Evicenter
P&T meetings

Hovilpri (pritelivir)

Refractory mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infection in immunocompromised adults

Also known as AIC316
Last updated
239 sources

Section 4 of 6

Clinical evidence

1080 evidence topics · 77 sources

Study summaries

PRIOH-1 parts C to F

Objective
Location and study date
Study dates and status in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
FieldRegistry value
Study start (actual)“2017-05-08”
Primary completion (actual)“2025-08-15”
Study completion (actual)“2025-11-11”
First posted“2017-03-08”
Last update posted“2026-06-12”
Status“Completed”
Results“No Results Posted”
Study locations in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
LocationFacility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States“University of Alabama at Birmingham”
Huntsville, Alabama, United States“Metro Infectious Disease Consultants, LLC - Huntsville”
Mobile, Alabama, United States“University of South Alabama”
Tucson, Arizona, United States“University Arizona - Department of Medicine Arizona Health Sciences Center”
Duarte, California, United States“City of Hope”
Los Angeles, California, United States“Cedars-Sinai Medical Center”
Sacramento, California, United States“University of California, Division of Infectious Diseases”
DeLand, Florida, United States“Midland Florida Clinical Research Center, LLC”
Ft. Pierce, Florida, United States“Midway Immunology and Research Center (MIRC)”
Gainesville, Florida, United States“University of Florida (UF) - Division of Infectious Disease”
Miami, Florida, United States“Links Clinical Trials”
Tampa, Florida, United States“University of South Florida”
Atlanta, Georgia, United States“Emory Hospital Midtown Infectious Disease Clinic”
Decatur, Georgia, United States“Metro Infectious Disease Consultants - Atlanta”
Burr Ridge, Illinois, United States“Metro Infectious Disease Consultants, LLC”
Chicago, Illinois, United States“Department of Medicine J. H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County”
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States“LSU Health Baton Rouge Pulmonary Clinic”
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States“Tulane University - School of Medicine”
Baltimore, Maryland, United States“Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine”
Boston, Massachusetts, United States“Brigham and Women's Hospital”
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States“University of Minnesota”
Lee's Summit, Missouri, United States“Lee's Summit MO United States 64086”
Omaha, Nebraska, United States“University of Nebraska Medical Center”
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States“Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School”
Brooklyn, New York, United States“Kings Country Hospital Center”
New York, New York, United States“David H. Koch Center at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center”
Durham, North Carolina, United States“Duke University Medical Center - Division of Infectious Diseases”
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States“Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist”
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States“Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center”
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States“Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center”
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States“University of Pittsburgh Medical Center”
Houston, Texas, United States“MD Anderson Cancer Center”
Seattle, Washington, United States“Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center”
Córdoba, Argentina“Hospital Rawson”
Córdoba, Argentina“Sanatorio Mayo Privado S.A.”
La Plata, Argentina“Instituto FIDES”
Parkville, Australia“Melbourne Health - Royal Melbourne Hospital”
Westmead, Australia“Westmead Hospital, Centre for Infectious Disease and Microbiology”
Bruges, Belgium“AZ Sint-Jan Brugge”
Brussels, Belgium“Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre”
Roeselare, Belgium“AZ Delta”
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada“Alberta Health Services Cross Cancer Institute at the University of Alberta”
Limoges, France“CHU Limoges - Centre national de reference des Herpes virus”
Nantes, France“CHU de Nantes”
Paris, France“Hôpital Saint Louis - AP-HP”
Paris, France“AP-HP Hopital Necker-Enfants Malades”
Paris, France“AP-HP Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard”
Tbilisi, Georgia“LLC Diakor”
Tbilisi, Georgia“Multiprofile Clinic Consilium Medulla LTD”
Cologne, Germany“Universitätsklinikum Köln”
Essen, Germany“Universitätsklinikum Essen”
Würzburg, Germany“Universitätsklinikum Würzburg”
Athens, Greece“General Hospital of Athens - Laiko”
Heraklion, Greece“Regional University General Hospital of Heraklion”
Tel Litwinsky, Israel“Chaim Sheba Medical Center”
Calabria, Italy“Grande Ospedale Metropolitano”
Milan, Italy“Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano”
Pavia, Italy“Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo”
Chihuahua City, Mexico“Unidad de Investigacion CIMA SC”
Distrito Federal, Mexico“Centro de Investigacion Clinica GRAMEL S.C.”
Durango, Mexico“Instituto de Investigaciones Aplicadas a la Neurociencia A.C”
Guadalajara, Mexico“Centro de Investigacion Farmaceutica Especializado de Occidente S.C.”
Veracruz, Mexico“Arke SMO S.A. de C.V.”
Basel, Switzerland“Universitaetsspital Basel”
Geneva, Switzerland“Hopitaux universitaires de Geneve”
Zurich, Switzerland“Universitaetsspital Zuerich”
Kyiv, Ukraine“ARENSIA Exploratory Medicine LLC”
Edinburgh, United Kingdom“Nhs Lothian”
London, United Kingdom“Research Department of Haematology, UCL Cancer Institute”
Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom“Freeman Hospital”
Overall trial dates in the EU Clinical Trials Information System record
FieldRegistry value
Locations“Greece, Belgium, Italy, Germany, France”
Start of trial“15/03/2022”
End of trial“30/10/2025”
Global end of trial“11/11/2025”
Estimated recruitment start date in the EU and EEA“18/06/2021”
Planned sites and regions in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
FieldRegistry value
Date the record was first entered in the EudraCT database“2021-06-14”
Date of competent authority decision, Germany“2022-01-06”
Number of sites anticipated in Germany“E.8.4.1 Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned 2”
Number of sites anticipated in the EEA“E.8.5.1 Number of sites anticipated in the EEA 14”
Regions in which trial sites are planned“Argentina Switzerland Australia Canada Georgia Israel Mexico United Kingdom United States Belgium France Germany Greece Italy”
Study design
Design details in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Phase 3 design and planned arm sizes on the trial-in-progress congress poster
Eligibility criteria
Part C exclusion criteria: laboratory thresholds in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Treatment
Treatments received in the investigator's choice arm, full analysis population
Investigator's choice treatmentICT, N = 50, n (%)
Foscarnet IV“35 (70)”
Imiquimod topical“7 (14)”
Cidofovir IV“6 (12)”
Cidofovir topical“2 (4)”
Extent of exposure in days by treatment received, full analysis population
StatisticPritelivir, N = 51Foscarnet IV, N = 35Cidofovir IV, N = 6Cidofovir topical, N = 2Imiquimod topical, N = 7
Mean (SD)“27.1 (10.88)”“18.2 (11.79)”“14.7 (10.39)”“34.5 (10.61)”“34.7 (12.13)”
Median“27.0”“16.0”“13.0”“34.5”“43.0”
Q1, Q3“19.0, 41.0”“8.0, 28.0”“7.0, 13.0”“27.0, 42.0”“21.0, 45.0”
Minimum, maximum“6, 43”“1, 43”“7, 35”“27, 42”“17, 45”
Treatments received in the investigator's choice arm, HIV subgroup
Investigator's choice treatmentHIV subgroup, N = 15, n (%)
Foscarnet IV“7 (47%)”
Imiquimod topical“6 (40%)”
Cidofovir IV“0 (0%)”
Cidofovir topical“2 (13%)”
Study outcomes
Rationale for using healing of all lesions within 28 days as the primary endpoint
Primary endpoint in the EU Clinical Trials Register record: cure, failure, and indeterminate response

“Endpoints will be evaluated separately in Part C, Part D and Part F.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Cure rate: number of subjects cured (all lesions healed as assessed by the Investigator) during the treatment period of up to 28 days relative to the total number of subjects treated with trial medication in the respective treatment group.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Failure is defined as meeting at least one of the following criteria at the end of treatment within the treatment period of up to 28 days: a) not all lesions have healed, b) discontinuation and/or replacement of trial medication after at least 7 days of treatment due to worsening of lesion(s) and/or appearance of new lesion(s), c) discontinuation of trial medication due to trial medication related adverse event or intolerance to trial medication before lesion healing, or d) discontinuation due to resistance to trial medication.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Indeterminate: Circumstances preclude where it is not possible to attribute either cure or failure, for example due to: a) lost during treatment period, b) subject treated with trial medication needed concomitant CMV treatment or treatment for other infection with medications that were also active against HSV, c) subject refuses endoscopy for non-cutaneous lesions at the end of treatment when the Investigator considers the lesions have healed in the absence of any clinical signs and symptoms.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Secondary efficacy outcome measures in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Outcome measureMeasure descriptionTime frame
Cure rate up to 42 days“Number of subjects cured (all lesions healed as assessed by the Investigator) during the treatment period of up to 42 days relative to the total number of subjects treated with trial medication in the respective treatment group.”“Up to a maximum of 42 days”
Time to lesion healing“Time to lesion healing, defined as complete epithelization of the mucocutaneous HSV lesion(s) within the treatment period and no appearance of new lesions, as assessed by the Investigator.”“Up to a maximum of 42 days”
Recurrence rate at 2 months“Recurrence rate at 2 months following PoTV assessed by telephone, defined as number of subjects with a recurrence as assessed by the Investigator following 2/3 months after PoTV relative to the total number of subjects assessed for recurrence at the respective telephone call per treatment.”“At 2 months following post treatment visit, from randomization up to a maximum of 108 days”
Recurrence rate at 3 months“Recurrence rate at 3 months following PoTV assessed by telephone, defined as number of subjects with a recurrence as assessed by the Investigator following 2/3 months after PoTV relative to the total number of subjects assessed for recurrence at the respective telephone call per treatment.”“At 3 months following post treatment visit, from randomization up to a maximum of 139 days”
Pain rate“Number of days with pain at lesion site relative to the total number of days with analyzable pain data through daily subject self-reporting”“Up to a maximum of 42 days”
Time to pain cessation at site of lesion“Starting at first dose of trial medication until pain is no longer reported by the subject (date and time)”“Up to a maximum of 42 days”
Average pain score“Using a single-dimensional scale assessing pain intensity through daily subject self-reporting”“Up to a maximum of 42 days”
Clinical shedding rate“Number of HSV positive swabs per subject relative to the total number of swabs collected per subject from lesion swabs taken from HSV lesion(s)”“From date of randomization until the date of first documented healing, assessed up to a maximum of 42 days”
Time to cessation of shedding“Number of days until swabs taken are negative”“Up to a maximum of 42 days”
Mean log number of HSV DNA copies“Mean log number of HSV DNA copies on HSV DNA positive swabs from lesion(s) as detected by quantitative real-time PCR (polymerase chain reaction).”“From date of randomization until the date of safety follow-up visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
Resistance to trial medication“Resistance to trial medication for lesions not healed within the treatment period or newly appeared lesions under treatment before or at the PoTV.”“From date of randomization until the date of post treatment visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
Secondary safety outcome measures in the ClinicalTrials.gov record
Outcome measureMeasure descriptionTime frame
Chronic kidney disease, number of subjects“Safety measured by number of subjects developing chronic kidney disease”“From date of randomization until the date of safety follow-up visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
Chronic kidney disease, percentage of subjects“Safety measured by percentage of subjects developing chronic kidney disease”“From date of randomization until the date of safety follow-up visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
Acute kidney injury“Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) stage >1 of KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome) criteria (increase in serum creatinine by 2.0 to 2.9 times compared to baseline or urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for >12 hours)”“From date of randomization until the date of safety follow-up visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
Renal impairment“Safety measured by percentage of subjects developing renal impairment”“From date of randomization until the date of safety follow-up visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
Electrolyte abnormality“Safety measured by percentage of subjects developing electrolyte abnormality All abnormal values”“From date of randomization until the date of safety follow-up visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
Seizures“Safety measured by percentage of subjects developing seizures All seizures”“From date of randomization until the date of safety follow-up visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
Anemia“Safety measured by percentage of subjects developing anemia Haemoglobin measurement”“From date of randomization until the date of safety follow-up visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
Adverse events“Incidence of Adverse Events”“From date of randomization until the date of safety follow-up visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
Hematology“Incidence of abnormal hematologic laboratory test results”“From date of randomization until the date of safety follow-up visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
Lymphadenopathy“Incidence of lymphadenopathy measured by physical examination”“From date of randomization until the date of safety follow-up visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
C-reactive protein“Incidence of CRP increase”“From date of randomization until the date of safety follow-up visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
Cutaneous adverse events“Incidence of cutaneous adverse events by physical examination”“From date of randomization until the date of safety follow-up visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
Partial thromboplastin time“Incidence of (a)PTT increase”“From date of randomization until the date of safety follow-up visit, assessed up to a maximum of 73 days”
Discontinuation rate“Number of subjects discontinuing pritelivir or 'Inverstigator's Choice' due to AE(s) or intolerance relative to the total number of subjects treated with pritelivir or foscarnet, respectively”“Up to a maximum of 42 days”
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Planned number of participants by part on the trial-in-progress congress poster
PartPlanned number
All phase 3 parts“N=153”
Part C, pritelivir“Experimental arm N=49”
Part C, investigator's choice“Comparator arm N=49”
Parts D and F“Pritelivir only N=35”
Part E“Pritelivir only N=20”
Planned number of participants in the EU Clinical Trials Register record
Participants randomized, treated, and analyzed in Part C
GroupCongress presentation value
Enrolled and randomized“Enrolled & Randomized N=102”
Randomized to each arm“Pritelivir N=51 Investigator’s Choice N=51”
Treated with pritelivir“Pritelivir Treated N=51”
Treated with investigator's choice“Investigator’s Choice Treated N=50”
Randomized and not treated“Not Treated (N=1)”
Description of analysis sets
Results
Participant disposition
Part C: other reasons for not completing treatment in the investigator's choice arm
ReasonInvestigator's choice
Death“Death: n=3 (6%)”
Foscarnet intolerance“FOS intolerance: n=9 (18%)”
Treatment failure or new lesions“Failure/new lesions: n=5 (10%)”
Physician decision, withdrawal by the participant, or other“Physician decision/subject withdrawal/other: n=5 (10%)”
HIV subgroup: other reasons for not completing treatment in the investigator's choice arm
ReasonInvestigator's choice
Foscarnet intolerance“FOS intolerance: n=2(13%)”
Treatment failure or new lesions“Failure/new lesions: n=1 (6.7%)”
Physician decision, withdrawal by the participant, or other“Physician decision/subject withdrawal/other: n=3 (20%)”
Parts D, E, and F: completion and discontinuation

No evidence found.

Baseline characteristics
Demographics and baseline characteristics by arm, full analysis population
CharacteristicPritelivir, n = 51, n (%)ICT, n = 50, n (%)Total, n = 101, n (%)
Mean age, years (SD)“49.2 (14.9)”“56.0 (14.6)”“52.6 (15.1)”
Male“32 (62.7)”“21 (42.0)”“53 (52.5)”
Female“19 (37.3)”“29 (58.0)”“48 (47.5)”
Reason for treatment start: refractory HSV (clinical failure)“39 (76.5)”“33 (66.0)”“72 (71.3)”
Reason for treatment start: laboratory-confirmed acyclovir resistance“12 (23.5)”“17 (34.0)”“29 (28.7)”
American Indian or Alaskan Native“11 (21.6)”“5 (10.0)”“16 (15.8)”
Asian“1 (2.0)”“2 (4.0)”“3 (3.0)”
Black or African American“14 (27.5)”“9 (18.0)”“23 (22.8)”
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander“0”“0”“0”
White“20 (39.2)”“29 (58.0)”“49 (48.5)”
Other race“5 (9.8)”“5 (10.0)”“10 (9.9)”
Maximum length of index lesion, participants with a measurement“47”“42”“89”
Maximum length of index lesion (mm), mean (SD)“31.2 (28.3)”“37.3 (41.7)”“34.1 (35.2)”
Underlying disease by arm, with participants counted under each applicable condition
Underlying diseasePritelivir, n = 51, n (%)ICT, n = 50, n (%)Total, n = 101, n (%)
Stem cell transplant“14 (27.5)”“26 (52.0)”“40 (39.6)”
Solid organ transplant“2 (3.9)”“2 (4.0)”“4 (4.0)”
Hematological cancer or disorder“18 (35.3)”“29 (58.0)”“47 (46.5)”
Non-hematologic malignancy“10 (19.6)”“16 (32.0)”“26 (25.7)”
Autoimmune or inflammatory disease“19 (37.3)”“10 (20.0)”“29 (28.7)”
HIV infection“23 (45.1)”“15 (30.0)”“38 (37.6)”
Immunosuppressive condition by arm, with each participant counted once by hierarchy
Immunosuppressive conditionPritelivir, n = 51, n (%)ICT, n = 50, n (%)Total, n = 101, n (%)
Transplant“16 (31.4)”“28 (56.0)”“44 (43.6)”
Oncology, autoimmune, or inflammatory disorders“19 (37.3)”“15 (30.0)”“34 (33.7)”
HIV infection“16 (31.4)”“7 (14.0)”“23 (22.8)”
HIV subgroup: demographics and baseline characteristics by arm
CharacteristicPritelivir, N = 23, n (%)ICT, N = 15, n (%)Total, N = 38, n (%)
Mean age, years (SD)“48.5 (12.9)”“50.0 (15.6)”“49.1 (13.9)”
Male“20 (87.0)”“9 (60.0)”“29 (76.3)”
Female“3 (13.0)”“6 (40.0)”“9 (23.7)”
Reason for treatment start: refractory HSV (clinical failure)“20 (87.0)”“11 (73.3)”“31 (81.6)”
Reason for treatment start: laboratory-confirmed acyclovir resistance“3 (13.0)”“4 (26.7)”“7 (18.4)”
American Indian or Alaskan Native“7 (30.4)”“3 (20.0)”“10 (26.3)”
Asian“1 (4.3)”“0”“1 (2.6)”
Black or African American“11 (47.8)”“8 (53.3)”“19 (50.0)”
White“1 (4.3)”“4 (26.7)”“5 (13.2)”
Other race“3 (13.0)”“0”“3 (7.9)”
Maximum length of index lesion, participants with a measurement“23”“13”“36”
Maximum length of index lesion (mm), mean (SD)“35.6 (33.8)”“38.7 (29.3)”“36.7 (31.9)”
CD4 count, participants with a measurement“21”“15”“36”
CD4 count (cells/mm3), mean (SD)“349.0 (242.9)”“314.8 (226.9)”“334.8 (233.6)”
CD4 count (cells/mm3), Q1, Q3“137.0, 541.0”“149.0, 473.0”“143.0, 514.5”
HIV subgroup: participants with a CD4 count below 200 cells/mm3
MeasurePritelivir, N = 23ICT, N = 15Total, N = 38
CD4 count below 200 cells/mm3, n (%)“7 (33.3)”“7 (46.7)”“14 (36.8)”
HIV subgroup: other underlying conditions
Underlying diseaseHIV subgroup, N = 38, n (%)
HIV infection only“23 (60%)”
HIV infection and non-hematologic malignancy“11 (29%)”
HIV infection and hematological cancer or disorder“2 (5%)”
HIV infection and transplant“1 (3%)”
HIV infection, hematological cancer or disorder, and non-hematologic malignancy“1 (3%)”
Lesion site at baseline

No evidence found.

Part E: baseline characteristics

No evidence found.

Efficacy results
Primary endpoint: all lesions healed up to day 28, prescribing information
MeasureHOVILPRI, n/N (%)Investigator's Choice, n/N (%)Adjusted treatment difference (95% CI)p-value
Response rate: proportion of participants with lesions healed up to Day 28“32/51 (63%)”“17/50 (34%)”“28.4 (9.6, 47.3)”“0.0047”
Unadjusted treatment difference in the full analysis set
Time pointPritelivir, m/M (%)Investigator's choice, m/M (%)Treatment difference, % (95% CI)
Up to 28 days of treatment“32/51 (62.7)”“17/50 (34.0)”“28.7 (8.0, 47.1)”
Up to 42 days of treatment“42/51 (82.4)”“21/50 (42.0)”“40.4 (20.7, 56.8)”
Subgroups by region, sex, age, and race: lesion healing up to day 28
Subgroups by region, sex, age, and race: lesion healing up to day 42
Subgroups by immunocompromised condition: lesion healing up to day 28
Immunocompromised conditionPritelivir, m/M (%)Investigator's choice, m/M (%)Treatment difference, % (95% CI)
Transplant“8/16 (50.0)”“11/28 (39.3)”“10.7 (-20.3, 40.4)”
Oncology and other (non-transplant)“13/19 (68.4)”“4/15 (26.7)”“41.8 (6.7, 69.0)”
HIV infection“11/16 (68.8)”“2/7 (28.6)”“40.2 (-7.5, 73.7)”
Subgroups by immunocompromised condition: lesion healing up to day 42
Immunocompromised conditionPritelivir, m/M (%)Investigator's choice, m/M (%)Treatment difference, % (95% CI)
Transplant“12/16 (75.0)”“14/28 (50.0)”“25.0 (-6.6, 51.0)”
Oncology and other (non-transplant)“17/19 (89.5)”“5/15 (33.3)”“56.1 (20.3, 80.0)”
HIV infection“13/16 (81.3)”“2/7 (28.6)”“52.7 (6.4, 83.1)”
Pritelivir against each investigator's choice treatment: lesion healing up to day 28
Comparator receivedInvestigator's choice, m/M (%)Treatment difference against pritelivir (32/51), % (95% CI)
Foscarnet IV“12/35 (34.3)”“28.5 (4.1, 48.0)”
Cidofovir IV“3/6 (50.0)”“12.7 (-26.3, 51.6)”
Cidofovir topical“0/2 (0.0)”“NC”
Imiquimod 5% topical“2/7 (28.6)”“34.2 (-10.4, 62.2)”
Pritelivir against each investigator's choice treatment: lesion healing up to day 42
Comparator receivedInvestigator's choice, m/M (%)Treatment difference against pritelivir (42/51), % (95% CI)
Foscarnet IV“14/35 (40.0)”“42.4 (19.1, 60.7)”
Cidofovir IV“4/6 (66.7)”“15.7 (-15.3, 59.1)”
Cidofovir topical“1/2 (50.0)”“NC”
Imiquimod 5% topical“2/7 (28.6)”“53.8 (3.7, 80.6)”
Subgroups by laboratory-confirmed acyclovir resistance: lesion healing up to day 28 and up to day 42
Subgroup and time pointPritelivir, n/N (%)ICT, n/N (%)Treatment difference, % (95% CI)
Laboratory-confirmed acyclovir resistance, up to day 28“11/22 (50.0)”“10/34 (29.4)”“20.6 (-6.9, 45.7)”
Acyclovir resistance not detected or not evaluable, up to day 28“21/29 (72.4)”“7/16 (43.8)”“28.7 (-2.2, 56.2)”
Laboratory-confirmed acyclovir resistance, up to day 42“17/22 (77.3)”“14/34 (41.2)”“36.1 (7.0,58.2)”
Acyclovir resistance not detected or not evaluable, up to day 42“25/29 (86.2)”“7/16 (43.8)”“42.5 (10.7,68.0)”
HIV subgroup, all participants living with HIV: lesion healing up to day 28 and up to day 42
Time pointPritelivir, healedPritelivir, %Investigator's choice, healedInvestigator's choice, %DifferenceP value
Up to day 28“n= 14/23”“61%”“n= 3/15”“20%”“37%”“p=0.0265”
Up to day 42“n= 18/23”“78%”“n= 4/15”“27%”“46%”“p=0.0046”
Time to lesion healing, recurrence, and treatment failure rate

No evidence found.

Viral DNA: mean detection rate in lesion swabs and cessation of detection
MeasurePritelivirInvestigator's choiceComparison
Mean HSV DNA detection rate in lesion swabs“26,4%”“54,1%”“Risk Ratio = 0.37 95% CI, 0.23-0.59 p<0.0001”
Participants with cessation of HSV DNA detection, post hoc analysis“73.7%”“48.7%”“Difference: 25.0% 95% CI, 2.7-45.5 p=0.025”
MeasurePritelivirInvestigator's choice
Participants with cessation of HSV DNA detection, count“n = 28/38”“n = 19/39”
Part E: efficacy results

No evidence found.

Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
Results for pain and quality-of-life endpoints

No evidence found.

Safety results
Overview of adverse events by arm, safety population
CategoryPritelivir, n = 51, n (%)ICT, n = 50, n (%)
Patients with any AE“41 (80.4)”“45 (90.0)”
Exposure-adjusted event rate per patient year“42.8”“102.0”
Drug-related TEAEs“11 (21.6)”“27 (54.0)”
Treatment-emergent serious adverse events“10 (19.6)”“15 (30.0)”
Treatment discontinuation due to any TEAE“2 (3.9)”“11 (22.0)”
Treatment discontinuation due to drug-related TEAEs“1 (2.0)”“10 (20.0)”
Adverse events of special interest by arm, including renal and electrolyte events
CategoryPritelivir, n = 51, n (%)ICT, n = 50, n (%)
Patients with any TEAEs of special interest“13 (25.5)”“27 (54.0)”
Skin disorders“5 (9.8)”“8 (16.0)”
Hematological AE“5 (9.8)”“14 (28.0)”
Renal or urinary disorders“3 (5.9)”“13 (26.0)”
Electrolyte abnormalities“1 (2.0)”“8 (16.0)”
Treatment-emergent adverse events with an incidence of 5% or more, by preferred term
MedDRA preferred termPritelivir, n = 51, n (%)ICT, n = 50, n (%)
Patients with any TEAE“40 (78.4)”“44 (88.0)”
Nausea“4 (7.8)”“12 (24.0)”
Diarrhea“6 (11.8)”“7 (14.0)”
Headache“7 (13.7)”“6 (12.0)”
Vomiting“3 (5.9)”“5 (10.0)”
Dizziness“3 (5.9)”“4 (8.0)”
Hypokalemia“0”“7 (14.0)”
Hypomagnesemia“1 (2.0)”“6 (12.0)”
Thrombocytopenia“1 (2.0)”“6 (12.0)”
Anemia“1 (2.0)”“4 (8.0)”
Cough“2 (3.9)”“3 (6.0)”
Decreased appetite“4 (7.8)”“1 (2.0)”
Adverse events among reasons for not completing treatment, by arm
Deaths and foscarnet intolerance among reasons for not completing treatment in the investigator's choice arm
Part E: safety results

No evidence found.

Study limitations
Summary

Part C was open-label, and the investigator assessed lesion healing. The comparator was the investigator's choice among four regimens; 35 of 50 comparator participants (70%) received intravenous foscarnet, and the control arm design changed between protocol versions. The trial randomized 102 participants and analyzed 101; confidence intervals for several subgroups include zero, and the analysis of all 38 participants with HIV was post hoc. In the comparator arm, 23 of 50 participants (46%) did not complete treatment. Parts D and F were single-arm with 35 participants, and no result for Part E was located. As of October 2026, Part C results come from the prescribing information, congress presentations and abstracts, and company releases; no full peer-reviewed publication was found, and the ClinicalTrials.gov record has no posted results. Sources differ on total enrollment (153, 157, or 158). The share of participants with HIV is 37.6% (38 of 101) when each participant is counted under every underlying disease and 22.8% (23 of 101) when each is counted once by hierarchy.

PRIOH-1 parts A and B

Objective
Location and study date
Registry record: protocol number, start date, and status of the phase 2 parts
FieldQuoted record
Other study identifier“AIC316-03-II-01”
Study start (actual)“2017-05-08”
Status of Parts A and B“Part A and Part B (Phase 2) have been finalised.”
Study design
Treatment and follow-up periods shown in the congress slides
Eligibility criteria
Treatment
Regimens as shown in the congress slides
Study outcomes
Rationale for using time to lesion healing as the primary endpoint
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Participants in each analysis set of the publication's tables
AnalysisPart A, pritelivirPart A, foscarnetPart B, pritelivir
Baseline characteristics, full analysis set“n = 15”“n = 7”“n = 8”
Pritelivir recipients pooled across both parts in the congress slides
GroupParticipants
Part A, pritelivir“PRITELIVIR N= 15”
Part A, foscarnet“FOSCARNET N=7”
Part B, pritelivir“PRITELIVIR N= 8”
All parts, pritelivir“PRITELIVIR N= 23”
Description of analysis sets
Results
Participant disposition
Discontinuation because of adverse events, congress slides
GroupParticipants with an adverse event leading to discontinuation, n (%)
Part A, pritelivir, N = 15“0”
Part A, foscarnet, N = 7“3(42.9)”
Part B, pritelivir, N = 8“1 (12.5)”
All parts, pritelivir, N = 23“1 (4.3)”
Baseline characteristics
Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, full analysis set
Baseline parameterPart A, pritelivir, n = 15Part A, foscarnet, n = 7Part B, pritelivir, n = 8
Age at screening, median (minimum to maximum), years“52.0 (31–70)”“56.0 (45–68)”“56.0 (26–69)”
Male, No. (%)“7 (46.7)”“4 (57.1)”“2 (25.0)”
Female, No. (%)“8 (53.3)”“3 (42.9)”“6 (75.0)”
White, No. (%)“3 (20.0)”“5 (71.4)”“5 (62.5)”
Black or African American, No. (%)“11 (73.3)”“2 (28.6)”“3 (37.5)”
Other race, No. (%)“1 (6.7)”“0”“0”
Hispanic or Latino, No. (%)“1 (6.7)”“0”“1 (12.5)”
Not Hispanic or Latino, No. (%)“14 (93.3)”“7 (100)”“7 (87.5)”
HSV-1, from medical history, No. (%)“4 (26.7)”“4 (57.1)”“2 (25.0)”
HSV-2, from medical history, No. (%)“8 (53.3)”“3 (42.9)”“4 (50.0)”
Both HSV-1 and HSV-2, from medical history, No. (%)“3 (20.0)”“0”“2 (25.0)”
Genital lesion site, No.“10”“3”“6”
Oral lesion site, No.“5”“4”“2”
Maximum length of lesion, mean (SD), mm“24.3 (14.6)”“30.0 (13.5)”“36.7 (37.1)”
Maximum length of lesion, median (minimum to maximum), mm“25.0 (5–50)”“30.0 (10–52)”“20.0 (7–110)”
Maximum width of lesion, mean (SD), mm“15.5 (10.7)”“20.1 (9.7)”“19.5 (13.9)”
Maximum width of lesion, median (minimum to maximum), mm“12.5 (3–40)”“20.0 (5–35)”“17.0 (5–41)”
Documented acyclovir resistance, No. (%)“13 (86.7)”“7 (100)”“5”“(62.5)”
No documented acyclovir resistance, No. (%)“2 (13.3)”“0”“3 (37.5)”
Most recent anti-HSV treatment before enrollment: any listed, No. (%)“10 (66.7)”“4 (57.1)”“5 (62.5)”
Most recent anti-HSV treatment before enrollment: acyclovir, No. (%)“1 (6.7)”“0”“0”
Most recent anti-HSV treatment before enrollment: foscarnet, No. (%)“0”“1 (14.3)”“2 (25.0)”
Most recent anti-HSV treatment before enrollment: valacyclovir, No. (%)“9 (60.0)”“3 (42.9)”“3 (37.5)”
Immune suppression from HIV, No. (%)“8 (53.3)”“2 (28.6)”“2 (25.0)”
Immune suppression from hematopoietic cell transplant, No. (%)“5 (33.3)”“5 (71.4)”“3 (37.5)”
Immune suppression from kidney transplant, No. (%)“1 (6.7)”“0”“0”
Immune suppression from leukemia, No. (%)“0”“0”“3 (37.5)”
Immune suppression from undifferentiated connective tissue disease, No. (%)“1 (6.7)”“0”“0”
Mean age as presented in the congress slides
ParameterPart A, pritelivir, N = 15Part A, foscarnet, N = 7Part B, pritelivir, N = 8
Age at screening, mean ± SD, years“53.0 ± 10.97”“57.7 ± 9.07”“54.4 ± 13.51”
Efficacy results
Primary and selected secondary efficacy endpoints in Part A, full analysis set
Efficacy end pointPritelivir, n = 15Foscarnet, n = 7Hazard ratio or difference in percentage healed (95% CI), P value
Primary: time to lesion healing up to 28 days by independent photographic review, median (95% CI), days“26.0 (13.0–31.0)”“NE (20.0–NE)”“2.70 (0.33–21.83), P = .34”
Secondary: time to lesion healing up to 28 days by investigator, median (95% CI), days“19.0 (15.0–25.0)”“21.0 (11.0–NE)”“1.18 (0.38–3.63), P = .78”
Secondary: healing rate up to 28 days by investigator, No. (%)“14 (93.3)”“4 (57.1)”“36.2 (−10.1 to 74.1), P = .077”
Secondary: healing rate up to 28 days by independent photographic review, No. (%)“10 (66.7)”“1 (14.3)”“52.4 (6.4–84.1), P = .064”
Resistance rates among participants tested after treatment, congress poster
ArmRateParticipants with resistance of those tested
Pritelivir, Parts A and B combined“4.8%”“1/21”
Foscarnet“20.0%”“1/5”
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

No evidence found.

Safety results
Part A: overview of treatment-emergent adverse events, safety analysis set
Type of adverse event, No. (%)Pritelivir, n = 15Foscarnet, n = 7
Any treatment-emergent adverse event“9 (60.0)”“7 (100.0)”
Treatment-emergent adverse event leading to discontinuation“0”“3 (42.9)”
Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse event“0”“5 (71.4)”
Treatment-emergent adverse event leading to death“1 (6.7)”“2 (28.6)”
Treatment-emergent serious adverse event“3 (20.0)”“2 (28.6)”
Drug-related treatment-emergent serious adverse event“0”“0”
Part A: treatment-emergent adverse events of special interest, safety analysis set
Adverse event of special interest, No. (%)Pritelivir, n = 15Foscarnet, n = 7
Any cutaneous event of special interest“5 (33.3)”“0”
Herpes simplex“2 (13.3)”“0”
Rash“1 (6.7)”“0”
Furuncle“1 (6.7)”“0”
Genital herpes simplex“1 (6.7)”“0”
Acute graft-vs-host disease in skin“1 (6.7)”“0”
Graft-vs-host disease in skin“1 (6.7)”“0”
Intertrigo“1 (6.7)”“0”
Any hematological event of special interest“0”“4 (57.1)”
Anemia“0”“1 (14.3)”
Hematocrit decreased“0”“1 (14.3)”
Hemoglobin decreased“0”“1 (14.3)”
Gastrointestinal hemorrhage“0”“1 (14.3)”
Hypogammaglobulinemia“0”“1 (14.3)”
Any coagulation event of special interest“0”“0”
Part A: adverse events with an incidence of 10% or more in either arm, by preferred term
Preferred term, No. (%)Pritelivir, n = 15Foscarnet, n = 7
Edema peripheral“2 (13.3)”“1 (14.3)”
Headache“1 (6.7)”“2 (28.6)”
Arthralgia“2 (13.3)”“0”
Herpes simplex“2 (13.3)”“0”
Atrial fibrillation“1 (6.7)”“1 (14.3)”
Blood creatinine increased“1 (6.7)”“1 (14.3)”
Fall“1 (6.7)”“1 (14.3)”
Hypertension“1 (6.7)”“1 (14.3)”
Hyperphosphatemia“0”“2 (28.6)”
Hypocalcemia“0”“2 (28.6)”
Acute kidney injury“0”“1 (14.3)”
Anemia“0”“1 (14.3)”
Cytomegalovirus“0”“1 (14.3)”
Constipation“0”“1 (14.3)”
Drug intolerance“0”“1 (14.3)”
Encephalopathy“0”“1 (14.3)”
Fluid overload“0”“1 (14.3)”
Hematocrit decreased“0”“1 (14.3)”
Hemoglobin decreased“0”“1 (14.3)”
Hepatic encephalopathy“0”“1 (14.3)”
Hyperglycemia“0”“1 (14.3)”
Hypernatremia“0”“1 (14.3)”
Hypophosphatemia“0”“1 (14.3)”
Nausea“0”“1 (14.3)”
Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus“0”“1 (14.3)”
Paresthesia“0”“1 (14.3)”
Pneumonia“0”“1 (14.3)”
Pneumonia fungal“0”“1 (14.3)”
Pulmonary mass“0”“1 (14.3)”
Septic shock“0”“1 (14.3)”
Overview of safety findings in Part A, Part B, and all pritelivir recipients, congress slides
Type of adverse event, n (%)Part A, pritelivir, N = 15Part A, foscarnet, N = 7Part B, pritelivir, N = 8All parts, pritelivir, N = 23
Any treatment-emergent adverse event“9 (60)”“7 (100)”“8 (100)”“17 (73.9)”
Non-serious treatment-emergent adverse event“9 (60)”“7 (100)”“8 (100)”“17 (73.9)”
Treatment-emergent serious adverse event“3 (20)”“2(28.6)”“3 (37.5)”“6 (26.1)”
Death“1 (6.7)”“2(28.6)”“0”“1 (4.3)”
Treatment-emergent adverse event leading to discontinuation“0”“3(42.9)”“1 (12.5)”“1 (4.3)”
Severe treatment-emergent adverse event (DAIDS Grade 3 or higher)“2 (13.3)”“4(57.1)”“4 (50.0)”“6 (26.1)”
Drug-related treatment-emergent serious adverse event“0”“0”“1(12.5)”“1 (4.3)”
Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events by system organ class, congress slides
Type of adverse event, n (%)Part A, pritelivir, N = 15Part A, foscarnet, N = 7Part B, pritelivir, N = 8All parts, pritelivir, N = 23
Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse event“0”“5 (71.4)”“2 (25)”“2 (8.7)”
Gastrointestinal disorders“0”“2 (28.6)”“1 (12.5)”“1 (4.3)”
General disorders and administration site conditions“0”“2 (28.6)”“0”“0”
Investigations“0”“1 (14.3)”“0”“0”
Metabolism and nutrition“0”“2 (28.6)”“1 (12.5)”“1 (4.3)”
Nervous system disorders“0”“2 (28.6)”“0”“0”
Renal and urinary disorders“0”“1 (14.3)”“0”“0”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders“0”“0”“1 (12.5)”“1 (4.3)”
Study limitations
Summary

Part A randomized 22 participants (15 to pritelivir, 7 to foscarnet) against a planned 30, after the sponsor ended phase 2 to begin phase 3; Part B treated 8 participants without a comparator. Treatment was open label, and the trial was not designed or powered to detect statistical differences. The primary endpoint did not differ significantly (hazard ratio 2.70; 95% CI 0.33 to 21.83; P = .34). Healing was recorded in 10 of 15 pritelivir recipients by independent photographic review and in 14 of 15 by investigators. Five of 7 foscarnet recipients stopped treatment early. The arms differed in race and in cause of immunosuppression, which was not a stratification factor. AiCuris funded the trial and employs three authors.

AIC316-01-II-01

Objective
Location and study date
Study dates and status in the registry record
FieldRegistry entry
Recruitment status“Completed”
Study start“2010-03”
Primary completion (actual)“2010-12”
Study completion (actual)“2011-03”
Results first posted“2022-02-04”
Last update posted“2023-04-21”
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Age, sex, and healthy volunteer fields in the registry record
FieldRegistry entry
Ages eligible for study“18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult )”
Sexes eligible for study“All”
Accepts healthy volunteers“No”
Treatment
Study outcomes
Rationale for using genital HSV shedding rate as the primary endpoint
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Enrollment in the registry record
FieldRegistry entry
Enrollment (actual)“156”
Participants started and in the full analysis set by arm, registry results
MilestoneDose regimen 1 (5 mg daily)Dose regimen 2 (25 mg daily)Dose regimen 3 (75 mg daily)Dose regimen 4 (400 mg weekly)Placebo
Started“34”“32”“29”“31”“30”
Full analysis set“33”“32”“29”“31”“30”
Analyzed for the primary outcome“33”“32”“29”“31”“30”
Description of analysis sets
Baseline analysis population in the registry results
FieldRegistry entry
Baseline analysis population description“Based on Full Analysis Set”
Overall number of baseline participants“155”
Results
Participant disposition
Participant flow by arm in the registry results
MilestoneDose regimen 1 (5 mg daily)Dose regimen 2 (25 mg daily)Dose regimen 3 (75 mg daily)Dose regimen 4 (400 mg weekly)Placebo
Started“34”“32”“29”“31”“30”
Completed“29”“32”“26”“31”“29”
Not completed“5”“0”“3”“0”“1”
Reasons for not completing by arm in the registry results
ReasonDose regimen 1 (5 mg daily)Dose regimen 2 (25 mg daily)Dose regimen 3 (75 mg daily)Dose regimen 4 (400 mg weekly)Placebo
Protocol violation“1”“0”“0”“0”“0”
Lost to follow-up“1”“0”“0”“0”“0”
Withdrawal by subject“1”“0”“3”“0”“1”
Pregnancy“1”“0”“0”“0”“0”
Adverse event“1”“0”“0”“0”“0”
Baseline characteristics
Demographics by arm in the registry results, full analysis set
CharacteristicDose regimen 1 (5 mg daily), n = 33Dose regimen 2 (25 mg daily), n = 32Dose regimen 3 (75 mg daily), n = 29Dose regimen 4 (400 mg weekly), n = 31Placebo, n = 30Total, n = 155
Age, mean (standard deviation), years“37.7 (12.56)”“38.8 (12.00)”“41.6 (12.47)”“42.0 (11.79)”“43.1 (10.81)”“40.5 (11.97)”
Female, count (%)“22”( “66.7%”)“21”( “65.6%”)“20”( “69.0%”)“20”( “64.5%”)“21”( “70.0%”)“104”( “67.1%”)
Male, count (%)“11”( “33.3%”)“11”( “34.4%”)“9”( “31.0%”)“11”( “35.5%”)“9”( “30.0%”)“51”( “32.9%”)
American Indian or Alaska Native, count (%)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“1”( “3.3%”)“1”( “0.6%”)
Asian, count (%)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“1”( “3.2%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“1”( “0.6%”)
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, count (%)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)
Black or African American, count (%)“8”( “24.2%”)“5”( “15.6%”)“4”( “13.8%”)“5”( “16.1%”)“7”( “23.3%”)“29”( “18.7%”)
White, count (%)“25”( “75.8%”)“27”( “84.4%”)“20”( “69.0%”)“23”( “74.2%”)“21”( “70.0%”)“116”( “74.8%”)
More than one race, count (%)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)
Race unknown or not reported, count (%)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“5”( “17.2%”)“2”( “6.5%”)“1”( “3.3%”)“8”( “5.2%”)
Characteristics of the placebo and 75 mg daily arms combined, from a later analysis of the trial data
CharacteristicPritelivir trial participants, n = 59
Age, median (range), years“42 (20–67)”
Male sex, number (%)“18 (31)”
White race, number (%)“41 (69)”
Other race, number (%)“18 (31)”
HSV-2 antibody only, number (%)“35 (59)”
HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibody, number (%)“24 (41)”
Time since acquisition of 1 year or longer, number (%)“56 (95)”
Time since acquisition unknown, number (%)“3 (5)”
Years since acquisition, median (range)“15 (1–40)”
Swabbing days, median (range)“28 (8–29)”
Efficacy results
Primary outcome in the registry results: mean per-participant shedding rate
MeasureDose regimen 1 (5 mg daily)Dose regimen 2 (25 mg daily)Dose regimen 3 (75 mg daily)Dose regimen 4 (400 mg weekly)Placebo
Participants analyzed“33”“32”“29”“31”“30”
Shedding rate, mean (standard deviation), percentage of swab days“21.2 (23.79)”“9.2 (12.61)”“2.0 (4.00)”“5.2 (6.50)”“16.5 (18.61)”
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

No evidence found.

Safety results
All-cause mortality, serious adverse events, and other adverse events by arm in the registry results
CategoryDose regimen 1 (5 mg daily)Dose regimen 2 (25 mg daily)Dose regimen 3 (75 mg daily)Dose regimen 4 (400 mg weekly)Placebo
All-cause mortality“0/33 (0.00%)”“0/32 (0.00%)”“0/29 (0.00%)”“0/31 (0.00%)”“0/30 (0.00%)”
Serious adverse events“0/33 (0.00%)”“0/32 (0.00%)”“0/29 (0.00%)”“0/31 (0.00%)”“0/30 (0.00%)”
Other (not including serious) adverse events“27/33 (81.82%)”“26/32 (81.25%)”“27/29 (93.10%)”“23/31 (74.19%)”“23/30 (76.67%)”
Adverse events by system organ class and term in the registry results, participants affected of participants at risk
System organ classTermDose regimen 1 (5 mg daily)Dose regimen 2 (25 mg daily)Dose regimen 3 (75 mg daily)Dose regimen 4 (400 mg weekly)Placebo
Blood and lymphatic system disordersBlood and Lymphatic System Disorders“2/33 (6.06%)”“1/32 (3.13%)”“3/29 (10.34%)”“1/31 (3.23%)”“1/30 (3.33%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersGastrointestinal Disorder“17/33 (51.52%)”“13/32 (40.63%)”“17/29 (58.62%)”“15/31 (48.39%)”“12/30 (40.00%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersNausea“9/33 (27.27%)”“5/32 (15.63%)”“5/29 (17.24%)”“9/31 (29.03%)”“4/30 (13.33%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersDiarrhoea“3/33 (9.09%)”“3/32 (9.38%)”“5/29 (17.24%)”“4/31 (12.90%)”“3/30 (10.00%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersAbdominal Pain Upper“2/33 (6.06%)”“4/32 (12.50%)”“4/29 (13.79%)”“2/31 (6.45%)”“3/30 (10.00%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersDyspepsia“0/33 (0.00%)”“1/32 (3.13%)”“2/29 (6.90%)”“4/31 (12.90%)”“2/30 (6.67%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersAbdominal Pain“0/33 (0.00%)”“4/32 (12.50%)”“0/29 (0.00%)”“0/31 (0.00%)”“0/30 (0.00%)”
General disordersGeneral Disorders and Administration Site Conditions“7/33 (21.21%)”“6/32 (18.75%)”“8/29 (27.59%)”“3/31 (9.68%)”“8/30 (26.67%)”
General disordersFatigue“4/33 (12.12%)”“2/32 (6.25%)”“5/29 (17.24%)”“3/31 (9.68%)”“5/30 (16.67%)”
General disordersPyrexia“1/33 (3.03%)”“1/32 (3.13%)”“3/29 (10.34%)”“1/31 (3.23%)”“0/30 (0.00%)”
Infections and infestationsInfections and Infestations“12/33 (36.36%)”“8/32 (25.00%)”“8/29 (27.59%)”“8/31 (25.81%)”“10/30 (33.33%)”
Infections and infestationsUpper Respiratory Tract Infection“3/33 (9.09%)”“2/32 (6.25%)”“1/29 (3.45%)”“3/31 (9.68%)”“1/30 (3.33%)”
Infections and infestationsUrinary Tract Infection“2/33 (6.06%)”“1/32 (3.13%)”“1/29 (3.45%)”“0/31 (0.00%)”“3/30 (10.00%)”
Injury, poisoning and procedural complicationsInjury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications“1/33 (3.03%)”“1/32 (3.13%)”“5/29 (17.24%)”“2/31 (6.45%)”“0/30 (0.00%)”
InvestigationsInvestigations“1/33 (3.03%)”“1/32 (3.13%)”“4/29 (13.79%)”“2/31 (6.45%)”“5/30 (16.67%)”
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersMusculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders“10/33 (30.30%)”“9/32 (28.13%)”“7/29 (24.14%)”“6/31 (19.35%)”“11/30 (36.67%)”
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersArthralgia“1/33 (3.03%)”“5/32 (15.63%)”“2/29 (6.90%)”“1/31 (3.23%)”“2/30 (6.67%)”
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersBack Pain“1/33 (3.03%)”“2/32 (6.25%)”“2/29 (6.90%)”“1/31 (3.23%)”“5/30 (16.67%)”
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPain in the Extremity“2/33 (6.06%)”“2/32 (6.25%)”“2/29 (6.90%)”“2/31 (6.45%)”“3/30 (10.00%)”
Nervous system disordersNervous System Disorders“13/33 (39.39%)”“15/32 (46.88%)”“14/29 (48.28%)”“16/31 (51.61%)”“12/30 (40.00%)”
Nervous system disordersHeadache“12/33 (36.36%)”“14/32 (43.75%)”“11/29 (37.93%)”“14/31 (45.16%)”“12/30 (40.00%)”
Nervous system disordersDizziness“3/33 (9.09%)”“1/32 (3.13%)”“5/29 (17.24%)”“2/31 (6.45%)”“1/30 (3.33%)”
Psychiatric disordersPsychiatric Disorders“3/33 (9.09%)”“4/32 (12.50%)”“5/29 (17.24%)”“4/31 (12.90%)”“3/30 (10.00%)”
Psychiatric disordersInsomnia“2/33 (6.06%)”“3/32 (9.38%)”“3/29 (10.34%)”“2/31 (6.45%)”“2/30 (6.67%)”
Reproductive system and breast disordersReproductive System and Breast Disorders“7/33 (21.21%)”“4/32 (12.50%)”“7/29 (24.14%)”“5/31 (16.13%)”“8/30 (26.67%)”
Reproductive system and breast disordersDysmenorrhoea“2/33 (6.06%)”“0/32 (0.00%)”“2/29 (6.90%)”“2/31 (6.45%)”“4/30 (13.33%)”
Reproductive system and breast disordersPruritus Genital“1/33 (3.03%)”“0/32 (0.00%)”“2/29 (6.90%)”“1/31 (3.23%)”“3/30 (10.00%)”
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersRespiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal Disorders“4/33 (12.12%)”“4/32 (12.50%)”“6/29 (20.69%)”“7/31 (22.58%)”“6/30 (20.00%)”
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersOropharyngeal Pain“1/33 (3.03%)”“2/32 (6.25%)”“4/29 (13.79%)”“4/31 (12.90%)”“3/30 (10.00%)”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersSkin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders“2/33 (6.06%)”“6/32 (18.75%)”“5/29 (17.24%)”“7/31 (22.58%)”“3/30 (10.00%)”
Study limitations
Summary

AIC316-01-II-01 enrolled otherwise healthy, immunocompetent adults with genital HSV-2 infection, a population outside the labeled indication of immunocompromised adults with refractory mucocutaneous HSV infection. The regimens tested (5, 25, or 75 mg daily, or 400 mg weekly) differ from the approved regimen of 400 mg on day 1 followed by 100 mg daily. Treatment lasted 28 days, and 155 participants were analyzed in five arms of 29 to 33 participants. The primary endpoint was a virologic measure, and the investigators state that the trial was not powered to evaluate recurrences. The publication reports one serious adverse event (pancreatitis 2 weeks after treatment), and the registry results list none.

AIC316-01-II-02

Objective
Location and study date
Study dates and status in the registry record
FieldRegistry entry
Recruitment status“Terminated”
Study start“2012-10”
Primary completion (actual)“2013-05”
Study completion (actual)“2013-07”
Results first posted“2023-04-21”
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Age, sex, and healthy volunteer fields in the registry record
FieldRegistry entry
Ages eligible for study“18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult )”
Sexes eligible for study“All”
Accepts healthy volunteers“No”
Treatment
Study outcomes
Rationale for using within-participant genital HSV shedding as the primary endpoint
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Participants contributing to efficacy analyses by first-period assignment
MeasurePritelivir first, n = 45Valacyclovir first, n = 46Total, n = 91
Contributed to efficacy analyses, number (%)“44 (98)”“44 (96)”“88 (97)”
Swabs obtained during study, median (range)“213 (2-231)”“214 (13-222)”“214 (2-231)”
Participants enrolled, analyzed, and at risk in the registry results
MeasureAIC316 (pritelivir)Valacyclovir
Participants analyzed for the primary outcome measures“76”“76”
Participants at risk for adverse events“77”“78”
FieldRegistry entry
Enrollment (actual)“91”
Description of analysis sets
Results
Participant disposition
Participant flow by period and treatment sequence in the registry results
PeriodMilestoneAIC316 (pritelivir), then valacyclovirValacyclovir, then AIC316 (pritelivir)
Period 1: first intervention (28 days)Started“45”“46”
Period 1: first intervention (28 days)Completed“38”“36”
Period 1: first intervention (28 days)Not completed“7”“10”
Washout period (28 days)Started“38”“36”
Washout period (28 days)Completed“32”“32”
Washout period (28 days)Not completed“6”“4”
Period 2: second intervention (28 days)Started“32”“32”
Period 2: second intervention (28 days)Completed“29”“27”
Period 2: second intervention (28 days)Not completed“3”“5”
Baseline characteristics
Demographic and clinical characteristics by first-period assignment in the publication
CharacteristicPritelivir first, n = 45Valacyclovir first, n = 46Total, n = 91
Age, median (range), years“46 (21-66)”“50 (21-61)”“48 (21-66)”
Women, number (%)“28 (62)”“29 (63)”“57 (63)”
White, number (%)“37 (82)”“29 (63)”“66 (72)”
HSV-2 antibody only, number (%)“27 (60)”“27 (59)”“54 (59)”
HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibody, number (%)“18 (40)”“19 (41)”“37 (41)”
Years since HSV-2 acquisition, median (range)“15 (1-41)”“20 (1-42)”“17 (1-42)”
Recurrences per year before the study, median (range)“5 (4-9)”“5 (4-9)”“5 (4-9)”
Suppressive therapy before study entry, number (%)“5 (11)”“7 (15)”“12 (13)”
Demographics by treatment sequence in the registry results
CharacteristicAIC316 (pritelivir), then valacyclovir, n = 45Valacyclovir, then AIC316 (pritelivir), n = 46Total, n = 91
Age, mean (standard deviation), years“45.2 (13.22)”“45.5 (11.4)”“45.4 (12.26)”
Female, count (%)“28”( “62.2%”)“29”( “63.0%”)“57”( “62.6%”)
Male, count (%)“17”( “37.8%”)“17”( “37.0%”)“34”( “37.4%”)
Hispanic or Latino, count (%)“7”( “15.6%”)“7”( “15.2%”)“14”( “15.4%”)
Not Hispanic or Latino, count (%)“38”( “84.4%”)“39”( “84.8%”)“77”( “84.6%”)
American Indian or Alaska Native, count (%)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)
Asian, count (%)“0”( “0.0%”)“2”( “4.3%”)“2”( “2.2%”)
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, count (%)“0”( “0.0%”)“1”( “2.2%”)“1”( “1.1%”)
Black or African American, count (%)“7”( “15.6%”)“9”( “19.6%”)“16”( “17.6%”)
White, count (%)“37”( “82.2%”)“29”( “63.0%”)“66”( “72.5%”)
More than one race, count (%)“1”( “2.2%”)“5”( “10.9%”)“6”( “6.6%”)
Efficacy results
Virologic end points by treatment in the publication
End pointPritelivir, n = 75Valacyclovir, n = 76Relative risk or difference in copy number, pritelivir vs valacyclovir (95% CI)P value
Genital HSV shedding, overall, number of swabs/total (%)“173/7276 (2.4)”“392/7453 (5.3)”“0.42 (0.21 to 0.82)”“.01”
Genital HSV shedding, subclinical, number of swabs/total (%)“127/6989 (1.8)”“284/6984 (4.1)”“0.40 (0.20 to 0.81)”“.01”
Genital HSV shedding, lesional, number of swabs/total (%)“40/134 (29.9)”“106/294 (37.1)”“0.86 (0.22 to 3.30)”“.76”
Shedding episodes/person-months“78/60”“97/61”“0.80 (0.52 to 1.22)”“.29”
HSV DNA log10 copies/mL, overall, mean (SD)“3.2 (1.2)”“3.7 (1.3)”“−0.1 (−0.6 to 0.5)”“.83”
HSV DNA log10 copies/mL on days with no lesions, mean (SD)“2.8 (0.6)”“3.3 (1.0)”“−0.3 (−0.5 to −0.1)”“<.001”
HSV DNA log10 copies/mL on days with lesions, mean (SD)“4.4 (1.3)”“4.8 (1.4)”“0.7 (0.3 to 1.0)”“<.001”
Clinical end points by treatment in the publication
End pointPritelivir, n = 75Valacyclovir, n = 76Relative risk, pritelivir vs valacyclovir (95% CI)P value
Days with lesions, number/total (%)“35/1855 (1.9)”“75/1900 (3.9)”“0.40 (0.17 to 0.96)”“.04”
Recurrences/person-months“11/61”“18/63”“0.65 (0.35 to 1.22)”“.18”
Incidence rates per person-month and durations by treatment in the publication
MeasurePritelivir, n = 75Valacyclovir, n = 76P value
Duration of shedding episodes, median (IQR), hours“6.0 (6.0 to 12.0)”“6.0 (6.0 to 36.0)”“.06”
Duration of recurrences, median (IQR), days“3.0 (1.0 to 4.0)”“5.0 (3.0 to 6.0)”“.10”
MeasurePritelivir, n = 75Valacyclovir, n = 76
Shedding episodes, incidence rate per person-month“1.3”“1.6”
Recurrences, incidence rate per person-month“0.2”“0.3”
Primary outcome measures in the registry results
MeasureAIC316 (pritelivir)Valacyclovir
Participants analyzed“76”“76”
Within-subject shedding rate, mean (standard deviation), percentage of positive swabs per subject“2.3 (5.2)”“4.9 (10.8)”
Overall shedding rate, percentage of positive swabs“2.4”“5.2”
Statistical analysis of the within-subject shedding rate in the registry results
FieldRegistry entry
Comparison type“SUPERIORITY”
Method“non-linear mixed effects model”
Estimation parameter“Risk Ratio (RR)”
Estimated value“0.43”
95% confidence interval, lower limit“0.30”
95% confidence interval, upper limit“0.63”
P value“<0.0001”
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
Duration of pain
MeasurePritelivir, n = 75Valacyclovir, n = 76P value
Duration of pain, median (IQR), days“4.0 (2.0 to 4.0)”“4.0 (2.0 to 4.0)”“.83”
Safety results
Participants with treatment-emergent adverse events by treatment in the publication, number (%)
VariablePritelivir 100 mg daily, n = 77Valacyclovir 500 mg daily, n = 78Total, n = 91
Any treatment-emergent adverse event“48 (62.3)”“54 (69.2)”“71 (78)”
Serious“0”“0”“0”
Leading to discontinuation“1 (1.3)”“1 (1.3)”“2 (2.2)”
DAIDS grade 2 events“11 (14.3)”“12 (15.4)”“21 (23.1)”
DAIDS grade 3 events“3 (3.9)”“3 (3.8)”“5 (5.5)”
Headache, total“10 (13.0)”“13 (16.7)”“21 (23.1)”
Headache, DAIDS grade 2“3 (3.9)”“3 (3.8)”“6 (6.6)”
Headache, DAIDS grade 3“0”“1 (1.3)”“1 (1.1)”
Nervous system disorders, total“14 (18.2)”“14 (17.9)”“25 (27.5)”
Nervous system disorders, DAIDS grade 2“3 (3.9)”“4 (5.1)”“7 (7.7)”
Nervous system disorders, DAIDS grade 3“1 (1.3)”“1 (1.3)”“2 (2.2)”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, total“8 (10.4)”“7 (9.0)”“12 (13.2)”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, DAIDS grade 2“1 (1.3)”“0”“1 (1.1)”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, DAIDS grade 3“0”“0”“0”
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders, total“2 (2.6)”“2 (2.6)”“4 (4.4)”
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders, DAIDS grade 2“0”“0”“0”
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders, DAIDS grade 3“0”“0”“0”
All-cause mortality, serious adverse events, and other adverse events in the registry results
CategoryAIC316 (pritelivir)Valacyclovir
All-cause mortality“0/77 (0.00%)”“0/78 (0.00%)”
Serious adverse events“0/77 (0.00%)”“0/78 (0.00%)”
Other (not including serious) adverse events“48/77 (62.34%)”“54/78 (69.23%)”
Adverse events by term in the registry results, participants affected of participants at risk
System organ classTermPritelivir (AIC316) 100 mg dailyValacyclovir 500 mg daily
Gastrointestinal disordersNausea“3/77 (3.90%)”“4/78 (5.13%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersDiarrhea“4/77 (5.19%)”“2/78 (2.56%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersHemorrhoids“1/77 (1.30%)”“3/78 (3.85%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersAbdominal Pain Upper“0/77 (0.00%)”“3/78 (3.85%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersDry Mouth“0/77 (0.00%)”“2/78 (2.56%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersGastrointestinal sounds abnormal“2/77 (2.60%)”“1/78 (1.28%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersVomiting“0/77 (0.00%)”“2/78 (2.56%)”
General disordersFatigue“3/77 (3.90%)”“5/78 (6.41%)”
General disordersChills“0/77 (0.00%)”“2/78 (2.56%)”
Infections and infestationsUpper respiratory tract infection“11/77 (14.29%)”“8/78 (10.26%)”
Infections and infestationsVulvovaginal mycotic infection“3/77 (3.90%)”“3/78 (3.85%)”
Infections and infestationsTooth infection“2/77 (2.60%)”“1/78 (1.28%)”
Infections and infestationsVaginitis bacteria“1/77 (1.30%)”“3/78 (3.85%)”
Infections and infestationsGastroenteritis viral“0/77 (0.00%)”“2/78 (2.56%)”
Infections and infestationsSinusitis“2/77 (2.60%)”“0/78 (0.00%)”
Injury, poisoning and procedural complicationsContusion“2/77 (2.60%)”“1/78 (1.28%)”
Injury, poisoning and procedural complicationsLaceration“0/77 (0.00%)”“2/78 (2.56%)”
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersBack Pain“1/77 (1.30%)”“2/78 (2.56%)”
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersArthralgia“0/77 (0.00%)”“2/78 (2.56%)”
Nervous system disordersHeadache“12/77 (15.58%)”“14/78 (17.95%)”
Nervous system disordersDizziness“3/77 (3.90%)”“3/78 (3.85%)”
Nervous system disordersDysgeusia“0/77 (0.00%)”“4/78 (5.13%)”
Psychiatric disordersAnxiety“2/77 (2.60%)”“3/78 (3.85%)”
Psychiatric disordersInsomnia“1/77 (1.30%)”“2/78 (2.56%)”
Reproductive system and breast disordersVulvovaginal pruritus“2/77 (2.60%)”“1/78 (1.28%)”
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersCough“2/77 (2.60%)”“4/78 (5.13%)”
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersOropharyngeal pain“1/77 (1.30%)”“2/78 (2.56%)”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersDry Skin“2/77 (2.60%)”“2/78 (2.56%)”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersErythema“1/77 (1.30%)”“3/78 (3.85%)”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersPruritus“2/77 (2.60%)”“0/78 (0.00%)”
Vascular disordersFlushing“0/77 (0.00%)”“2/78 (2.56%)”
Reporting threshold, time frame, and coding dictionary in the registry results
FieldRegistry entry
Frequency threshold for reporting other adverse events“2%”
Time frame“28 days for each intervention”
Source vocabulary“MedDRA (15.1)”
Study limitations
Summary

AIC316-01-II-02 enrolled healthy, immunocompetent adults with 4 to 9 genital HSV-2 recurrences per year, a population outside the labeled indication of immunocompromised adults with refractory mucocutaneous HSV infection. The pritelivir regimen (400 mg on day 1, then 100 mg daily) matched the approved dose and was given for 28 days to suppress shedding. The sponsor terminated the trial after the FDA clinical hold of May 2013; 91 participants were randomized against 98 planned, and 56 completed both treatment periods. For the primary endpoint, the publication reports a relative risk of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.82) and the registry reports a risk ratio of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.63). The publication was corrected in January 2017.

LipP1

Objective
Location and study date
Study dates and status in the registry record
FieldRegistry entry
Recruitment status“Completed”
Study start (actual)“2016-11-29”
Primary completion (actual)“2017-09-29”
Study completion (actual)“2017-10-16”
Results first posted“2021-07-13”
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria for the topical ointment trial in the protocol summary

“Healthy men and women of any ethnic group aged ≥18 years” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Subjects should have experienced ≥4 recurrences of HL in the previous 12-month period” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Subjects should have experienced prodromal symptoms in at least 50% of rHL episodes and should have developed ulcerative lesions that have progressed through vesicle, ulcer, and crust stages in at least 50% of the episodes” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Willingness not to use any topical application (such as cosmetics, lip balm, sunscreens etc.) other than the trial medication in the area of lesion development from start of prodromal symptoms to healing” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Willingness not to use any systemic and topical anti-HSV agent during the trial participation including prescription and over-the-counter products” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Willingness not to use any systemic, anti-inflammatory or analgesic agents from start of prodromal symptoms to healing” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Willingness to refrain from mechanical disruption (ie, scrubbing, lancing, shaving) of the prodromal area or lesion after start of treatment with trial medication until end of the trial participation” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Women of child bearing potential and males must use adequate contraception” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Subject must give written informed consent.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Subjects with current lesion may be enrolled, but must not to treat the lesion present at randomization with the trial medication; they should be instructed to wait for the next subsequent lesion.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Exclusion criteria for the topical ointment trial in the protocol summary

“Known intolerance to pritelivir or any of the ointment ingredients (ie, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), PEG-400, PEG-4000, propylene glycol)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Known intolerance to Zovirax® Cream or any of the ingredients (ie, acyclovir, cetostearyl alcohol, mineral oil, poloxamer 407, propylene glycol, sodium lauryl sulfate, and white petrolatum) or valacyclovir” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Any skin conditions that could interfere with the assessment of HL recurrences (eg, eczema, psoriasis, acne)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Any other condition which in the opinion of the Investigator would interfere with successful completion of this clinical trial” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Participation in any investigational drug trial within the last 30 days before randomization for this clinical trial” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Previous treatment with pritelivir tablets” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Previous participation in a HSV vaccination trial (unless having received placebo)” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Clinically relevant ECG abnormalities (eg, QTc according to Fridericia: QTcF > 450ms for males and QTcF > 470ms for females; PR > 220 ms) at screening” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Clinically relevant abnormalities in laboratory indices at screening which in the opinion of the investigator might have an impact on the safety and evaluability of the subject” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Known chronic infections which in the opinion of the investigator might have an impact on the safety and evaluability of the subject” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Evidence of active malignancy or immunodeficiency disease, or require chronic use of immunosuppressive drugs (eg, systemic steroids) or topical steroids, or chronically use antiviral medication with activity against HSV” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“HIV positive based on screening labs.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Age, sex, and healthy volunteer fields in the registry record
FieldRegistry entry
Ages eligible for study“18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult )”
Sexes eligible for study“All”
Accepts healthy volunteers“No”
Treatment
Study outcomes
Rationale for using the percentage of participants with non-ulcerative lesions as the primary endpoint
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Participants started, analyzed for the primary outcome, and at risk for adverse events by topical treatment arm
MeasurePritelivir 5% w/w ointmentPlacebo ointmentZovirax cream
Started“73”“73”“77”
Analyzed for the primary outcome“71”“72”“75”
At risk for adverse events“73”“73”“77”
Description of analysis sets
Results
Participant disposition
Participant flow among participants who started topical treatment
MilestonePritelivir 5% w/w ointmentPlacebo ointmentZovirax cream
Started“73”“73”“77”
Completed“67”“70”“71”
Not completed“6”“3”“6”
Lost to follow-up“6”“3”“5”
Withdrawal by subject“0”“0”“1”
Baseline characteristics
Demographics of participants who started topical treatment, by arm
CharacteristicPritelivir 5% w/w ointment, n = 73Placebo ointment, n = 73Zovirax cream, n = 77Total, n = 223
Age, median (full range), years“54 (21 to 74)”“49 (20 to 77)”“51 (18 to 79)”“51 (18 to 79)”
Female, count (%)“52”( “71.2%”)“53”( “72.6%”)“56”( “72.7%”)“161”( “72.2%”)
Male, count (%)“21”( “28.8%”)“20”( “27.4%”)“21”( “27.3%”)“62”( “27.8%”)
American Indian or Alaska Native, count (%)“0”( “0.0%”)“1”( “1.4%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“1”( “0.4%”)
Asian, count (%)“1”( “1.4%”)“1”( “1.4%”)“1”( “1.3%”)“3”( “1.3%”)
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, count (%)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“0”( “0.0%”)
Black or African American, count (%)“8”( “11.0%”)“6”( “8.2%”)“10”( “13.0%”)“24”( “10.8%”)
White, count (%)“63”( “86.3%”)“65”( “89.0%”)“65”( “84.4%”)“193”( “86.5%”)
More than one race, count (%)“1”( “1.4%”)“0”( “0.0%”)“1”( “1.3%”)“2”( “0.9%”)
Enrolled in the United States, count (%)“73”( “100.0%”)“73”( “100.0%”)“77”( “100.0%”)“223”( “100.0%”)
Body mass index, median (full range), kg/m2“27.8 (19.3 to 48.5)”“27.3 (19.4 to 56.7)”“28.1 (17.1 to 47.7)”“27.8 (17.1 to 56.7)”
Efficacy results
Primary endpoint for topical pritelivir 5% ointment: percentage of participants with non-ulcerative recurrences
MeasurePritelivir 5% w/w ointmentPlacebo ointmentZovirax cream
Participants analyzed“71”“72”“75”
Non-ulcerative recurrences, percentage of participants“21.8”“16.4”“19.9”
Ulcerative recurrences, percentage of participants“78.2”“83.6”“80.1”
Statistical comparison of topical pritelivir ointment with placebo ointment
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

No evidence found.

Safety results
All-cause mortality, serious adverse events, and other adverse events by topical treatment arm
CategoryPritelivir 5% w/w ointmentPlacebo ointmentZovirax cream
All-cause mortality“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Serious adverse events“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Other (not including serious) adverse events“30/73 (41.10%)”“27/73 (36.99%)”“27/77 (35.06%)”
Adverse events by term for topical pritelivir ointment, placebo ointment, and Zovirax cream, participants affected of participants at risk
System organ classTermPritelivir 5% w/w ointmentPlacebo ointmentZovirax cream
Blood and lymphatic system disordersAnaemia“1/73 (1.37%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Cardiac disordersPalpitations“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Ear and labyrinth disordersEar Pain“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Ear and labyrinth disordersEustachian tube dysfunction“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersAbdominal discomfort“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersAbdominal pain lower“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersChapped lips“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersDiarrhoea“1/73 (1.37%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersLip blister“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersNausea“1/73 (1.37%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Gastrointestinal disordersToothache“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
General disordersApplication site inflammation“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
General disordersApplication site pain“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
General disordersInduration“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
General disordersPain“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
General disordersPyrexia“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Infections and infestationsBronchitis“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Infections and infestationsGastroenteritis“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Infections and infestationsOral herpes“10/73 (13.70%)”“5/73 (6.85%)”“3/77 (3.90%)”
Infections and infestationsPharyngitis streptococcal“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Infections and infestationsPyuria“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Infections and infestationsRespiratory tract infection“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Infections and infestationsRhinitis“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Infections and infestationsSinusitis“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Infections and infestationsUpper respiratory tract infection“1/73 (1.37%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Infections and infestationsViral upper respiratory tract infection“2/73 (2.74%)”“2/73 (2.74%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Injury, poisoning and procedural complicationsArthropod bite“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“2/77 (2.60%)”
Injury, poisoning and procedural complicationsBrain contusion“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Injury, poisoning and procedural complicationsLimb crushing injury“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Injury, poisoning and procedural complicationsMuscle strain“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Injury, poisoning and procedural complicationsThermal burn“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Injury, poisoning and procedural complicationsWound complication“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
InvestigationsBlood creatine phosphokinase increased“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“2/77 (2.60%)”
InvestigationsBlood pressure increased“1/73 (1.37%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
InvestigationsBlood sodium decreased“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
InvestigationsC-reactive protein increased“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
InvestigationsCardiac murmur“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
InvestigationsElectrocardiogram ST-T change“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
InvestigationsElectrocardiogram T wave inversion“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
InvestigationsEosinophil count increased“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
InvestigationsHaptoglobin increased“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
InvestigationsLipase increased“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
InvestigationsPlatelet count increased“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
InvestigationsUrine analysis abnormal“2/73 (2.74%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
InvestigationsWhite blood cell count increased“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersArthralgia“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersBack pain“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersMuscle spasms“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersMusculoskeletal pain“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersMusculoskeletal stiffness“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersMyalgia“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersPain in extremity“1/73 (1.37%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Nervous system disordersDizziness“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Nervous system disordersHeadache“1/73 (1.37%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“3/77 (3.90%)”
Nervous system disordersSinus headache“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Renal and urinary disordersHaematuria“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Renal and urinary disordersProteinuria“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Reproductive system and breast disordersVaginal haemorrhage“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersOropharyngeal pain“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersRhinorrhoea“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersSinus congestion“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“3/77 (3.90%)”
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersThroat irritation“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersUpper-airway cough syndrome“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersAcne“0/73 (0.00%)”“2/73 (2.74%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersEcchymosis“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersPapule“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersPruritus“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersRash“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/73 (1.37%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersSkin mass“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“1/77 (1.30%)”
Vascular disordersHypertension“1/73 (1.37%)”“0/73 (0.00%)”“0/77 (0.00%)”
Study limitations
Summary

LipP1 tested pritelivir 5% w/w ointment applied 5 times daily for 4 days, a topical formulation other than the approved 100 mg tablet. It enrolled healthy adults with recurrent herpes labialis and excluded immunodeficiency disease and HIV infection, a population outside the labeled indication. Of 362 randomized participants, 223 treated a recurrence and 139 had no outbreak. Non-ulcerative recurrences occurred in 21.8% of participants receiving pritelivir ointment and 16.4% receiving placebo ointment (P = 0.4294). The comparison with Zovirax cream was planned as descriptive. The registry posts no results for secondary endpoints and records an agreement that restricts publication without the sponsor's consent.

Expanded access and early access program case series

Objective
Location and study date
Expanded access record: country, protocol number, registration dates, and status
FieldQuoted record
Country“in the USA”
Other study identifier“AIC316-03-E-01”
First submitted“2023-04-25”
First posted“2023-05-06”
Last update posted“2025-02-10”
Status“Available”
Locations“No location data”
Study design
Expanded access record: type and collaborator
Eligibility criteria
Expanded access protocol: main inclusion criteria
CriterionQuoted record
Immune status and age“Immunocompromised (due to conditions including but not limited to HIV infection, hematopoietic-cell or solid organ transplantation, and chronic use of immunosupressive treatment) men and women of any ethnic group aged ≥16 years.”
Infection“ACV-resistant and foscarnet-resistant/intolerant mucocutaneous HSV infection based on clinical failure (no improvement after oral or iv doses for at least 7 days at doses equivalent to or greater than the local agency approved high doses of valacyclovir or famciclovir and/or foscarnet iv therapy or intolerance to foscarnet requiring cessation of foscarnet treatment) or result from genotypic/phenotypic testing or ACV-resistant and previously treated in PRIOH-1 Part C.”
Virologic confirmation“The current lesion(s) should be confirmed to be positive for HSV before the start of treatment. If not tested beforehand, a lesion swab should be taken for PCR or cell culture before starting treatment, but treatment may be started before obtaining results.”
Lesion“Visual confirmation of lesion at start of treatment (including by endoscopy).”
Contraception“Willing to remain abstinent or use highly effective method of contraception.”
Pregnancy testing“Negative pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential at Day 1 and every 4 weeks thereafter.”
Consent“Patient must be willing and able (in the opinion of the physician) to understand the informed consent form. Patient must give written informed consent.”
Ages eligible“16 Years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)”
Expanded access protocol: main exclusion criteria
CriterionQuoted record
Access to a trial“Eligibility and feasibility for a patient to participate in a currently ongoing clinical trial with pritelivir.”
Intolerance“Known intolerance to pritelivir or any of the excipients (microcrystalline cellulose, croscarmellose sodium, mannitol, colloidal anhydrous silica, magnesium stearate, hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose, polyethylene glycol, calcium diphosphate).”
Proton pump inhibitors excluded at any dose“Need to use the following medications at any dose: esomeprazole, rabeprazole.”
Proton pump inhibitors excluded above a daily dose“Need to use the medications with the following daily dose levels: omeprazole > 20 mg/d, lansoprazole > 20 mg/d or pantoprazole > 80 mg/d.”
Absolute neutrophil count“ANC < 1000 cells/mm3”
Platelets“Platelet count < 25,000 cells/mm3”
Hemoglobin“Hemoglobin < 8.0 g/dL”
Aminotransferases“AST or ALT > 5 x ULN”
Bilirubin“Bilirubin > 2.5 x ULN”
Malabsorption“History or current evidence of gastrointestinal malabsorption which, in the opinion of the physician, may affect the extent of absorption of pritelivir.”
Renal function“Hemodialysis for any indication and ESRD (eGFR <15 mL/min; stage 5 CKD).”
Other disease“History or current evidence of significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, hematological, endocrinological, metabolic, neurological, psychiatric, or other diseases, which, in the opinion of the physician, may affect the patient's safety.”
Laboratory abnormalities“Abnormalities in hematological, clinical chemical or any other laboratory variables regarded as clinically relevant by the physician unless they are due to underlying disease or condition.”
Pregnancy and breastfeeding“Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women.”
Treatment
Hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with genital HSV-2 infection: five pritelivir courses in 2 participants
Pritelivir courseDays of treatmentSymptomsTolerance of antiviral treatment
Participant 1, first course“Day 41–83”“almost complete healing”“good”
Participant 1, second course“Day 149–191”“complete healing”“good”
Participant 1, third course“Day 248–290”“complete healing”“good”
Participant 2, first course“Day 140–168”“complete healing”“good”
Participant 2, second course“Day 348–ongoing”“complete healing”“good”
Study outcomes
Rationale for using lesion healing as an efficacy outcome
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Description of analysis sets

No evidence found.

Results
Participant disposition
Hematopoietic cell transplant recipient treated in two episodes: death after the second episode
Stem cell transplant recipient with HSV-2 infection: death as recorded in a review table
Baseline characteristics
Stem cell transplant recipient with HSV-2 infection: characteristics as recorded in a review table
Efficacy results
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes
Safety results
Herpes simplex encephalitis, a use outside the labeled indication: tolerability with intravenous acyclovir
Pediatric transplant recipients, a use outside the labeled indication: deaths among participants whose antiviral drugs included pritelivir
Study limitations
Summary

The expanded access record (NCT05844436) lists a status of Available and no location data. Aggregate early access outcomes come from sponsor slides alone: at the April 2024 data cut-off, 86 of 137 evaluable treatment cycles (63%) were healed or partially healed within 28 days, a category that combines complete and partial healing. Published reports are uncontrolled case reports and series with 1 to 3 pritelivir recipients each. Relapse after pritelivir was stopped is described in 3 reports. Use for encephalitis, pneumonitis, secondary prophylaxis, and children rests on 1 to 3 participants per use, and the encephalitis participant also received intravenous acyclovir. In the pediatric series, 1 of 3 pritelivir recipients had a good clinical response.

AIC316-03-I-07

Objective
Location and study date
Registry dates and status
FieldQuoted record
Study start (actual)“2022-12-04”
Primary completion (actual)“2023-05-18”
Study completion (actual)“2023-05-18”
First submitted“2022-12-12”
First posted“2023-01-04”
Results first submitted“2024-04-09”
Results first posted“2025-03-14”
Last update posted“2025-03-14”
Recruitment status“Completed”
Protocol identifiers, version, and planned trial period
FieldQuoted record
Sponsor“AiCuris Anti-infective Cures AG”
EudraCT number“2022-000203-12”
Protocol version“V2.0”
Protocol date“25 Nov 2022”
Study center“Richmond Pharmacology”
Planned trial period“Q4 2022 to Q2 2023”
Phase of development“Phase 1”
Study design
Registry design fields
FieldQuoted record
Study type“Interventional”
Phase“Phase 1”
Allocation“Randomized”
Interventional model“Parallel Assignment”
Masking“Double”
Primary purpose“Prevention”
Enrollment (actual)“64”
Blinding of participants, site staff, and sponsor
Eligibility criteria
Age, sex, and healthy volunteer status in the registry record
FieldQuoted record
Ages eligible for study“18 Years to 45 Years”
Sexes eligible for study“All”
Accepts healthy volunteers“Yes”
Inclusion criteria: contraception

“Male subjects were not planning to father or to donate sperms for in vitro fertilization during the trial and for at least 3 months after dosing of trial medication.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Women of childbearing potential had to perform adequate contraception.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Adequate contraception was defined as a combination of a highly effective method of birth control and additional barrier contraception.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Highly effective method of birth control was defined as follows: combined (estrogen and progesterone) oral contraceptives, combined hormonal vaginal rings, hormone implants, hormone injectables, or intrauterine device that needed to be in place for a period of at least 2 months prior to Screening and continue for at least 3 months after dosing of trial medication.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“A single barrier method alone or abstinence alone was not acceptable.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Women of non-childbearing potential could be included if surgically sterile (documented complete hysterectomy, supracervical hysterectomy or bi-tubal ligations; partial hysterectomy was not sufficient) or if postmenopausal (who have a history of no menses of at least 24 months at screening and postmenopausal status was confirmed by follicle stimulating hormone [FSH] test at screening).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Exclusion criteria: medical history

“History or current evidence of clinically relevant allergies or idiosyncrasy to drugs or food.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“History of any moderate or severe allergy or any known allergy to any active or inactive ingredient(s) of moxifloxacin investigational medicinal product (IMP), pritelivir IMP, or their respective matching placebos.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“History or current evidence of any clinically relevant cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, hematologic, endocrine, metabolic, neurological, psychiatric, or other disease suspected to influence pharmacokinetics or safety of the IMP.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“History or any current evidence of a dermatological condition requiring treatment by a general practitioner (GP) or specialist (with the exception of burns, fungal infections, and/or warts).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“History of malignancy.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Chronic or clinically relevant acute infections or febrile illness within 5 days prior to administration of the IMP.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Diseases or surgery of the gastrointestinal tract which could have interfered with drug absorption (note: this is not applicable for minor abdominal surgery such as eg, appendectomy and herniotomy).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Subject was lactating or breastfeeding.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Treatment
Selection of the supratherapeutic dose

“Thus, a high supra-therapeutic dose of pritelivir, which results in an exposure in excess of what would be observed in patients, will be used in this TQT trial.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Following the exposure to 400 mg pritelivir on Day 1 and 100 mg qd for the next 5 days, dosing of 400 mg qd pritelivir for 10 further days (Day 7 to Day 16) is sufficient (based on results of trial AIC316-01-I-05) to reach steady-state conditions for the planned pharmacokinetic sampling and ECG Day 16.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Overall, a dosage of 400 mg qd pritelivir is considered to be the supra-therapeutic dose because of a lag of absorption at doses higher than 400 mg pritelivir, ie, no higher exposures can be reached by increasing the dose when administering pritelivir once daily.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“An about 4-fold higher exposure after 400 mg qd dosing compared to the therapeutic exposure after 100 mg qd dosing is also considered to cover intrinsic and extrinsic factors that may increase pritelivir exposure after a therapeutic dose of 100 mg pritelivir is given” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In conclusion, the expected highest pritelivir exposure in this TQT trial after 400 mg qd pritelivir dosing at steady state is already covered by previous clinical trial- and nonclinical data.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Study outcomes
Rationale for using placebo-corrected change in QTcF as the primary endpoint
Reference ranges for electrocardiographic parameters
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Participants enrolled and included in the baseline analysis
PopulationGroup 1Group 2aGroup 2bTotal
Overall number of baseline participants“32”“16”“16”“64”
Participants analyzed for the primary outcome measure
PopulationGroup 1Group 2aGroup 2b
Participants analyzed“32”“16”“16”
Description of analysis sets
Maximum time between blood sampling and electrocardiogram for a paired measurement
Analysis populations posted with the registry results
AnalysisQuoted population description
Baseline characteristics“Safety Set”
Results
Participant disposition
Participant flow
MilestoneGroup 1Group 2aGroup 2b
Started“32”“16”“16”
Completed“32”“16”“16”
Not completed“0”“0”“0”
Baseline characteristics
Age
CharacteristicGroup 1Group 2aGroup 2bTotal
Participants“32”“16”“16”“64”
Age in years, mean (standard deviation)“27.5 (4.74)”“27.3 (4.78)”“30.8 (6.23)”“28.2 (5.28)”
Sex and ethnicity, count and percentage of participants
CharacteristicGroup 1Group 2aGroup 2bTotal
Female“12”“37.5%”“8”“50.0%”“7”“43.8%”“27”“42.2%”
Male“20”“62.5%”“8”“50.0%”“9”“56.3%”“37”“57.8%”
Hispanic or Latino“3”“9.4%”“0”“0.0%”“2”“12.5%”“5”“7.8%”
Not Hispanic or Latino“29”“90.6%”“16”“100.0%”“14”“87.5%”“59”“92.2%”
Ethnicity unknown or not reported“0”“0.0%”“0”“0.0%”“0”“0.0%”“0”“0.0%”
Race, count and percentage of participants
Efficacy results
Statistical analysis of the primary outcome measure posted on the registry
FieldQuoted record
Type of comparison“NON_INFERIORITY”
Null hypothesis“Null hypothesis: difference to placebo of change from baseline QTcF ≥ 10 ms.”
P value“<0.05”
Statistical method“Mixed Models Analysis”
Estimation parameter“Prediction @ mean max concentration”
Estimated value“0.8”
Confidence level, %“90”
Number of sides“TWO_SIDED”
Confidence interval, lower limit“-1.3”
Confidence interval, upper limit“2.9”
Unit of measure“ms”
Mean QTcF in milliseconds by group and time point
Day and time relative to dosingGroup 1, meanGroup 1, standard deviationGroup 2a, meanGroup 2a, standard deviationGroup 2b, meanGroup 2b, standard deviation
Day 1, -1 hour“402.66”“15.198”“405.23”“17.208”“401.94”“16.989”
Day 1, -40 minutes“404.55”“15.043”“408.19”“17.040”“404.21”“17.782”
Day 1, -20 minutes“405.66”“15.781”“409.10”“15.934”“405.19”“19.805”
Day 1, 15 minutes“405.86”“15.653”“407.06”“14.679”“406.23”“16.081”
Day 1, 30 minutes“400.94”“14.466”“403.96”“15.311”“398.56”“17.347”
Day 1, 45 minutes“401.82”“13.891”“405.48”“17.832”“402.13”“17.295”
Day 1, 1 hr“403.99”“15.280”“405.69”“17.724”“403.27”“20.122”
Day 1, 2 hr“403.34”“13.638”“406.42”“16.724”“404.06”“19.436”
Day 1, 3 hr“404.70”“15.006”“409.08”“17.105”“403.60”“18.037”
Day 1, 4 hr“405.84”“14.719”“407.63”“16.228”“403.75”“19,248”
Day 1, 5 hr“398.16”“13.577”“401.54”“16.387”“401.29”“15.948”
Day 1, 6 hr“396.48”“13.705”“397.56”“15.982”“396.98”“16.573”
Day 1, 7 hr“397.40”“13.037”“398.69”“17,711”“396.65”“16.517”
Day 1, 8 hr“398.92”“14.727”“401.81”“16.308”“397.98”“17.455”
Day 1, 12 hr“402.41”“11.990”“402.63”“15.583”“402.96”“17.687”
Day 6, -1 hr“406.43”“14.456”“404.94”“13.207”“404.63”“20.971”
Day 6, -40 minutes“405.40”“16.410”“407.56”“16.518”“406.60”“18.966”
Day 6, -20 minutes“407.01”“16.483”“405.33”“14.640”“407.94”“16.662”
Day 6, 1 hr“404.76”“15.722”“406.04”“18.259”“404.23”“20.257”
Day 6, 2 hr“405.93”“15.895”“404.54”“17.555”“404.29”“19,128”
Day 6, 3 hr“405.34”“17.242”“404.81”“18.170”“405.15”“18.768”
Day 6, 4 hr“404.73”“16.959”“406.44”“18.839”“405.63”“22.097”
Day 6, 5 hr“398.04”“13.348”“396.40”“14.502”“401.42”“14.800”
Day 6, 6 hr“395.97”“14.423”“396.48”“15.856”“397.83”“18.350”
Day 6, 7 hr“396.82”“14.461”“396.10”“15.270”“394.21”“18.831”
Day 6, 8 hr“400.02”“13.161”“397.63”“17.160”“398.40”“16.213”
Day 6, 12 hr“399.09”“12.784”“396.92”“16.245”“399.17”“17.726”
Day 16, -1 hr“403.56”“15.159”“405.54”“13.995”“404.79”“15.734”
Day 16, -40 minutes“404.81”“15.116”“405.54”“17.129”“405.52”“15.714”
Day 16, -20 minutes“405.36”“13.483”“408.75”“15.479”“406.38”“14.649”
Day 16, 1 hr“403.93”“14.543”“404.71”“15.240”“404.88”“15.248”
Day 16, 2 hr“404.14”“14.856”“407.85”“15.755”“405.15”“18.643”
Day 16, 3 hr“405.32”“15.513”“405.52”“17.318”“406.83”“16.953”
Day 16, 4 hr“405.74”“15.966”“406.85”“17.257”“405.38”“16.946”
Day 16, 5 hr“398.14”“13.121”“399.71”“17.031”“399.56”“14.704”
Day 16, 6 hr“395.29”“12.566”“397.60”“16.424”“396.04”“16.262”
Day 16, 7 hr“396.54”“13.894”“395.44”“15.874”“396.42”“17.022”
Day 16, 8 hr“400.52”“16.196”“399.52”“16.536”“398.46”“15.975”
Day 16, 12 hr“398.61”“13.372”“399.00”“14.569”“400.23”“15.474”
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

Not applicable.

Safety results
Deaths, serious adverse events, and other adverse events
CategoryGroup 1Group 2aGroup 2b
All-cause mortality“0/32 (0.00%)”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0/16 (0.00%)”
Serious adverse events“0/32 (0.00%)”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0/16 (0.00%)”
Other (not including serious) adverse events“20/32 (62.50%)”“10/16 (62.50%)”“10/16 (62.50%)”
Adverse events by system organ class and preferred term
System organ classPreferred termGroup 1, affected / at riskGroup 1, eventsGroup 2a, affected / at riskGroup 2a, eventsGroup 2b, affected / at riskGroup 2b, events
Cardiac disorders“dizziness”“2/32 (6.25%)”“2”“1/16 (6.25%)”“1”“1/16 (6.25%)”“1”
Cardiac disorders“dizziness postural”“1/32 (3.13%)”“1”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Gastrointestinal disorders“Constipation”“0/32 (0.00%)”“0”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”“3/16 (18.75%)”“3”
Gastrointestinal disorders“Dyspepsia”“1/32 (3.13%)”“1”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Gastrointestinal disorders“Gastrooesophageal reflux disease”“2/32 (6.25%)”“2”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”“2/16 (12.50%)”“2”
Gastrointestinal disorders“Nausea”“3/32 (9.38%)”“3”“2/16 (12.50%)”“3”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Gastrointestinal disorders“Toothache”“1/32 (3.13%)”“1”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Infections and infestations“Gastroenteritis”“0/32 (0.00%)”“0”“1/16 (6.25%)”“1”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Infections and infestations“Upper respiratory tract infection”“2/32 (6.25%)”“2”“1/16 (6.25%)”“1”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Infections and infestations“Urinary tract infection”“1/32 (3.13%)”“1”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Infections and infestations“Viral upper respiratory tract infection”“5/32 (15.63%)”“5”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”“1/16 (6.25%)”“1”
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications“Neck Injury”“1/32 (3.13%)”“1”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)“Lipoma”“0/32 (0.00%)”“0”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”“1/16 (6.25%)”“1”
Nervous system disorders“Headache”“2/32 (6.25%)”“2”“4/16 (25.00%)”“4”“2/16 (12.50%)”“2”
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders“Epistaxis”“2/32 (6.25%)”“2”“1/16 (6.25%)”“1”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders“Dermatitis atopic”“0/32 (0.00%)”“0”“1/16 (6.25%)”“1”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders“Dermatitis contact”“5/32 (15.63%)”“6”“4/16 (25.00%)”“4”“3/16 (18.75%)”“5”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders“Erythema ab igne”“1/32 (3.13%)”“1”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders“Pruritus”“0/32 (0.00%)”“0”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”“1/16 (6.25%)”“1”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders“Rash maculo-papular”“2/32 (6.25%)”“2”“1/16 (6.25%)”“1”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders“Rash papular”“0/32 (0.00%)”“0”“1/16 (6.25%)”“1”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders“Rash vesicular”“1/32 (3.13%)”“1”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders“Skin hyperpigmentation”“1/32 (3.13%)”“1”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”“0/16 (0.00%)”“0”
Study limitations
Summary

AIC316-03-I-07 enrolled 64 healthy adults aged 18 to 45 years at 1 site; concomitant medication was an exclusion criterion, with exceptions for hormonal contraception, hormone replacement therapy, and a single intake judged to have no clinical relevance. The highest pritelivir dose was 400 mg once daily, given for 10 days. The registry posts mean QTcF by time point and one model-based prediction with its 90% confidence interval. It posts no moxifloxacin assay sensitivity result, no heart rate, PR interval, or QRS duration result, and no pharmacokinetic result. No journal publication of the trial was identified.

AIC316-03-I-01

Objective
Location and study date
Registry dates and status
FieldQuoted record
Study start (actual)“2020-07-13”
Primary completion (actual)“2020-10-13”
Study completion (actual)“2020-10-13”
First submitted“2022-08-22”
First posted“2022-08-24”
Results first submitted“2022-09-16”
Results first posted“2023-09-15”
Last update posted“2024-02-22”
Recruitment status“Completed”
Trial center, planned trial period, and document dates
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Age, sex, and healthy volunteer status in the registry record
FieldQuoted record
Ages eligible for study“18 Years to 45 Years”
Sexes eligible for study“All”
Accepts healthy volunteers“Yes”
Inclusion criteria: contraception and pregnancy testing
Treatment
Products, doses, and duration in the protocol and statistical plan summary
Study outcomes
Rationale for using pritelivir exposure as the primary endpoint
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Participants enrolled and analyzed on the registry
PopulationPritelivir 100 mg aloneEsomeprazole 40 mg and pritelivir 100 mg
Analyzed for Cmax, tmax, and tlag“16”“15”
Analyzed for AUC(0-last), AUC(0-infinity), λz, t1/2z, CL/F, and Vd/F“15”“15”
Participants in the pharmacokinetic comparison reported in the prescribing information
FieldQuoted record
Number of participants included in the pharmacokinetic analysis“15”
Description of analysis sets
Baseline analysis population posted with the registry results
AnalysisQuoted population description
Baseline characteristics“Safety Set”
Results
Participant disposition
Participant flow for the overall study
MilestoneParticipants
Started“16”
Completed“15”
Not completed“1”
Not completed: withdrawal by subject“1”
Baseline characteristics
Age, sex, and ethnicity
CharacteristicAll participants
Participants“16”
Age in years, mean (standard deviation)“29.6 (8.20)”
Female, count and percentage“5”“31.3%”
Male, count and percentage“11”“68.8%”
Hispanic or Latino, count and percentage“1”“6.3%”
Not Hispanic or Latino, count and percentage“15”“93.8%”
Ethnicity unknown or not reported, count and percentage“0”“0.0%”
Race, count and percentage of participants
CharacteristicAll participants
American Indian or Alaska Native“0”“0.0%”
Asian“0”“0.0%”
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander“0”“0.0%”
Black or African American“12”“75.0%”
White“4”“25.0%”
More than one race“0”“0.0%”
Race unknown or not reported“0”“0.0%”
Efficacy results
Geometric mean ratios of pritelivir exposure with and without esomeprazole
ParameterGeometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval), with esomeprazole relative to pritelivir alone
AUC0-inf“0.41 (0.36, 0.48)”
AUC0-last“0.41 (0.35, 0.47)”
Cmax“0.24 (0.20-0.30)”
Primary outcome measures on the registry: maximum concentration and area under the curve
Parameter, mean (standard deviation)UnitPritelivir 100 mg aloneEsomeprazole 40 mg and pritelivir 100 mg
Cmax“ng/mL”“1102 (421)”“282 (141)”
AUC(0-last)“ng*h/mL”“67599 (22012)”“28325 (11071)”
AUC(0-infinity)“ng*h/mL”“69140 (22147)”“29404 (11447)”
Secondary outcome measures on the registry: time to maximum concentration and lag time
Parameter, median (full range)UnitPritelivir 100 mg aloneEsomeprazole 40 mg and pritelivir 100 mg
tmax“hours”“3.00 (0.50 to 10.00)”“8.00 (0.75 to 48.00)”
tlag“hours”“0.00 (0.00 to 0.25)”“0.00 (0.00 to 0.25)”
Secondary outcome measures on the registry: elimination, clearance, and volume of distribution
Parameter, mean (standard deviation)UnitPritelivir 100 mg aloneEsomeprazole 40 mg and pritelivir 100 mg
Terminal elimination rate constant (λz)“1/h”“0.0106 (0.0020)”“0.00970 (0.0018)”
Terminal elimination half-life (t1/2z)“hours”“67.7 (12)”“73.7 (13)”
Apparent clearance (CL/F)“L/h”“1.58 (0.46)”“3.93 (1.6)”
Apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F)“L”“157 (63)”“432 (231)”
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

Not applicable.

Safety results
Adverse event reporting period
Deaths, serious adverse events, and other adverse events
CategoryPritelivir 100 mg aloneEsomeprazole 40 mg and pritelivir 100 mg
All-cause mortality“0/16 (0.00%)”“0/15 (0.00%)”
Serious adverse events“0/16 (0.00%)”“0/15 (0.00%)”
Other (not including serious) adverse events“2/16 (12.50%)”“4/15 (26.67%)”
Adverse events by system organ class and preferred term
System organ classPreferred termPritelivir 100 mg alone, affected / at riskEsomeprazole 40 mg and pritelivir 100 mg, affected / at risk
Gastrointestinal disorders“Tooth impacted”“1/16 (6.25%)”“0/15 (0.00%)”
Infections and infestations“Upper respiratory tract infection”“0/16 (0.00%)”“1/15 (6.67%)”
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications“Ankle fracture”“1/16 (6.25%)”“0/15 (0.00%)”
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications“Lumbar vertebral fracture”“0/16 (0.00%)”“1/15 (6.67%)”
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications“Pulmonary contusion”“0/16 (0.00%)”“1/15 (6.67%)”
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications“Skin abrasion”“1/16 (6.25%)”“0/15 (0.00%)”
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders“Myalgia”“0/16 (0.00%)”“1/15 (6.67%)”
Nervous system disorders“Headache”“0/16 (0.00%)”“1/15 (6.67%)”
Study limitations
Summary

AIC316-03-I-01 was an open-label, fixed-sequence trial without randomization in 16 healthy adults aged 18 to 45 years at 1 site. Pritelivir was given as a single 100 mg dose under fasted conditions, and esomeprazole 40 mg once daily was the only acid-reducing regimen tested. One participant withdrew before the second period, and 15 participants entered it. The registry posts means and standard deviations; the geometric mean ratios appear in the prescribing information. No metabolite result is posted, and no journal publication of the trial was identified.

AIC316-03-I-03 and AIC316-03-I-06

Objective
Location and study date
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Treatment
Trial AIC316-03-I-03: probe substrate doses and dosing days
Study outcomes
Rationale for using probe substrate exposure ratios (Cmax and AUC) as the primary pharmacokinetic endpoint
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Participants contributing to each descriptive pharmacokinetic parameter
Substrate and treatmentParticipants contributing to the parameter
Celiprolol alone (day 1)“n = 15 for AUC0-inf, t1/2z, and CL/F.”
Midazolam alone (day 3), midazolam with pritelivir (day 19), and rosuvastatin with pritelivir (day 9)“n = 14 for AUC0-inf, t1/2z, and CL/F.”
OH-flurbiprofen alone (day 3)“n = 13 for AUC0-inf, t1/2z, and ratioAUC0-inf,m/p.”
OH-flurbiprofen with pritelivir (day 19)“n = 11 for t1/2z and n = 8 for AUC0-inf and ratio AUC0-inf,m/p.”
Bupropion with pritelivir (day 19)“n = 13 for AUC0-inf, t1/2z, and CL/F.”
OH-bupropion alone (day 3)“n = 15 AUC0-last, t1/2z, and ratio AUC0-last,m/p; n = 13 for AUC0-inf and ratio AUC0-inf,m/p.”
OH-bupropion with pritelivir (day 19)“n = 14 for t1/2z; n = 13 for AUC0-inf; n = 10 for ratio AUC0-inf,m/p.”
Repaglinide alone (day 1)“n = 4 for AUC0-inf, t1/2z, and CL/F.”
Repaglinide with pritelivir (day 7)“n = 7 for AUC0-inf, t1/2z, and CL/F.”
Repaglinide with pritelivir (day 20)“n = 8 for AUC0-inf, t1/2z, and CL/F.”
Rosuvastatin alone (day 2)“n = 9 for AUC0-inf, t1/2z, and CL/F.”
Description of analysis sets
Test and reference treatments for the least square means ratios
Role in the ratioTreatment as named by the authors
Test“substrate with pritelivir”
Reference“substrate without pritelivir”
Results
Participant disposition
Baseline characteristics
Efficacy results
Trial AIC316-03-I-03: least square means ratios for OATP2B1, CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP2B6 substrates
Substrate and parameternWithout pritelivir (reference)With pritelivir (test)LSmeans ratio (%)90% CI (%)
Celiprolol (OATP2B1), Cmax (ng/mL)“16”“540”“743”“137.6”“89.1-212.3”
Celiprolol (OATP2B1), AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)“16”“2827”“3708”“131.1”“97.3-176.8”
Celiprolol (OATP2B1), AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)“15”“3320”“3756”“113.1”“96.3-132.9”
Celiprolol excluding subject 107, Cmax (ng/mL)“15”“655”“733”“111.9”“86.5-144.9”
Celiprolol excluding subject 107, AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)“15”“3248”“3678”“113.3”“96.1-133.5”
Celiprolol excluding subject 107, AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)“15”“3320”“3756”“113.1”“96.3-132.9”
Midazolam (CYP3A4), Cmax (ng/mL)“16”“7.0”“6.1”“87.4”“76.7-99.7”
Midazolam (CYP3A4), AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)“16”“16.1”“14.8”“91.8”“82.3-102.3”
Midazolam (CYP3A4), AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)“12”“17.8”“17.3”“97.2”“86.0-109.7”
Flurbiprofen (CYP2C9), Cmax (ng/mL)“16”“1873”“1833”“97.9”“93.2-102.7”
Flurbiprofen (CYP2C9), AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)“16”“7066”“8219”“116.3”“111.5-121.3”
Flurbiprofen (CYP2C9), AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)“16”“7291”“8546”“117.2”“112.3-122.3”
OH-flurbiprofen, metabolite-to-parent ratio of AUC0-last“16”“0.04”“0.04”“113.3”“104.6-122.6”
OH-flurbiprofen, metabolite-to-parent ratio of AUC0-inf“8”“0.05”“0.06”“113.2”“98.7-129.9”
Bupropion (CYP2B6), Cmax (ng/mL)“16”“39.0”“37.6”“96.3”“77.3-119.9”
Bupropion (CYP2B6), AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)“16”“163”“148”“90.8”“81.4-101.3”
Bupropion (CYP2B6), AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)“13”“184”“178”“96.9”“90.2-104.1”
OH-bupropion (CYP2B6), metabolite-to-parent ratio of AUC0-last“15”“9.4”“11.2”“118.7”“106.4-132.4”
OH-bupropion (CYP2B6), metabolite-to-parent ratio of AUC0-inf“9”“9.5”“10.5”“110.9”“96.2-127.7”
Trial AIC316-03-I-06: least square means ratios for CYP2C8 and BCRP substrates
Substrate and parameternWithout pritelivir (reference)With pritelivir (test)LSmeans ratio (%)90% CI (%)
Repaglinide (CYP2C8), day 7, Cmax (ng/mL)“16”“7.7”“7.6”“97.9”“80.3-119.2”
Repaglinide (CYP2C8), day 7, AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)“16”“9.9”“11.4”“115.5”“102.9-129.6”
Repaglinide (CYP2C8), day 7, AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)“3”“13.8”“13.7”“99.4”“75.9-130.1”
Repaglinide (CYP2C8), day 20, Cmax (ng/mL)“16”“7.7”“8.7”“113.2”“92.9-137.9”
Repaglinide (CYP2C8), day 20, AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)“16”“9.9”“12.6”“127.5”“113.6-143.1”
Repaglinide (CYP2C8), day 20, AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)“3”“13.8”“15.6”“113.5”“86.6-148.5”
Rosuvastatin (BCRP), Cmax (ng/mL)“16”“7.1”“11.9”“167.0”“145.2-192.0”
Rosuvastatin (BCRP), AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)“16”“81.1”“115”“141.3”“128.0-155.9”
Rosuvastatin (BCRP), AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)“8”“84.4”“116”“136.9”“126.6-147.9”
Trial AIC316-03-I-03: descriptive pharmacokinetic parameters of the parent substrates
Trial AIC316-03-I-03: descriptive pharmacokinetic parameters of the hydroxy metabolites
Metabolite and treatmentnCmax (ng/mL)tmax (hour)AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)t1/2z (hour)Ratio AUC0-last,m/pRatio AUC0-inf,m/p
OH-flurbiprofen alone (day 3)“16”“79.2 (24.0)”“0.8 (0.5-0.8)”“305 (92.2)”“380 (90.7)”“3.4 (0.8)”“0.04 (0.02)”“0.05 (0.01)”
OH-flurbiprofen + pritelivir (day 19)“16”“77.4 (24.6)”“0.8 (0.5-1.5)”“400 (126)”“513 (109)”“4.4 (1.0)”“0.05 (0.02)”“0.06 (0.01)”
OH-bupropion alone (day 3)“16”“56.9 (22.3)”“4.5 (2.0-5.0)”“1806 (851)”“1787 (691)”“24.6 (5.2)”“9.9 (3.1)”“9.7 (3.3)”
OH-bupropion + pritelivir (day 19)“16”“61.5 (24.8)”“4.0 (2.0-5.0)”“1911 (917)”“1918 (729)”“23.1 (4.9)”“12.1 (4.9)”“11.3 (5.0)”
Trial AIC316-03-I-06: descriptive pharmacokinetic parameters of repaglinide and rosuvastatin
Substrate and treatmentnCmax (ng/mL)tmax (hour)AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)t1/2z (hour)CL/F (L/h)
Repaglinide alone (day 1)“16”“8.4 (3.6)”“0.6 (0.5-1.3)”“10.7 (4.2)”“11.9 (4.0)”“2.0 (0.1)”“47.4 (22.2)”
Repaglinide + pritelivir (day 7)“16”“8.2 (3.2)”“0.8 (0.5-2.0)”“11.9 (3.4)”“12.6 (3.1)”“1.6 (0.2)”“42.3 (12.6)”
Repaglinide + pritelivir (day 20)“16”“9.7 (4.4)”“0.5 (0.3-3.0)”“13.3 (4.2)”“12.9 (4.4)”“1.7 (0.3)”“43.2 (15.6)”
Rosuvastatin alone (day 2)“16”“9.1 (7.6)”“4.0 (0.5-6.0)”“91.4 (46.5)”“101 (49.0)”“13.2 (1.8)”“246 (119)”
Rosuvastatin + pritelivir (day 9)“16”“14.6 (10.3)”“4.0 (0.5-6.1)”“127 (58.3)”“124 (58.1)”“12.8 (2.4)”“195 (86.9)”
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

Not applicable.

Safety results
Study limitations
Summary

Both trials were single-center, open-label, sequential phase 1 trials, each enrolling 16 healthy participants (age range 22 to 55 years in Trial 03 and 25 to 55 years in Trial 06). Each was sized to characterize an interaction of 20% or 25%, and the authors state the trials were not powered to show the absence of an effect. AUC0-inf ratios were based on 3 of 16 participants for repaglinide and 8 of 16 for rosuvastatin. Celiprolol is also a P-glycoprotein substrate and rosuvastatin is also an OATP2B1 substrate. Treatment days differed between treatments, which limits comparison of adverse event counts. The sponsor funded both trials, and 5 authors are its employees.

AIC316-03-I-04 and AIC316-03-I-05

Objective
Location and study date
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Treatment
Study outcomes
Rationale for using pritelivir AUC0-inf, AUC0-last, and cmax as the primary pharmacokinetic variables
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Description of analysis sets
Results
Participant disposition
Baseline characteristics
Trial AIC316-03-I-04: demographics by renal function group
ParameterControl (n = 8)Mild renal impairment (n = 8)Moderate renal impairment (n = 8)Severe renal impairment (n = 8)
Age (years), mean (range)“69 (62-73)”“68 (55-82)”“68 (49-84)”“69 (47-80)”
Height (cm), mean (range)“172 (165-178)”“170 (156-183)”“170 (161-183)”“169 (154-180)”
Weight (kg), mean (range)“80.1 (66.5-92.0)”“82.6 (61.5-105.5)”“73.7 (57.0-100.2)”“78.4 (61.0-93.5)”
BMI (kg/m2), mean (range)“27.2 (23.8-31.8)”“28.3 (21.1-31.5)”“25.4 (21.9-33.5)”“27.6 (21.8-34.7)”
eGFR (mL/min), mean (range)“101.6 (91.5-118.6)”“77.7 (60.7-89.3)”“48.3 (31.0-58.2)”“24.0 (16.2-28.9)”
Race, White, n (%)“8 (100)”“8 (100)”“8 (100)”“8 (100)”
Ethnicity, non-Hispanic or Latino, n (%)“8 (100)”“8 (100)”“8 (100)”“8 (100)”
Male, n (%)“5 (62.5)”“5 (62.5)”“4 (50.0)”“6 (75.0)”
Female, n (%)“3 (37.5)”“3 (37.5)”“4 (50.0)”“2 (25.0)”
Trial AIC316-03-I-05: demographics by hepatic function group
ParameterControl (n = 8)Moderate hepatic impairment (n = 8)
Age (years), mean (range)“57 (44-74)”“59 (40-72)”
Height (cm), mean (range)“167 (150-183)”“171 (158-182)”
Weight (kg), mean (range)“72.9 (59.5-91.6)”“76.8 (62.1-94.4)”
BMI (kg/m2), mean (range)“26.1 (20.0-30.6)”“26.6 (19.4-35.3)”
Race, White, n (%)“8 (100)”“8 (100)”
Ethnicity, non-Hispanic or Latino, n (%)“8 (100)”“8 (100)”
Male, n (%)“4 (50.0)”“4 (50.0)”
Female, n (%)“4 (50.0)”“4 (50.0)”
Child-Pugh score 7, n (%)“0”“4 (50.0)”
Child-Pugh score 8, n (%)“0”“2 (25.0)”
Child-Pugh score 9, n (%)“0”“2 (25.0)”
Efficacy results
Trial AIC316-03-I-04: least square means ratios for pritelivir, mild renal impairment against control
ParameternControl (reference)Impaired (test)LS means ratio (%)90% CI (%)%CV
Total Cmax (ng/mL)“8”“1141”“1021”“89.5”“52.0-153.9”“70.9”
Total AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)“8”“76,079”“67,492”“88.7”“60.4-130.3”“47.7”
Total AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)“8”“77,595”“68,905”“88.8”“61.2-128.7”“45.9”
Unbound Cmax,u (ng/mL)“8”“6.84”“5.99”“87.6”“51.3-149.5”“69.6”
Unbound AUC0-last,u (ng•h/mL)“8”“456”“396”“86.9”“57.4-131.4”“51.8”
Unbound AUC0-inf,u (ng•h/mL)“8”“465”“404”“86.9”“58.1-130.0”“50.2”
Trial AIC316-03-I-04: least square means ratios for pritelivir, moderate renal impairment against control
ParameternControl (reference)Impaired (test)LS means ratio (%)90% CI (%)%CV
Total Cmax (ng/mL)“8”“1141”“1141”“100.0”“58.1-171.9”“70.9”
Total AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)“8”“76,079”“80,558”“105.9”“72.0-155.6”“47.7”
Total AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)“8”“77,595”“82,946”“106.9”“73.7-155.0”“45.9”
Unbound Cmax,u (ng/mL)“8”“6.8”“6.9”“101.0”“59.2-172.4”“69.6”
Unbound AUC0-last,u (ng•h/mL)“8”“456”“488”“107.0”“70.7-162.0”“51.8”
Unbound AUC0-inf,u (ng•h/mL)“8”“465”“502”“108.0”“72.2-161.6”“50.2”
Trial AIC316-03-I-04: least square means ratios for pritelivir, severe renal impairment against control
ParameternControl (reference)Impaired (test)LS means ratio (%)90% CI (%)%CV
Total Cmax (ng/mL)“8”“1141”“1834”“160.7”“93.4-276.4”“70.9”
Total AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)“8”“76,079”“119,294”“156.8”“106.6-230.4”“47.7”
Total AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)“8”“77,595”“121,560”“156.7”“108.0-227.1”“45.9”
Unbound Cmax,u (ng/mL)“8”“6.84”“11.3”“166.0”“97.2-283.2”“69.6”
Unbound AUC0-last,u (ng•h/mL)“8”“456”“738”“162.0”“106.9-245.1”“51.8”
Unbound AUC0-inf,u (ng•h/mL)“8”“465”“752”“161.8”“108.1-242.1”“50.2”
Trial AIC316-03-I-05: least square means ratios for pritelivir, moderate hepatic impairment against control
ParameternControl (reference)Impaired (test)LS means ratio (%)90% CI (%)%CV
Total Cmax (ng/mL)“8”“1297”“1465”“113.0”“66.4-192.1”“66.2”
Total AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)“8”“79,928”“76,300”“95.5”“69.1-131.8”“37.9”
Total AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)“8”“81,666”“77,995”“95.5”“69.7-130.8”“36.9”
Unbound Cmax,u (ng/mL)“8”“7.11”“10.4”“145.7”“86.4-245.8”“65.0”
Unbound AUC0-last,u (ng•h/mL)“8”“438”“540”“123.2”“84.6-179.2”“44.6”
Unbound AUC0-inf,u (ng•h/mL)“8”“448”“552”“123.2”“85.1-178.4”“44.0”
Trial AIC316-03-I-05: authors' interpretation of exposure in moderate hepatic impairment

“In subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, pritelivir systemic exposure was similar compared with matched control subjects (LS means ratios between 113.0% and 95.5% for Cmax and AUC), suggesting that moderate hepatic impairment does not have a clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of pritelivir.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Since pritelivir metabolites are mainly formed by nonenzymatic biotransformation (hydrolysis) and partly by enzymatic (hydroxylation, glucuronidation) biotransformation, the effect of hepatic impairment on pritelivir exposure was expected to be limited.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The fu appeared to be higher and the unbound clearance CLu/F appeared to be lower in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“As a result, unbound systemic exposure of pritelivir was higher compared with matched control subjects (LS means ratios between 145.7% and 123.2% for Cmax and AUC), suggesting that moderate impairment has a modest effect on the pharmacokinetics of unbound pritelivir.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“For the pharmacologically inactive metabolites PPA and ATS, a modest effect of moderate hepatic impairment was observed on the systemic exposure (LS means ratios of 122.2% and 168.8%, respectively).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“For PPA-acyl glucuronide systemic exposure was similar (LS means ratio of 95.1%) and thus suggesting no clinically relevant effect.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Trial AIC316-03-I-04: descriptive pharmacokinetic parameters of pritelivir by renal function group
Trial AIC316-03-I-05: descriptive pharmacokinetic parameters of pritelivir by hepatic function group
ParameterControl (n = 8)Moderate hepatic impairment (n = 8)
Total Cmax (ng/mL)“1532 (776)”“1638 (832)”
tmax (hour)“4.0 (0.8-36.0)”“3.5 (0.5-16.0)”
Total AUC0-last (ng•h/mL)“85,236 (28,944)”“79,517 (22,578)”
Total AUC0-inf (ng•h/mL)“86,739 (28,726)”“81,269 (23,268)”
t1/2z (hour)“52.0 (9.3)”“45.9 (16)”
CL/F (L/h)“1.3 (0.6)”“1.3 (0.5)”
fu (%)“0.551 (0.057)”“0.738 (0.25)”
Unbound Cmax,u (ng/mL)“8.5 (4.8)”“11.2 (4.2)”
Unbound AUC0-last,u (ng•h/mL)“472 (178)”“586 (280)”
Unbound AUC0-inf,u (ng•h/mL)“480 (177)”“601 (296)”
CLu/F (L/h)“242 (109)”“195 (81)”
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

Not applicable.

Safety results
Study limitations
Summary

Both trials were single-center, open-label, single-dose trials with 8 participants per group, all White; the 90% confidence interval of the Cmax ratio in mild renal impairment spanned 52.0% to 153.9%. The hepatic trial enrolled Child-Pugh stage B only, and 2 of 8 impaired participants had abnormal albumin, bilirubin, or prothrombin values. Regression lines against eGFR had low R2 values. Fraction unbound measured ex vivo (0.551% to 0.607% in controls) differed from the earlier in vitro value of 2.8%. Hemodialysis and severe hepatic impairment were not evaluated. The sponsor funded both trials.

AIC316-01-I-04 and AIC316-03-I-02

Objective
Location and study date
Study design
Eligibility criteria
Treatment
Study outcomes
Rationale for using recovery of total radioactivity in urine and feces as the primary outcome
Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)
Trial AIC316-01-I-04: participants contributing to each parameter
Analyte or measureParticipants contributing
Pritelivir in plasma“n = 7 for AUC0-last, AUC0-inf and t1/2z.”
Total radioactivity in plasma“n = 7 for AUC0-last, n = 3 for AUC0-inf and t1/2z.”
Recovery of total radioactivity in excreta“Trial 1 0-624 hours (n = 7)”
Description of analysis sets
Results
Participant disposition
Baseline characteristics
Efficacy results
Recovery of total radioactivity in urine and feces over 0 to 624 hours in both trials
Amount excreted, mean (mean % of recovered dose)Trial AIC316-01-I-04 (n = 7)Trial AIC316-03-I-02 (n = 6)
Urine (% of dose)“76.4 (83.0)”“50.8 (76.9)”
Feces (% of dose)“15.5 (16.8)”“15.2 (23.0)”
Total (% of dose)“92.0 (100)”“66.0 (100)”
Trial AIC316-01-I-04: pharmacokinetic parameters of pritelivir and dose-normalized total radioactivity
Parameter, mean (SD); tmax, median (range)Pritelivir (n = 8)Total radioactivity (n = 8)
C0h (ng/mL), day 2“5222 (2731)”“N.A.”
C0h (ng/mL), day 3“5289 (1426)”“N.A.”
C0h (ng/mL), day 4“4259 (1050)”“N.A.”
C0h (ng/mL), day 5“3964 (956.1)”“N.A.”
C0h (ng/mL), day 6“3944 (990.6)”“N.A.”
C0h (ng/mL), day 7“4017 (984.0)”“N.A.”
C0h (ng/mL), day 8“3458 (772.9)”“N.A.”
Cmin (ng/mL)“3194 (739.1)”“N.A.”
Cmax ([ng eq]/mL)“N.A.”“3356 (1832)”
Cmax,ss (ng/mL)“5889 (1924)”“N.A.”
tmax (h)“3.00 (0.75-5.00)”“4.00 (0.50-10.10)”
AUCtau (ng/h/mL)“102,941 (25170)”“N.A.”
AUC0-24 ([ng eq]/h/mL)“N.A.”“57,167 (20,966)”
AUC0-last (ng [eq]/h/mL)“301,124 (57,966)”“199,871 (18,884)”
AUC0-inf (ng [eq]/h/mL)“306,430 (58,580)”“197,211 (18,004)”
t1/2z (h)“63.06 (1.904)”“227.8 (5.704)”
CL/F (L/h)“1.022 (0.2434)”“N.A.”
Trial AIC316-01-I-04: notes to the pharmacokinetic parameter table
Note applies toNote as printed
Total radioactivity“Scaled to a 100 mg dose.”
Units of AUC0-last and AUC0-inf“Units are ng/h/mL for pritelivir and [ng eq]/h/mL for 14C labeled pritelivir.”
AUC0-inf and t1/2z of total radioactivity“Accurate determination is not possible.”
Trial AIC316-03-I-02: plasma pharmacokinetic parameters of pritelivir, metabolites, and total radioactivity
Trial AIC316-03-I-02: whole-blood pharmacokinetic parameters of pritelivir, metabolites, and total radioactivity
Trial AIC316-03-I-02: apparent clearance of pritelivir
MatrixCL/F (L/h), mean (SD)
Plasma“2.45 (1.23)”
Whole blood“0.536 (0.293)”
Trial AIC316-03-I-02: metabolite identification in urine

“In pooled urine collected between 0 and 432 hours postdose, a total of 12 pritelivir-related peaks were detected.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The main component in urine was identified as PPA-β-1-acyl glucuronide, accounting for 29.6% of TRA present (44.5% of the recovered dose).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Three isomers of PPA-acyl glucuronide accounting for 2.0%-3.4% were also detected (3.0%-5.1% of the recovered dose).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In total, PPA-acyl glucuronide and isomers accounted for 38.2% of the TRA in urine (57% of the recovered dose).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“ATS accounted for 23.1% of TRA (34.7% of the recovered dose).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“An additional metabolite was tentatively identified as N-demethylated ATS, accounting for 12.8% of the TRA (19.2% of the recovered dose).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“PPA accounted for 2.1%, hydroxylated pritelivir accounted for 1.9%, and pritelivir accounted for 0.6% (3.2%, 1.4%, and 0.5% of the recovered dose, respectively).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Four minor metabolites were tentatively assigned to N-demethylated ATS (2.0%), hydroxylated and glucuronidated pritelivir (1.1%), glucuronidated pritelivir (2.1%), and hydroxylated PPA (1.5%).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In urine, 84.9% of TRA was assigned to peaks with relative abundances above 1%.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

Prescribing information: metabolism and excretion of pritelivir
PropertyValue as printed
Metabolism“Pritelivir is primarily metabolized by non-enzymatic hydrolysis to its major inactive metabolites,”
Metabolite AIC090015, molar ratio to total drug-related material in plasma“AIC090015 (26.3%)”
Metabolite AIC090105, molar ratio to total drug-related material in plasma“AIC090105 (14.4%)”
Dose excreted in urine“76.4% (0.6% unchanged)”
Dose excreted in feces“15.5% (6.0% unchanged)”
Major route of elimination“Non-enzymatic hydrolysis, followed by urinary excretion of the metabolites”
Blood-to-plasma ratio, mean“AUC: 1.86”
Half-life, mean“60 h”
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

Not applicable.

Safety results
Study limitations
Summary

The trials enrolled 8 and 6 healthy men in open-label, single-center designs. In the single-dose trial, 66.0% of the radioactive dose was recovered, which the authors attribute to slow capsule dissolution and incomplete absorption; plasma exposure was about 2-fold lower than in previous trials. In the multiple-dose trial, the single label position left some metabolites undetectable, fecal extraction efficiency was 37.4%, one participant withdrew before collections ended, and AUC0-inf of total radioactivity could not be determined accurately for 5 of 8 participants. The cause of the second elimination phase of total radioactivity was not identified. The sponsor funded both trials.

First-in-human phase 1 trials

Objective
Location and study date

No evidence found.

Study design
Eligibility criteria
Treatment
Study outcomes
Rationale for using safety and pharmacokinetics as the primary endpoints

No evidence found.

Statistical analysis description
Number of participants (Planned and analyzed)

No evidence found.

Description of analysis sets

No evidence found.

Results
Participant disposition

No evidence found.

Baseline characteristics

No evidence found.

Efficacy results
Prescribing information values for absolute bioavailability, food effect, time to maximum concentration, and half-life
ParameterQuoted value
Absolute bioavailability“72%”
Time to maximum concentration, mean (range)“3 h (2.0–4.5 h)”
Food effect on area under the curve“AUC ratio fed/fasted: 1.16”
Food effect on maximum concentration“Cmax ratio fed/fasted: 1.33”
Half-life, mean“60 h”
Dose on which the time to maximum concentration and half-life are based“The values are based on a 100 mg once daily dose.”
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes

Not applicable.

Safety results
Study limitations
Summary

The publication of the five trials is quoted from its PubMed abstract. The abstract gives no enrollment counts, trial numbers, sites, dates, or adverse event rates. Participants were healthy men, with 1 cohort of healthy women in the single-ascending-dose trial. The abstract reports tolerability up to 200 mg once daily with multiple dosing. The sponsor's thorough QT trial protocol, dated 25 November 2022, describes trial AIC316-01-I-05, which was stopped early after skin reactions in 5 of 16 participants in the 400 mg dose group (4 of 12 receiving pritelivir and 1 of 4 receiving placebo).