B-Well 2
82 evidence topics · 18 sources
Objective
Purpose stated in the ClinicalTrials.gov brief summary
Main objective in the EU Clinical Trials Information System record
Main and secondary objectives in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Aims of both B-Well trials stated by the company
Location and study date
Study dates and status in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
“Study Start (Actual) 2022-12-06” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Primary Completion (Actual) 2025-11-03” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Study Completion (Actual) 2026-04-13” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“First Posted 2022-11-30” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Last Update Posted 2026-07-08” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Completed” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“No Results Posted” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
Number of locations in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Study locations by country in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
EU and EEA member states, trial start, and end of trial in the EU Clinical Trials Information System record
Planned sites in the European Economic Area and regulatory and ethics decisions in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Countries in both B-Well trials stated by the company
Trial start in the company pipeline appendix
Initiation of the two phase 3 studies announced by the licensor
Study design
Official title in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Design details in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
| Field | Registry value |
|---|---|
| Phase | “Phase 3” |
| Primary purpose | “Treatment” |
| Allocation | “Randomized” |
| Interventional model | “Parallel Assignment” |
| Model description | “This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.” |
| Masking | “Quadruple” |
| Masking description | “This will be a double blinded study in which investigators/site staff and the Sponsor will remain blinded to treatment assignment.” |
Four study stages, stratification, and total duration in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Two identically designed phase 3 trials in the prescribing information
Nucleos(t)ide analogue cessation at week 48 and cessation eligibility criteria
Criteria to restart nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy after cessation
Replicate double-blind design in the primary publication
“In two replicate, double-blind trials (B-Well 1 and B-Well 2), we randomly assigned adults with noncirrhotic chronic HBV infection in a 2:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous bepirovirsen (at a weekly dose of 300 mg) or placebo for 24 weeks.” (opens the original PubMed page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Eligible patients discontinued NA therapy at 48 weeks.” (opens the original PubMed page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
Placebo control, treatment arms, and data monitoring committee in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
“Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Placebo Yes” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Number of treatment arms in the trial 2” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
Design of both B-Well trials stated by the company
Eligibility criteria
Key inclusion and exclusion criteria summarized in the prescribing information
Population described in the primary publication
Inclusion criteria in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Exclusion criteria: coinfection, cirrhosis, malignancy, vasculitis, and extrahepatic disorders in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Exclusion criteria: prior and concomitant therapy in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Definition of cirrhosis for exclusion in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Other exclusion criteria in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Treatment
Hibsago or placebo dosing regimen with background nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy
Arms and interventions in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
| Arm | Registry value |
|---|---|
| Experimental arm | “Experimental: Bepirovirsen”; “Bepirovirsen will be administered.” |
| Placebo arm | “Placebo Comparator: Placebo”; “Matching placebo will be administered.” |
Treatment arms in the company pipeline appendix
Investigational product and placebo in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
| Field | Registry value |
|---|---|
| Pharmaceutical form | “Solution for injection” |
| Route of administration | “Subcutaneous use” |
| Concentration unit | “mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre” |
| Concentration number | “Concentration number 150” |
| Current sponsor code | “GSK3228836” |
| Placebo used | “Is a Placebo used in this Trial? Yes” |
| Pharmaceutical form of the placebo | “Pharmaceutical form of the placebo Solution for injection” |
| Route of administration of the placebo | “Route of administration of the placebo Subcutaneous use” |
| Care after the trial | “To continue with standard of care.” |
Study outcomes
Rationale for using functional cure as the primary endpoint
Registered primary outcome measure in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Registered secondary outcome measures in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Primary and secondary end points and time point in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Primary and three key secondary endpoints assessed at week 72 in the prescribing information
Functional cure definition and assay thresholds in the company release
Functional cure definition and primary outcome in the primary publication
“Treatment with bepirovirsen, an antisense oligonucleotide targeting hepatitis B virus (HBV) transcripts, has the potential to result in a functional cure, defined by at least 24 weeks of a sustained HBV DNA level below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss after fixed-duration therapy.” (opens the original PubMed page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“The primary outcome was a functional cure at week 72.” (opens the original PubMed page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
Functional cure as the preferred primary endpoint: AASLD-EASL treatment endpoints conference
“Of all these surrogate endpoints, HBsAg loss is considered to be the most relevant because HBsAg seroclearance is associated with sustained off-treatment improvement in clinical outcomes.” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Moreover, HBsAg seroclearance is easy to measure with standardized and widely available assays.” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“The recommended endpoint of novel therapy is functional cure defined as HBsAg loss using a conventional assay for detection of HBsAg (limit of detection 0.05 IU/mL) and HBV DNA below the lower limit of quantification (i.e. < 10 IU/ml) at 24 weeks off-therapy.” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
Clinical endpoints are unfeasible as trial endpoints: AASLD-EASL treatment endpoints conference
“These clinical endpoints however typically develop over decades and are therefore unfeasible to be used as primary therapeutic endpoints for clinical trials of new investigational agents.” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Although long-term sustained off-treatment HBV DNA suppression is associated with similar improvements in clinical outcomes as HBsAg loss, in patients with cirrhosis, it is not reliably durable, and there is a 15-40% lifetime chance of disease reactivation.” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
Nucleos(t)ide analogue withdrawal in trial control arms: AASLD-EASL treatment endpoints conference
“If off-treatment response is a primary endpoint, then NA should be withdrawn from both active treatment and control arms but only if stringent predetermined criteria based on HBsAg levels and other parameters are met to ensure safety.” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
Efficacy endpoints and add-on placebo-controlled design for finite therapy: FDA guidance
Functional cure as the primary endpoint of phase II/III trials: EASL clinical practice guideline
Functional cure as the optimal endpoint for new therapies: bepirovirsen phase 2b design report
“Recently, functional cure, defined as durable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss with or without HBsAg seroconversion and undetectable HBV DNA, has been accepted as the optimal endpoint for new HBV therapies” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
“Functional cure is rare (≤ 5%) with NA therapy” (opens the original PMC page at this quote in a new tab)View highlighted excerpt for this quote
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Planned number of participants in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
“In the EEA 191” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“In the whole clinical trial 900” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Number of subjects for this age range: 738” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
“Number of subjects for this age range: 162” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)
Actual enrollment in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Randomized participants and full analysis set in the prescribing information
Participants analyzed for the primary endpoint in the primary publication
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: participants in both trials
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: participants in the pooled safety population
Description of analysis sets
Statistical methods for the primary endpoint: stratified common rate difference and exact Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test
Statistical methods for the key secondary endpoints in participants with baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL
Ranked order of the primary and key secondary endpoints
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: pooled safety data set, weeks 1 to 36
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: subgroup analyses of the pooled population
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: post hoc analysis of predictors of nonresponse
Pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results: durability population of participants who stopped nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy
Results
Participant disposition
Randomized participants and full analysis set
Baseline characteristics
Efficacy results
Primary and key secondary endpoints met
Primary endpoint: sustained HBV DNA suppression and HBsAg not detected 24 weeks after NrtI cessation, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL
| Measure (full analysis set) | Value |
|---|---|
| Hibsago, n/N (%) | “106/570 (19)” |
| Placebo, n/N (%) | “0/286 (0)” |
| Common rate difference, % (95% CI) | “13 (10.4, 16.1)” |
| p-value | “<0.0001” |
Key secondary endpoint: sustained HBV DNA suppression and HBsAg not detected, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL
| Measure (full analysis set) | Value |
|---|---|
| Hibsago, n/N (%) | “95/342 (28)” |
| Placebo, n/N (%) | “0/179 (0)” |
| Rate difference, % (95% CI) | “28 (23.3, 32.8)” |
| p-value | “<0.0001” |
Key secondary endpoints: sustained HBV DNA suppression below the LLOQ 24 weeks after NrtI cessation
| Measure (full analysis set) | Value |
|---|---|
| Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: Hibsago, n/N (%) | “132/570 (23)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: placebo, n/N (%) | “0/286 (0)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: common rate difference, % (95% CI) | “18 (15.1, 21.3)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: Hibsago, n/N (%) | “113/342 (33)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: placebo, n/N (%) | “0/179 (0)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: rate difference, % (95% CI) | “33 (28.3, 38.2)” |
| p-value, each stratum | “<0.0001” |
Functional cure at week 72 by baseline HBsAg stratum, pooled and B-Well 2
| Population | Value |
|---|---|
| Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: rate | “19% vs. 0% (placebo)” |
| Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: participants | “233 of 1,220 vs. 0 of 614” |
| B-Well 2, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: rate | “B-Well 2: 19% vs. 0%” |
| B-Well 2, baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: participants | “106 of 570 vs. 0 of 286” |
| Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: rate | “26% vs. 0% (placebo)” |
| Pooled, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: participants | “200 of 768 vs. 0 of 393” |
| B-Well 2, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: rate | “B-Well 2: 28% vs. 0%” |
| B-Well 2, baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: participants | “95 of 342 vs. 0 of 179” |
Nucleotide polymorphisms in the bepirovirsen binding site
| Population and measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: baseline polymorphisms, % (n/N) | “7 (7/104)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 3,000 IU/mL: treatment-emergent mutations, % (n/N) | “6 (2/31)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: baseline polymorphisms, % (n/N) | “12 (6/50)” |
| Baseline HBsAg up to 1,000 IU/mL: treatment-emergent mutations, % (n/N) | “0 (0/10)” |
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
No evidence found.
Safety results
Safety data reported as pooled B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 results
Most frequently observed adverse events
Study limitations
Summary: study limitations
B-Well 2 had the same design as B-Well 1: bepirovirsen was administered for 24 weeks, the primary endpoint was assessed at week 72, 24 weeks after possible cessation of NrtI therapy, and the longest reported follow-up is week 96, covering the 295 of 1,220 pooled bepirovirsen recipients who stopped NrtI therapy at week 48. Eligibility required stable NrtI therapy, HBsAg above 100 and up to 3,000 IU/mL, HBV DNA below 90 IU/mL, and ALT up to 2 times the upper limit of normal, and excluded participants with cirrhosis, HCV, HIV, or HDV coinfection, eGFR at or below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, or platelet count below 140 × 10⁹/L. Participants were randomized to bepirovirsen or placebo added to background NrtI therapy, with no active-comparator group. In the full analysis set, 92% of participants were HBeAg negative, 6% were enrolled in the US and Canada, and 2% had an unknown genotype. The label reports safety data for B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 only as pooled results, and neither the label nor the published abstract reports health-related quality of life or patient-reported outcome results.