Evicenter
P&T meetings

Hovilpri (pritelivir)

Refractory mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infection in immunocompromised adults

Also known as AIC316
Last updated
239 sources

Product information and disease descriptionPlace of product in therapyDisease descriptionEpidemiology

Prevalence of Refractory mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infection in immunocompromised adults

43 evidence topics · 33 sources

Resistance rates by population in the consensus review
PopulationReported rate
Immunocompetent patients“very low (<1%)”
Hematopoietic cell transplant recipients“often ranging from 0% to 14% in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients”
Solid organ transplant recipients“0%–3% of solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients”
Advanced HIV disease“with prevalence rates of 3%–7%”
People with HIV receiving effective antiretroviral treatment“they are much less common in patients receiving effective antiretroviral treatment”
Stability of prevalence over two decades: resistance among isolates by immune status
French surveillance network of 15 laboratories: patients excreting acyclovir-resistant strains by immune status

“Between May 1999 and April 2002, 4,098 isolates, corresponding to 3521 patients, were collected.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The population studied was 55% immunocompetent patients (n = 1,855) and 45% immunocompromised patients (n = 1,502) (Table 1).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“In conclusion, 0.3% of immunocompetent patients excreted ACV-resistant strains, in contrast to 3.6% of immunocompromised patients (P < 0.001). The percentage of ACV-resistant HSV-2 strains is not significantly higher than the percentage of HSV-1 strains.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“Only six immunocompetent patients excreted ACV-resistant HSV strains (0.32%), including one female patient not treated with ACV who was infected primary by an ACV-resistant strain. Among the 54 immunocompromised patients from whom ACV-resistant HSV strains were isolated (3.5%), the bone marrow transplantation patients showed the highest prevalence of resistance (10.9%), whereas among patients infected by human immunodeficiency virus, the prevalence was 4.2%.” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

“The main causes of immunosuppression were hemopathy (32% of the cases), HIV infections (21% of the cases), organ transplantations (13.5% of the cases), and bone marrow transplantations (13.5% of the cases) (Table 5).” (opens the source at this quote in a new tab)

United States patient-count estimates by line of treatment in the company briefing
United States claims and health record analysis: modification patterns among immunocompromised patients with any pattern, by subgroup
PatternHematopoietic cell transplantSolid organ transplantPeople living with HIVImmunocompromising therapy
Upward titration“42.0% (n=58)”“43.8% (n=57)”“36.8% (n=225)”“43.5% (n=535)”
Switch within first-line therapy“72.5% (n=100)”“54.6% (n=71)”“51.3% (n=314)”“58.9% (n=725)”
Route of administration change“18.1% (n=25)”“26.2% (n=34)”“29.9% (n=183)”“30.3% (n=373)”
Switch from first-line to second-line therapy“13.8% (n=19)”“11.5% (n=15)”“17.2% (n=105)”“8.2% (n=101)”
Second-line therapy without a first-line switch“1.4% (n=2)”“6.2% (n=8)”“5.6% (n=34)”“2.8% (n=34)”