline HBsAg ≤1,000 IU/mL.” (opens the prescribing information at this quote)

“Blips in the Week 72 analysis window were permitted for the primary and key secondary endpoint analyses.” (opens the prescribing information at this quote)

Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Participants analyzed for the primary and first key secondary endpoints by treatment group
Analysis populationHibsago (n/N)Placebo (n/N)
Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL (primary endpoint)“106/570”“0/286”
Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL (first key secondary endpoint)“95/342”“0/179”
Description of analysis sets
Results
Participant disposition
Baseline characteristics
Efficacy results
Primary endpoint: sustained HBV DNA suppression and HBsAg not detected 24 weeks after NrtI cessation, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL
Measure (full analysis set)Value
Hibsago, n/N (%)“106/570 (19)”
Placebo, n/N (%)“0/286 (0)”
Common rate difference, % (95% CI)“13 (10.4, 16.1)”
p-value“<0.0001”
Key secondary endpoint: sustained HBV DNA suppression and HBsAg not detected, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL
Measure (full analysis set)Value
Hibsago, n/N (%)“95/342 (28)”
Placebo, n/N (%)“0/179 (0)”
Rate difference, % (95% CI)“28 (23.3, 32.8)”
p-value“<0.0001”
Key secondary endpoints: sustained HBV DNA suppression below the LLOQ 24 weeks after NrtI cessation
Measure (full analysis set)Value
Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: Hibsago, n/N (%)“132/570 (23)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: placebo, n/N (%)“0/286 (0)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: common rate difference, % (95% CI)“18 (15.1, 21.3)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: Hibsago, n/N (%)“113/342 (33)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: placebo, n/N (%)“0/179 (0)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: rate difference, % (95% CI)“33 (28.3, 38.2)”
p-value, each stratum“<0.0001”
Functional cure at week 72 by baseline HBsAg stratum, pooled and B-Well 2
PopulationValue
Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: rate“19% vs. 0% (placebo)”
Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: participants“233 of 1,220 vs. 0 of 614”
B-Well 2, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: rate“B-Well 2: 19% vs. 0%”
B-Well 2, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: participants“106 of 570 vs. 0 of 286”
Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: rate“26% vs. 0% (placebo)”
Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: participants“200 of 768 vs. 0 of 393”
B-Well 2, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: rate“B-Well 2: 28% vs. 0%”
B-Well 2, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: participants“95 of 342 vs. 0 of 179”
Nucleotide polymorphisms in the bepirovirsen binding site
Population and measureValue
Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: baseline polymorphisms, % (n/N)“7 (7/104)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: treatment-emergent mutations, % (n/N)“6 (2/31)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: baseline polymorphisms, % (n/N)“12 (6/50)”
Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: treatment-emergent mutations, % (n/N)“0 (0/10)”
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

No evidence found.

Safety results
Study limitations
Summary: study limitations

B-Well 2 had the same design as B-Well 1: bepirovirsen was administered for 24 weeks, the primary endpoint was assessed at week 72, 24 weeks after possible cessation of NrtI therapy, and the longest reported follow-up is week 96, covering the 295 of 1,220 pooled bepirovirsen recipients who stopped NrtI therapy at week 48. Eligibility required stable NrtI therapy, HBsAg above 100 and up to 3,000 IU/mL, HBV DNA below 90 IU/mL, and ALT up to 2 times the upper limit of normal, and excluded participants with cirrhosis, HCV, HIV, or HDV coinfection, eGFR at or below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, or platelet count below 140 × 10⁹/L. Participants were randomized to bepirovirsen or placebo added to background NrtI therapy, with no active-comparator group. In the full analysis set, 92% of participants were HBeAg negative, 6% were enrolled in the US and Canada, and 2% had an unknown genotype. The label reports safety data for B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 only as pooled results, and neither the label nor the published abstract reports health-related quality of life or patient-reported outcome results.